ItsJustMe

40.9K posts

ItsJustMe

ItsJustMe

@ItsJustMe44

انضم Mayıs 2009
217 يتبع460 المتابعون
ItsJustMe
ItsJustMe@ItsJustMe44·
@smith22701 @njdotcom There is zero evidence of this - that anyone would allege it, let alone repeat it as if true, is appalling
English
0
0
0
2
ItsJustMe
ItsJustMe@ItsJustMe44·
@JCh505 @cspan @KevinKileyCA What? TX had to correct their distrusting as they were race based (completely illegal), D’s decided this was underhanded and began scribbling themselves, yet they already have gerrymandered the bajeezus out of States -
English
0
0
0
11
CSPAN
CSPAN@cspan·
Rep. @KevinKileyCA: "This entire redistricting war has been a total disaster for our county. What's more, it's been utterly pointless as was predicted neither side is really going to come out ahead. Every side has lost."
English
10
10
50
13.6K
ItsJustMe
ItsJustMe@ItsJustMe44·
@Indybuck1 @tedperl @RNCResearch Assuming all of the list are true, this means it’s ok to kill him? Because apparently that seems to be the overriding sentiment. “Words are violence” and must be met with death?
English
0
0
0
0
ItsJustMe
ItsJustMe@ItsJustMe44·
@tedperl @RNCResearch Slotkin has labeled the Orange one an existential threat - makes zero sense then, she’s happy he’s unharmed.
English
0
0
0
2
Ted Perlmutter
Ted Perlmutter@tedperl·
Trump's views. Any criticism on your part? Trump has called the left: - Enemy within - Scum - Terrorists - Vermin - Radical - Lunatics - Demonic - Evil - Fascists - Marxists - Communists - Garbage - The enemy of the people - The enemy within - Treasonous - Animals - Degenerates - Jew haters - Lowlives
English
13
1
13
369
ItsJustMe
ItsJustMe@ItsJustMe44·
@RNCResearch Peculiar the woman is thankful a person she has deemed “an existential threat” was unharmed…. It’s as if they all share the same PR firm
English
0
0
0
2
ItsJustMe أُعيد تغريده
Shipwreckedcrew
Shipwreckedcrew@shipwreckedcrew·
And as I make clear in my article, @AWeissmann_ KNEW 100% that would be the outcome of a guilty verdict. SEC rules prevented publicly traded companies from employing CPAs with a felony conviction, and that applied to companies. Arthur Andersen as a company had a felony conviction -- its clients had no choice but to drop them. Weissmann knew he was going to destory 80,000 jobs and cost hundreds of "partners" more than a billion dollars combined -- none of whom had anything to do with ENRON.
Jim Sitlington@JSitlington

@shipwreckedcrew @RonColeman I have a good friend who was a partner at Arthur Anderson, running one of their offices with nothing to do with Enron. He lost everything. Decades of work up in a cloud of smoke.

