
The Monkey in the Machine 🐒
12.9K posts

The Monkey in the Machine 🐒
@MonkeyInMachine
Host of a podcast nobody watches. Very curious about AI. Amateur philosopher. Just a monkey in a machine ruminating about transmonkeyism.




Nvidia's CEO told the American workforce this week that AI driven layoffs are a leadership problem, not a technology problem. That is a convenient argument when you are the one selling the technology. Jensen Huang told Jim Cramer that companies using AI to cut workers are simply "out of imagination," and that businesses with real vision will use AI to build more and do more. But that framing ignores the most basic economic reality of what automation actually does at scale. When a single AI agent can handle the workload of ten employees, the financially rational move for most companies is to have fewer employees and that has nothing to do with a lack of vision. Jensen is repackaging a structural economic outcome as a character flaw, which conveniently shifts blame away from the technology and toward the executives deploying it. The irony is that one of his newest major customers is Anthropic, whose own CEO Dario Amodei has said AI could eliminate the majority of entry level white collar jobs within a few years. Nvidia's growth story does not depend on which version of the future wins. Whether your CEO is a visionary expanding the business or a cost-cutter slashing headcount, the Nvidia chips still get purchased and the revenue still comes in. When Cramer pointed out that Nvidia's stock was sitting at $183 despite the GTC announcements, Huang said the market "can't hold us back forever". Because the customer base keeps expanding, OpenAI, xAI, Meta, Anthropic, and now OpenClaw, which he called as significant as the original ChatGPT launch. That expansion is real and the growth case for Nvidia is legitimate. But none of that changes what is happening to workers on the other side of these deals and calling it an imagination problem does not make it any less real.

🚨𝘽𝙍𝙀𝘼𝙆𝙄𝙉𝙂: European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen unveiled EU–INC, a new framework that lets you launch a company in 48 hours for under €100 Starting a company across the EU today = 27 legal systems, 60+ company structures 🤯 That might be about to change… The European Commission just introduced 𝗘𝗨 𝗜𝗻𝗰., a new optional corporate framework designed to make Europe actually function like one market. Here’s what stands out: → Set up a company in 48 hours → Cost: < €100 → Fully online, no minimum capital → One single framework across all EU countries → Easier share transfers & fundraising → EU-wide employee stock options (huge for talent) Especially the EU-wide stock option plans, taxed only when employees actually sell (instead of when granted) is huge. This makes it far easier for startups to attract and retain top talent, finally putting Europe closer to the US playbook. Source/More info: ec.europa.eu/commission/pre… In short: This is Europe trying to compete with the simplicity of a Delaware C-Corp 🇺🇸 And honestly… it’s long overdue. For years, European founders had 2 choices: 1. Stay local and deal with fragmentation 2. Move to the US to scale 𝗘𝗨 𝗜𝗻𝗰. is trying to remove that trade-off. If executed well, this could be one of the most important structural changes for European startups in decades. What do you think?






@_kaitodev @garrytan @karpathy All jobs will be optional. There will be universal high income.



TLDR There is no inner self, you're chasing an imaginary concept, the end.












