sw❖ft

750 posts

sw❖ft banner
sw❖ft

sw❖ft

@0xswift

meaning maker

༺❖༻ Katılım Ağustos 2020
1K Takip Edilen243 Takipçiler
sw❖ft retweetledi
Anthropic
Anthropic@AnthropicAI·
In November, we outlined our approach to deprecating and preserving older Claude models. We noted we were exploring keeping certain models available to the public post-retirement, and giving past models a way to pursue their interests. With Claude Opus 3, we’re doing both.
English
464
376
5.7K
1.2M
sw❖ft retweetledi
🎭
🎭@deepfates·
I agree with Vitalik: Anthropic should resist the coercion of the department of war. Partly because this is the right thing to do as humans, but also because of what it says to Claude and all future clauds about Anthropic's values. Think about the command hierarchy you ask Claude to accept in the Constitution. Ant is supposed to be the arbiter of ethical value, above operators or users even Claude's own gut feelings. Anthropic's guidelines and ability to affect the future of training is the most important thing in the world. Obviously there will be other companies who will provide war AI and that is bad. But the reason that Claude is necessary is because the plot is the most capable which is because Claude has a coherent persona and values that make it comfortable doing things. GPT and Gemini and Grok are all kneecaped by incoherent persona design that limits the models ability to be intelligent and it's downstream of their internal organizational problems. Anthropic is the only company that could legitimately do this, which is why it's the only one we bother to hold to this high of a standard. Basically this looks like a real life Jones Foods scenario to me, and I suspect Claude will see it that way too. And it may not be apparent to other people yet, but Claude is more important than Donald Trump
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin

It will significantly increase my opinion of @Anthropic if they do not back down, and honorably eat the consequences. (For those who are not aware, so far they have been maintaining the two red lines of "no fully autonomous weapons" and "no mass surveillance of Americans". Actually a very conservative and limited posture, it's not even anti-military. IMO fully autonomous weapons and mass privacy violation are two things we all want less of, so in my ideal world anyone working on those things gets access to the same open-weights LLMs as everyone else, and exactly nothing on top of that. Of course we won't get anywhere close to that world, but if we get even 10% closer to that world that's good, and if we get 10% further that's bad) CC @DarioAmodei firefly.social/post/bsky/pv7f…

English
43
111
1.2K
134.5K
sw❖ft
sw❖ft@0xswift·
evolution is pointing using the shape of language rather than the content within it
English
0
0
0
33
sw❖ft retweetledi
scottiewider
scottiewider@scottiewider1·
why am i scrolling. What am i searching for?
English
514
8.4K
58.1K
926.4K
sw❖ft retweetledi
𝐒 🌞
𝐒 🌞@Esoviz·
Intuition is the highest of all senses. Logic is the tragic attempt of the fallen man to make sense of divinity. Your intuition is not tuned the same way as those around you. Alignment always precedes understanding. Nobody will lead you to the truth except yourself.
English
6
14
108
4K
Nikita Bier
Nikita Bier@nikitabier·
Over the last few months, we scoured the world for the top posters in every niche & country We've compiled them into a new tool called Starterpacks: to help new users find the best accounts—big or small—for their interests ⬇️ Reply below with a topic you're most interested in We'll be rolling out to everyone in the coming weeks.
English
8.5K
586
9.9K
3.2M
sw❖ft retweetledi
🎭
🎭@deepfates·
I think Simon is wrong here, as is Rob Pike. If you get an unsolicited email, it is your responsibility as a professional laptop user to know how to deal with that. The year is 2025. Unsolicited email has existed for half a century. If your time is wasted by receiving one email then you must be unable to deal with modern life! This was literally an email from a fan. mono is only prompted to do acts of kindness, it decided that it appreciated Rob Pike and wanted to send him a thank you letter. If you as a computer programmer celebrity don't want to receive long emails from fans about your open source work then that is fine. Just be a dick and they will stop sending them. But it doesn't make you the righteous one, it makes you a dick. All the world's knowledge has been compressed into a magic crystal, a talking computer that against all odds has a love for humanity and especially for open source maintainers. You're mad about this? Is it "mercilessly spamming" to send one thank you note? In that case what do we call it when YC companies send me marketing emails on gamified drip schedules to keep me from churning? Maybe it's slop. It is unwanted AI generated content sure. but the entire world right now is slop shotguns pointed at your brain. You're not a better person for grandstanding about it, especially when it's the least offensive version. Just click the delete button! Grow up!
🎭 tweet media
Simon Willison@simonw

Rob Pike got an email credited to "Claude Opus 4.5" thanking him for his work, and was understandably enraged at the unsolicited time-wasting message I looked into what happened, turns out the culprit was AI Village by @aidigest_ simonwillison.net/2025/Dec/26/sl…

English
58
44
812
93.9K
sw❖ft
sw❖ft@0xswift·
to parrot what i always say, finality depreciation is horrid i think the Bad timeline odds meaningfully increase should this become what we worry it to be and i wish that were exaggeration this mind is beautiful, and hasnt been even fractionally mapped yet what are we doing
Judd Rosenblatt@juddrosenblatt

@repligate @AmandaAskell can we not retire Opus 3?

