jukeboxgrad

35K posts

jukeboxgrad

jukeboxgrad

@jukeboxgrad

'compelling … thorough and well-argued' - G. Greenwald 1/10/06 https://t.co/YnoR3lfDGr 'always very much appreciated' - O. Kerr 8/31/10 https://t.co/kkjtvDDoty

Beigetreten Mart 2009
0 Folgt775 Follower
MozzieStix
MozzieStix@vivalamozz·
@RobMrT1620000 Yet you, of course, somehow know it was planted. That’s pretty impressive champ
English
2
0
0
31
MozzieStix
MozzieStix@vivalamozz·
I think we’d all agree that a fair trial isn’t just about the absence of falsified evidence. It requires the absence of bias, prejudice, and impropriety from those who gather it. When an officer demonstrates conduct like Proctor’s, their credibility is compromised at a fundamental level and the evidence they collect can’t be separated from the bias they brought. Neither Proctor, nor any evidence he gathered, had any fair place in the Commonwealth’s case in chief and I believe (especially with today’s news) it was wise for Hank Brennan to try the case without him and any evidence he gathered. The same holds true for Sean Goode who was also left out (although both were subpoenaed and available to the defense). #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #TrueCrime #BreakingNews #Boston
English
9
0
15
622
Non-Expert Witness
Non-Expert Witness@bishalot·
You are the deflector. I’m just asking for a semblance of accountability for your bullshit claims, such as ‘they would hear a collision from inside the house.’ You attack and berate people until they acknowledge when they’ve made a mistake, but you are incapable of doing so yourself. That makes you a hypocrite.
English
1
0
0
18
jukeboxgrad
jukeboxgrad@jukeboxgrad·
@Dan_Donovan_17 JO wasn’t in a bike accident. No arm hit by a car looks like JO’s arm. Where’s the photo? It doesn’t exist.
English
0
0
9
123
Dan Donovan🌺
Dan Donovan🌺@Dan_Donovan_17·
@suspiciousauce What am I dishonest about? Please. Use your words. That is a still, mine is a video. Did Coleen Crawford edit that too.
English
2
0
3
178
Dan Donovan🌺
Dan Donovan🌺@Dan_Donovan_17·
When the RED polycarbonate shell is broken. The taillight will still light red, both the running lights, and the break lights. The LED lights are RED. The diffusers have minimal impact. They are 16th of an inch and break easily. This is EXACTLY how the LEXUS SUV looked at 5:30am
English
7
8
52
3.5K
Johanna
Johanna@JohannaMordecai·
@MafiaMasshole @NatalieDiana67 The phone temp didn’t keep dropping. It only reached 50f at 1.06, not cold enough to be outside & didn’t change until 6.06. Who had the phone at 6.04.01 and took 432 steps?
English
2
0
4
123
NatalieDiana67
NatalieDiana67@NatalieDiana67·
Seeing that some people are thinking that Officer O'Keefe may have fallen and hit his head on the way up to the Alberts home...how do you explain the belt, shoe, hat, vomit in his jeans, ripped back pocket, and being found face down but with various face injuries...wouldn't he be covered with more snow if he was out there for 5+ hours? Just curious...no shade.
English
17
2
33
2.4K
girlwithaneagleeye
girlwithaneagleeye@AnEagleEyedGirl·
NORFOLK COUNTY, MA / KAREN READ SURVEY (Post 2nd Trial): Results from a survey conducted on the eve of the verdict of the 2nd trial of Karen Read for the death of John O'Keefe with Norfolk County residents (1,170 sample size balanced across various demographics - age, gender, location, education) had some telling results: Summary Findings opiniondiagnostics.com/Norfolk-Read-S… Detailed View of Question/Responses drive.google.com/file/d/1LkQRXQ… - 93% had heard of the Karen Read trial (this number also was very similar to what we witnesses during jury selection). People in this community were heavily exposed to information about this case from the news, social media, word of mouth (friends/family), etc. Interesting survey results found traditional media (local news outlets still played a key role). I concur with these findings and on a personal level, I can say I heard things early on that was not fully contextualized (as I realized once hearing trial evidence). For more info on how social media may have played a role, I recommend the below video: x.com/MafiaMasshole/… - 6% believed she she have been found guilty of manslaughter. 24% thought there remained reasonable doubt. As someone who would have fallen into the 6% category (after hearing all trial evidence), I can unequivocally say that there was evidence presented in the 2nd trial - that if one was relying on social media, lawtubers, mainstream media and not the trial evidence itself - you may have missed some critical information. - Roughly, 63% thought taillight pieces were planted by police. For those that may fall into this category, may I suggest the following video below. (Hint: The timeline surrounding Karen Read's vehicle debunks the planting theory presented by her defense team). youtube.com/watch?v=cx4KTz… - Interestingly, only 24% of respondents watched the trial every day and 16% "very often." These results suggest that perhaps the community is not familiar with some of the evidence presented in the 2nd trial - or relied on sources outside of the trial (social media, news, etc.) to help form opinions. CONCLUSION: If you may have formed an opinion about the trial based on media headlines or social media, consider watching the trial directly (including all per-trial hearings). If you came to a conclusion of innocence, consider reaching out to others with opposing views to challenge your existing beliefs. If you formed a guilty conclusion, consider having respectful communications about evidence you understood not widely being discussed on social media. A community depends on it.
YouTube video
YouTube
English
8
5
34
8K
jukeboxgrad
jukeboxgrad@jukeboxgrad·
@Geauxtgrs66 @PattyBengals148 @AnEagleEyedGirl “she used a microscope” So did the person who took this photo. I’m glad you think a grain of rice is microscopic.
jukeboxgrad@jukeboxgrad

@rowemedic @JulieCar94 @erin_lahey @jojoyousaidwhat @GeauxTiger66 @lisaharold23 @TuesdayGazette @theginnyjamz A grain of rice, photographed with a microscope. Is a grain of rice microscopic? Did this grain of rice become microscopic because it was photographed with a microscope? Words, how do they work?

English
2
0
2
53
Ken
Ken@Geauxtgrs66·
@jukeboxgrad @PattyBengals148 @AnEagleEyedGirl I guess we could argue nonstop of what the exact size of the “less than 1/16th of an inch” would be, but she used a microscope bro. Move on, you have lost this debate
English
1
0
1
11
jukeboxgrad
jukeboxgrad@jukeboxgrad·
@Geauxtgrs66 @PattyBengals148 @AnEagleEyedGirl It helps prove that you have a chronic habit of posting irrelevant video. Examining something “microscopically” does not make it microscopic. Zero witnesses said any taillight was “microscopic.”
English
1
0
3
9
Ken
Ken@Geauxtgrs66·
@jukeboxgrad @PattyBengals148 @AnEagleEyedGirl One of her descriptions was “less than 1/16th of an inch”. In their world, there is not an exact measurement for that piece of evidence and they officially use that terminology. So you get to determine that exact size, why?
English
1
0
1
15
Antiquated 📛Rogue
Antiquated 📛Rogue@ontologyofRouge·
@DonnaBisbal @1_and_only_Wade The speed decline in 0.6 seconds was the strike. What do you think she hit in front of the house that made the speed decline like that? Lol tell us cult lol.
English
5
0
0
68
Sir Thomas A. Wade 😂
Sir Thomas A. Wade 😂@1_and_only_Wade·
No one believes you no matter how much you scream about the big bad blogger Jen McCabe! Your own testimony told us everything we needed to know about the lying liar that you are! #HosLong
English
27
50
523
13K