Coati

111 posts

Coati

Coati

@_Coati_

Beigetreten Kasım 2021
665 Folgt29 Follower
Coati
Coati@_Coati_·
@JonW1993 Sometimes I hear colleagues take pride in their performance with a certain set of skills (physical exam, landmark lines, DL), implying they are good or great without tech and therefore don’t “need” it, but I think they’d just be even better with it
English
0
0
0
7
Coati
Coati@_Coati_·
@JonW1993 I wonder how much of discourse about this.. and related topics such as US for vascular access, VL for intubation, is about struggling with the discomfort of not having ready access (or time for) modalities that have an intuitive and literature proven benefit
English
1
0
0
31
Jonika Weerasekare
Jonika Weerasekare@JonW1993·
Classic auscultation signs really have limited utility in high resource health care settings. Important to combine pocus with traditional physical exam and clinical reasoning. Have seen countless patients with VTIs of 5, low CI but ok cap refill and adequate organ function
Philippe Rola@ThinkingCC

@Inamanotherapy @khaycock2 @NephroP Every time i examine. Pocus is just part of a comprehensive exam. Touch, cap refill, but i won’t use a surrogate (S3/4 or percussing heartt borders) when i can look and see…

English
2
0
4
1.3K
Coati
Coati@_Coati_·
@aribindi @ThinkingCC @fersaurin I’m sure you’re plenty familiar with cardiogenic shock patients who decompensated despite best efforts, in which I’m not sure what exactly is to blame. I think the question is in aggregate does POCUS add any diagnostic/management accuracy, not is it perfect.
English
0
0
0
20
Coati
Coati@_Coati_·
@aribindi @ThinkingCC @fersaurin a critical failure. Or misplaced confidence in a POCUS judgement leading someone not to course correct if possible. But outside of anchoring, I still think the POCUS should be judged against the decision that would be made in its absence, which could be the exact same one.
English
1
0
1
24
Coati
Coati@_Coati_·
@aribindi @ThinkingCC @fersaurin Likely to benefit from a fluid load given some degree of right sided dysfunction on Echo. And then POCUS could inform a post test probability of fluids vs inotropes.
English
0
0
0
18
Coati
Coati@_Coati_·
@aribindi @ThinkingCC @fersaurin For that ‘average doc in practice’ some guidance on making the decision about whether a particular patient would benefit from fluids could reasonably come from some POCUS. Reasonable minds could disagree on the exact parameters and the pre-test % of patients likely to benefit.
English
1
0
1
21
Coati
Coati@_Coati_·
@Inamanotherapy @khaycock2 @NephroP @ThinkingCC Whether or not you feel there are cost, time or diagnostic yield or decision making reasons to POCUS someone or not is between you and the patient as it is any time you perform a maneuver or procedure or order a test.
English
0
0
1
30
Coati
Coati@_Coati_·
@Inamanotherapy @khaycock2 @NephroP @ThinkingCC This is a false dilemma, it’s not either or, you can consider POCUS to be a component of or extension of the physical, not necessarily a replacement of it. That would be like saying getting imaging or labwork of any kind is pointless because the clinical exam is sufficient.
English
2
0
2
58
Naman
Naman@Inamanotherapy·
For the Specialist not trained in the Gen Med here is an important but overlooked tip for your patient's Creatinine problems: If the BUN/Creatinine ratio is >20- Give Fluids. The Creatinine will normalize after 24 hours If the BUN/Creatinine ratio is <20- Call the nephrologist. This is not your patinet to treat !
English
10
23
239
21.7K
Coati
Coati@_Coati_·
@jackdeliuc @PulmCrit But I think some more discussion of the medicolegal landscape and the true diagnostic yield improvement of contrast outside of obvious vascular concerns on differential would be useful. Just saying the clinical risk is overblown/has changed isn’t enough at this stage IMO
English
1
0
0
21
𝙟𝙤𝙨𝙝 𝙛𝙖𝙧𝙠𝙖𝙨 💊
modern IV contrast dye for CT scans isn’t neprotoxic. definitive imaging saves lives. this is so simple but people & journals & textbooks keep on messing it up.
Dr. Chacón-Lozsán F .'.@franciscojlk

🩻Contrast-induced AKI: one of the biggest myths still shaping clinical decisions For decades we were taught: 👉 “Contrast damages the kidneys” 👉 “Avoid CT with contrast in CKD” 👉 “Hydrate, protect, delay imaging if needed” But what if… most of this is wrong?🤔 ->The uncomfortable reality Modern evidence shows: 👉 Low-osmolar contrast rarely causes true nephrotoxicity 👉 Even in CKD, AKI, and ICU patients 👉 The risk is often overestimated—or nonexistent So where did the fear come from? 📍 1950s high-osmolar contrast (actually toxic) 📍 Poorly controlled observational studies 📍 “Creatinine rise = contrast injury” assumption 👉 Correlation became causation 👉 And the dogma stayed ⚠️What recent data tells us ✔ No difference in AKI rates with vs without contrast ✔ No benefit from bicarbonate, NAC, or aggressive hydration ✔ Even ICU and AKI patients show no worsening outcomes ->Translation to real life 👉 The patient was going to develop AKI anyway...Not because of contrast!! ->The real problem: “Renalism” 👉 Avoiding necessary imaging 👉 Delaying diagnosis 👉 Choosing inferior tests And that leads to: ❌ Missed PE ❌ Delayed sepsis source control ❌ Worse outcomes ->Clinical mindset shift Instead of asking: 👉 “Will contrast harm the kidneys?” We should ask: 👉 “Will NOT doing the scan harm the patient?” ->Who still deserves caution? ✔ eGFR <30 ✔ Severe hemodynamic instability ✔ Multiple nephrotoxins Even then: 👉 Optimize volume 👉 Minimize dose 👉 Don’t delay critical imaging 🤓Bottom line ✔ Contrast nephrotoxicity exists… but is rare ✔ The fear is bigger than the risk ✔ The harm of NOT imaging is often greater In critical care 👉 We don’t treat creatinine 👉 We treat patients And sometimes… 👉 The most dangerous thing is NOT the contrast 👉 It’s hesitation. 📃Reference Florens N, Demiselle J. Kidney360 7: 445–449, 2026. doi: doi.org/10.34067/KID.0…

English
15
163
651
93.3K
Coati
Coati@_Coati_·
@PerformativeM How do you even find this stuff if you don’t follow anyone
English
0
0
0
10
PerformativeMedicine2
PerformativeMedicine2@PerformativeM·
This shit is fucking A+ stuff. You can’t even make it up.
English
1
0
0
429
Coati
Coati@_Coati_·
@PerformativeM Lol can I DM you or are you a public square only kinda guy
English
0
0
0
16
PerformativeMedicine2
PerformativeMedicine2@PerformativeM·
Yeah. Go outside or your little academic shit hole. You’ll be told to suck a dick moron. Because nurses can do your job. But go ahead. Do the winky face out in practice. Or you’ll be the cock suck that hides in academics forever.
Oreh@OrehCursor

@PerformativeM @gilmcnillchill @loser4sure98 @DrPlantel Isn’t the radiology read the answer machine? sounds redundant. And you don’t get to say no when I say “Come down here.” 😘

English
1
0
0
400