Pedro Ramírez

8.4K posts

Pedro Ramírez

Pedro Ramírez

@PedroRamirezOrg

Tham gia Ocak 2020
485 Đang theo dõi173 Người theo dõi
Pedro Ramírez đã retweet
Tristan Harris
Tristan Harris@tristanharris·
The verdict is in. Meta, YouTube both found negligent in social media addiction trial. Everything we predicted in 2013-2017. cnbc.com/2026/03/25/met…
English
16
52
194
13.5K
Amjad Taha أمجد طه
The UAE stands as a strong partner of the United States. No ceasefire with the Islamic regime in Iran. Not now. You don’t negotiate with terror. You end it. The UAE stands firm. Zero space for terrorists. Germany, Britain, Spain's governments say they want a diplomatic solution with this terrorist regime. Fine. Let it be your neighbour. Take its leadership, as you did with the Muslim Brotherhood. Give them citizenship. They are all yours. If you want the rubbish, take it but don’t ask us to accept it or live with it. It stinks. You can have it. Live with it alone. This Saturday will not pass quietly. It will be marked. It will be remembered.
English
3.3K
5.8K
28.3K
1.6M
Pedro Ramírez đã retweet
Melissa Chen
Melissa Chen@MsMelChen·
This is one of the most important threads that explains what has been eating at you over the last few years. Ever since the great Precambrian Woke Explosion of 2020, it no longer mattered what the specific issue was whether it was climate change, BLM, trans rights, ANTIFA, Free Palestine, or feminism. All left-wing activist causes suddenly felt deeply interconnected and totalizing in very weird and strange ways. If you are a sane person, you'd have asked: > how come feminists didn't care about the Iranian women subjugated and slaughtered by the Mullahs for wanting more freedom? > how come UN Women cared more about making sure trans women (men) have access to female prisons than Hamas terrorists raping Israeli women? > how come Greta "How Dare You" Thunberg smoothly pivoted to campaigning against Israeli "apartheid" while never once mentioning China destroying marine ecosystems with overfishing? > what the fuck EVEN is Queers for Palestine? > why the hell was Microsoft doing land acknowledgments before Zoom town halls? Everything from American corporate life to Hollywood movies to universities became vehicles for the omnicause: a single, all-encompassing moral framework where climate, race, gender, borders, and foreign conflicts are fused. The surface “issue” often became secondary to maintaining ideological purity across the entire bundle. What was driving this? I KNEW where it was coming from. Now, @DataRepublican and @AsraNomani have the receipts. David Horowitz used to say that "the issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution." The revolution here is the overthrow of the ideological architecture of the West and the remaking of the world order. China's leadership explicitly wants to undermine American confidence of itself and of the US-led World Order because Beijing is a revisionist power that sees the system as designed to keep it subordinate. And so it amplifies narratives that portray the US-led order as the "root of evil" - imperialist, morally bankrupt, white supremacist, exploitative, and in inevitable decline. The aim is cognitive warfare to erode domestic support for protecting this order which serves to facilitate China's seamless rise. Neville Roy Singham has funneled at least $278 million through dark-money intermediaries, donor-advised funds, shell companies, and US nonprofits into a vast network of far-left activist groups, media outlets, and political education organizations to push this. @DataRepublican directly quotes Singham at a 2024 CCP forum in Shanghai: "If we want to have a new world order based on multilateralism that President Xi and CPC and China have proposed, we have to undo the ideological damage that has been done by the narrative of World War II." Read that again. Understand that Singham sees this WWII narrative as the last major cultural obstacle standing between the current order and the “multipolar” (China-led) future his network is working toward. And now... notice all those around us who are parroting the same line. It used to be just the crazy lefties and the NGOs like the UN. Or the globalists like the WEF. Now you're seeing it on the right. Beijing wins when a majority in the West treats US hegemony and the post-1945 system as invalid, so that it can replace it with one where it sets the rules and norms.
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican

🧵 THREAD: "House of Singham" : Neville Singham's mega-exposure. This is part 1 out of 5 in a mega-project exposing Neville Singham and his money flows. Honored to have been friends with @AsraNomani throughout this. I'm going to explain this article below - but you should also click through it, because it shows the amazing depth and scope of research which Asra has done. 👇 As always, patience as I pull together the thread.

