Shallon

@Gaynotqueer1 He's an incredibly annoying young man, but he's also being shamelessly used. That's uncomfortable to watch. And it’s not going to go well for him.

'Stuns' indeed.

@PnkThrnRambles @MillieCheesey @AstroLlamaBeans @SVPhillimore How actually stupid *are* you? The mind boggles.

@forevershallon @MillieCheesey @AstroLlamaBeans @SVPhillimore Oh so you're just making shit up and hoping people won't notice. Got it.

Time to repeal the GRA. It serves no useful purpose.

@PnkThrnRambles @MillieCheesey @AstroLlamaBeans @SVPhillimore He didn't. I'm employing a literary device. Obviously. (Jesus Christ, the stupid!)

@forevershallon @MillieCheesey @AstroLlamaBeans @SVPhillimore Show the class where she used those exact words.

@AstroLlamaBeans @Patty_Cakes_xx @SVPhillimore @MillieCheesey Once again, the SC judgment was a reiteration of the law as per the Equality Act. It’s not in the SC remit to *change* statute law. The SC delivered its judgment. Job done. Contempt for the law and the Supreme Court is not anticipated and is not tenable for obvious reasons.

@Patty_Cakes_xx @SVPhillimore @forevershallon @MillieCheesey Weird, nobody seems to have listened to them for over a year. The SC ruling is legally unworkable

@Patty_Cakes_xx @AstroLlamaBeans @BirdThe86733 @MillieCheesey @SVPhillimore It's too ridiculous. We’re meant to believe that the whole of humanity has suddenly been stricken with mass amnesia and has forgotten how to recognise sex. We've lost the hard-wired ability to recognise sex in our own species that’s been driven by millions of years of evolution.

@forevershallon @AstroLlamaBeans @BirdThe86733 @MillieCheesey @SVPhillimore It's because transgenderism requires everyone to pretend they cannot see which sex someone is.

@AstroLlamaBeans @Patty_Cakes_xx @BirdThe86733 @MillieCheesey @SVPhillimore Well, thank heaven for small mercies. And we recognise sex with clothes on. As you well know. Being human.

@Patty_Cakes_xx @forevershallon @BirdThe86733 @MillieCheesey @SVPhillimore My hair is usually on display. My genitals usually aren't

@Patty_Cakes_xx @AstroLlamaBeans @BirdThe86733 @MillieCheesey @SVPhillimore It's like saying that being human is a private attribute. That daft.

@AstroLlamaBeans @forevershallon @BirdThe86733 @MillieCheesey @SVPhillimore How is sex a private attribute? That's like saying eye or hair colour is a private attribute.

@latsot LGB has been used as a shield. The ‘trans’ movement is utterly shameless. This is not a movement that cares about collateral damage, but seems to revel in it.

LGB people *did* warn us all that there'd be a backlash. In fact, James himself, among many others, made that warning. In fact, he made it specifically to Tatchell. A Whole bunch of times. He's right that it's rich of Tatchell, of all people, to complain now. Don't get me wrong, James is a very intelligent and thoughtful man but it didn't take someone as smart as he is to see this coming. Even I spotted it a decade off. The alphabet salad that comes after the B is not just of fundamentally different character to the LGB, it's fundamentally *opposed* to it. It's an ideology that demands that same-sex attraction - and especially exclusive same-sex attraction - is bigotry. It decrees that homosexual men and women are bigots and (of course) nazis if they refuse to succumb to social pressure to fuck people of the opposite sex. It is wholly and fundamentally homophobic, through and through. The cynical, money-grabbing exercise of force-teaming a homophobic movement with LGB was never going to end well for the LGB, but the harm was hugely compounded by two things: First, the continued refusal of a fixed definition of what any of those other letters - and especially the + - means. Because everyone knows why this refusal exists: it's because everyone after the LGB is either a tourist, a pervert, or both. A backlash was inevitable. Second, the rabid insistence on 'rights' that nobody else has and the erosion of the existing and hard-won rights and boundaries of women, children and the LGB. The underhand and oppressive way in which this was done. The lies. The threats. The violence. People now wrongly associate all of this insanity with LGB. The TQ+ bullshit does not resemble *in any way* the gay and lesbian liberation movements of previous decades. Same-sex attracted people rightly demanded to have what everyone else had, not to have sparking new insane rights that ran roughshod over everyone else. *Of course* a backlash was inevitable against same-sex attracted people because they've been - involuntarily - lumped in with a bunch of authoritarian narcissists and perverts for whom no capitulation by societies or individuals is ever, *ever* enough. And we TOLD you this would happen. Again and again and again and again.

@MrMennoTweets @ISBI3 @Janet4369587977 @NoSecretLessons @vfxx555 @AlessandraAster @ThePosieParker Note M’s claim rested on Christian belief protected as religious belief under EA s. 10, citing belief in Genesis 1:27 (SS for the Bible rusty) and Christian conscientious objection to transgenderism. Oh my. The judge ref’ed the EAT judgment in Forstater. That's going to happen.

@ISBI3 @Janet4369587977 @NoSecretLessons @vfxx555 @AlessandraAster @forevershallon @ThePosieParker ‘Gender identity beliefs’ are also protected - check out the Dr David Mackareth ruling (2022, he lost over ‘misgendering’)

Oh give me strength… 🤦‍♀️ Apparently we now have to sue our way back to free speech through small claims, like we’ve been mis-sold car finance. I just don’t even know where to start.

