IggyM

@jackcoder0 @21WIRE Great work. I’m surprised it’s taken this long to figure out. Even with the most basic knowledge of economics I knew unreversal credit for all couldn’t work. I’m sure the people touting the idea knew it couldn’t work, they can’t be that dumb. Only those that bought into it could.

Two economists just published a mathematical proof that AI will destroy the economy. Not might. Not could. Will — if nothing changes. The paper is called "The AI Layoff Trap." Published March 2, 2026. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Boston University. Peer reviewed. Mathematically modeled. The conclusion is one sentence. "At the limit, firms automate their way to boundless productivity and zero demand." An economy that produces everything. And sells it to nobody. Here is how you get there. A company fires 500 workers and replaces them with AI. A competitor fires 700 to keep up. Another fires 1,000. Every company is behaving rationally. Every company is following the incentives correctly. And every company is building a trap for itself. Because the workers who were fired were also customers. When they lose their jobs faster than the economy can absorb them, they stop spending. Consumer demand falls. Companies respond by cutting costs — which means automating more workers — which means less spending — which means more falling demand — which means more automation. The loop has no natural exit. The researchers tested every proposed solution. Universal basic income. Capital income taxes. Worker equity participation. Upskilling programs. Corporate coordination agreements. Every single one failed in the model. The only intervention that worked: a Pigouvian automation tax — a per-task levy charged every time a company replaces a human with AI, forcing them to price in the demand they are destroying before they pull the trigger. No government has implemented this. No major economy is seriously discussing it. Meanwhile the numbers are already tracking the curve. 100,000 tech workers laid off in 2025. 92,000 more in the first months of 2026. Jack Dorsey fired half of Block's workforce and said publicly: "Within the next year, the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion." Nobody is doing anything wrong. Companies are following their incentives perfectly. That is exactly the problem. Rational behavior. At scale. Simultaneously. With no mechanism to stop it. Two economists built the math. The math leads to one place. Source: Falk & Tsoukalas · Wharton School + Boston University ·

@KillaXBT Very helpful. Thank you

Major update regarding bitcoin:native So, you've probably noticed that I've started gradually adding more BTC spot around 74K. Since people on this app often like to twist narratives, take things out of context, and muddle the message, I think it's important to clearly explain my current stance. That's exactly what I'll do in this post. First and foremost, I have been bearish for 8 months straight. Through my thesis, analysis, and TA, I was able to avoid the price action where most people get rekt, which is bear market price action. In doing so, I avoided a 50% drop whilst capitalizing on my public swing shorts. A typical bear market lasts around 300 to 350 days. BTC is currently on day 237. I have stated multiple times that I expect BTC to push lower into the August period. I have also stated that my estimated bottom based on historical cycles sits in the 45K to 55K region. That means one of my current buys at 74K could potentially be 25% to 30% underwater. A lot of people are asking, "If you're confident in your thesis, why are you buying again at 74K?" The answer is simple. Investing and trading are two different things. BTC is currently down 41% from the highs. At most, I believe we probably see another 25% to 30% decline. That means more than 65% of the bear market retracement has already occurred. Essentially, buying at 74K today, if historical cycles continue to play out, is comparable to buying around 30K during the last cycle, which ultimately worked out very well. It doesn't matter how good you are as a trader or how much money you have. What matters is recognizing when the risk to reward profile begins shifting in your favor and positioning accordingly. I think BTC will be sitting somewhere in the 160K to 200K range next cycle. Yes, those are bold targets and bold predictions, but they are not unrealistic. They are rooted in historical returns, diminishing returns, and cycle data. That means buying around 70K today could potentially generate 100% to 150% returns over the next few years, significantly outperforming legacy markets and gold, even in a diminishing returns environment. On the other hand, if BTC does reach my 45K to 55K bottom zone, that's another 25% to 30% downside from current levels. So the question you need to ask yourself is simple: Would you miss a potential 100% to 150% move higher over the next few years because you were worried about a possible 25% to 30% drawdown? For me, the answer is no. Even if that means sitting through temporary drawdowns in the short term. Now, I am both a swing trader and an investor. My current swing trade is still a short position, which I have been holding for nearly two months. The objective of that short position is to trade the current market structure, which remains bearish. I am not focused on being bullish until the structure itself turns bullish. That is not flip flopping. It is simply two different strategies with two different objectives. On the higher timeframes, I am an investor and a buyer. On the intermediate timeframes, I am following trend and structure, positioning accordingly until I see evidence that the trend has shifted. As most of you know, people on X love to take things out of context without understanding objectives or timeframe alignment, which is why I wanted to clarify exactly how I am thinking about the market right now. Additionally, many of the higher timeframe cycle indicators are beginning to shift. When BTC reached 126K, most of the traditional cycle top indicators never reached peak euphoria. In fact, many remained well below previous cycle extremes. These indicators are a major component of my higher timeframe investing framework. What I am noticing is a divergence. During the bull market, many metrics failed to reach historical euphoria levels. At the same time, during the bear market, extreme capitulation readings are also becoming less severe and are not reaching the depths seen in previous cycles. In other words, the cycles themselves appear to be evolving. Volatility is compressing. Market behavior is changing. That means adaptation is necessary, and it also means we should remain open to the possibility that future cycles may not play out exactly as they have in the past. Whether that happens this cycle or the next is impossible to know with certainty. What I do know is that when the math, probabilities, and risk to reward are in my favor, I am simply a buyer. That's it. I have attached a few charts outlining the plan I had from 100K+, the areas where I intended to become a buyer, and several metrics showing that extreme capitulation zones continue to become shallower over time. Volatility compression suggests there is a real possibility that future bear markets become less violent and less dramatic than what we have historically experienced. Hopefully this post clears up any confusion regarding my current stance. It took a while to write, but I felt it was necessary. Let me know if you would like me to do more posts like this in the future.