English
8
81
314
8.8K
Margot Cleveland
Margot Cleveland@ProfMJCleveland·
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: FBI Opening EC on Clinton Foundation released. 12 pages of details of potential pay-to-play. And yet Washington Field Office only opened a "preliminary investigation." Compare that to "full investigation" opened on Trump based on "Russians have dirt on Hillary."/1
Margot Cleveland tweet media
English
35
926
2.2K
48.5K
ItsJustMe أُعيد تغريده
Shipwreckedcrew
Shipwreckedcrew@shipwreckedcrew·
Long article will be posted shortly about Andrew Weissmann's article in Just Security on the SPLC indictment. I cover this issue in detail but I want to put it out here for all -- here is the level of duplicity Weissmann will stoop to: Several times (at least 4-5) he calls the indictment a "Speaking Indictment" -- "an indictment that tells the story of the crime," and then uses that as a premise to criticize allegations that don't appear -- suggesting the DOJ lacks evidence of them. The SPLC indictment is 14 pages long. 3 pages cover the SPLC history, publications, and samples of public representations it has made. 2 pages cover the "Informant Program" and provides limited info about 8 "informants. 1 page describes the 6 fictitious businesses. 2 pages describe the "Scheme to Defraud" -- required by the statute. 2 plus pages describes the false statements in opening six bank accounts in the names of those fictitious businesses. 2 full pages allege the conspiracy to engage in money laundering. 2 plus pages describe two different forfeiture allegations -- mostly required notice language necessary to sustain a forfeiture judgment as part of the verdict. 14 pages -- 11 charged counts, and 2 forfeiture allegations. Compare that to the Mueller SCO's "Speaking Indictment" in the "election interference" case that a Russian company appeared in and contested -- and DOJ ultimately dismissed under Joe Biden. justice.gov/d9/fieldable-p… Count One charging “Conspiracy to Defraud the United States” covers over 30 pages. A “conspiracy” requires an allegation that two or more people entered into an agreement to commit one or more federal crimes, and that a member of the conspiracy committed an “overt act” in furtherance of that agreement. That doesn’t take 30 pages unless your real motive is to get all those allegations -- which no one in the Mueller SCO ever expected they would have to prove -- into the public discourse by writing an indictment that is more of a press release than it is a charging document. Just emblematic of the level of bald-face dishonesty Weissmann is willing to engage in.
English
13
199
581
10.4K
ItsJustMe أُعيد تغريده
Sarai (Sarah Idan) Miss Iraq
Sarai (Sarah Idan) Miss Iraq@RealSarahIdan·
If you’re wondering why he would make a statement this ridiculous, from a psychological point of view, this is what it does: it creates doubt where clarity already exists. That is a classic political manipulation tactic. You don’t deny the evidence directly; you simply imply that the public should “wait for details,” which SLOWS moral judgment and protects the side whose ideology may be implicated. He is not speaking to people who already know the facts. He is speaking to people who need permission not to process the facts. His language gives them a psychological escape hatch: “We don’t know yet,” “Don’t jump to conclusions,” “Maybe there are other motives” That protects them from cognitive dissonance. The genius of this kind of framing is that it can manipulate the opposition too. It forces people to waste energy proving what is already visible, while his supporters accuse them of being partisan, MAGA, or inflammatory. That is how gaslighting affects opposition: it turns reality itself into the battlefield. This is how propaganda and political indoctrination work: deny clarity, create doubt, then accuse anyone who names the truth of being partisan.
Barack Obama@BarackObama

Although we don’t yet have the details about the motives behind last night's shooting at the White House Correspondents Dinner, it’s incumbent upon all us to reject the idea that violence has any place in our democracy. It’s also a sobering reminder of the courage and sacrifice that U.S. Secret Service Agents show every day. I’m grateful to them – and thankful that the agent who was shot is going to be okay.

English
189
1.6K
6.2K
178.4K
ItsJustMe
ItsJustMe@ItsJustMe44·
@susancrabtree @SecretService At this point, who amongst us would be shocked to discover this? Truly a disgrace that the Service has been essentially MIA for more than a decade, and the incompetence repeated all too frequently.
English
0
0
0
17
Susan Crabtree
Susan Crabtree@susancrabtree·
❓❓❓Was the Secret Service Uniformed Division officer shot last night in a case of friendly fire? I just asked the @SecretService about the possibility that the UD officer was hit by another Secret Service officer or agent based on the analysis of the video below. I'm told there's a gag order on the entire Secret Service over what exactly occurred last night in terms of who shot whom. Sources in the Secret Service community are raising friendly fire questions based on a joint analysis of the below video, which they shared with me: Analysis: Video shows officer in suit (upper right) looking in opposite direction (allegedly distracted by a female walking by).  There are 2 UD officers in uniform deeply engrossed in conversation (lower left). All three USSS are totally oblivious to gunman running towards them at the checkpoint with weapon in hand. A UD officer in uniform (lower left) pivots while stepping back with handgun drawn and fires at the gunman running through the checkpoint (in direct line of fire of the male UD in suit). UD in suit gets hit by shot fired at gunman by UD in uniform, and he hunches over but still remains standing while stepping back and pulling his handgun to also fire at perp running through the checkpoint. Then u see 3-4 USSS firing at the gunman from behind as gunman is running away. Yet no one shot hits the gunman."
SETH WEATHERS@sethweathers

I enhanced the security footage from last nights assassination attempt using AI. The footage was extremely low quality and it seems AI made up some things to fill in the gaps, but gives a better view of what took place.

