Harry Haury U4F

Hello everyone, I have decided to become directly active on X as the Chairman of Unite4Freedom. I welcome honest debate and questions. Liberal, libertarian or conservative. We may not agree, but let's be civil and honest. I like the truth and proper context. Welcome.

@GoodDog84 @Bquietfruitcake @Unite4Freedom This is the moment that "We the People" restore our country or lose it!

This is the moment. Not theory. Not debate. Not talking points. Reality. While Washington argues, the data already exists. @Unite4Freedom has analyzed 35 states—with 95+ credentialed data analysts—documenting patterns of noncompliance with federal law (NVRA, HAVA, Civil Rights Act). This isn’t opinion. This is evidence. And here’s what every Senator needs to understand: If you vote 'No' on the SAVE America Act without reviewing the data— you are choosing willful blindness over due diligence. Put it in the Congressional Record. Force the facts into the open. Make every vote accountable. Because once it’s on record… no one gets to say “we didn’t know.”

As the fight to pass the SAVE America Act continues – it is growing more teeth. Today, Wednesday, March 18, 2026, the SAVE America Act (an updated version of the original SAVE Act) is in the midst of a high-stakes, week-long debate on the Senate floor. Following a successful procedural vote yesterday, Senate Republicans have officially opened the floor for a "marathon" debate aimed at pressuring the minority to defend their opposition. Current Status in the Senate: The Procedural Win: Yesterday, March 17, the Senate voted 51–48 to begin debate on the bill. This was a simple-majority threshold vote. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) was the only Republican to vote with Democrats against taking up the bill. The "Talking Filibuster" Strategy: Leadership has indicated that they intend to keep the Senate in session through nights and weekends. The goal is to highlight the bill’s provisions—specifically those requiring documentary proof of citizenship (DPOC) for voter registration—ahead of the 2026 midterms. New Amendments: The "SAVE America" version currently being debated includes several high-profile additions demanded by the White House, such as: - A nationwide ban on universal vote-by-mail and "no-excuse" absentee voting. - A requirement for all 50 states to provide unredacted voter rolls to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for citizenship verification. - Provisions related to gender-transition care and participation in sports, which have further polarized the debate. While the debate is ongoing, the path to final passage remains difficult. The 60-Vote Wall: Despite passing the procedural hurdle, the bill still requires 60 votes to overcome a final filibuster and move to a definitive vote. Senate Democrats remain unified in their opposition, arguing the bill would disenfranchise millions of eligible voters, including married women with name changes and rural citizens without easy access to passports. We the People need to keep the pressure on – Tag your Senators. Make sure they know: @Unite4Freedom has comprehensive data across 35 states—real evidence that underscores exactly why passage is essential. @SenMikeLee @LindseyGrahamSC @JohnCornyn @LeaderJohnThune @SenatorBanks @SenJohnBarrasso @MarshaBlackburn @JohnBoozman @SenKatieBritt @SenTedBuddNC @JDVance @realDonaldTrump @elonmusk

@DogBountyHunter if you have the time to read my DM I sent I would be so thankful!! Sean is a Veteran and former Deputy Sheriff He's a good man

@DogBountyHunter 🚨😍💪 Thank you so much for following me!! We have been non stop fighting for my dear friend Sean PLEASE HELP.. need your attention on an active situation in Montgomery County, PA. A man is being held under a 302 that literally states “unknown at this time.” A second version appears later. He has filed an appeal and habeas corpus. He is reporting threats of extended detention and forced injection tied to medication compliance. There is a witness. He is coherent, documenting everything, and helping other patients. Families are now reaching out. This needs exposure. I can provide documentation. #FREESEANCONNOLLY

@RealAmVoice @Bquietfruitcake @DevinNunes In DC they hold back information as a weapon to be used later. How many files have the Senate and House held back for reasons unknown. I tend to think the info is held in little glass jars inscribed with, "in case of emergency, break glass." Full honesty and transparency, anyone?