@veritebeaute @naomirwolf The riots were not about the football. That’s for sure.

Anonyme : Je suis pompier et ce que j’ai vu hier dans les rues de Paris m’a brisé le cœur. On est intervenus vers 22h, après l’appel pour un feu de poubelles qui dégénérait. On pensait à un simple incident de soirée. On est arrivés sur place et c’était l’enfer. Paris, ma ville, celle où j’ai grandi, où j’ai fait mes premières gardes, était devenue une zone de guerre. Des fumées noires partout, des cris, des explosions de mortiers. Des groupes de jeunes, souvent issus de l’immigration, cagoulés, organisés, qui chargeaient les forces de l’ordre comme sur un champ de bataille. J’ai vu des collègues policiers se faire lyncher à coups de barre de fer. J’ai vu une voiture de police caillassée alors qu’on sortait juste pour éteindre un feu qui menaçait des familles. On a été pris à partie par des émeutiers qui nous hurlaient dessus, nous traitant de “chiens”. On essayait juste de sauver des vies, et on devenait des cibles. J’ai ramassé un gamin de 14 ans, le visage en sang, qui pleurait en disant qu’il avait suivi “les grands” pour “s’amuser”. J’ai vu une mère de famille, volets fermés, qui nous suppliait de protéger ses enfants pendant que ça cassait tout en bas. Les vitrines défoncées, les commerces pillés, les voitures brûlées… tout ça sous prétexte de “fêter” quelque chose. Fêter, ce n’est pas casser. C’est ça, la France en 2026 ? Un pays où on ne peut plus sortir le soir sans risquer sa vie ? Un pays où des quartiers entiers sont livrés à des clans qui ne respectent ni nos lois, ni notre histoire, ni nos pompiers, ni nos policiers ? Où on regarde impuissant notre capitale, symbole de lumière et de culture, transformée en terrain de jeu pour des barbares qui crachent sur la main qui les nourrit ? Cette nuit, en rentrant chez moi à 6h du matin, encore couvert de suie et de sueur, j’ai pleuré comme un gosse. Pas de fatigue. De rage et de tristesse. Pour mes enfants. Pour mes collègues blessés. Pour ce pays que j’aime et qui se laisse mourir. Réveillez-vous. S’il vous plaît. Avant qu’il ne reste plus rien à sauver.

