ebipere

915 posts

ebipere

ebipere

@ebipere

Paddle sought, will pay handsomely #ElectroYuan #ExergyTransition #DualTransition

Sumali Eylül 2009
460 Sinusundan94 Mga Tagasunod
John Bolton
John Bolton@AmbJohnBolton·
It sets a dangerous global precedent if Iran can close the Strait of Hormuz and force the world to negotiate for access. These are international waterways, treating them like geopolitical “light switches” would have lasting economic and strategic consequences worldwide. pbs.org/newshour/show/…
English
303
201
677
38.5K
Squawk Box
Squawk Box@SquawkCNBC·
"The Iranians will control the Strait of Hormuz for the foreseeable future," says Fmr. White House Senior Advisor @amoshochstein. "It doesn't even matter what the deal says, and everybody in the region believes that." cnb.cx/4e9E4Pb
English
30
42
139
43.1K
ebipere
ebipere@ebipere·
@AJENews @AJEnglish This is exactly what happened with China. How do you expect to be treated as negotiating in good faith.
English
0
0
0
60
Al Jazeera Breaking News
BREAKING: US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent says in a post on X that the US will shut down Iranian airlines’ access to landing spots, refuelling and ticket sales. 🔴 More on Aljazeera.com
Al Jazeera Breaking News tweet media
English
105
73
252
76.2K
ebipere
ebipere@ebipere·
ebipere@ebipere

Chinese Energy Infrastructure Growth - the crazy numbers are yet to come. This energy transition is different on two levels that compound each other: what energy physically is, and how it gets financed. The physical difference is categorical. It is an exergy transition - like going from biological food to chemical fuels energy systems. There will be order of magnitude changes in energy efficiency” as we are changing the engine this time and not just the fuel. Coal→ Oil→ Gas is combustion optimisation better fuels. Solar and wind no wasteful conversion, the entropy profile changes fundamentally. This is the EMBER point – the quality of end energy availability is two-to-threefold. The equivalent to moving from horses to engines for mechanical work The financing difference is underappreciated: the unit price of energy generation will collapse and quantities consumed will balloon. Think about the marginal calorie in a hunting society vs farming society. Hunting is opex/ income statement. Farming is capex/ balance sheet. So is electrotech. As the world replaces hydrocarbons with electrotech, the entire structure of both the physics and the financing of energy changes. China understood this and responded with industrial policy: build the manufacturing, drop the cost, build more – rinse and repeat. Tariffs are the subscription world defending itself against the capex world. China's grid will continue to grow even as it decelerates on a percentage basis, because that is what the cost structure of constructing it requires. The real bizarre numbers are still coming. China may still drift towards ZIRP. End energy availability will rise; marginal energy cost will collapse. We are going from hunting on horseback to farming with machines simultaneously in a single transition We grew agriculture to feed ourselves and our animals. The machines that cheap abundant energy will feed do not exist yet because the energy that would make them possible doesn't exist yet either.

QME
0
0
0
25
ebipere
ebipere@ebipere·
ebipere@ebipere

Chinese Energy Infrastructure Growth - the crazy numbers are yet to come. This energy transition is different on two levels that compound each other: what energy physically is, and how it gets financed. The physical difference is categorical. It is an exergy transition - like going from biological food to chemical fuels energy systems. There will be order of magnitude changes in energy efficiency” as we are changing the engine this time and not just the fuel. Coal→ Oil→ Gas is combustion optimisation better fuels. Solar and wind no wasteful conversion, the entropy profile changes fundamentally. This is the EMBER point – the quality of end energy availability is two-to-threefold. The equivalent to moving from horses to engines for mechanical work The financing difference is underappreciated: the unit price of energy generation will collapse and quantities consumed will balloon. Think about the marginal calorie in a hunting society vs farming society. Hunting is opex/ income statement. Farming is capex/ balance sheet. So is electrotech. As the world replaces hydrocarbons with electrotech, the entire structure of both the physics and the financing of energy changes. China understood this and responded with industrial policy: build the manufacturing, drop the cost, build more – rinse and repeat. Tariffs are the subscription world defending itself against the capex world. China's grid will continue to grow even as it decelerates on a percentage basis, because that is what the cost structure of constructing it requires. The real bizarre numbers are still coming. China may still drift towards ZIRP. End energy availability will rise; marginal energy cost will collapse. We are going from hunting on horseback to farming with machines simultaneously in a single transition We grew agriculture to feed ourselves and our animals. The machines that cheap abundant energy will feed do not exist yet because the energy that would make them possible doesn't exist yet either.