English
65
95
272
34.5K
ItsJustMe
ItsJustMe@ItsJustMe44·
@JonathanTurley I hate to say it Professor, but a DC jury does not have my vote of confidence dispense here. He’ll be home before the weekend I suspect
English
0
0
1
24
Jonathan Turley
Jonathan Turley@JonathanTurley·
...Allen will be arraigned today. His manifesto and his statements undermine any defense. This was clearly an attempted political assassination. His writings and planning will make any incapacity defense unlikely. While the defense would love a jury with with the lingering doubts of President Obama, the videotape is likely to leave much room for the defense to work with a jury.
English
83
287
2K
35.6K
Jonathan Turley
Jonathan Turley@JonathanTurley·
President Obama cautioned that we really do not know the motives of Cole Allen. foxnews.com/politics/obama… Sure, he called Trump the "anti-Christ" and said he wanted to attack the Administration. However, he might have been a disgruntled hotel guest or someone vehemently against dinner parties.
English
759
1.9K
7.2K
76.8K
ItsJustMe أُعيد تغريده
Shipwreckedcrew
Shipwreckedcrew@shipwreckedcrew·
As a tease for what is coming later -- but also because I get tired of Weissmann being rolled out as a legal authority on anything -- my article will begin thusly: "Andrew Weissmann “left” DOJ in the weeks following the Supreme Court’s 9-0 decision reversing his crowning achievement as head of the Enron Task Force, the conviction of Big Five accounting firm Arthur Anderson. Here are the facts surrounding his departure: Weissmann was part of the Enron Task Force when it was created in 2002, and became Director in 2004. But the Enron investigation began prior to the Task Force being formed, and was handled by Weissmann in the Fraud Section of DOJ’s Criminal Division. It was then moved to the Enron Task Force when Weissmann moved. The indictment was handed down in March 2002, and the trial was in May-June 2002 — the facts were largely undisputed and the issues at trial mostly involved “intent” and a legal interpretation of the “obstruction” statute Weissmann relied upon. The conviction led to Arthur Anderson’s collapse as a company, with 85,000 jobs lost world-wide, and 30,000 jobs lost in the U.S. The Supreme Court reversed the conviction of Arthur Anderson on May 31, 2005. The vote was 9-0 that the theory used by Weismann was constitutionally unsound — with Antonin Scalia agreeing with Ruth Bader Ginsburge that Weissmann didn’t know what he was doing. DOJ announced Weissmann’s departure from the Enron Task Force on July 18, 2005 — 6 weeks after the verdict. When Weissmann joined the New York law firm of Jenner & Block in January 2006, the firm’s announcement said he was “Special Counsel” to FBI Director Mueller from July to December 2005 — strongly suggesting Mueller saved him from being politely "asked" to leave DOJ in the aftermath of the Arthur Anderson FIASCO. From the Supreme Court’s opinion in Arthur Anderson, commenting on the legal theory pressed by Weissmann in the trial through the jury instructions he urged the trial judge to use: "The instructions also were infirm for another reason. They led the jury to believe that it did not have to find any nexus between the “persua[sion]” to destroy documents and any particular proceeding…. [T]he Government relies heavily on §1512(e)(1), which states that an official proceeding “need not be pending or about to be instituted at the time of the offense.” It is, however, one thing to say that a proceeding “need not be pending or about to be instituted at the time of the offense,” and quite another to say a proceeding need not even be foreseen. A “knowingly … corrup[t] persaude[r]” cannot be someone who persuades others to shred documents under a document retention policy when he does not have in contemplation any particular official proceeding in which those documents might be material." Basically, Weissmann pressed the theory that a criminal conviction for document destruction could stand even when the entity engaging in the destruction had no reason to believe the documents would ever be used in a criminal investigation. He was wrong — 9-0 — but 85,000 people still lost their jobs and a Big Five accounting firm ceased to exist because of his incompetence. Did Weissmann have to go? Well, he went. His LEGAL CAREER should have ended after that — not just his DOJ career. But, as I noted, Mueller saved him. Don’t ask me why.
Shipwreckedcrew@shipwreckedcrew

