Naka-pin na Tweet
“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.”
-George Orwell
English
🌐 t̷̵̸e̸̶̵m̵̴̸p̷̸̸s
13.2K posts
🌐 t̷̵̸e̸̶̵m̵̴̸p̷̸̸s
@tempstat
Bitcoin is the first and largest Public Global Payments Infrastructure with no bank dependency, central issuer, or counter party risk. Available to anyone.
Sumali Mayıs 2011
50 Sinusundan360 Mga Tagasunod
@Bitcoinapolis55 @btctrek Kind of accurate but Jim Cramer of Bitcoin is still also Jim Cramer.
English
@btctrek Wow. Bailey is the Jim Cramer of Bitcoin. 0fer
English
@tempstat I used to buy my Bitcoin from them. Until I found bitcoinwell.com
English
Someone sent a friend $5 of Bitcoin over Lightning. Strike froze it and demanded the sender's full legal name.
But the person receiving it had no way to answer. Nobody knows a stranger's surname from a Lightning payment. That's the whole point of the technology. Strike's CEO, Jack Mallers, apologized and named the culprit directly: the new MiCA regulations.
That's the same rulebook doing its work from the other side. MiCA is why 70% of Binance's exiting EU users just fled into self-custody. It is also why a $5 tip on Strike now triggers a demand for a stranger's legal name. One regulation, two doors. Wherever the state can reach a custodian, it makes that custodian watch you.
Here's the lesson hiding in both. A custodian is a chokepoint by design. However good its intentions, it holds a door the state can always knock on. Your own wallet has no door. A self-custodial Lightning payment never asks for anyone's name, because there is no middleman left to compel.
They can write every rule in Brussels and still never reach the wallet you hold yourself. Not your keys, not your coins. Not their business, either.
English
@AsyncN8 Man the threats are palatable..
>Or enjoy your KYC whitelisted UTXOs and CBDC stablecoins.
So much angst and urgency.
I still run Bitcoin Core v 0.11 client before any Epstein funding.
Fight me.
English
Anti #BIP110 folks. You’re rooting for 5 KYC government regulated companies. You realize where that is headed if you don’t fight with us?? Swallow your pride and help us reassert the power to the node runners. Or enjoy your KYC whitelisted UTXOs and CBDC stablecoins.
English
@MrFraische @MajorianBTC Right, but it's accretive to their Bitcoin holding. You sell the fork and buy BTC - that's why.
English
@tempstat @MajorianBTC Well he’d have the exact same amount of ₿ , and also the same number of tokens in some shitcoin called 110… I think that second part means nothing to him.
English
Saylor says bitcoin has no spam problem.
The irony is that bitcoin has lost 50% of its market value since Core 30 went live, which is sinking Saylor's financial empire.
English
English
@TomerStrolight >technobabble
Sounds like what someone non technical would say after hearing something they didn't understand.
If you don't understand the underlying technology from not only how but why code choices were made, your opinion on it is irrelevant.
English
After listening to this it is clear that there is widespread and rational concern over Core’s judgment, integrity and independence - not just from those running BIP110, but from longstanding bitcoiners who disagree with the BIP110ers about many other things. Moreover, it was pretty clear that Core’s defenders are in an anxious, emotional and irrational state of mind, grasping at straws and misdirections to avoid addressing those concerns.
Core’s bad choices and the bubble of immature yet self proclaimed experts they’ve surrounded themselves with who basically hurl insults and technobabble while avoiding the substance of the concerns has isolated and shattered confidence and trust in that group.
This is worth the listen (especially the last couple of hours) to come to your own conclusions.
Loren HODL™️ 🔆@LorenHodl
English
English
English
@BTC_for_Freedom @NHpilled I'm hoping we really have a chain split so I could dump BTCore as much as possible
Leave those inscriptions garbage to themselves .
English
One of the biggest rug pullers in Bitcoin history is trying to tell you to not run BIP-110 to get Bitcoin more decentralized.
David Bailey🇵🇷 $2.0mm/btc is the floor@DavidFBailey
BIP110 fanatics are angry I’m spending time mogging their malicious fork. We’re one of the largest corporate holders of bitcoin in the world and we own the largest bitcoin media company in the world. We’re a meaningful economic node and we’re going to defend our asset. We don’t consent to you changing Bitcoin. After 14 years in Bitcoin this is not the first or second or third time we’ve had to squash malicious take over attempts… This is the true origin of toxic maximalism. The mogging will continue until you fork off and find out.