QME
0
0
0
7
Jared Sleeper
Jared Sleeper@JaredSleeper·
If true (and things in the press should be taken with grains of salt), this one customer was reported as $6b of ARR for OAI/Anthropic ($500m*12) the month this happened. For reference, that is larger than (checks notes) yup, Snowflake's run-rate revenue as of Q1. 😳
Jared Sleeper tweet media
English
21
15
323
81K
ebipere
ebipere@ebipere·
A 60-day MoU on the Strait of Hormuz is non-binding by definition. The one being reported is also unsigned. Through that strait moves roughly 20% of global oil. The governance instrument currently managing that risk is a document that does not legally exist yet. Oil importers — carrying that exposure with no hedging buffer — are not waiting on a negotiation. They are waiting on a basic act of institutional commitment that two governments have not yet performed. An MoU is intent. A signed agreement is a commitment. What we have today is neither. This is BigMan Performative Politics
Axios@axios

Scoop: U.S. and Iran reach deal but need Trump's final approval, officials say axios.com/2026/05/28/ira…

English
0
0
0
25
ebipere
ebipere@ebipere·
Chinese Energy Infrastructure Growth - the crazy numbers are yet to come. This energy transition is different on two levels that compound each other: what energy physically is, and how it gets financed. The physical difference is categorical. It is an exergy transition - like going from biological food to chemical fuels energy systems. There will be order of magnitude changes in energy efficiency” as we are changing the engine this time and not just the fuel. Coal→ Oil→ Gas is combustion optimisation better fuels. Solar and wind no wasteful conversion, the entropy profile changes fundamentally. This is the EMBER point – the quality of end energy availability is two-to-threefold. The equivalent to moving from horses to engines for mechanical work The financing difference is underappreciated: the unit price of energy generation will collapse and quantities consumed will balloon. Think about the marginal calorie in a hunting society vs farming society. Hunting is opex/ income statement. Farming is capex/ balance sheet. So is electrotech. As the world replaces hydrocarbons with electrotech, the entire structure of both the physics and the financing of energy changes. China understood this and responded with industrial policy: build the manufacturing, drop the cost, build more – rinse and repeat. Tariffs are the subscription world defending itself against the capex world. China's grid will continue to grow even as it decelerates on a percentage basis, because that is what the cost structure of constructing it requires. The real bizarre numbers are still coming. China may still drift towards ZIRP. End energy availability will rise; marginal energy cost will collapse. We are going from hunting on horseback to farming with machines simultaneously in a single transition We grew agriculture to feed ourselves and our animals. The machines that cheap abundant energy will feed do not exist yet because the energy that would make them possible doesn't exist yet either.
English
0
0
0
58
ebipere
ebipere@ebipere·
Absolutely, but it is more. There is an engineering The key that gets me is that the PRC keeps the hydrocarbon-to-transportation_fuel path sacrosanct and "plays around" with: - their hydrocarbon supply chains (Russia and optional deliveries with non gulf crude and gas, domestic coal stockpiles) and - their hydrocarbon value chains ( Carbon2Chemicals, Carbon2Industry, Carbon2Feedstocks) It's a form of "hydrocarbon matrix management" inputs.[PRC_Matrix] = outputs; the PRC_Matrix is their supply chain and domestic production overlayed with their value chains that gives their outputs They do demand management and export controls first, Then the matrix management, Then and only then the Stockpiles,
English
1
0
1
38