What an absolute GIFT. I get to spend all day on Sunday explaining why Andrew Weissman is a duplicitous moron, why he was reversed 9-0 by the Supreme Court, and why his criticisms of the SPLC indictment make my case for me. The more people rely on him for ANYTHING the more disconnected from reality they appear.

English
72
753
2K
69.9K
Elizabeth
Elizabeth@ViewFrom72·
@ChidiNwatu @BarackObama Oh yes, the 2011 correspondents dinner really showed him taking the high road, didn’t it? The Obama I voted for in 2008 is not the same Obama today. Compare his speeches from 08 to last year‘s DNC speech, and that will tell you everything you need to know. It’s very sad.
English
2
0
5
621
Barack Obama
Barack Obama@BarackObama·
Although we don’t yet have the details about the motives behind last night's shooting at the White House Correspondents Dinner, it’s incumbent upon all us to reject the idea that violence has any place in our democracy. It’s also a sobering reminder of the courage and sacrifice that U.S. Secret Service Agents show every day. I’m grateful to them – and thankful that the agent who was shot is going to be okay.
English
38.4K
18.5K
235.9K
65.2M
ItsJustMe أُعيد تغريده
Matt Taibbi
Matt Taibbi@mtaibbi·
Every reporter who’s sold the phony “pedophilia” story should think about where these manias lead:
Matt Taibbi tweet mediaMatt Taibbi tweet media
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