US INTEL NOT DISCLOSING CHINA EVIDENCE @DevinNunes: “What I would first say is we ran a decade-long investigation in the Congress into China. And so this new bombshell that you just dropped is very concerning to me, and it should be to the Congress even today, that this information likely was around in 2019…Clearly, this is a scandal that's brewing, and I'm sure you're going to continue to track it.” @AmandaHead @jsolomonReports

Georgia RICO case motion filed today to drop charges and end that bogus prosecution of President Trump and 18 others wrongly accused. “Citizens not served pursuing the case”

A. Election fraudsters, media enablers, Democracy Now, and DC Bar are probably looking for hiding places tonight embarrassed at their shameful lies and lawfare against President Trump, the alternate electors, those wrongly accused in several battleground States, Jeff Clark and many others. B. Criminal investigation warrant was served today by FBI vs Fulton County now seizing: i. All ballots of all types (absentee, in person, test, duplicate, emergency) along with all ballot envelopes. (Includes over 540,000 absentee and in person ballots). ii. All tabulator tapes open, close, zero - all required to be accurate and retained. iii. The Fulton County Voter Registration and Voting Files iv. all ballot images and other election records C. Basis for warrant was cited as 52 USC 20701 failure to preserve election records and 52 USC 20511 that individuals defrauded voters by running an unfair election or that the tabulation / counting was fraudulent.

Mistakes by FBI’s Paul Brown in GA show he was as clueless or corrupt as Eric Siebert in EDVA -both rightly fired.(It’s poll tapes and tally sheets) More likely Brown was pulling a last minute half-measure to block real discovery. That failed causing ⁦@KDilanianMSNOW⁩ tears

O’Biden admin covered up major election system hack by Chinese company Konnech

@TheBasedMother @jjauthor Did he also shutoff the water to the Fulton County vote counting center in 2020?

This is Eric Taylor, the City Manager of Social Circle, Georgia who SHUT OFF the water at a new ICE facility. He wants to power, let's give him fame along with it.

They tried to destroy Catherine, Greg and True the Vote. TTV reported a connection found on the internet between Konnech and the CCP in China to the FBI. They were cooperating with an active investigation of Konnech by the Counter-Intelligence division of the FBI. In the meantime, a Grand Jury in California issued warrants to seize evidence and arrest Eugene YU for contract perjury. To complicate matters even further, the FBI suddenly turned on TTV under the Biden administration. I have always wondered why? (Not really, 'why' was pretty obvious to everyone) My firm was hired by LA County to assist with the cyber forensic recovery from the Konnech offices in Michigan. To complicate things further, Konnech sued TTV for libel and slander in front of a corrupt judge in Harris County, Texas. So what did my company discover? We found the extensive presence of the CCP in the US election system in October of 2022. We found that they had the names, social security numbers, birthdates and more PII of many election workers and officials across the country, they had just completed testing a live API connection to the voter rolls held in the SCYTL system allowing them to move these files to China, and they had a hidden rotating proxy connected to an extremely high bandwidth backbone internet connection that followed a known PLA APT pattern for illegal data exfiltration. All in all, it appeared to be serving an international espionage operation against the US and these connections were live during the 2022 election having durable connections to other election systems and multiple other foreign countries. Then it appeared that Washington DC showed up and pressured Gascon to shutdown the investigation and declare Konnech innocent. They were not innocent and we gathered more than enough evidence to prove it. TTV spent millions to defend themselves, my company was slandered repeatedly and Konnech was set free with a $5 million check for their trouble. This information was submitted to many parties under oath.

You are correct, @canncon. China is - without a doubt - in U.S. elections. Here’s one such example (note, this version has been translated, the original was in Chinese). The county seals are displayed like trophies, showing the locations their software controlled. We gave a trove of information to the @FBI in 2021 and wound up being put in prison over it in 2022. It was and is all true. Read this article by @RealSamFaddis 👉 open.substack.com/pub/andmagazin… Our Konnech collection 👉truethevote.org/search/results…

This may be one of the most ignorant postings I have ever read. The US Constitution requires that voters be eligible US Citizens. Federal law requires that election officials know the voters are eligible to vote before giving them a ballot. Hmmmmm....... sounds like a Voter ID should already be required but states are trying to circumvent the law.

Republicans are lying to the American people when they say the SAVE Act is a voter ID law—it’s a proof-of-citizenship requirement that would make voting harder, if not impossible, for a lot of people. Passports are expensive, documents don’t always match, and the process can be a mess (been there). We should be making voting easier, not adding more hurdles. Democrats can own this by proposing their own bill that accepts a range of IDs, and includes automatic voter registration and Election Day as a national holiday for starters.

