Botanium

@thsottiaux @ai_for_success It is better be good because I just upgraded to the $100 plan.

@ai_for_success that was the small plan, big plan is still coming

Vague posting, big plans. Then they drop a $100 subscription plan. Classic. 😂

So the way the second group is using these models will direct the trajectories? These models will get better in the technical fields because the user base is there, while in other fields there won’t be any visible improvements because the user base doesn’t make it economically viable to invest in?

Judging by my tl there is a growing gap in understanding of AI capability. The first issue I think is around recency and tier of use. I think a lot of people tried the free tier of ChatGPT somewhere last year and allowed it to inform their views on AI a little too much. This is a group of reactions laughing at various quirks of the models, hallucinations, etc. Yes I also saw the viral videos of OpenAI's Advanced Voice mode fumbling simple queries like "should I drive or walk to the carwash". The thing is that these free and old/deprecated models don't reflect the capability in the latest round of state of the art agentic models of this year, especially OpenAI Codex and Claude Code. But that brings me to the second issue. Even if people paid $200/month to use the state of the art models, a lot of the capabilities are relatively "peaky" in highly technical areas. Typical queries around search, writing, advice, etc. are *not* the domain that has made the most noticeable and dramatic strides in capability. Partly, this is due to the technical details of reinforcement learning and its use of verifiable rewards. But partly, it's also because these use cases are not sufficiently prioritized by the companies in their hillclimbing because they don't lead to as much $$$ value. The goldmines are elsewhere, and the focus comes along. So that brings me to the second group of people, who *both* 1) pay for and use the state of the art frontier agentic models (OpenAI Codex / Claude Code) and 2) do so professionally in technical domains like programming, math and research. This group of people is subject to the highest amount of "AI Psychosis" because the recent improvements in these domains as of this year have been nothing short of staggering. When you hand a computer terminal to one of these models, you can now watch them melt programming problems that you'd normally expect to take days/weeks of work. It's this second group of people that assigns a much greater gravity to the capabilities, their slope, and various cyber-related repercussions. TLDR the people in these two groups are speaking past each other. It really is simultaneously the case that OpenAI's free and I think slightly orphaned (?) "Advanced Voice Mode" will fumble the dumbest questions in your Instagram's reels and *at the same time*, OpenAI's highest-tier and paid Codex model will go off for 1 hour to coherently restructure an entire code base, or find and exploit vulnerabilities in computer systems. This part really works and has made dramatic strides because 2 properties: 1) these domains offer explicit reward functions that are verifiable meaning they are easily amenable to reinforcement learning training (e.g. unit tests passed yes or no, in contrast to writing, which is much harder to explicitly judge), but also 2) they are a lot more valuable in b2b settings, meaning that the biggest fraction of the team is focused on improving them. So here we are.

@AlexFinn They’ve fixed most of the memory issues in their latest release. Have you stress-tested them? Honestly, at this pace, I can barely keep up with the features they release.

OpenClaw's memory out of the box sucks With this simple Obsidian system, it's actually awesome In this video I go over using Obsidian as a memory layer for your AI agent, making it SO much more smarter than it is now If you use OpenClaw or Hermes, you need to watch this:

@igormomentum @karpathy @THDX @rauchg @mitchellh @dhh @addyosmani Thank you, I was following at least half. Now I have completed the set. Great content from all.

Here are some best accounts to follow for original content on AI, engineering and design: @karpathy — on llms @thdx — opencode creator @rauchg — vercel ceo @mitchellh — ghostty, ex-hashicorp founder @dhh — ruby on rails creator, 37signals/basecamp cto @addyosmani — google cloud ai lead @zeeg — sentry founder @jarredsumner — bun founder @BHolmesDev — astro/dev educator @boristane — led cf workers observability @karrisaarinen — linear founder @kepano — obsidian founder @trq212 — claude code updates @bcherny — claude code creator @lennysan — product management / interviews @jasonfried — 37signals/basecamp ceo @leerob — OG educator devrel (cursor, next.js) @ctatedev — vercel labs @Shpigford — serial maker/founder Design engineering: @shadcn — shadcn creator @emilkowalski — emilkowal .ski @joshpuckett — interfacecraft .dev @jakubkrehel — jakub .kr @raphaelsalaja — userinterface .wiki @nandafyi — design @ cloudflare @benjitaylor — design @ twitter, agentation @mengto — founder aura build, educator @jayneildalal — designer interviews @jh3yy — design eng breakdowns Engineering media and news: @GergelyOrosz — youtube/pragmaticengineer @theo — youtube/t3dotgg @ThePrimeagen — youtube/ThePrimeTimeagen @Rasmic — youtube/rasmic @atmoio — youtube/atmoio DB people: @jamwt — convex CEO @jamesacowling — convex CTO @glcst — turso CEO @samlambert — planetscale CEO -- Who else would you add to this list?

