Ewar Woowoo 🇺🇦 🇬🇱🇩🇰

@tomaseveraert @DoyleTeaBag @zaelefty Understood but, as a species, humans copulate recreationally, along with bonobos, a close relative of ours, and others? There's little pressure on us, as a species in general, for habitat and resources. This might explain our excess time and energy. I'm far from an expert 😂

@BusterSynapse @DoyleTeaBag @zaelefty I disagree with your last point. We have the urge to engage in sex because, as a species, we want to procreate. Because same sex couples cannot procreate, and we do not want to waste our time and energy on chanceless attempts, we (as a species) evolved...

Same age 14& 15. Two 'young boys' raped two 'young women'. This is how language sexualises females & diminishes responsibility for the males who attack them. Disgusting.

@tomaseveraert @DoyleTeaBag @zaelefty I express viewpoints (right or wrong) without resorting to insult. It's not ridiculous to say "Human sex is unchangeable" I would never use the second sentence as homosexuallity is nothing to do with procreation, just people making free choice about who they have relations with

@DoyleTeaBag @zaelefty So, if you say to a transwoman “you fool, nobody can change sex!” you can as well say to a gay man “you fool, you cannot procreate with a man!” In both cases you’re being ridiculous, since no-one believes otherwise.

@SpeechUnion I hate the need for people to use "belief discrimination" when their "belief" is fairly expressed and fully supported by common sense, science and real world experience.

FSU member and prison officer David Toshack was sacked for refusing to call male prisoners “she/her”. Over five weeks of training, David was widely praised for his efforts. He participated thoughtfully in discussions, including those on managing transgender prisoners. David made clear he would treat all prisoners with respect, use their chosen names, and adopt neutral language where appropriate. However, he explained that he could not, in good conscience, use pronouns that conflicted with biological sex. This position went unchallenged until the final week of training, when the safeguarding lead asked David to leave a session after he reiterated that he could only use sex-based pronouns. Minutes later, he was taken into a meeting with a senior trainer and HR and dismissed with immediate effect for being “not suitable” due to his “strong beliefs”. The company claimed his refusal was incompatible with “the law”, despite his belief being protected under the Equality Act 2010. No attempt was made to accommodate David’s beliefs, even though he offered a respectful compromise through neutral language. He was escorted off the premises the same day. Normal disciplinary procedures were ignored: no warning, no written record, and no opportunity to be accompanied. After he appealed, the company changed its justification, alleging he had expressed his views aggressively — an accusation contradicted by its own records. Thanks to the generous support of donors, David was able to proceed with his claim of belief discrimination earlier this year. With the help of the Free Speech Union, his legal team has now submitted a notice of appeal to the EAT, arguing that the Tribunal overlooked the clear connection between his beliefs and his actions, and failed to properly consider whether dismissal was proportionate. We are once again asking for your help to defend the right of David — and thousands like him — not to be compelled to act against their conscience by ideologically driven employers. As the appeal will set a binding precedent across Great Britain, the case has only grown in importance. If you can, please donate to David’s crowdfunder below 👇

@AvaLovelaceX @UileamMcOistin "...or risk being assaulted in the men’s bathroom" Now you understand why women don't want YOU in their toilets and changing rooms. Not because you, personally are dangerous, but because the statistical risk of male assault on females (that you recognise) is what they fear.

@UileamMcOistin We’re being forced to choose between holding our pee (medically dangerous) or risk being assaulted in the men’s bathroom. Yes this is essentially a ban on trans women from peeing.

In a world’s first, The United Kingdom moves to make it illegal for trans women to pee. Welcome to 2026 where laws discriminating against and segregating minorities are now commonplace again

@HJoyceGender @GSpellchecker Obviously not by @BBCNews

I look forward to Burnham being asked if women can have penises in every interview from now till the by-election. He brought it on himself.

