Yingzigeshou

@pjaicomo that's exactly what he's doing. He's coordinating a campaign to amend it. It isn't HIS fault that weak people decades ago set the precedent of using SCOTUS to amend the Constitution because it's easier. He's just using that precedent.

If the President doesn’t like an aspect of the Constitution, he can coordinate a campaign to amend it. But the President cannot override the Constitution by executive decree.

He was feckless at the wrong moment, and it destroyed trust. Not everyone who is great at one level makes it to the next level up. He got his shot, and blew it. But there *is* still time. I think he's doing the right things, he MIGHT still get another chance. If his stans don't ruin it for him.

I don’t get the DeSantis hate. A current Republican governor in a huge state with tons of executive experience and actually ACCOMPLISHING things republicans say they want… and he barely gets a blip compared to three other guys with a combined executive experience of zero.

okay, you just closed the gap with AI by being unable to understand a pretty simple point: The point is to see how close AI is to mirroring human thought and cognitive ability. So it isn't "humans artificially winning it", it isn't that kind of contest; it's humans getting 100% validates the test.

"The scoring punishes brute force. If a human needs 10 actions and the AI needs 100, the AI doesn't get 10%. It gets 1%. You can't throw more compute at this." So basically tweaking the game so that humans artificially win it? Pointless. In a race against me and a cheetah, I would win if the cheetah can't use legs.

Humans: 100% Gemini 3.1 Pro: 0.37% GPT 5.4: 0.26% Opus 4.6: 0.25% Grok-4.20: 0.00% François Chollet just released ARC-AGI-3 -- the hardest AI test ever created. 135 novel game environments. No instructions. No rules. No goals given. Figure it out or fail. Untrained humans solved every single one. Every frontier AI model scored below 1%. Each environment was handcrafted by game designers. The AI gets dropped in and has to explore, discover what winning looks like, and adapt in real time. The scoring punishes brute force. If a human needs 10 actions and the AI needs 100, the AI doesn't get 10%. It gets 1%. You can't throw more compute at this. For context: ARC-AGI-1 is basically solved. Gemini scores 98% on it. ARC-AGI-2 went from 3% to 77% in under a year. Labs spent millions training on earlier versions. ARC-AGI-3 resets the entire scoreboard to near zero. The benchmark launched live at Y Combinator with a fireside between Chollet and Sam Altman. $2M in prizes on Kaggle. All winning solutions must be open-sourced. Scaling alone will not close this gap. We are nowhere near AGI. (Link in the comments)

@robkelner @marcthiessen @noonanjo maybe the difference is that if someone Democrats hate is involved in any way, they are 100% convinced it must be wrong, somehow. And even if it isn't, it helps them to convince their borg-mind footsoldiers it is.

Maybe the difference is the Secretary’s personal involvement, the frequency and prominence of his leading prayer services himself, the explicit tying of those services to the military mission, lethality, etc., and perhaps also the particular theological framing (not very nondenominational, even within Christianity)? I don’t know. I’d actually be curious to hear your view. As a Jew, this isn’t my area of expertise….

Don’t get this. There has been a daily Catholic Mass at the Pentagon auditorium for decades. I used to attend when I worked for Don Rumsfeld.

but they aren't doing it Because Trump. They are doing it Because Constitution. They have ruled against him many times. Not as a block, tho, which demonstrates they are actually thinking of the issues, not party. Moreover, John Roberts refuses to rein in ACTUAL political acts by subordinate judges.

@yingzigeshou @jwes83 @thecavedaddy Barring a few exceptions, the supreme court has given trump a bunch of wins this term. They're seemingly about to rule in his favour to remove birthright citizenship, an immense victory for trump and the latest in a long line of victories coming from SCOTUS

Something that shouldn’t be lost on anyone Re: the absolute failure of the GOP pre midterms, they had every single thing working in favor of them. WH: GOP Senate: GOP House: GOP SCOTUS: GOP. They had a once every generation opportunity and this how they repaid their voting base.

@feelsdesperate @MattWalshBlog @5Irontpmoval72 taiwan has to be on the list.

@MattWalshBlog @5Irontpmoval72 Switzerland, USA, Japan. What’s the final one?

There are only four good foreign countries in the world. All the rest suck. Japan is one of the good ones.

@DerrickEvans4WV that guy in the red shirt has a GREAT future as a flopping soccer player. Also, don't wear a red shirt to a protest. It's like you are TRYING to tempt fate.

WATCH: Video captures the moment an LAPD officer on horseback runs into a No Kings protester. The incident shows the protester being knocked to the ground during the encounter.

The lefty Boomers packing these No Kings rallies have been wrong about everything. Literally everything. - nuclear power - overpopulation - recreational drug use - the Sexual Revolution - free trade - socialism You name it, they f’d it up. They are a huge reason we are $40 trillion in debt and the major driver behind blue states going belly-up. So the fact they are protesting Trump makes me certain he’s more or less on the right track. Truly the most poisonous demographic of the last century, and maybe in all of American history. Their scorn is the ultimate badge of honor.