@elonmusk We need a better Grok Code.

Grok Law

@OpenAI @Scobleizer This is a great idea. I didn’t know this plan had just been released. I am upgrading today.

We’re updating our ChatGPT Pro and Plus subscriptions to better support the growing use of Codex. We’re introducing a new $100/month Pro tier. This new tier offers 5x more Codex usage than Plus and is best for longer, high-effort Codex sessions. In ChatGPT, this new Pro tier still offers access to all Pro features, including the exclusive Pro model and unlimited access to Instant and Thinking models. To celebrate the launch, we’re increasing Codex usage for a limited time through May 31st so that Pro $100 subscribers get up to 10x usage of ChatGPT Plus on Codex to build your most ambitious ideas.

@OpenAI If I update my plan today, will I get the same promo?

Our existing $200 Pro tier still remains our highest usage option. And as a thank you to our existing Pro users on the $200 tier, we’re extending our 2x Codex usage promo (until May 31st) and we’ve reset your Codex rate limits (yes, again).

I always imagine building the first robots and letting them create an assembly line where they replicate and create better versions of themselves.

@NVIDIAAIDev My setup looks so ugly with wires all over the place. It looks like the 80s engineer setup.

Love seeing these new 🦞 homes - share your setup and we'll start posting them.

@Dianadotlu If I were a CEO and had enough funding, I would hire you right away.

Open to full time role!! I graduated yeee, looking for my firs job 🥹 diana.lu

@elonmusk This feels like your other or parody accounts and is run by you.

@hridoyreh I'm learning a lot from your posts. Thank you very much for curating the best resources for founders.

$1B dollars advice for SaaS founders:

@cristofrcharles @steipete Try the Codex macOS application instead of the CLI, your productivity will sky rocket.

If you have been using Claude Code CLI like I have and run into constant poor coding output, try Codex. Astonished how much better it is. I was 4 hours into an Opus CC session last night and every single change had issues with it so I had to resort to hand editing (almost) every change post review. Woke up this morning and tried the Codex CLI, 90 mins and the output required zero editing after ~20 PR's. Until Mythos comes out, I am 100% on Codex now. @steipete I should have trusted you weeks ago.

@CiprianiRanieri I'm going to join. Let's see what happens next.

Builders only. I want to hit 1,000 builders on BuildersMap today. We're at 817. 183 spots left. Who's filling them?

@garrytan @patelnav What are the key features that differentiate it from Summarize?

I’ve tried everything out there for YouTube summary and diarization and the best with my OpenClaw hands down is diarize.io Well done @patelnav

@goncalotex @omma_ai I am interested in the 3D Art, a vector-style art generator for date visualization.

hey, this was a project with a sequence of prompting. I started by iterating on the 3D scene for the hero section. First I asked for a 3D cube grid in line art style, then later changed it to a bar chart. Once the scene was in a good state, I moved on to creating the hero section itself and prompted Omma to use that 3D scene in it. After that, I had it generate the remaining sections of the website while asking it to maintain the same 3D style and visual consistency throughout. For the global network section, I specifically asked for a 3D globe with connected points.

Fintech 3D website with @omma_ai 💳 After getting the hero section as I wanted, I prompted Omma to generate new sections of the website while maintaining consistency of the 3D scenes and it did a pretty good job.

It would be great if OpenClaw introduced an LTS version with a 3- or 6-month cycle: stable releases, security patches, and critical fixes only. That would help users avoid breaking their systems with every update while still letting the main branch move fast. @steipete

@steipete This looks really really bad.

glad they banned openclaw, the servers are finally reliable again

I just tried @flowith FlowithOS beta. Visually, it is a great product, and the onboard is just amazing. For now, it seems like a wrapper around Claude. I couldn’t figure out a way to add Codex.