Jonathan Accelnorm retweeted
Jonathan Accelnorm
310 posts
Jonathan Accelnorm
@accelnorm
Cybersecurity Analyst & US Law Student. On a quest to give uplifting web3 infra to underserved communities.
Canada Joined Ağustos 2013
1.5K Following221 Followers
Jonathan Accelnorm retweeted
Most of companies leading the space are completely disconnected from the real world and local communities…
They will come only a week because it’s @EFDevcon, not for Argentina unfortunately. I’m not sure they will have time to realize the real potential here. Just hoping they will get more in touch with communities like @crecimientoar to push the adoption further after November.
This country has the regulatory framework and really no choice to use crypto daily. If you are looking for users, just go there. Don’t forget to adapt your content in Spanish as well.
I already spent 5 months in Argentina in less than 2 years, and I hope to spend more time here 🇦🇷
English
@certora @jito_sol @evanbat_ Would be great to have a workshop at Solana Startup Village Toronto too while @SagivMooly & @teryanarmenn are around. 👀
English
gm @solana builders ☀️
Join us next week at @SolanaConf for a hands-on workshop on how leading protocols secure their code with formal verification.
We’ll break down a real-world case study from @jito_sol (Re)staking, presented by @evanbat_
See you there!
lu.ma/ualypbml?v=1
English
@nicucrypto I'm pretty sure Chainlink won't be the only solution for proof of reserves.
English
@pete_rizzo_ If it's only a statement about "burning" keys, it wouldn't meet the "don't trust, verify" test.
Isn't there a "zero address" on Bitcoin, where funds are demonstrably not recoverable?
English
BREAKING: MICHAEL SAYLOR CONFIRMS HE'S BURNING THE KEYS TO OVER 17,000 #BITCOIN WORTH $1.5 BILLION
"THAT'S MY LEGACY." 🔥
English
@EricForgy Vitalik has been speaking positively about the type of subjective oracle token used by UMA. See, e.g.:
x.com/VitalikButerin…
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin
@econoar Basically "nationalize" Augur/Kleros into the base layer.
English
@WuBlockchain Vitalik has been railing against governance tokens since governance tokens became a thing.
I started drafted some ideas for a non-transferrable (but mintable) reputation token. I still think we need something like that for governance.
English
A governance attack occurred on Polymarket, where a UMA tycoon used his voting power to manipulate the oracle, allowing the market to settle false results and successfully profit. The tycoon cast 5 million tokens through three accounts, accounting for 25% of the total votes. Polymarket is committed to preventing this from happening again.
English
@adamscochran I did check too quickly, assuming there must be something corresponding to their statements.
It's unfortunate that you shifted your focus from excellent crypto content to hostile interactions about politics, regularly demeaning others.
English
@accelnorm Really?
You can’t read and analyze basic details on public records (let alone ones related to digital security) and yet call yourself a cybersecurity analyst?
English
More than 24 hours have passed.
The prize sits at $3000 now.
No one has produced any evidence of any of Elon's endless number of fraud claims.
Including from those that should be represented by public contracts on USASpending.
Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)@adamscochran
I'll double down on this. I'll give the first person to *prove* Elon found & validated any actual case of fraud - $1000. Every MAGA nut was calling me dumb for claiming Elon hadn't found fraud, so prove me wrong and take my money! Rules: 1. You have 72 hours. 2. It must be fraud found by Elon/DOGE before this post. 3. It cannot be something found by GAO, an Auditor General or other government investigator. 4. It must be actual *fraud* and not simply something you disagree with. 5. It must be something documented or provable, that was not debunked. If you prove me wrong, I'll admit my defeat, pin the post, and send you the money. Elon claims that DOGE has saved "$117B" in spending and that much of it was "fraud" especially "on the left" This should be an easy task for MAGA to "own the libs", right? 🤷♂️
English
@adamscochran Ok, thanks for clarifying. I did check quickly, assuming there must be something corresponding to their statements.
English
If you actually read those, you’d see they are funded by the DoD and that those amounts are aggregate since 2002 and 2005 respectively, not singular payments.
Leidos is a contractor who manages secure defense infrastructure in NATO allied spaces, and has speciality clearance and help manage US geospatial intelligence.
They do not make websites or feedback forums.