🇺🇸 The full manifesto of WHCD gunman Cole Allen has been obtained by the New York Post. Key takeaways: - A 31-year-old California teacher who described himself as "half-black, half-white" - Sent the 1,052-word document to family 10 minutes before the attack - Targeted Trump administration officials by rank, explicitly excluded Kash Patel - Used buckshot deliberately to minimize collateral casualties - Described Secret Service security as "actually insane" and said he walked in with multiple weapons undetected - "If I was an Iranian agent instead of an American citizen, I could have brought a Ma Deuce in here and no one would have noticed" - Ended the manifesto: "It's awful. I want to throw up. Can't really recommend it. Stay in school, kids." Full manifesto: "Hello everybody! So I may have given a lot of people a surprise today. Let me start off by apologizing to everyone whose trust I abused. I apologize to my parents for saying I had an interview without specifying it was for “Most Wanted.” I apologize to my colleagues and students for saying I had a personal emergency (by the time anyone reads this, I probably most certainly DO need to go to the ER, but can hardly call that not a self-inflicted status.) I apologize to all of the people I traveled next to, all the workers who handled my luggage, and all the other non-targeted people at the hotel who I put in danger simply by being near. I apologize to everyone who was abused and/or murdered before this, to all those who suffered before I was able to attempt this, to all who may still suffer after, regardless of my success or failure. I don’t expect forgiveness, but if I could have seen any other way to get this close, I would have taken it. Again, my sincere apologies. On to why I did any of this: I am a citizen of the United States of America. What my representatives do reflects on me. And I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes. (Well, to be completely honest, I was no longer willing a long time ago, but this is the first real opportunity I’ve had to do something about it.) While I’m discussing this, I’ll also go over my expected rules of engagement (probably in a terrible format, but I’m not military so too bad.) Administration officials (not including Mr. Patel): they are targets, prioritized from highest-ranking to lowest Secret Service: they are targets only if necessary, and to be incapacitated non-lethally if possible (aka, I hope they’re wearing body armor because center mass with shotguns messes up people who *aren’t* Hotel Security: not targets if at all possible (aka unless they shoot at me) Capitol Police: same as Hotel Security National Guard: same as Hotel Security Hotel Employees: not targets at all Guests: not targets at all In order to minimize casualties I will also be using buckshot rather than slugs (less penetration through walls) I would still go through most everyone here to get to the targets if it were absolutely necessary (on the basis that most people *chose* to attend a speech by a pedophile, rapist, and traitor, and are thus complicit) but I really hope it doesn’t come to that. Rebuttals to objections: Objection 1: As a Christian, you should turn the other cheek. Rebuttal: Turning the other cheek is for when you yourself are oppressed. I’m not the person raped in a detention camp. I’m not the fisherman executed without trial. I’m not a schoolkid blown up or a child starved or a teenage girl abused by the many criminals in this administration. Turning the other cheek when *someone else* is oppressed is not Christian behavior; it is complicity in the oppressor’s crimes. Objection 2: This is not a convenient time for you to do this. Rebuttal: I need whoever thinks this way to take a couple minutes and realize that the world isn’t about them. Do you think that when I see someone raped or murdered or abused, I should walk on by because it would be “inconvenient” for people who aren’t the victim? This was the best timing and chance of success I could come up with. Objection 3: You didn’t get them all. Rebuttal: Gotta start somewhere. Objection 4: As a half-black, half-white person, you shouldn’t be the one doing this. Rebuttal: I don’t see anyone else picking up the slack Objection 5: Yield unto Caesar what is Caesar’s. Rebuttal: The United States of America are ruled by the law, not by any one or several people. In so far as representatives and judges do not follow the law, no one is required to yield them anything so unlawfully ordered. I would also like to extend my appreciation to a great many people since I will not be likely to be able to talk with them again (unless the Secret Service is *astoundingly* incompetent.) Thank you to my family, both personal and church, for your love over these 31 years. Thank you to my friends, for your companionship over many years. Thank you to my colleagues over many jobs, for your positivity and professionalism. Thank you to my students for your enthusiasm and love of learning. Thank you to the many acquaintances I’ve met, in person and online, for short interactions and long-term relationships, for your perspectives and inspiration. Thank you all for everything. Sincerely, Cole “coldForce” “Friendly Federal Assassin” Allen PS: Ok now that all the sappy stuff is done, what the hell is the Secret Service doing? Sorry, gonna rant a bit here and drop the formal tone. Like, I expected security cameras at every bend, bugged hotel rooms, armed agents every 10 feet, metal detectors out the wazoo. What I got (who knows, maybe they’re pranking me!) is nothing. No damn security. Not in transport. Not in the hotel. Not in the event. Like, the one thing that I immediately noticed walking into the hotel is the sense of arrogance. I walk in with multiple weapons and not a single person there considers the possibility that I could be a threat. The security at the event is all outside, focused on protestors and current arrivals, because apparently no one thought about what happens if someone checks in the day before. Like, this level of incompetence is insane, and I very sincerely hope it’s corrected by the time this country gets actually competent leadership again. Like, if I was an Iranian agent, instead of an American citizen, I could have brought a damn Ma Deuce in here and no one would have noticed shit. Actually insane. Oh and if anyone is curious is how doing something like feels: it’s awful. I want to throw up; I want to cry for all the things I wanted to do and never will, for all the people whose trust this betrays; I experience rage thinking about everything this administration has done. Can’t really recommend it! Stay in school, kids." Source: New York Post

English
138
428
2.7K
109.6K
ItsJustMe أُعيد تغريده
Brit Hume
Brit Hume@brithume·
Whew! This is rough but full of truth.
LHGrey™️@grey4626