First of all, thank you for your more comprehensive reply although I wish you would stop making claims about what my proposals mean before you actually understand them. Prior to these emotionally charged outbursts we had some reasonable conversations and private. But as with any complicated matter, understanding things in their full nuanced context is critical to understanding what something really means, and you do not. At least you could respect my on-going openness to talking about these matters before going postal. So now I will try to adress your concerns and the correct way to interpret what I am saying. Then take issue with that as you will, in public or privately. You are part of a group, Cause of America, that has made many mistakes, as have we. This does not mean they are your mistakes but they are mistakes from a vantage point of the organization you represent. In terms of Rag Doll assertions you are making them yourself. Never once have I said that I want to implement machines. What we have said clearly and repeatedly is that if we are going to use machines they must be secure. I have also said that the current machines are not secure and should not be used. The predicate for this is the Help America Vote Act which is the law and that law defines what can and cannot be done. It says the systems should be certified and clearly infers they need to be safe. The current systems cannot legally be used under HAVA because they are neither certified nor safe. In your outrage, you ignore this stipulation and you are ignoring that HAVA is the law. To prevent their use you have to do one of two things: 1) prove they are unsafe(which we are doing), or 2) change the law. But as you say we have no time, the law is not going to be changed in time. So, we must prevent their use by proving they are unsafe. For the record, I am in favor of changing the law to eliminate them. Further, I was part of the DOD struggle to protect the SIPRNET while allowing open systems to be used. I have written several papers about this problem and how unimaginably complex it is. I DO NOT BELIEVE THE PEOPLE SELLING THESE SYSTEMS, BUYING THESE SYSTEMS, INSTALLING THESE SYSTEMS, MONITORING THESE SYSTEMS, OR OPERATING THESE SYSTEMS ARE CAPABLE OF DELIVERING A SECURE SOLUTION. Just as you claim. But the law allows them so how do you prevent their use? Change the law or prove they are unsafe. My wording says they must be secure, I am not selling that they can be secure. Although it should be clear in my words, the extension is already obvious, stop the use of insecure systems. But your rag doll is to say that I support machines, when that is not what I say. Further, HAVA does not require the use of machines, it already allows manual systems. You conflate these two with a slight of hand, they do not comply with FISMA now, I clearly say they must be secure and I doubt any vendor will ever try to take them through FISMA compliance. And I agree there is no time left, the only answer is to forbid their use. Claiming that I have said they should be used is nonsense, I hope it is because of misunderstanding my position and not with the intent to defame. Let me offer a premise, since you have experience in this arena, do you think the vendors and users could comply with FISMA before the 2026 election? If they ever could comply, do you think they could put the training in place, systems in place and other required policies and procedures in place by the 2026 or 2028 election? If they ever did, would these systems be affordable? Of course they cannot. Our experience with HAIPE and the Radiant Guards for example proved how complex, expensive and impossible to manage this type of security is. Finally, the word systems is not limited in the way you infer, paper and manual systems are still systems. Even paper and manual systems should be proven to be secure. As to OpSec, all systems have operational security boundaries, there is no need to eliminate transparency