The headings of technical support and SETA services are used when the specific mission details are classified DoD operations.
When that happens it requires express review by internal committee and the GAO.
So no, these are not what Musk is discussing.
English
@adamscochran 3/3
How can you know those are legitimate? Did you miss the first two by searching for “between $70m and $75m” when DOGE mentioned “$75M”?
x.com/DOGE/status/19…
Department of Government Efficiency@DOGE
This week, @Interior is dissolving the Federal Consulting Group (FCG), where one government department charges another to broker consulting contracts. As an example, FCG brokered a $75M contract to design website customer satisfaction surveys, and then attempted to award $830M to conduct similar surveys. The latter contract was discovered by @Interior and DOGE, and cancelled before signature. Example of the work product:
English
@adamscochran 2/3
There is also one for $73,235,606.50 for “IGF::OT::IGF SAP APPLICATION HOSTING SERVICES” with SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP which might include the website?
usaspending.gov/award/CONT_IDV…
English
I'll double down on this.
I'll give the first person to *prove* Elon found & validated any actual case of fraud - $1000.
Every MAGA nut was calling me dumb for claiming Elon hadn't found fraud, so prove me wrong and take my money!
Rules:
1. You have 72 hours.
2. It must be fraud found by Elon/DOGE before this post.
3. It cannot be something found by GAO, an Auditor General or other government investigator.
4. It must be actual *fraud* and not simply something you disagree with.
5. It must be something documented or provable, that was not debunked.
If you prove me wrong, I'll admit my defeat, pin the post, and send you the money.
Elon claims that DOGE has saved "$117B" in spending and that much of it was "fraud" especially "on the left"
This should be an easy task for MAGA to "own the libs", right? 🤷♂️
Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)@adamscochran
And yet, Elon has produced 0 evidence of *any* fraud in any department his team has reviewed. He’s shared evidence of programs he doesn’t like or agree with. He’s shared his own team’s endless accounting and clerical errors. But still, no fraud. $0. Put up, or shut up!
English
Muse is now live at muse.markets.
Tokenize your crypto app idea directly from Twitter. Be the first to buy into others’ ideas in a PvE market. Build projects that already have a community of users.
Join us in the innovation trenches.
English
@cz_binance Even if you don't want to profit from your dog pic, consider providing an address that can benefit some initiative or the @Binance Foundation...
English
For those asking for a CA (contract address) from me, no, I am NOT issuing a meme coin. I am just posting a photo of my dog and his name, as some of your requested.
I also took advice from this thread yesterday. Let the best meme coin in the community win. 🙏🙏🙏
Byzantine General@ByzGeneral
@cz_binance Yeah there will be multiple memecoins. It's kind of a gamble, one will get lucky and start running and then the market usually sticks with that one.
English
If the state of memecoin launches keeps being so disappointing, I will consider making a launchpad that advances these ideals…
But with so many competitors to Pump Fun being launched already, I’d like to ask if anybody is already making memecoins much better for the world, and how?
Are there also other better memecoin types I am missing?
English
After Pump Fun having launched on January 19, 2024, more should be expected from the leading launchpad to make memecoins more meaningful (and not just more "fun" or better curated, as it plans). Right before the January 20, 2025, inauguration, Donald Trump and Melania Trump could still get away with avoiding a "fair launch" as implemented by the launchpads, or thoughtfulness, given their status.
This should not be acceptable in 2025, but it is because of the money to be made, both by promoters and traders.
I call on Key Opinion Leaders to advocate on what else memecoins could be, and for a consensus to be formed around certain guidelines or token ratings to warrant allocations to memecoins (especially when publicly earmarking funds for memecoins like @AvalancheFDN did). More competition and manifested market interest in thoughtful approaches will be necessary so that pointless celebrity memecoins are not that appealing anymore.
English
5 Types of Memecoins That Can Do Better
It’s a shame that celebrities keep launching pointless memecoins for speculative value. In his March 29, 2024 article, @VitalikButerin called to consider what else they could be. He has long said that “issuing coins could be a new way to fund important public projects”. vitalik.eth.limo/general/2024/0…
In this post, I’m going to restate his ideas and state more types. Token promoters wanting to be impactful can consider them. Buyers should form a consensus to only buy thoughtful projects, as led by major allocators committing to certain guidelines or token ratings.
English