Shimecki

Anthropic decidió dar de baja a toda nuestra organización por una supuesta infracción de sus condiciones de uso. Qué política específica infringimos no tengo ni la menor idea: simplemente recibimos un mail y listo, adiós Claude. Si querés apelar la medida hay que completar un Google Form, así de ridículo como suena. De golpe más de 60 personas se quedaron sin una herramienta fundamental para trabajar. Integraciones, skills, historial de conversaciones: todo perdido o, en el mejor de los casos, parado por tiempo indeterminado. Enorme aprendizaje para cualquier empresa de software que dependa de herramientas de IA en procesos críticos. Nunca hay que poner todos los huevos en una canasta.

"AI will be better at coding than humans by 2027" Agree or disagree?

"AI will be better at coding than humans by 2027" Agree or disagree?

To all of you who are having "Mythos psychosis" moment, you should read this. Number one - nothing changed! Nothing! Number two - all economically valuable tasks can already be performed by Sonnet and Opus-level models. That's what matters. Read the full story 👇 I've been deeply immersed in AI since GPT-3.5. I'm an engineer. AI writes 100% of my code for over two years. I use it for marketing, startegy, sales - everything - even personal health improvements. When Opus 4.6 came out, it suddenly became apparent to everyone what level of autonomy AI can achieve, I had my own version of AI psychosis. I snapped out of it 2 months later. So will you. Consider this. Where is your concern coming from? 1⃣ Is it that you feel the you will not get the same level of access to latest models as corporations and governments? Guess what - That's been true for technology for the last 50 years. Or forever. Nothing new. And BTW you think you've had access to the latest model so far? Guess again. There's no way US government was using the same Claude Opus like you and me for $200/mo sub. 2⃣ Do you fear that your peers will outrun you because now they have the same level of access to generate code or outcomes as you do? That requires agency. It's not the expertise that differentiates you. It's the level of agency you have that others don't. Your agency got you to learn and use the systems that elevated you above others. That has not changed, and will not change. 3⃣ Look at the adoption curve. Barely anybody I know has, in any meaningful way, even after three years of GPT-4, embedded AI into their workflows. There is such a long way to go! And you, who are currently having AI psychosis, are going to snap out of it, and for years to come, help others integrate - and also help them go through the same feelings of psychosis. Now... Mythos apparently can break security. So what? We had the same fears about quantum computing for years. That is yet to materialize. But the way this is being rolled out is actually reassuring, not the opposite. The fact that the "good guys" have access to it first means we can all harden it and soften the blow. It's coming either way. And on the bright side -if any of our systems were not fully secure, it's better to have them secured sooner rather than later. These are natural steps in the evolution of technical capabilities. Nothing more, nothing less. Nothing godlike has suddenly appeared, although it may seem that way to some of us. What I realized after my Opus 4.6 psychosis is that two months later, the world is still the same. I walk outside, the grass is green, the sky is blue, and most of my friends are still oblivious to the fact that AI exists. Most businesses are still not utilizing it to full extent. Even the ones that are still have a long way to go. We're finding new ways to monetize AI every single day. On the flip side, think about the benefits of having the most powerful AI model in the world pointed towards problems like disease and economic prosperity for everyone. And the big reminder - open source has so far been able to catch up within six months or less. You think that won't be the case? There's no evidence that Open Source won't be catching up whatsoever. Even if it was three years, who cares? We'll all have access to Mythos-level AI models, one way or the other. I could not be more optimistic about the future. Ask yourself this: Would you rather have Mythos not exist and prove that scaling laws have reached a ceiling... or would you have it exist and show that more is possible than what we now know? I, for one, am happy and excited.