@neco_arctic People born as a man or woman do not need an adjective to qualify the noun. You are relegating women to a sub-set of the biological group to which they belong. #MenKeepOutOfWomensSpaces #TransWomenAreConMen

It should be a form of illegal discrimination to treat trans women differently to cis women in literally any way I don't care about the equivocation, we deserve equality

Won’t someone think of the poor men who sell their daughters to be raped so that their sons get enough food. This is repulsive, even by BBC standards.

@JohnCleese I do

I don't understand why they don't ask a professor of Biology

@BBCNews Who gives a fuck!

BBC confirms new Strictly Come Dancing hosts bbc.in/3Rghlbn

@KateBMwriting And open an account which will undoubtedly trigger relentless push notifications and marketing regardless of what you tick or don't tick. Bonus nonsense: Another bloomin' password to remember 😡

Why do I have to download an app to do EVERYTHING?

Aaaaaand another one

@triffic_stuff_ Trevor, put on some lippy and a dress and you won't have to face such statements from Nandy and her ilk

WTF?? Labour’s Lisa Nandy Complains Because She’s Being Interviewed By A Man On Sky News. Lisa Nandy on Sky News this morning, literally complaining that she’s being interviewed by a man (Trevor Phillips) who dared to ask about men competing for the Labour leadership. Trevor points out that she keeps emphasising the word “men” and asks if she’s trying to make a point by doing so. Her response was f*cking ludicrous: “It’s just not lost on me Trevor that I’m being interviewed by a man, being asked to give my views about several men in the Labour Party. I’m sorry if I’ve come across as a bit irritated.” 😂 What a ridiculous, entitled whinge from one of the worst woke politicians in Labour. Throwing a sulk because the biggest story in politics right now involves male leadership contenders and she has to answer questions about it like every other politician doing the media rounds. Who the f*ck cares what sex the interviewer is or the people running for leader? Grow up you pathetic clown.

@bodytalkman @simonmaechling By 'reading', do you mean Facebook/X/Truth Social etc?

@simonmaechling The point is that a close reading of that data exposes the myth. Do some reading on the other side of your biases. Show some intellectual curiosity. You won’t like what you find.

You can ask whether vaccines are safe. But when decades of research and millions of lives saved answer “yes,” refusing to accept it is no longer critical thinking.

Copilot just told me to calm my tits! I asked about something happening later this year and it said "it's not happening this year, it's October 2026"

@tweetclix @SoVeryBritish @AareHmd Gets through a lot of Trill every day though

@SoVeryBritish @AareHmd And what about Pegasus crossings (ones that have extra high buttons for people on horseback to push). Pegasus did have wings at least so a bit like a bird.

I can’t believe I’ve only just found out that the bird-related UK road crossing names all stand for things: Pelican: “PEdestrian LIght CONtrolled” Puffin: “Pedestrian User-Friendly Intelligent” Toucan: Because bicycles and pedestrians can cross together (two can cross) I thought they just named them after birds because birds are nice 🤦‍♂️

Andy doesn’t understand the @ForWomenScot ruling by @UKSupremeCourt Why is that, Andy? Why did Andy latch on to criticism of the perfectly legal interim update by the @EHRC (as ruled by Mr Justice Swift) Who was feeding Andy that line back then?

@thewitchof653 @ripx4nutmeg Block it is then. Bye

@BusterSynapse @ripx4nutmeg They are not. That’s social media bullshit I’m an attempt to gain territory in a pointless culture war. It allows idiots like you to flex about protecting women when on no reality are you talking actual harms and reasons for them. You sound like a plank

Here's Harriet Harman, the UK government's new adviser on women and girls, speaking at length in 2024 about why she believes some men are women

@thewitchof653 @ripx4nutmeg No, men in women-only spaces and sports etc. are the danger to women. This has been demonstrated in toilets, prisons and sports etc. E.g. Paris Olympics: Two males were celebrated for punching women. Affected women evicerated for expressing the pain and loss they experienced

@BusterSynapse @ripx4nutmeg What you present is a danger to women

@thewitchof653 @ripx4nutmeg Dangerous? For expressing an opinion or standing up for my wife's rights?

@BusterSynapse @ripx4nutmeg You can do all those things. But you’d be seen as vexatious or potentially dangerous