Hashtagmath

Started reading @LawrenceLepard “The Big Print”. I’m going to Xeet up a storm as there are certain to be endless quotes worth spreading widely. So let’s start at the beginning, the foreword. In a world of PnD influenzas/KOLs @maxkeiser makes a great point. Who do you want working for you? When you buy bitcoin those working for you include Larry Fink, Michael Saylor, and Paul Tudor Jones. 🤔

Just finished. Honestly a fantastic read that surprised me. Moving from nonfiction to fiction can’t be easy, but Lyn did a great job applying nonfiction concepts to her fictional world. Finished hoping that this becomes a series.

@_Checkmatey_ Beautifully written. Anyone who disagrees is either an idiot or has ulterior motives.

A few thoughts on quantum: The debate around "if" vs "when" a CRQC comes to market is a fruitless one. You won't convince either side to switch, because there is little observable progress, and the risk is there may not be until its too late. The risk a CRQC comes to market is existential if Bitcoin doesn't have a credible plan of action. Risk is probability x consequence, and even if the probability is low, the consequence is 100%. Thus any sane actor should see developing a plan as worth the effort. Arguments that Bitcoin devs are doing nothing appear to be false. Arguments that 'we're all good, do nothing' are also mistaken. Reality is in between, it's a solveable issue, folks are working on it, AND we do NOT have a credible plan yet. Rushing PQ-cryptography is a massive risk, and is the wrong approach. Not developing a credible set of BIPs, is also a mistake. Coinbase and Nic absolutely have an incentive...to protect their bags and business models, which are massively long Bitcoin. They may also have incentives which are misaligned with Bitcoin, and yet that still doesn't disqualify their opinions. Coinbase has millions of BTC folks, they are the 'longest' entity in the world. Question them yes, but assuming pure malice without considering that they are capitalists looking after their interests, is frankly retarded. I'm a Bitcoiner who is massively long the asset (holdings and business), and I try my best to adopt a reasonable middle ground opinion of things. The two extremes of 'emergency' and 'no problem' are both wrong, because they do not understand the simple equation of risk = probability x consequence. I fully support the development of PQ BIPs for Bitcoin. I very much look forward to learning about the proposals, discussing the trade-offs, and doing what little I can to form consensus, and parse the complexities. Having a plan, and not needing it, is far better than needing a plan, and not having one. The truth is in the middle, and there is little benefit to debating in the quagmire of 'will-it, won't it' ever show up. A CRQC may never show up. In that case, the plan stays in the BIP repo as copy and unmerged, but fully reviewed code. What is a totally fucked result, is if we assume a CRQC won't show up, and then it does. Don't fuck this up, the middle ground is the correct path to walk. Probability x Consequence. Small number x 100% loss == take it seriously.

@AutismCapital Your post sounds like hyperbole but it is spot on. Watched this with my kids and left angry. Propaganda is truly the only apt description. Mabel sucks.

MOVIE REVIEW: Saw a new Pixar movie called “HOPPERS”. The positives: delightful animation style, some genuinely funny moments, very cute for kids/entertaining. The negatives: the most unlikable main character imaginable. The MC is a 19 yo girl named Mabel who literally only causes problems for everyone around her because of her overly righteous animal activism trying to save the forestland. She lies, she steals, she uses, she kills (actually), she breaks every law, she disrupts not only the lives of the humans but also the animals, she causes billions of dollars in property damage, all because she can’t properly process her rage emotions. Without spoiling, by the end of the movie she learns absolutely no lessons, NONE, she has no accountability or consequence at all, suddenly everyone is okay with her, she doesn’t end up in prison, and she has no growth as a character at all. The moral of the story literally could be boiled down to: be a psycho activist and that’s cool. It’s a shame because the animation, music, gags, everything outside of the actual main character was really enjoyable and fun. The activist plot even if done differently could also have been made to work. But as the movie was, the MC, Mabel, is profoundly annoying and unlikable, the other characters in the movie even self-referentially say that she is shrill and annoying. Great animation. Wrong values. Truly no consequences for Mabel, who should objectively be in prison. Fun movie though.