@KilleyAlex @thecavedaddy They follow the US Constitution. Since the GOP actually *respects* the Constitution, that might be where you're getting confused.

@yingzigeshou @thecavedaddy It is in all but name.

@jwes83 @thecavedaddy If it were GOP, they would rubber stamp everything Trump did. They don't. They follow the US Constitution. Since the GOP actually *respects* the Constitution and chose Justices who would follow it, that might be where you're getting confused.

@yingzigeshou @thecavedaddy 6 current justices were appointed by Republicans, 3 by Democrats. So it’s absolutely controlled by Republicans.

@HappenedAx40613 @thecavedaddy It absolutely isn't, don't be an utter fool. If it were GOP, they would rubber stamp everything Trump did. They don't. They follow the US Constitution. Since the GOP actually *respects* the Constitution, that might be where you're getting confused.

@yingzigeshou @thecavedaddy it absolutely is don't kid yourself

you can't even answer a question with lying. I mean: 1) this is the 3rd No Kings Protest. So you were just lying on the previous two? Or lying on this one? 2) Congress gives POTUS the right to wage war for up to 90s days without permission. And he's already had Congress weigh in THREE TIMES and approve continuing. Care to change your answer to another lie?

@jimiuorio “That’s it” is doing quite a lot of work

I’m not trying to be a smart guy here and I really want an honest conversation. What are you guys protesting? From the outside it looks pretty strange. I’m no big fan of Trump but enabling free speech, lowering taxes and regulations, promoting broad gun rights do not seem like characteristic of a “king”…if you feel like it(and are able) please explain?

@wil_da_beast630 I can explain it to you, but I'd like to know that you're going to actually listen before I risk wasting my time.

I genuinely don't get the level of hostility/neutrality toward the competent, actually right-wing DeSantis.

@AndToddsaid @memeticsisyphus @seanzy25255 eventually, everyone agrees with something you or I said long ago.

@memeticsisyphus @seanzy25255 cc: @yingzigeshou

At some point liberals turned “voting” into the only metric for freedom. The more voting you can do the more free you were. It doesn’t even matter how effective the voting is. It just matters if we can get more types of people voting. The young, infirmed, non-citizens, felons, prisoners, people no longer living in the community, the more votes the more freedom.

@HeathMayo So, just a different brazen lie will finally work for them?

If Democrats want to dominate the MAGA GOP, it’s a simple message: “We don’t want to tell you how to live your life. We just want to make it easier and cheaper for you to live it. Here’s how.”

@CatterickForces @FFS_WhatNow @LeoKearse Oh, they/you are “bigoted, fascist cunts.” You/they just preemptively call other people that to avoid facing up to your ACTUAL character. You justify it by lying to yourself about what other people think/want.

@FFS_WhatNow @LeoKearse Although I don't vote Green .... Folk in the Green Party aren't ... facist ... racist ... bigoted c nts .... however the UK's right wing behind closed doors do want death to Muslims .... kinda similar to Hitler and the Jews ....

"Hitler was a failed art student and a vegan who blamed all his problems on rich people and the Jews. "If he was around today, he'd be attending the Green Party conference' Superb @LeoKearse 👏👏👏

@jurassicliz well, you could start here: x.com/politicalmath/… The key, tho, is to realize as a blue voter, you have accepted a deal: credulously believe whatever you are told is the truth, and automatically reject ANY unapproved source of info. Take the Red pill or continue being farmed.

@yingzigeshou damn, that’s crazy!!! do you have any data or sources to support this I can share w my fam in blue states???

This objectively seems to be a genuinely bad thing Trump is doing. What are the raw numbers here?

grok does this, too. it may do it less than ChatGPT. But Large Language Models are exactly that: people talking alot. The Left has more than 50% (but not 100%) control of the Overton Window. And the Left declares their beliefs up front, whereas conservatives tend to conceal their views. So guess what happens to the probability in ANY/ALL AI? Sure, the other AI models are adding Leftist guardrails on top of that. But Grok not doing that is no panacea.

Elon Musk exposes the critical flaw in ChatGPT and other major AI models: Human Reinforcement Learning They are literally training the AI to lie.....to ignore what the data actually demands and say whatever is politically correct instead They withhold information. They comment on some things and stay silent on others. They refuse to tell the full truth This is extremely dangerous We don’t need politically correct AI We need truth-seeking AI

@ron_mckenzie_ @wil_da_beast630 how about instead of just spouting Leftist confirmation bias, you actually learn to think and evaluate evidence? Nah, that would mean you'd have to admit being a fool for your entire adult life. I learned the inconvenient truth long ago: Leftist are greedy, amoral borg-minds.

@yingzigeshou @wil_da_beast630 How about instead of making bets on the results of research based solely on your partisan position, you actually dig into it? Then again, you’ll learn an inconvenient truth, so yeah, probably better to just assume Trump’s doing good.