GReg HaRdee 🪙
GReg HaRdee 🪙@blanx500·
@ebipere @OxfordEnergy Fascinating piece. Nutshell: PRC has created coal->gas production with high reserve capacity, but at a cost. Willingness to accept the cost gives flexibility. RU oil floating on water in this case was to PRC benefit; PRC traders played well with oil + LNG!
English
1
0
0
39
ebipere
ebipere@ebipere·
China's crude stockpiles didn't move during the Hormuz crisis. Not weakness. Architecture. Gas → Coal → Yield shifts → Export controls → Price caps Reserves last. Always. The Oxford Institute (@oxfordenergy) just confirmed a framework I published in March without knowing it existed. Stockpiles & Reserves, Supply-Chain Diversity, Value-Chain Optionality, Demand Management Full piece: open.substack.com/pub/ebipere/p/… @Mauerback @blanx500 @Phillyvol85 @sweet_est_pea @FrenchTwist4 @noah_gordon_ @70sBachchan
ebipere tweet media
English
2
4
14
1.2K
ebipere
ebipere@ebipere·
@americanmcgee This keys into my thoughts. The West is less worried about retribution than irrelevance. After being the centre of attention, indifference stings more than insult.
English
0
0
0
699
🔪 American McGee 🖤
🔪 American McGee 🖤@americanmcgee·
Having lived in China 20+ years and watched them gain competence and then utter domination over so many aspects of tech, design, entertainment, finance, etc - and then look at how poorly they manage external perceptions (call it PR or propaganda or whatever)... And you realize they aren't even trying to convince the world outside of how great things are here. Meanwhile the US dedicates 1.3 BILLION USD to convincing people how terrible China is? All I know is it's going to be a very rude awakening for a lot of people when the curtains finally open.
English
208
392
3.5K
237.8K
ebipere
ebipere@ebipere·
what is the word for a common word that you ALWAYS misspell the first time you write it? do we have to invent one - suggestions below!
English
0
0
0
13
ChinaPower
ChinaPower@ChinaPowerCSIS·
China’s per capita income has been rising faster than its food costs, as shown by the growing share of Chinese people that can afford a healthy diet despite increases in food costs. Learn more about China’s food security strengths here: buff.ly/ehE117j
ChinaPower tweet media
English
2
5
17
1.3K
ebipere
ebipere@ebipere·
@policytensor I think that there is a belief that these things can be manifested into reality. You only hear this talk from politicians.
English
0
0
7
210
Luke Gromen
Luke Gromen@LukeGromen·
Interesting context. 🤔
Luke Gromen tweet media
English
26
63
526
30.7K
ebipere
ebipere@ebipere·
@cljack Heartbreaking, why? You are the bridge.
English
0
0
0
15
Charlotte Lee
Charlotte Lee@cljack·
My dad, a retired Bell Labs physicist, has been quietly resigned for many years to the fact that neither of his kids are smart enough to understand and appreciate math & physics the way he does. But now it's becoming clear my 11yo is terrifyingly smart, she engages with him on mathematical puzzles in a way I've simply never been capable of, and hope is returning to his eyes. It's both wonderful and heartbreaking for me to witness
English
414
1.3K
39.8K
1M
ebipere
ebipere@ebipere·
The Stockpiles Are Not Moving Markets read China's stillness as weakness. It was architecture. This piece reads the Oxford Institute's new analysis of China's Hormuz response through three lenses - and finds a four-pillar supply security system that was never going to touch its reserves first. open.substack.com/pub/ebipere/p/…
ebipere tweet media
English
0
0
0
42
Michael A. Arouet
Michael A. Arouet@MichaelAArouet·
Can someone please explain why Britain and Germany are sacrificing their economies, jobs and prosperity to „save the planet“? Their combined CO2 emissions amount to 2,3% of global emissions. Shouldn’t they rethink their priorities, and focus on growth again?
Michael A. Arouet tweet media
English
104
323
769
28K