English
Vincent (Cryptolution) 👑@Cryptolution
December 9, 2010. A user asks Satoshi Nakamoto why Bitcoin shouldn't just allow 64 or 128 bytes of "arbitrary data" in a transaction. His answer, verbatim: "I also support a third transaction type for timestamp hash sized arbitrary data. There's no point not having one since you can already do it anyway. It would tell nodes they don't need to bother to index it." Read the design spec inside that answer. Small. Standardized. Not indexed by nodes. Bitcoin Core shipped that exact spec in March 2014. It's called OP_RETURN. #Runes lives entirely inside OP_RETURN. One runestone per transaction, prunable, zero UTXO bloat, full market fees. #Ordinals pays the same toll through witness space. The only gatekeeper Satoshi ever wrote into the system was the fee. Both pay it. Now read BIP110. It proposes to reject the exact transaction class Satoshi said he supports, from the channel built to his own spec. That is not enforcing Satoshi's design. That is reversing it. And we already ran this experiment. In this same December 2010 thread, miners holding double digit hashrate publicly refused to filter non-standard transactions. Satoshi's response was not a crackdown. It was the quote above. Fees settled this in 2010. Fees are settling it again in 2026. Source: satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcoint…
QME
🌐 t̷̵̸e̸̶̵m̵̴̸p̷̸̸s nag-retweet
December 9, 2010. A user asks Satoshi Nakamoto why Bitcoin shouldn't just allow 64 or 128 bytes of "arbitrary data" in a transaction.
His answer, verbatim:
"I also support a third transaction type for timestamp hash sized arbitrary data. There's no point not having one since you can already do it anyway. It would tell nodes they don't need to bother to index it."
Read the design spec inside that answer. Small. Standardized. Not indexed by nodes.
Bitcoin Core shipped that exact spec in March 2014. It's called OP_RETURN.
#Runes lives entirely inside OP_RETURN. One runestone per transaction, prunable, zero UTXO bloat, full market fees. #Ordinals pays the same toll through witness space. The only gatekeeper Satoshi ever wrote into the system was the fee. Both pay it.
Now read BIP110. It proposes to reject the exact transaction class Satoshi said he supports, from the channel built to his own spec.
That is not enforcing Satoshi's design. That is reversing it.
And we already ran this experiment. In this same December 2010 thread, miners holding double digit hashrate publicly refused to filter non-standard transactions. Satoshi's response was not a crackdown. It was the quote above.
Fees settled this in 2010. Fees are settling it again in 2026.
Source: satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcoint…
English
@Leafarion Mas não é. Tem o vídeo desse objeto e já postei aqui.
Português
Engraçado ver o governo dos EUA liberar vídeos de OVNIs amorfos (aqueles sem uma forma definida). A comunidade ufológica já sabe da existência deles a muito tempo.
Português
@dotkrueger The fact that you are thinking in dollars shows you still don't get it.
The same goes for everyone else here.
Bitcoin doesn't have a price, it has an exchange rate.
All I read from your post is "I said 1 BTC, we got 1 BTC"
English
I said 70K, we got 64K.
You got to take what you get.
English
@RepNancyMace If they have an issue with it they can go back to italy. His city hus rules. Get used to it.
English
Zohran Mamdani pissed off the wrong group of people.
The Italian American Civil Rights League@TheIACRL
We were here before Zohran. We will be here long after Zohran. Little Italy will NOT be erased.
English
@_BitcoinCapital @adam3us lmao casious
Casascius. Mike Caldwell is probably anti-BIP110 anyway. @Casascius - hasn't replied since 2019 so..
English
if some 110 proponents would put their money where their mouth is, we could make them pay for the boat party when cypherpunk summer starts🌞
(by shorting their fork, and buying more BTC!)
(there's effectively no bid, the open interest with BCH & SegWit2x was > 100,000x more)
English
@spartywrx @BTCBreadMan I hope you bought more since then.
-Class of 2011
English
@BTCBreadMan Class of 2016 checking in
Bought $250 worth and then forgot about it until 2025.
English
@CoSatoshi821 I mean, you're welcome to call it whatever you want.
I call Canadian dollars Snow Pesos.
English
@HodlTarantula Gold doesn't have or need a management team.
Humans are the fallacy. That's what makes the Bitcoin protocol priceless. Anyone who tries to control Bitcoin fails miserably.
English
Gary's mad his number's not going up.
Anons and memes are mean and childish. Bad marketing. Etc 🤣
Fuck that pussy. 💀
Terence Michael@ProofOfMoney
Bitcoin is a distributed system. This is often frustrating for traditional investors, especially successful ones, who are still learning. The fiat world relies on good people doing good things (who sometimes don't). Bitcoin is not a company. It's is not an industry. And there is no management. It is a money system with a set of rules. And that's a GOOD THING.
English