@SteaknShake All in… hats off to a company that is future proofing their operations.

Starting March 1, ALL hourly employees earn a Bitcoin bonus of 21 cents per hour! 🧡 We also offer $1k contribution to Trump Accounts, supporting our employees ' children. 🇺🇸 We aim to be a Maximum-Wage Employer in our respective communities. We look to pay the best to obtain the best so we can give the best! We take care of our employees, who then take care of our customers, and the results take care of themselves!

@HodlMagoo 😂😂😂😂

Jane Street are reputable actors in the Bitcoin ecosystem

@HODL15Capital That’s some serious distribution.

@ArlenHansen @Frank_Giustra @Mandrik Trying to put a true OG on blast. What a joke. These are the pansies that pretend to be investors.

@Frank_Giustra @Mandrik @mandrik has clearly never experienced a bear market... "Embrace the pain?" No thanks....

Embrace the pain of a Bitcoin bear market. It's Fight Club-esque. "How much can you know about yourself if you've never been in a fight?"

@mikealfred Eternal bull in the face of endless nukes. Chapeau

It's like actually over. Unironically.

@saylor @lopp @Croesus_BTC Nice to see you chime in… price action has everyone flustered.

@lopp @Croesus_BTC We buy real bitcoin. We don’t rehypothecate.

Strategy has acquired 40,150 BTC so far in 2026. Only 11,700 BTC has been mined so far in 2026. Eventually, the BTC price must go higher. Much higher.

@hodlonaut Nic has been a shitcoiner for so long now I don’t know him as anything else. When you’re focus on VC and maximizing your net worth you become an extractor. That’s who Nic is now.

Being against grifting on the blockchain is so.. *cheks notes*… «anti intellectual» 😂🤡 Nic’s retard star has kept rising, I see… (Have to use screenshot since I’m blocked for ages)

@StackerSatoshi Relentless bid and few sellers. So easy.

Gold has gained 1.25X the entire $BTC market cap in value this week.

@ByzGeneral Think that’s how most are feeling… something just feels off. The narratives don’t fit the action.

Good - why the fuck is every single fucking asset in the world ripping except for fucking crypto god fucking dammit why do I even work in this market fuck - morning.

@WalkerAmerica 65-66

Help me settle debate with my wife… what is the optimal nighttime bedroom temperature for sleeping?

@zerohedge lol… is she a Deloitte consultant?

"big SWOT analysis"

@BitPaine It truly blows my mind. If all this gambled levered cash went to spot bitcoin buys nobody would have to worry about getting rich. Instead it’s PvP where retail levered to the tits get smoked over and over again.

did you know that you can just not trade bitcoin and instead just buy bitcoin and then you don’t have to get poorer and instead you can get richer

@CryptoKaleo Not if you mute.

Isn’t he 50% of everyone’s feed?

@FurkanGozukara Never sure if I should love or hate these posts. Love because it highlights how early we still are. Hate because it highlights how stupid most people are. Math education failing the human race.

LMAO this scam never ending You can buy and sell 0.00000000001 bitcoin thus it is infinite Now try same to buy 0.000000001 gram gold

@matthew_sigel That’s some serious FUD. Bitcoin has always been anti-fragile. Feels like quantum is the next thing for the community to solve together as it’s clearly impacting the perspective of big players.

One of the most widely followed Wall Street strategists Chris Wood (Jefferies, former CLSA), author of GREED & FEAR, removed BTC from his long-term asset allocation model portfolio last week, due to quantum computing risks. The paper that spooked him is in replies.

@JSeyff Stablecoins offering yield is just another competitor. Banks don’t want more competition. They want a monopoly on money. Protection of incumbents is what this is all about. Not free market economics.

I don’t fully understand the Banks’ argument here. There’s so many high yield savings accounts out there that offer 3% or more. Betterment, Marcus/Goldman, CIT, SoFi, AmEx, Wealthfront etc. How are these not the same pressure on <0.1% yield deposits as stablecoin yields?