Pellitz

@marclanders No way that’s true (as a cannabis user)

44-year study showed Cannabis users showed LESS brain aging/decline! Main finding: Men who had ever used cannabis actually showed less drop in their cognitive (thinking) abilities over the decades compared to men who never used it. Among the cannabis users, things like starting at a young age or using it frequently did not lead to worse long-term cognitive decline. Overall conclusion: In this large group of men tracked for over 40 years, cannabis use did not cause harmful long-term effects on age-related brain aging or cognitive decline. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39508467/

need btc to hit one million dollars so i can afford to live the lifestyle of a middle-class 1980’s carpenter

@FredWick7 Wow muting “epstein” really the solution. Get a stronger stomach maybe?

I spent some time catching up on the Epstein emails that were released today. I feel sick, like in a dark place. Are we really run by devil worshipping psychopathic rapists? No more. I’m muting “Epstein”. My only hope is that there is justice someday and the good win this war. For the sake of humanity. ☮️

@krugermacro Bro it’s chatGPT

Good take. Rieder and Hassett were the more bullish candidates for risk assets though. At least short term.

@0x_carson @Sychype @paxoslabs @HypurrFi @HyperbeatFND ok sorry I missed it😑

So as a member of @paxoslabs I urge you guys to check out the pinned tweet on our page. As promised, we are bringing a stablecoin to Hyperliquid and we have a lot planned for $USDG0 including working with @HypurrFi and @HyperbeatFND It's unfortunate to see the community seems to think we just forgot about Hyperliquid and walked away after the $USDH vote because this couldn't be further from the truth. Of course we are not developing the same product as $USDH, as we were not the one's selected to build $USDH by the community. But we are still fulfilling our promise of building a stablecoin ecosystem powered by Paxos on Hyperliquid

I love Hyperliquid and am a hype maxi but these votes absolutely suck, this is not how decentralization should be. I understand that this vote is a formality and burning $HYPE can be seen as a good or bad thing However these Proposals & votes on Hyperliquid side is insanely bearish for Hyperliquid as a whole 2 votes back to back where there are no other even slight contention for anything aside from the consensus The USDH Vote had PAXOS who had the official Paypal account tweeting Hyperliquid in support for Paxos who are also US regulated. No shade or disrespect onto Native markets but the proposal was pretty much decided before the vote even started. "Alignment" is proving to not be a discussion, which could mean for people to lose faith in the entire system as a whole. This vote is a formality as the funds are already somewhat "burnt" and probably were always going to be, but the lack of discussion around the validators or even the amount of thought that is going into these "YES" votes are lackluster to say the least They should at the minimum give some reasoning or logic to why they are voting yes, or even better leave it up to their community to decide weather they should vote yes, no or a different suggestion. I think i said this in the last vote but i don't see why the vote should be given to the validators to command instead of the actual holders / stakers If 50%+ of the validators automatically side to one vote then its pretty much set without the public actually having any opinion on how the proposal goes there SHOULD be more discussion around all of these proposals, more thoughts shared on why each validator is voting yes, automatic yes men for hyperliquid is very bearish, the team can be wrong. there are other options that should be explored, and should be put on the table by validators IF they are the ones who get to decide the votes Examples of other use cases for AF funds: - Holding in case of an emergency - Future incentives for users - Many other options idk lol My point being there should be discussions, not instant YES's minutes / hours after the proposal is up. Burning isn't the worst thing or a bad thing it especially since its more as "confirmation" of a burn then anything else, but these votes are not it These votes are quite centralized, they can be heavily improved on, this is not the future of decentralization, this is basically no better then any other platforms that come before us framed in a way of giving people a choice by moving funds, lets be real no one is moving their funds if 50-60%+ of validators have voted for one outcome Would love to see the next vote be in the hands of stakers / holders instead of validators, or make validators give their communities the opportunity have a say. Let some discussions happen, Since validators have the power ensure that their communities are aligned with their stance in some way or form, run inhouse polls within their communities skewed to the validators opinions. as it stands the votes are pointless

@Sychype I remember this behaviour of “we like hyperliquid so much we would do it anyway” coming from all concurrent parties. Kraken listing was another carrot by paxos that remained hanging since they lost. Ethena kept the word tho.

@pellitz00 Did they say they would deploy on hl regardless of how the vote went?

the hyperliquid team will solve zk compatibility and scaling issues on some random tuesday in a discord update

Hacker seems to also be using binance as their exchange. If anyone has a contact at BINANCE or TETHER pls I can’t stress this enough lmk ASAP might still have a chance to retrieve the funds. @cz_binance @cz_binance @Tintinx2021 @zachxbt @paoloardoino

Founder discrediting other founders is always a retarded (and bearish) behaviour

@bottomblastcap @smartestmoney @nativemarkets You’re swapping stablecoins fucking retard. “What’s the upside?” The upside is USDH contribute to the AF and we don’t have to deal with that shitchain that is arbitrum.

@smartestmoney @nativemarkets what's the upside? v vague

Direct onramping via @nativemarkets is now available on both Hypercore and HyperEVM It took me less than 2 minutes to complete the swap from USDC to USDH as a large minter. Remember that USDH pairs have 50% contributing to the AF and lower fees as an aligned stablecoin. Hyperliquid.

@DeeZe Yea bro, who could bear 2 fucking clicks for millions of $ airdropped😂😂😂

Really hate this trend on hyperliquid of signing foundations terms of use

@andyyy Man just STFU

An open letter to Jeff & the Hyperliquid team about the upcoming unlocks: I want to start by saying the community knows you and the team are going to do what’s best for the business, no matter what. This has been one of the best assets to own in the entire world for the last year. Even though the company has less than 20 people, you still profited hundreds of millions from fees. You’re locked in. You want to play long-term games. I think we can all see that & firmly respect it. It’s why we love Hyperliquid. It’s why we’ve participated for the months & years leading to the launch, held HYPE for nearly a year, and believe you guys will dominate the next few years. You’ve honestly blown my mind the impact you’ve made on the space & helped me crush this cycle. Most everything else sucked for us unless you nailed the mention casino. We all know that game is on life support rn already and people are finally coming back to real value investing. It’s only natural they poke at the pending unlocks. The team & airdrop recipients finally able to sell is going to ruffle feathers until you address the community head on. The entire market has PTSD from the destruction on charts of VC-backed vapor. HYPE is the polar opposite. You’ve set the standard for programmable token mechanics at scale. It makes sense to set the standard here, too. With 5 days away until the first unlocks & we haven’t heard anything. The people wanna know how you will manage the future of the token and how you will scale the operation for 2026 & beyond. We wanna believe. - A fellow HYPE holder since day one, who wants to see this thing keep cooking

@paulewaulpaul Is the indicator public?

The price of any commodity tends to gravitate toward the production cost. If the price is below cost, then production slows down. … At the same time, the increased production … pushes the cost of generating towards the price. Satoshi Nakamoto - Feb 21, 2010 #Bitcoin

@jessepollak That’s fucking horrible mate

treating myself big time after a big day

@0xlone_ranger @fiege_max @nativemarkets @prjx_hl Bridge to hypercore and then rebridge to EVM. It’s literally 2 clicks

Requesting @fiege_max and @nativemarkets to please improve liquidity on @prjx_hl and other LP pools for USDH ser!! As much as I want to move to $USDH, liquidity and price efficiency is a challenge compared to USDT and USDC🙏

@Modestfrfr Didn’t you find god some time ago?

Zec accumulating for nine years straight doesn't deserve a 100x run after it breaks out? is that what you are saying?

@realpeterjm A founder fudding a competitor is always retarded behaviour