Blackpilled Trad Wife📟

One of the best threads I've read in a very long time

@Ms_1776 If he did he wouldnt make her die from cringe

@wing_trad I have this sneaking suspicion he doesnt follow Ephesians 5:25

Lookin like siblings

@wing_trad Putting my fetish in the public eye just trad things

@JMDucksworth I think its best to not procreate with any man who wants to wear your submission like a trophy tbh

For real though, if you're a woman who naturally leans obedient and believes this is proper in the context of Christian marriage, you're better off with a man who leans a bit socially and theologically liberal than one who wants to display your marital submission like a trophy.

@FishboneHarp Just DMd

@wing_trad Are you also from Appalachia? I like it okay but sometimes it just gets to a point

This is just a universal parent thing

@FishboneHarp Yeah probably. Up north here people def dont talk like that though. I always like it when parents tell fucked up stories

@wing_trad Well i feel like it happens in more places and cultures than it doesnt!

Please pray for me, life is rather hard atm

Communists aren’t people

Male immodesty is also distracting

“Women should let their husbands lead them” The husbands: “I don’t know what I’m supposed to do, I need you to make me a list”

@hollowearthterf @ubiquitousnewt @danishacarterr New wilson lore just dropped

@ubiquitousnewt @danishacarterr Not to mention she was Andrew’s sidechick and he was married to another woman

I wouldn't describe Rachel or Andrew Wilson as an authority on stable motherhood or relationships. She has 5 children to 3 different Fathers. One man abandoned her and his two kids over vague “personal issues.” The next Father was a criminal drug abuser who abandoned her and their one child fleeing legal trouble. Only Andrew Wilson gave her the trad family she now preaches. But he only committed to her after he was able to confirm the kids were his via DNA testing. What does that suggest about the dynamic? Rachel has shown self awareness and knows how her blended family looks, downplaying it as “youthful mistakes”. But mistakes these are not. This a well documented, multi year, behavioural pattern of maladaptive mate selection; serial monogamy with successively dysfunctional, low stability males, resulting in three different fathers for five children, two periods of single motherhood, and one tragic child fatality. And yet, she and Andrew think they are best placed to be critics of modern women and they are ab authority of what benevolent, stable family life should be like. Rachel and Andrew have built their entire brand shaming modern women for low partner standards, serial monogamy, single motherhood, and multiple baby daddies, the exact life she lived. Hypocrisy on full display. What kind of man is drawn to such a woman like Rachel Wilson to begin with? Well, Andrew is a bit of a bastard isn't he. Andrew Wilson’s core traits are abrasive high conflict dominance, arrogance paired with defensive aggression, and a rigid insistence on his unchallenged authority. You can see repeatedly by from his debate footage that he is irritable, rude, and bullying in style. Yes, he can be sharp and logical but he routinely shifts to personal attacks, insults, and verbal aggression when he perceives his authority or family is directly challenged. I don't think he can organically evoke genuine deference or voluntary submission from a desirable, respectable, agentic, and stable woman. Such a woman has independent, better mating options and would probably reject the unilateral “he is in charge of everything” authority because it clashes with her core traits. Rachel, shaped by a pattern of suboptimal mate selection and multiple children, has limited mating alternatives. So she explicitly conforms. She states on record that submission means “you submit to your husband in all things,” that Andrew holds charge of everything, and that she performs total domestic service because his dependability finally enabled the homemaking role her prior partners could not. He secures what he needs through a partner whose baggage makes compliance the rational exchange for security. They portray this trade off via a christian redemption narrative they co brand. Interesting.

Me when i lie

@SydDivineTarot Men will do shit like this and still cheat

which zodiac sign is this 😂

Candy getting assaulted out here for us all to see

@FishboneHarp 🥲

@wing_trad They eat everyone unfortunately

Locking myself in a cage overnight that can only be opened from the outside with a pitbull that was surrendered bc it ripped the fingers off of a black child

@FishboneHarp You aint a black kid, hes not gonna eat you

@wing_trad What do you mean queen

@FanceeSpectatin YES. ITS DISGUSTING

I do not care if I catch hell for what I am about to state as far as my opinion goes, but ... EATING A PLACENTA IS NASTY & UNNECESSARY. un... necessary.