@MillieCheesey @AstroLlamaBeans @SVPhillimore Oh, an appearance of the wee gnomes. Bless. Haven't seen them wheeled out for quite some time. It’s a threat, you chump. Men don't look like ‘transmen’. This grows ever more and more ridiculous. And all to insert men into women's lavatories (and other intimate services).

@forevershallon @AstroLlamaBeans @SVPhillimore That's not a veiled threat thats an observation of fact Trans men for example can indeed look like c1s men. Therefore a c1s male predator can simply say "actually im a trans man" and waltz right into the women's loos You wanted these guys in with you 🤷🏻‍♀️

@MillieCheesey @AstroLlamaBeans @SVPhillimore Veiled threats are threats. The interpretation of this one is hardly difficult. It's not really that veiled! It's obviously not a direct quote, but a fictitious cutting-to-the-chase interpretative one as a literary device. Are you thick? You certainly seem to wish to appear so.

@forevershallon @AstroLlamaBeans @SVPhillimore You put it in quotation marks and yet, as anybody can see, that's very clearly not what she said. Are you thick? Why lie one a public forum where everyone can see it, in writing?

@unisonldnlgbt Hi Unison, read the Workplace Regulations (1992). Regarding the provision of facilities separated by sex, *that* is the legislation that applies in the workplace. And that separation is a requirement, not a choice.

Opposing the EHRC guidance: Over the next 30 days, UNISON is trying to convince as many MPs as possible to oppose the guidance on single sex spaces. The union wants examples of how the guidance is unworkable in your workplace. Please send examples to out@unison.co.uk

@MillieCheesey @AstroLlamaBeans @SVPhillimore “Allow men access to women's lavatories or women will get it.” It's a threat! Do you think we're stupid, or something?

@forevershallon @AstroLlamaBeans @SVPhillimore She didn't make a threat, she said women are in danger because of this illegal guidance Which we can already see Right now there's a sexist with a flower pfp filling up my mentions with sexist tosh

@AstroLlamaBeans @chrisbizarre2 @SVPhillimore @MillieCheesey What is wrong w/ you? The second picture is a photo of a voyeur caught in the act of photographing little girls; the second is a meme projecting male voyeurism onto women. Mixed-sex services involving undressing are notorious for providing increased opportunities for voyeurs.

@chrisbizarre2 @SVPhillimore @forevershallon @MillieCheesey Because empowering men to harass innocent people is bad Already its being used by sex pests to covertly film people in changing rooms x.com/AstroLlamaBean…

@AstroLlamaBeans @SVPhillimore @MillieCheesey Read what you wrote. And own the threat, sir.

@forevershallon @SVPhillimore @MillieCheesey Im sorry you think women don't face harassment already? Are you tapped?

@AstroLlamaBeans @SVPhillimore @BirdThe86733 @MillieCheesey You *are* a man. A delusional one. Re ‘passing’, I very much doubt you do (see ‘delusional man’). But you do know you don't, too. See your chummy anecdote about a women's ward resting on recognition and acceptance as a ‘transwoman’. Think carefully, what does that tell us?

@forevershallon @SVPhillimore @BirdThe86733 @MillieCheesey Your own delusions are irrelevant. My own wife is a lesbian and of course would have nothing to do with a "man" Therefore I obviously pass pretty well. 🤷🏼‍♀️

@AstroLlamaBeans @BirdThe86733 @MillieCheesey @SVPhillimore Sex is apparent. That's why ‘gender reassignment’ is apparent, too. Mistaken perception is always covered. But here it’s a mistaken perception of a visible characteristic. Ofc, you pretend women will be mistaken for ‘transwomen’, whereas, in reality, TW are recognised as men!

@forevershallon @BirdThe86733 @MillieCheesey @SVPhillimore Eh? None of these are apparent, disability, gender, sex, religion etc are all invisible. Gender reassignment also covers "perceived", so if you're biased to a c1s woman and you think she's trans, she's doubly protected by the act.

@WrathQueenof @SmolDickMusk @MillieCheesey @SVPhillimore But not women's recognition and rights generally. Another ‘limited degree’ was women's sport. Which was given specific exemption. Also, the descent of peerages and inheritance. Amusing how swift the chaps were to block the *one place* where their sex stood to be disadvantaged.

@forevershallon @SmolDickMusk @MillieCheesey @SVPhillimore … and it did to a limited degree consider 3rd party rights with the so-called ‘spousal veto’…

@AstroLlamaBeans @SVPhillimore @MillieCheesey Ah, there it is! The man threatening women with punishment (‘harassment’) if he doesn't get what he wants gambit. The standing legislation isn't illegal!

@forevershallon @SVPhillimore @MillieCheesey Lmao 🤣 Oh so it went from amazing to heel dragging did it. Amazing legal system you have there You don't at all think the illegal definition which can't legally ever be used without harassing women is slow to implement, because its illegal, do you?

@SVPhillimore @AstroLlamaBeans @BirdThe86733 @MillieCheesey And have you heard him speak?! (It's all too silly.)

@forevershallon @AstroLlamaBeans @BirdThe86733 @MillieCheesey I saw the video of his driving a bus…