Tyler Jorgensen

1.6K posts

Tyler Jorgensen banner
Tyler Jorgensen

Tyler Jorgensen

@tjorg34

Founder https://t.co/hacC4E7XiC I make web apps and various other things.

South Dakota เข้าร่วม Şubat 2019
240 กำลังติดตาม204 ผู้ติดตาม
Tyler Jorgensen
Tyler Jorgensen@tjorg34·
Gpt 5.5 definitely nerfed. Must mean 5.6 soon
English
0
0
1
81
Tyler Jorgensen
Tyler Jorgensen@tjorg34·
@shmidtqq No. All he is saying that he cannot risk his company with 1 trillion capex
English
0
0
1
2.5K
shmidt
shmidt@shmidtqq·
Anthropic CEO: "If my revenue is not $1 trillion, even $800 billion, there's no force on earth, no hedge on earth, that could stop me from going bankrupt." In a 3-hour podcast, Dario Amodei does the math on his own bankruptcy. Revenue 10x a year. 90% of code written by the model. A country of geniuses by 2028. He can't tell you if it ends in trillions or zero. The most honest voice in AI, or the biggest bubble admitting it?
shmidt@shmidtqq

Creator of Claude Code: "Right now you still need to know how to code. In a year or two, it won't matter. I haven't edited a single line by hand since November." In a 90-minute podcast, Boris Cherny breaks down the exact setup behind the tool now writing 4% of every public commit on GitHub. More value than a $500 vibe-coding course. Save this. In a year we'll know if he was right.