Harry, first of all, I don't have "sponsors." Second, I don't pretend to know what other people think; not even my friends. In my experience, when people attest to what others think, they're usually trying inject their own biases through the ragdoll of their assertions. I know what other people say, and I believe them or don't depending on my experience and level of trust. Here's what you say; I'm literally reading your own literature, from your own site. It says, as part of your "solution": "all voting systems and machines must be tested to ensure compliance with all state and federal laws, specifically FISMA." That doesn't sound like "no voting machines," and if quoting you is "sophistry," then I guess guilty as charged, though I'd be Hippias in this dynamic. What it sounds like, Harry, is "I helped write HAVA and if they can just do HAVA the right way, we can do it, this time..." But you can't do it this time. NOBODY who understands the threat believes that "testing to ensure compliance w/all state and federal laws, (including) specifically FISMA" could possibly lead to voting systems even minimally defensible vs. the threat, let alone secure. Where to even begin? Hyper-acceleration of the threat. Weak, obsolete standards. Absolute failure to even consider supply-chain threats. Gross inadequacy of cyber workforce. Tech illiteracy of election officials, who must assert state standards, and preserve records, and who will control access during lifecycle. Fed bureaucracy sinecures and courtesans nodding like bobbleheads. Obstruction by every level of government to the pursuit of truth and administrative or judicial remedies. Manufacturing base. Cost. Sustaining public awareness and interest. And if we could solve ALL of that, which we can't, w/the snap of fingers, instantaneously, we would still be operating a system opaque to citizens. Not just no, but hell no. Infinite hell no. Hell no like a Schumann resonance for free people. All the no, Harry. And I didn't even get to the principle adverse variable: time. We don't have it. "Within the boundaries of the law" includes, and must include, drastic, forceful action by any and every official, to the extent of their Constitutional authorities, to restore any amount of transparency and citizen control over our elections which we can claw back, on the edge of this cliff. The pretense of norms and the opinions of pundits are suicidal noise. As for what you were "first at," there's no pride of place at work, Harry. Election integrity is a pinata, and any victory for it, by anybody, means candy for everyone. It's no knock on you to state the fact that, despite your sly (and you're not the first) and false insinuation that I or we somehow have limited our focus to "Eliminating the machines," we haven't. Please, Harry: stop the bullshit and don't careen into the ranks of liars like Jovan, claiming that somehow I or we have ignored everything but "the machines." USA didn't even exist, let alone U4F, when I started publicly calling for a comprehensive approach that addressed voter rolls, absentee/mail ballots, tallying, and auditing. You have internet access; use your search engine; this should embarrass you. Re: your 7 beliefs: Agreed, except: - "meaningful identification" doesn't mean anything; we must learn that the corrupt assholes like Elias exploit all latitude or ambiguity to circumvent purported and imagined safeguards. Positive identification of voters, using gov-issued photo ID to verify identity, citizenship, and residency. This is obvious, and we should eviscerate any statute or rule that allowed exceptions like tribal ID, school ID, utility bills, checks, certificates of percentage of indian blood, etc. - "as they exist today" (machines) is just the kind of weasel language I'm talking about. Stop pretending this is something other than a loophole. Stop pretending that isn't a life preserver for machines. FFS, Harry, neither of us is stupid, so let's stop the charade. Nothing but hand-counting will ever be verifiable by every citizen. No machine design, structure, test, or operation will ever be. "as they exist today" goes hand-in-hand to hell with "auditable." There is no value in "auditable," a basket big enough to hold the eminently, inevitably corrupt RLA, and "audits" that candidates or citizens have to pay for, and which occur after certification. - OpSec. It doesn't mean what you think it does. OpSec is policy and procedure to safeguard information from enemies, to prevent loss of operational advantage. We don't need OpSec in elections. In fact, we should oppose OpSec in elections with the force of arms, exercising our 2A rights and obligations, if necessary. We have plenty of OpSec now, and we shouldn't have any - it has the practical effect of denying transparency to citizens, often until corruption and irregularity are fait accompli. - Audits. To complete the thought above: useless unless mandatory and all-encompassing, timely, and (I agree w/you) independent. This should be what citizen canvassing boards do, every time. As citizens, we should not ever permit our government to certify election results. That should be done only by fully-informed citizen canvass boards. Speaking of idiots: I would NEVER criticize your claims or assertions without familiarizing myself with them. Not ever. I wouldn't have proxies doing it, either. Hence, me reading your "Solution" and recognizing, from your own words, that any claim you recommend eliminating voting machines is bullshit. Before you reply or post again any claim about how I spend my time or the differences between your recommendations and mine, someone of your intelligence might consider actually going to our site (causeofamerica.org) or our rumble channel (rumble.com/user/CauseofAm…) and reading or watching long enough to not make yourself look like ass with false claims. I wish you well and success at everything we agree on, and abject, catastrophic failure at any attempt to preserve or allow for the use of computerized/electronic voting systems in U.S. elections (they should be banned for stockholder votes, too, BTW).

A much superior argument regarding the use of election machines: 1) We have a certification requirement for the machines that is being ignored. 2) They do not use meaningful validation tests. 3) The machine is a “black box we are forbidden to examine.” 1/

Shawn, we are not pimping "secure the system". We are trying to stop the theft of our elections. Your sponsors and allies seem to think we must tear it all down before we can end up in a safe place. So far, we still believe we can fix this mess within the boundaries of the law and we strongly believe the system must be fixed. Further, we believe it must be fixed, now. How exactly do you think we do that without violence or tyrannical control? Where is the safe titration point? What you call pimping is advocating a lawful and real solution. Your nakedness assertions that we are "OK" with the machines is sophistry, at best. It is simply not our corner. Specifically, we were among the first advocating an Emergency Order. We were the first advocating a whole of battlespace engagement. `Eliminating the machines` does not solve the problem by itself. We are advocating a comprehensive solution which includes getting rid of the machines. We also believe: 1) Voter entry must be fully controlled. 2) Some form of meaningful identification verificatio must be used. 3) Ballots must be real, physical and go directly from the voters hands to the ballot box in a verifiable and auditable fashion, in person. 4) We must guarantee all ballots are real, lawfully submitted and counted. 5) Machines cannot be used for tabulation, as they exist today, and aggregation systems must be manually verifiable from original records. 6) The entire system must have OpSec that is effective and auditable using people to administer and operate and operate it that are trained in using the system. 7) Audits must be independent, comprehemsive, transparent, and reasonably easy to trigger. Of course, each of the above functional requirements will translate into strict operational controls and activities. We have those spelled out already and believe all parties should come together to develop a solution. But we do not believe getting rid of the machines, by itself will come close to solving current problems or offer a lasting solution. What is your solution? Or do you really just want to spend your days calling people idiots, morons and worse. Navigating this without a peaceful, transparent and comprehensive debate carries profound risks of violence between well meaning Americans.