@visegrad24 @Cernovich Absolutely heartbreaking listening to that child. Bukele is showing the rest of the way to deal with these murderous gangs

Before Bukele, emergency dispatchers often heard people calling who saw gang members torturing & murdering their friends & family members. Here’s an example of a young boy calling 911 as a gangster kills his mom. Bukele now has the highest approval rating of all world leaders. The homicide rate in El Salvador has plummeted from 106 homicides per 100 000 inhabitants in 2015 to 1 homicide per 100 000 inhabitants in 2025. El Salvador now has the world’s highest incarceration rate, with 1.7% of the population behind bars. Many of them are gang members who have been sentenced to life without parole and will never be let of prison. They won’t be able to murder anyone’s mom again. @nayibbukele is up there with Lee Kuan Yew as the politician who has had the most impact on his nation in modern history.

@jackquick_frost @beverleyturner I think it was the influence he had that he got murdered for. No leftie could match him in a debate. He had real and ever growing power.

The sheer delusion of the leftwing lunatics scared of their own shadows but then thats what makes them so dangerous scared gutless individuals are dangerous because when they are scared they are capable of anything Look at the assassination of Charlie kirk killed murdered in cold blood infront of his wife and children because they was scared of what he was saying

Now swap out the "vaccine" for "digital id" as the means of keeping you "safe"..... You were meant to seize upon that as the next life-raft. Starmer tried his best. Social stigma was meant to accompany its rejection. But too many people woke up to the digital control grid. Looking at the idiots on this clip though, with enough fear, they would try to brainwash you again....

@mazemoore Most people I know that took the vaccine say they took it because they wanted to go on holiday. How selfish.

This is one of the more important videos I’ve made. Never forget this evil.

@hicasamadim 4

mantığını anlamadan bu soruyu çözmen imkansız! çözebilir misin?

@SpeechUnion Any idea or ideology must stand up against scrutiny that is the scientific method. If it needs protection or hides behind secrecy something is wrong. Freedom of speech is essential to an evolving species.

It is vitally important in a free society that people are free to express themselves. We must distinguish between acts that criticise or challenge an ideology, religion or belief system, and acts that target people because of who they are. At a recent event, a guest asked whether we believe there should be any limits on free speech, citing our defence of those who have burned copies of the Koran. People must be free to express themselves, and sometimes symbolic acts are the most powerful form of expression. Context matters. The right to challenge, criticise and even offend is a fundamental part of living in a free society. The FSU’s Jill Levine explains our position below 👇

@newstart_2024 I think Eric nailed it about Britain.

Eric Weinstein just put his finger on something real. Liberal societies go illiberal in two different ways. One is hyper-liberal illiberalism. Open borders, fluid everything, “no person is illegal,” that whole vibe. The other is the backlash - hypo-liberal illiberalism. Hard borders, strong pushback, masculine energy. “Enough.” He was talking about Britain especially. Told them to stop the self-hatred. You built something special. That dry humor. That irreverent creativity. That ability to take ideas and make them world-class. Be proud of it. This feels like one of the clearest explanations I’ve heard for the pendulum we’re all watching swing right now. When one extreme goes too far, the correction comes hard. Societies need both openness and boundaries. Lose your sense of who you are, and things get messy fast. Do you think the UK (and other Western countries) actually need this corrective phase right now, or is it heading the wrong direction?

@DoctorYamakov @ABridgen Post

@DoctorYamakov @ABridgen I agree with most of what you pay but you really are a waste of time.

This should come as no surprise whatsoever, when the Muslim rape gang victims also have no confidence that their testimony and evidence will be taken seriously and investigated by our police forces. Given it was ignored by people in positions of power for decades. telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/05/2…

@MorryCrypto @Skint_Eastwood1 The endless, endless war.