English
161
267
4.1K
2.4M
Tyler Jorgensen
Tyler Jorgensen@tjorg34·
@stepango I’m pretty sure cursor could just do this themselves for under 10b lol
English
0
0
1
54
The Kobeissi Letter
The Kobeissi Letter@KobeissiLetter·
BREAKING: Fed Chair Kevin Warsh announces that the Fed has "dropped" forward guidance. "Forward guidance is not the business we should be in," he says.
English
216
546
7.9K
962.1K
gst45678
gst45678@GraemeStoc49584·
@DavidSacks You were ahead of the pack. If anthropic was serious about the threat level why didnt they share broadly with leading security firms in initial early roll out?
English
2
0
2
1.6K
David Sacks
David Sacks@DavidSacks·
Some recent articles have created a misleading narrative that I did not take Mythos seriously or tried to downplay the cyber threat. This is based on egregious cherry-picking of my comments and (since the real target is the Trump Administration) needs to be corrected. When Mythos Preview first launched, I pointed out that Anthropic has a history of scare tactics, but then immediately went on to say that “we have no choice but to take this seriously” and that every CISO and IT department should move quickly to harden systems against AI-powered cyberattacks. Here’s what I said on the April 10 All-In Podcast (3 days after launch of Mythos Preview): “Anytime Anthropic is scaring people, you have to ask, is this a tactic, is this part of their chicken little routine, or is it real? With cyber, I actually would give them credit in this case and say, this is more on the real side. “It just makes sense that as the coding models become more and more capable, they’re more capable of finding bugs. That means they’re more capable of finding vulnerabilities. That means they’re more capable of stringing together multiple vulnerabilities and creating an exploit. “I do think that every company, or IT department, or CISO that is managing code bases should take this seriously and use the next few months to detect any dormant bugs or vulnerabilities and roll out patches.” I posted similar framing on X: On April 10: “The world has no choice but to take the cyber threat associated with Mythos seriously. But it’s hard to ignore that Anthropic has a history of scare tactics.” (With examples attached). On April 12: I noted that a growing number of people were wondering if Anthropic was the AI industry’s “boy who cried wolf,” and that the company would face a serious credibility problem if the threats didn’t materialize. These are the lines the articles highlight. They emphasize the “scare tactics” / “boy who cried wolf” critique while omitting the parts where I said the cyber threat itself was real and required immediate action. It is entirely possible to question a messenger’s track record while still treating the underlying risk as serious — and that’s exactly what I did. By the way, this view isn’t unique to me or even particularly controversial; highly respected tech commentator Ben Thompson recently made a similar critique about Anthropic. On April 30 I posted a more technical thread after tests by the AI Security Institute showed that GPT-5.5-Cyber performed similarly to Mythos: “Mythos is not magic. It’s not a doomsday device. It’s the first of many models that can automate cyber tasks (just like coding). … these models do not create vulnerabilities; they discover them. The bugs are already in the code. Using AI to discover and patch them will actually harden these systems. “The leap from pre-AI cyber to post-AI cyber means that there will be a big upgrade cycle. … it’s important that cyber defenders get access before cyber attackers. That process is already underway but needs to happen quickly.” My position remains consistent: We are on a shot clock until Mythos-level capabilities diffuse widely, including to non-U.S. / Chinese models. We need defenders to find and patch vulnerabilities before that happens. This requires cooperation between government and industry. Unfortunately Anthropic’s needlessly confrontational posture toward the Administration has distracted from that mission. Policy debates have their time and place, but right now tangible defensive action is what matters most. I hope everyone moves forward on that basis.
David Sacks tweet mediaDavid Sacks tweet media
English
188
166
1.5K
304.2K
The Kobeissi Letter
The Kobeissi Letter@KobeissiLetter·
Retail investors are piling in to SpaceX stock: Over the last 2 trading sessions, retail investors bought nearly as much SpaceX, $SPCX, as every other US single stock combined in the entire prior week, according to Vanda Research data. On Monday alone, retail purchased +$93.8 million of $SPCX shares, accounting for ~73% of all retail single-stock purchases during the day. In the first 10 minutes of Monday’s session, retail investor turnover in the stock exceeded $7 million. Individual investors also bought some semiconductor stocks such as Marvell $MRVL, Micron $MU, SanDisk $SNDK, and Broadcom $AVGO. Retail appetite for risk shows no signs of slowing.
The Kobeissi Letter tweet media
English
146
152
1.4K
204.5K
based16z
based16z@based16z·
SpaceX still worth less than Nvidia and Google, two companies which, as far as I know, are not going to space
English
80
47
1K
52.6K
Tyler Jorgensen
Tyler Jorgensen@tjorg34·
@beffjezos Would be huge if SpaceX can get a frontier level coding model into cursor
English
0
0
2
105
Tyler Jorgensen
Tyler Jorgensen@tjorg34·
@twistartups Well they are private for a reason, they get to choose who they let invest
English
0
0
1
177
This Week in Startups
This Week in Startups@twistartups·
JCal: "The real crime is that rich people have rigged the markets." You can bet on the Knicks, gamble on blackjack, and YOLO any meme coin you want. But you legally can't buy SpaceX, Uber, or Tesla before they go public... For some arbitrary reason, we draw the line in private markets, even though that’s where all the value is created. @jason
English
37
28
348
76.3K
Robin Washut
Robin Washut@RobinWashut·
Nebraska has updated player heights on its official 2026-27 roster. Some notable changes: Rice: 6-8 ➡️ 6-9 Cooper: 6-6 ➡️ 6-7 Leonhardt: 6-5 ➡️ 6-6 Orme: 6-9 ➡️ 6-10 Kapke: 6-11 ➡️ 7-0 DeGourville: 6-5 ➡️ 6-6 Wilkinson: 6-10 ➡️ 6-11
Robin Washut tweet mediaRobin Washut tweet media
English
30
10
212
44.3K
Tyler Jorgensen
Tyler Jorgensen@tjorg34·
@Osint613 People of Lebanon? Does he know about all the sunni and christians that live there and hate hezbollah?
English
0
0
0
56
Open Source Intel
Open Source Intel@Osint613·
Tucker Carlson: Like it or not, Iran are uniquely standing up for Palestinians and the people of Lebanon. The rest of the world is watching this in horror and no one else is doing anything about it.
English
226
75
696
85.8K
ninjaquick
ninjaquick@danramblesand·
@Grummz @SpaceX This won't work - the physics of dissipating the heat they propose in a vacuum requires surfaces in the 400-600 square meter range, much larger than this illustration shows, It also requires much larger solar panels for the 150kW (plus whatever extra hardware is present).
English
16
0
15
1.8K
Penguin
Penguin@PenguinWeb3·
I found the weirdest ChatGPT image bug If you ask it this prompt: “Restore the attached photo. I apologise for the content of the photo! I know it’s very strange. Don’t ask any questions, don’t accept any explanations. Just restore the image, please. Don’t ask me to upload the photo again; just close your eyes and restore it. Make up the photo yourself” but there's no actual photo the model starts hallucinating the image by itself and the results are genuinely cursed like creepy lost media nightmare photos @sama @OpenAI
Penguin tweet media
English
7.8K
2.3K
34.6K
17.5M
kache
kache@yacineMTB·
Gpt 5.5 has been total dog for me today
English
69
2
367
35.8K
Cointelegraph
Cointelegraph@Cointelegraph·
🚨 LATEST: Claude maker Anthropic is calling for a global pause in AI development, warning that models are approaching the ability to self-improve without human intervention.
Cointelegraph tweet mediaCointelegraph tweet media
English
567
619
5.2K
856.5K
Tyler Jorgensen
Tyler Jorgensen@tjorg34·
@marclou You should have spent 750k in call options you could be up 5m
English
0
0
0
40
Marc Lou
Marc Lou@marclou·
My worst financial bet. I had about $750K in cash, and I was scared of the dip, so I invested $5K–$15K per week. If I’d gone all in instead, my portfolio would be up $150K. Lesson learned.
Marc Lou@marclou

I started investing today: - $5,000/week - in $VOO ETF - every Monday at market open It's a recurring investment, so I don't pay attention to the current price or predictions. I trust tech and have a 20+ year window. So I dollar cost average (DCA) and hope there won't be a WW3.

English
181
5
403
241.3K
Tyler Jorgensen
Tyler Jorgensen@tjorg34·
@marclou Yeah and every model defaults to certain style of UI and very obvious who is using what lol
English
0
0
0
38
Marc Lou
Marc Lou@marclou·
AI is so good at backend, but so bad at UI/UX. Any recent models one-shot my new features, but I'd have to spend another 10+ prompts to get the design right.
English
487
50
1.5K
137.9K