shinchan

6.9K posts

shinchan

shinchan

@jefflee2015

เข้าร่วม Haziran 2016
44 กำลังติดตาม43 ผู้ติดตาม
shinchan
shinchan@jefflee2015·
@jinchenyyds Guy used to annoy me because he was on everything in the 2000s, lmao.
English
0
0
0
10
zhen huan jiejie❣️甄学家
imo louis koo's best film performance was in election 2 (2006) rly cant imagine the HK film industry without him
zhen huan jiejie❣️甄学家 tweet mediazhen huan jiejie❣️甄学家 tweet media
English
5
17
92
3.9K
Astral🛸
Astral🛸@The_Astral_·
The MH370 videos have been thoroughly debunked by over 30 professional VFX specialists & videographers. It’s not even up for debate anymore. They’re fake.
Astral🛸 tweet media
English
199
27
484
47.3K
shinchan
shinchan@jefflee2015·
@UapEcosystem That's not what he said, tho. You need to start being honest or get better at reading.
English
0
0
0
12
UAP Experiencer
UAP Experiencer@UapEcosystem·
@jefflee2015 All 5000 plus cases? Mick hadn’t see that and neither have you. You need a reality check big time
English
1
0
0
21
shinchan
shinchan@jefflee2015·
@UapEcosystem >All cases with sufficient information turned out not to be large drones He's right.
English
1
0
2
25
UAP Experiencer
UAP Experiencer@UapEcosystem·
@jefflee2015 Can you let Mick know that as well? That there were drones? Please and thank you
UAP Experiencer tweet media
English
1
0
0
21
shinchan
shinchan@jefflee2015·
@UapEcosystem Of course there were drones - drones exist. But there were no "car-sized" drones or a drone "invasion". And no aliens, lmfao.
English
1
0
2
21
UAP Experiencer
UAP Experiencer@UapEcosystem·
@jefflee2015 @MickWest Yikes you clearly have not been reading the room. You must think your Presidents order is going to release some dots ? lol delulu indeed
English
1
0
0
21
BandwagonProductions
BandwagonProductions@BandWagonPrdcts·
@jefflee2015 It’s not about what YOU think is true. It’s about what the largest consensus believes.
English
1
0
0
27
shinchan
shinchan@jefflee2015·
@BandWagonPrdcts So who does? Random UFO nuts on twitter who's never put in the work? lmfao.
English
1
0
1
31
BandwagonProductions
BandwagonProductions@BandWagonPrdcts·
@jefflee2015 Yeah you don’t decide who the experts are anymore kiddo. Lost your credibility in the “trust the experts” long ago. Good science is ALWAYS changing so those “experts” have been outdated. Try again.
English
1
0
0
28
shinchan
shinchan@jefflee2015·
@BandWagonPrdcts Saying it's a UFO doesn't make it one, either. It's about evidence. Historians - the experts - don't find those paintings interesting in the way UFO nuts do.
English
1
0
0
30
shinchan
shinchan@jefflee2015·
@UapEcosystem @MickWest This dude's gonna be repeating this for decades to come, and the aliens will never be revealed lol.
English
1
0
2
28
UAP Experiencer
UAP Experiencer@UapEcosystem·
@MickWest Mick “no evidence exists” West! Good job! Man MetaClunk is going to look so dated after the UFO files are released. It’ll be like a frozen moment in time.
English
3
0
1
142
shinchan
shinchan@jefflee2015·
@MickWest It takes a few seconds on google to figure that out, but many UFO fans can't even do that.
English
1
0
5
769
Mick West
Mick West@MickWest·
Five of my followers were murdered in the last two years. At least that's the expected rate. Given my audience demographics, there would be over 200 deaths among my followers. This cherry-picking of "suspicious" deaths is stupid. Do the math. Learn about the base-rate.
Mick West tweet mediaMick West tweet media
Mick West@MickWest

This is stupid. The 10 people represent vastly fewer deaths and missing people than you'd expect from the population represented by those 10 people, whichever way you slice it. Doocy's framing is "access to classified nuclear or aerospace material." The relevant population is the cleared workforce in those sectors. Conservatively: - Los Alamos National Laboratory: ~16,000 employees and contractors - Sandia National Laboratories: ~17,000 - Lawrence Livermore: ~8,000 - NASA (full agency + contractors): ~60,000 - Kansas City National Security Campus: ~7,000 - Air Force Research Laboratory and associated contractors: ~10,000+ - Aerospace defense contractors with nuclear/classified aerospace roles (Lockheed, Raytheon, Northrop, Boeing, Aerojet, etc.): several hundred thousand A conservative minimum for "access to classified nuclear or aerospace material" is at least 500,000 people. The actual figure using Doocy's framing is arguably closer to 1–2 million if you include all cleared aerospace and defense contractor personnel. Expected deaths over ~2 years The ages of the 10 average around 59. For educated US professionals aged 45–70, annual all-cause mortality runs roughly 0.7–1.0% per year. Using 500,000 people at 0.8% per year over 2 years: Expected deaths = 500,000 × 0.008 × 2 = 8,000 Even in a far more restricted population of 50,000 the expected deaths are 800. Finding 10 is not anomalous — it is a near-invisible fraction of expected mortality. Expected homicides US homicide rate is approximately 6 per 100,000 per year. In 500,000 people over 2 years: Expected homicides = 500,000 × 0.00006 × 2 = 60 The list contains at most 2 genuine homicides (Loureiro and Grillmair) with identified perpetrators and no UAP connection. That is below the expected rate. Expected missing persons Roughly 600,000 people are reported missing in the US annually — about 0.18% per year. In 500,000 people over 2 years: Expected missing = 500,000 × 0.0018 × 2 = 1,800 The list contains 5 missing persons. Again, well within expectation. You can restrict the calculation to just "scientists"; it does not change anything. It's just cherry-picking some cases from the expected thousands and calling it a pattern.

English
24
12
107
8.8K
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna@RepLuna·
REF UAP DEADLINE: No one from the Pentagon had responded until we reached out, and it appears that someone did not pass the letter to the appropriate authorities. How convenient. Nonetheless, we will be getting the requested list. We are not waiting for a briefing at some unspecified future date. The Secretary of War is someone I consider a friend and someone who backs the President. The President has authorized the release, so whoever is trying to be cute at the Pentagon can take a hike.
English
995
2.2K
14.1K
5.4M
shinchan
shinchan@jefflee2015·
@digijordan But they (NASA) do have other photos that show stars. What are you saying? That they forget to add the stars sometimes? Lmfao. You are utterly delusional OR you have zero shame and are willing to look stupid just for the good and bad attention. You are a gross either way.
English
0
0
0
15
Jordan Crowder
Jordan Crowder@digijordan·
The first photo, I took tonight with my phone. The second one NASA took…with billions of dollars. I was screamed at by dozens of rabid people, about how it’s IMPOSSIBLE to capture stars with a bright light in the foreground. The pic I took has tons of light pollution AND the atmosphere working against it… And you can see hundreds of stars. NASA’s has ZERO STARS. I just really don’t get it.
Jordan Crowder tweet mediaJordan Crowder tweet media
English
483
79
978
106.8K
shinchan
shinchan@jefflee2015·
@digijordan Vast majority of people calling you out never said it's "impossible" to capture stars with a bright light. You are lying or have a low IQ.
English
0
0
0
11
Jordan Crowder
Jordan Crowder@digijordan·
The NPCs literally all say the same thing. It’s wild. I thought the simulator would be more dynamic than this.
English
9
0
27
1.8K