@ToWhom444 @HarryU4f That was sarcasm, champ. Nobody is going to handcount voter rolls. Nobody is recommending that. You already tried to pretend U4F isn't pimping "Secure the System"; FFS, don't make it worse. We agree on a lot. U4F didn't invent any of it, but we agree on it. Not that.

@Bannons_WarRoom @realMikeLindell Yes Steve, we have to pass the Save Act—and more—because we have the receipts that the 2026 Primaries in Texas are already being manipulated—both Democrat and Republican! 👇👇👇 x.com/Unite4Freedom/…

Who Hijacked the Texas 2026 Democrat and Republican Primary Elections? joehoft.com/who-hijacked-t…

***BREAKING - NATIONAL SECURITY ISSUE*** 66,146 GOP ballots DELETED during TX early voting. 87,336 voters appeared, disappeared, reappeared in state records. The Cornyn-Paxton margin is only 26K. Someone inside the system is picking our nominees. Don’t certify. Audit no, this is too big not to notice. Complacency will end our Constitutional Republic! WHAT HAPPENED? Your vote disappeared. During early voting, thousands of Texas ballots vanished from official state records—then reappeared—then vanished again. In BOTH parties. The data proves someone inside the system is manipulating who wins. We need answers before November. THE PROBLEM IN SIMPLE NUMBERS: REPUBLICAN PRIMARY: •87,336 voters appeared, disappeared, then reappeared in state records •66,146 ballots completely deleted from final count •35,772 extra ballots added to people who already voted •Only 26,000 votes separate Cornyn and Paxton—but 66,000 ballots disappeared DEMOCRAT PRIMARY: •37,039 voters appeared, disappeared, then reappeared •10,558 ballots completely deleted from final count •35,169 extra ballots added to people who already voted •144,000 votes separate Senate candidates—but 10,000+ ballots vanished Why This Matters: •These numbers are bigger than the margins in major races •This affects who appears on your November ballot •Both parties were hit—this isn’t partisan, it’s corruption THREE SIMPLE RULES THEY BROKE: Rule #1: Numbers Should Never Go Backwards •What should happen: Vote totals only go UP as more people vote •What actually happened: On February 17, the vote count went DOWN seven different times •Translation: Ballots were deleted in real-time during voting Rule #2: One Person, One Ballot •What should happen: Your Voter ID gets one ballot recorded •What actually happened: 1,549 Republican voters and 54 Democrat voters had MULTIPLE ballots counted •Translation: The system is stacking extra votes on real people Rule #3: Your Ballot Stays Counted •What should happen: Once you vote, your ballot stays in the record •What actually happened: 66,146 Republican and 10,558 Democrat voter records completely vanished by the end •Translation: Real votes were erased This isn’t a theory. This is downloaded government data from the Secretary of State’s website. Every day during early voting, researchers saved a copy of who voted. When they compared those snapshots, the numbers moved BACKWARDS. That’s mathematically impossible unless someone is inside the system changing records in real-time.” Supporting fact: The Texas Secretary of State changed the data file format multiple times during early voting and made access intermittent—exactly when researchers were watching. Whoever controls our elections controls TRILLIONS in state and federal budgets. This is a national security emergency. Foreign adversaries, cartels, corporate interests—anyone with the resources to breach our systems can now pick our leaders. President Trump, AG Bondi, and DNI Gabbard need to treat this like the cyber-attack it is and lock it down BEFORE November. #TXPrimary #ElectionIntegrity Thank you @Unite4Freedom for your in-depth dive into this National Security issue.

@DocPeteChambers @JeffYunaforTX @FCB5999 There should be ZERO oscillations in the voting records!

@Unite4Freedom @realJoeHoft You just cannot unsee these numbers! The interference is right there in black and white!

The SOS who deleted election records and leaked passwords with no accountability wants you vote for her for Attorney General.

Here we agree, completely. We have not even talked about the almost total lack of cyber experts amongst those implementing and running these systems. It is also apparent many jurisdictions do not understand best practices as applied to database operation and maintenance or any aspect of reasonably prudent operational security.

@GuySmith1713057 @HarryU4f It's not just networking, it's a thousand things. Networking is so egregious, it reveals the corrupt, captured nature of the presumed, asserted safeguards. We're bungie jumping on burning dental floss advertised as a Kevlar hawser.