English
116
1.4K
4.5K
194.8K
Pedro Ramírez đã retweet
shirish
shirish@shiri_shh·
This could be the biggest IPO ever… and make Elon the first TRILLIONAIRE in history. SpaceX is quietly gearing up for a $1.5–$1.75 trillion valuation...yeah… trillion. that’s bigger than anything the market has ever seen...we’re talking about a potential $30–50 billion raise in one shot. the kind of money that doesn’t just fund a company… it reshapes an entire industry and for once… regular people might actually get a shot at owning a piece of it. speculated to drop around June 28… Elon’s birthday and the rumored ticker is $SEX 😭
Kalshi@Kalshi

JUST IN: SpaceX reportedly aims to file for IPO as soon as this week

English
144
166
2.8K
433.5K
Pedro Ramírez đã retweet
NIK
NIK@ns123abc·
🚨 BREAKING: SpaceX filing IPO this week, aiming to raise $75 billion+ >biggest US IPO of all time >surpasses all money raised by US IPOs last year combined >filing may show xai losing money >investors don’t care >it’s elon Individual investors getting 20%+ of shares (vs typical 10%). No standard 6-month lockup. Elon wants retail investors in. we are so back
NIK tweet mediaNIK tweet mediaNIK tweet media
English
143
515
5.1K
368.3K
Pedro Ramírez đã retweet
Bloomberg
Bloomberg@business·
SpaceX aims to file a prospectus for an initial public offering as soon as this week, the Information reported, kicking off one of the year’s most-anticipated market debuts. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
English
20
67
324
54.9K
Pedro Ramírez đã retweet
Luc
Luc@investingluc·
My exposure is concentrated into a few themes at the moment. 1) Space + Rockets > focus name = $RKLB catalyst is spacex ipo 2) Uranium > focus name = $UUUU catalyst is iran/usa nuclear conflict, DoE's $2.7B funding for uranium enrichment, + powering datacenters 3) Stablecoins > focus name = $CRCL catalyst is global stablecoin adoption + deepening integrations with major banks, payment networks, tokenization platforms 4) Memory > focus name = $MU catalyst is dram/hbm being a legit ai bottleneck 5) Drones (military) > focus name = $ONDS catalyst is gov't focus on drone technology + ongoing macro conflict My thematic focus update as of March '25. 💙Luc
Luc tweet media
English
21
31
278
25.2K
Pedro Ramírez
Pedro Ramírez@PedroRamirezOrg·
@lesliona @luislarrainlyd Buena @lesliona, qué tal. Te respondo porque también soy periodista y este tipo de post desprestigian al periodismo. Menos del 1% de la población chilena "hace" Uber. Y sí, "solo los con plata usan auto". Es un hecho.
Español
5
0
0
507
Leslie Ayala
Leslie Ayala@lesliona·
@luislarrainlyd Luis… ¿y tú crees q la gente sencilla y cesante no hace uber? O solo los con plata usan auto. No creo q sea ese el análisis.
Español
14
3
130
9.2K
Peter Savodnik
Peter Savodnik@petersavodnik·
You can't find this kind or caliber of conversation anywhere else in American media.
Conversations with Coleman@ConvoswColeman

Coleman Hughes (@Coldxman) presses Glenn Greenwald (@GGreenwald) on his relationship with Tucker Carlson. @Coldxman: “I’ve heard [Tucker] promulgate lies to an extent that is really shocking to me…2020 election…Pizzagate…Aliens…Do you, as a journalist, feel that you have a responsibility to hold him accountable?” @GGreenwald: “I’m not saying everything Tucker has said has been in agreement with me. I’m not saying it hasn’t deviated from the facts. I’m not saying that he doesn’t occasionally wander into conspiracy theory. I think that’s true of a lot of people… But my journalism has focused on the people who can start wars—like the U.S. security state—and the people who can spy on us—like the NSA—and the people who go around the world killing people—like the CIA and the president—who can start wars…That’s my focus…There’s no shortage of people attacking Tucker Carlson every single day. But there is a shortage of people attacking all the other institutions. The much more damaging and powerful ones.”

English
15
11
279
29.9K
Pedro Ramírez đã retweet
zerohedge
zerohedge@zerohedge·
Total US debt: $38.9999 trillion
English
193
248
1.9K
202.8K
Jesse Cohen
Jesse Cohen@JesseCohenInv·
Trading in 2026:
Jesse Cohen tweet media
English
94
485
3.7K
125.4K
Hillel Neuer
Hillel Neuer@HillelNeuer·
BREAKING: Chile’s new government has withdrawn its backing of Michelle Bachelet’s bid for UN Secretary-General. She has a long record of coddling Communist dictators. As UN rights chief, she was widely condemned for kowtowing to Beijing and turning a blind eye to their abuses.
Hillel Neuer tweet mediaHillel Neuer tweet media
English
39
400
1.4K
29.4K