No British government ever imagined an American president might finally tell the truth about the “special relationship.” Until now. Spare me the pearl-clutching obituary from The Economist, that decaying salon of transatlantic nostalgia where the ghost of Churchill is still being pimped out like a rent-boy for Davos subscriptions. Your precious bunting of flags in the bin isn’t some tragic metaphor for Trump’s “betrayal.” It’s the autopsy photo of a one-way parasitic bargain that America has carried on its back like a drunk uncle for eighty goddamn years. And the drunk finally woke up, looked around, and said: Fuck this. This isn’t “turning his back.” This is a sovereign nation refusing to keep subsidizing a continent of strategic eunuchs who have spent decades castrating their own militaries, hollowing out their industrial bases, and importing the very pathologies that make them security liabilities rather than allies. You want the special relationship? Earn it. Reciprocate it. Stop treating the United States like an ATM with nuclear weapons. Geopolitically and militarily, the numbers don’t lie and they never have. The United States still shoulders roughly sixty percent of total NATO defense spending...$845 billion out of a collective $1.4 trillion last year. Most of your European “partners” couldn’t hit the 2% GDP target even after Russia parked tanks on Ukraine’s border and started lobbing missiles at civilian infrastructure. Britain under Starmer talks a big game about “global Britain” while quietly slashing capability, courting CCP-linked cash, and letting its own streets burn under the weight of demographic transformation and speech codes that make the old East German Stasi look libertarian. You lecture us about values while your own government criminalizes tweets and turns Rotherham into a cautionary tale the media still refuses to fully autopsy. Historically, the ledger is even more damning. We bled for you in 1917 and 1941 when your empires were on the ropes. We bankrolled your reconstruction, anchored your defense for the entire Cold War, and let you punch above your weight on the world stage because sentimental Anglosphere nostalgia still meant something. In return? Suez 1956, where you expected us to back imperial nostalgia while we were trying to contain Soviet expansion. Vietnam, where you sat it out. Iraq, where you half-assed it and then spent the next twenty years sneering at us in your broadsheets. And every single time an American president dared put America First, your commentariat wailed like Victorian widows about the death of the alliance...as if the alliance was ever meant to be a suicide pact. You’ve internalized a victimhood narrative so profound it borders on the clinical...projecting your own national decline, your own loss of agency, your own self-inflicted castration onto the one country that still possesses the will to act like a great power. Trump doesn’t “deprioritize” the relationship; he simply refuses to indulge the delusion any longer. He sees what you refuse to admit: the United Kingdom of 2026 is no longer the reliable offshore balancer of 1945. It’s a mid-tier European power wrestling with internal entropy, elite disconnect, and a demographic trajectory that makes long-term strategic partnership… let’s just say, complicated. We are sick of it. Sick of the free ride. Sick of the lectures from people whose capitals are turning into no-go zones while their defense ministers beg Washington for more F-35s and more carrier groups to patrol waters they can no longer secure themselves. Sick of the pomp, the pageantry, the royal visits, and the hand-wringing editorials that treat American self-interest as some kind of moral failing. The special relationship isn’t dead. It’s being stress-tested by reality. And reality, Mr. Economist, is a vicious bitch with a ledger in one hand and a mirror in the other. Look into it. 💀⚖️🗡️

English
220
1.8K
10.3K
532.9K
ItsJustMe
ItsJustMe@ItsJustMe44·
@TPostMillennial wtf is he talking about? Was he this vocal as Obama and holder went after Rosen, Risen, Atkisson, the AP? When Biden demanded silencing of “wrongthink? What has 47 done that’s remotely near “an assault on free speech?”
English
0
0
1
43
The Post Millennial
The Post Millennial@TPostMillennial·
Rep. Jamie Raskin: "There's been this terrible assault on the First Amendment, and freedom of the press, and speech, and so I thought last night would be a wonderful opportunity to try to reclaim the basic values of the country."
English
10
2
15
5K
ItsJustMe
ItsJustMe@ItsJustMe44·
@andruchk @MikeNellis Quick question - why would a “MAGA” want her dead after she just voted to remove benefits for illegal aliens? And why would a “MAGA” have “no kings” literature in his car?
English
1
0
1
63
Druchk
Druchk@andruchk·
The mor0ns are in the comments claiming that he was a democrat because he was “appointed by waltz” when everyone with a functioning brain knows that he was part of BI partisan board, a board that he was part of before WAltz even got into office, he was simply reappointed to said board becuase there was no need to make any changes. He’s an evangelical MAGA loon.
English
57
0
29
4.4K