Scizz

@JamesMelville China also builds more solar and wind than the rest of the world combined. I wonder why James won’t mention that 🙄

China emits more CO2 than the entire developed world combined. But meanwhile in the UK, the Climate Change Committee want to cut livestock numbers by 27% because of cow burps.

@FASTMOVER1 And then what? He’ll tweet “PUTIN STOP”?

@JohnStossel Capitalism has failed every time it has been tried so I don’t think that’s a very useful argument.

Bizarrely, 62% of young Americans hold a “favorable view” of socialism. How can they be so ignorant? Socialism has been tried by lots of countries. It’s failed. It always fails. johnstossel.com/socialist-utop…

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS You can get Grok to agree with almost anything. You need to look beyond the sycophancy at the actual maths beneath it. Nothing about my arguments was refuted.

@Scizz8 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS Scizz, you asked for Grok’s input, I answered, and Grok acknowledged the validity of the argument. You can’t dismiss it now because your source now turns on you! The work highlights a core issue in physics: kB​ is emergent, not fundamental. That’s the insight you’re running from

@Scizz8 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @joPO19942906 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS We have explained to you whats right and wrong in this paper- why do you keep confirming you dont understand the science.

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS It is, in fact, much more circular. No one besides you is trying to define any constants via Planck units.

@Scizz8 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS Scizz, Tp​ is no more circular than mp​. mp2=ℏc/G and Tp=mpc2/kB​ expresses temperature using a scaling factor. The issue is, you treat kB​ as fundamental when it’s emergent. Don’t confuse your scaling factors for first principles.

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS 3/Thermodynamics remains emipirically valid. In fact, just today I used the Stefan Boltzmann law to measure the temperature of my samples during sintering, with the help of a radiation thermometer.

@Scizz8 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS Just scroll down to the bottom and work back up. I had a similar problem with Grok. It is still readable on the bottom section where your argument is pretty well destroyed.

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS I have no issue with Planck's work. My issue with your "work" is the loop of circular logic which defines kB via itself. That is not what Planck did.

@Scizz8 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS LOL. It was you asking the questions. I responded and Grok acknowledged I was entitled to to claim what I have. If not you may as well dismiss all of Plancks work. You have no argument mate.

@joPO19942906 @dafalgoutDennis @FreeSpeech4Me_U @notEvileconboy @jimdtweet @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA CO2 radiates at all altitudes. Collisions maintain LTE. The result is a constant population of CO2 molecules in the excited states as a function of temperature and hence radiation.

@dafalgoutDennis @FreeSpeech4Me_U @notEvileconboy @jimdtweet @Scizz8 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA CO2 will give up its vibrational energy during a collision. Butr as translational energy. Photons are emitted near the top of the troposphere where it has more chance to emit. If collisions bring on vib/excitement then heat has been removed from the atmosphere. Not added.

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS 2/This was understood already well over a century ago. This is how we got to statistical mechanics and later quantum thermodynamics. You have unfortunately not stumbled on any new revolutionary insight. Nor have you disproven anything regarding standard textbook thermodynamics.

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS 1/Nope. You clearly don't understand what my argument even is. I further suspect that you have zero formal scientific education. To you it might seem revolutionary and profound that macroscopic thermodynamics arises from underlying quantum-level processes. But it is not.

@joPO19942906 @jimdtweet @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS More numerology crank crap. I’m sure if you try hard enough you can derive Earth’s temperature from your horoscope times your mother’s birthday.

@Scizz8 @jimdtweet @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS Here we go.

@joPO19942906 @jimdtweet @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS As I said, there is no physical meaning behind deriving the number of entities in one mole from the ratio of two lengths. It is just numerology and sophistry.

@Scizz8 @jimdtweet @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS Just a fantastic coincidence isnt it Scizz. Plancks Length and Avogadros number. LOL. Let me guess. your argument will be Circulatory logic. Come on do better than that. Use of e is perfectly fine. Read the paper or view his channel

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS It is essentially impossible to parse what is going on with that prompt I suggest you try again from scratch. And ask open ended questions instead of leading questions if you want to get an actually balanced and factual answer.

@Scizz8 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS Yeah that was odd. Not me. Had some issues with Grok. Going off. There is multiple duplications. Not me. Grok. Nice attempt at smear Scizz

@joPO19942906 @jimdtweet @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS More crank numerology it seems. There is no physical reason whatsoever why the number of atoms/molecules in a mole should be related to the ratio of two lengths nor why Euler’s number has anything to do with it.

@jimdtweet @Scizz8 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS Well that is because Hydrogen was used to calculate the number of "granules" of planck length in the Hydrogen. Bohrs radius and Eulers number. Fascinating stuff that opens turns everything upside down. researchgate.net/publication/33…

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS What on Earth is going on here? Can’t you write a query like a normal person?

@Scizz8 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS Grok kept repeating itself regarding the circultry argument as you are. But in the end my argument is as valid as how Planck units are derived x.com/i/grok/share/A…

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS There is no confusion. All you have done is take the definition of Tp: Tp = mp*c²*kB⁻¹ And rearranged the equation as: kB = mp*c²*Tp⁻¹ That’s all there is to it. And for some reason you pretend that this is new and insightful.

@Scizz8 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS I see now where the confusion lay. Yes my use of term such as first principles is not correct in the context science uses it. This does not take away from my message. Here is the major parts of Groks response from your link after I explained where I am with this. Please review

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS Post the link to the full conversation

@Scizz8 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS Grok Acknowledges my point and confirms that if Tp is circulatory with kB then all Planck derivatives are circulatory. The broader implications here are that you are not listening sorry understanding what it is I am asserting.

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS I corrected the issue with the missing square. But you’re still missing the point. To derive kB from first principles, all the constants must be independent of kB. Tp is not. So your logic is circular. When you actually substitute the Planck units you end up with kB=kB.

@Scizz8 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS This one I snipped. Too long in parts to send seperately.

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS When you take your expression for kB and substitute the definitions of the actual Planck units you just end up with kB = kB which is trivially true.

@joPO19942906 @ChrisBBacon3 @patfrank830 @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @Frnc_prep @MLeiter42 @craigthomler @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @notEvileconboy @dafalgoutDennis @sjsimmons @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @JJ9621073059835 @evenminded512 @BubbasRanch @ladyspat1 @WHPAAD @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @BudBromley @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @LexWaters7 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @WayneAllanH @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA @NASAGISS To derive kB from first principles, you need to derive it from constants which are independent of kB. Tp is not independent of kB. To calculate Tp you need to know kB already. Therefore, your supposed derivation is completely circular. x.com/i/grok/share/T…