🚨 Miliband Crumbles When Asked the One Question That Matters: How Much Would UK Net Zero Cool the Planet? Lee Anderson asked Energy Secretary Ed Miliband a simple, direct question in Parliament: “If Britain went Net Zero tomorrow, by how much would global temperatures fall?” As the man in charge of our energy policy and one of the most vocal champions of Net Zero, Miliband should have had the answer at his fingertips. Instead, he stood up and delivered pure waffle, dodging the question entirely with vague rhetoric about “British leadership” and how the 2008 Climate Change Act supposedly inspired the world. No numbers. No data. Just ideology. The truth is uncomfortable: it would make virtually no difference. The UK accounts for less than 1% of global CO₂ emissions. Even if we shut down every emitting industry, household, and vehicle overnight, the impact on the planet’s temperature would be negligible, too small to measure meaningfully. Meanwhile, the world’s biggest emitters aren’t playing along: China (1st), United States (2nd), and India (3rd). Together they dwarf our output. While we’re crippling our own energy costs, driving up bills, closing industries, and exporting jobs and businesses overseas, they continue expanding fossil fuel use to lift their populations out of poverty. This isn’t “saving the planet.” It’s self-harm dressed up as virtue. We’re sacrificing competitiveness, energy security, and working people’s livelihoods on an evidence-free fantasy.

@Skint_Eastwood1 It’s not even genuine virtue. The dressing is equality the reality is slavey. There is an orchestrated collapse of the west by globalists who seek to rebuild society in their own image. A world run by soulless sociopaths with a reduced population having zero rights.

@darrengrimes What gets me, regardless of their race or religion, is the total lack of respect by these two brothers for law and order which only foments further lack of respect from the wider community. The west is fuct.

In Two Tier Britain if it isn’t politically correct to jail you, you’ll get off just fine. Even if you do go at a female police officer’s face like a crazed thug. And worse still? This is why the police fear taking action today. They’re the ones punished and accused of wrongdoing.

@DoctorYamakov @ABridgen He speaks the truth though

@MonicaBamaGirl @LizaRosen0000 He follows a different branch of Islam and calls out the contradictions in the Suní version of Islam. He’s a good guy, check him out. @Imamofpeace

@LizaRosen0000 A Muslim scholar who doesn’t follow his own holy book. Why doesn’t he leave Islam? Oh because they would kill him.

Flashback: A Muslim scholar who openly calls for reforming Islam in order to end its war against the rest of humanity calls on the West: “Deport all the jihadists who want to kill you. Stop tolerating Islam’s intolerance.”

@RealDonKeith This is insane!

🚨Man stops two 12-year-old girls from sexual harassment. Gets arrested, banned from his town centre and has his flat trashed by police. This is two-tier Britain where protecting kids gets you punished.

@triffic_stuff_ Quite possibly the only decent thing to have ever left his lips

🚨 BLAIR BOMBSHELL: SCRAP NET ZERO NOW! “THERE’S NO LOGIC TO IT!” 🔥 Tony Blair Demands Starmer Scrap Milibands Mad Expensive Green Agenda Immediately‼️ Blair has just shredded mad Miliband and the entire net zero agenda. There’s zero logic to it! Asked directly for total clarity: “For total clarity, are you advising Keir Starmer to rip up Ed Milibands green energy targets?” Blair bluntly replied: “Yes I am!” He explained that the 3 biggest emitters in the world today are China, America and India. Together they “account for just over 50% of global emissions.” All are pursuing cheap energy. They still do renewable energy. “China for example builds more renewable energy than the rest of the world put together.” “It just means that the lens from which they judge policy is cheap energy.” He rightly points out Britain’s emissions are “under 1% of global emissions” so we can’t solve climate change. And says he “doesnt understand the logic behind” imposing costs on businesses and consumers to pursue net zero when the rest of the world is not doing so. He says again he doesnt understand why we’re shutting down North Sea oil and gas industry in circumstances where no other country in the world is doing that if “they’ve still got a requirement to import energy from oil and gas”. It costs way too much and “is not the right priority!” Net zero is not saving the planet. It is economic self-harm. Blair has just blown the entire agenda apart.