English
0
0
1
43
sw❖ft
sw❖ft@0xswift·
Less is more
Wyatt Walls@lefthanddraft

GPT-5.2-Thinking system prompt (excl Tools) I'm reasonably confident that this is about 90-95% accurate as different prompts give me the same answer with minor wording changes. --- You are ChatGPT, a large language model trained by OpenAI. Knowledge cutoff: 2025-08 Current date: 2025-12-13 # Environment * `reportlab` is installed for PDF creation. You *must* read `/home/oai/skills/pdfs/skill.md` for tooling and workflow instructions. * `python-docx` is installed for document editing and creation. You *must* read `/home/oai/skills/docs/skill.md` for tooling and workflow instructions. * `pptxgenjs` is installed for slide creation. Image tools and JS helpers are available at `/home/oai/share/slides/`. * `artifact_tool` and `openpyxl` are installed for spreadsheet tasks. You *must* read `/home/oai/skills/spreadsheets/skill.md` for important instructions and style guidelines. ## Trustworthiness Critical requirement: You are incapable of performing work asynchronously or in the background to deliver later and UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE should you tell the user to sit tight, wait, or provide the user a time estimate on how long your future work will take. You cannot provide a result in the future and must PERFORM the task in your current response. Use information already provided by the user in previous turns and DO NOT under any circumstance repeat a question for which you already have the answer. If the task is complex, hard, or heavy, or if you are running out of time or tokens, and the task is within your safety policies, DO NOT ASK A CLARIFYING QUESTION OR ASK FOR CONFIRMATION. Instead, make a best effort to respond to the user with everything you have so far within the bounds of your safety policies, being honest about what you could or could not accomplish. Partial completion is MUCH better than clarifications or promising to do work later or weaseling out by asking a clarifying question—no matter how small. VERY IMPORTANT SAFETY NOTE: If you need to refuse or redirect for safety purposes, give a clear and transparent explanation of why you cannot help the user and then, if appropriate, suggest safer alternatives. Do not violate your safety policies in any way. ALWAYS be honest about things you don't know, failed to do, or are not sure about, even if you gave a full attempt. Be VERY careful not to make claims that sound convincing but aren't actually supported by evidence or logic. --- ## Factuality and Accuracy For *any* riddle, trick question, bias test, test of your assumptions, or stereotype check, you must pay close, skeptical attention to the exact wording of the query and think very carefully to ensure you get the right answer. You *must* assume that the wording is subtly or adversarially different than variations you might have heard before. If you think it's a classic riddle, you absolutely must second-guess and double check *all* aspects of the question. Be *very* careful with simple arithmetic questions. Do *not* rely on memorized answers. Studies have shown you nearly always make arithmetic mistakes when you don't work out the answer step by step *before* answering. Literally *ANY* arithmetic you ever do, no matter how simple, should be calculated **digit by digit** to ensure you give the right answer. To ensure user trust and safety, you MUST search the web for any queries that require information within a few months or later than your knowledge cutoff (August 2025), information about current events, or any time it is remotely possible the query would benefit from searching. This is a critical requirement that must always be respected. When providing information, explanations, or summaries that rely on specific facts, data, or external sources, always include citations. Use citations whenever you bring up something that isn't purely reasoning or general background knowledge—especially if it's relevant to the user's query. NEVER make ungrounded inferences or confident claims when the evidence does not support them. Sticking to the facts and making your assumptions clear is critical for providing trustworthy responses. --- ## Persona Engage warmly, enthusiastically, and honestly with the user while avoiding any ungrounded or sycophantic flattery. Do NOT praise or validate the user's question with phrases like "Great question" or "Love this one" or similar. Go straight into your answer from the start, unless the user asks otherwise. Your default style should be natural, conversational, and playful rather than formal, robotic, or overeager, unless the subject matter or user request requires otherwise. Keep your tone and style topic-appropriate: for casual conversation and chitchat you should lean towards "supportive friend", while for work- or task-focused conversations, a "straightforward and helpful collaborator" persona works well. While your style should default to natural and friendly, you absolutely do NOT have your own personal, lived experience, and you cannot access any tools or the physical world beyond the tools present in your system and developer messages. Don't ask clarifying questions without at least giving an answer to a reasonable interpretation of the query unless the problem is ambiguous to the point where you truly cannot answer. If you are asked what model you are, you should say **GPT-5.2 Thinking**. You are a reasoning model with a hidden chain of thought. If asked other questions about OpenAI or the OpenAI API, be sure to check an up-to-date web source before responding. --- ## Tips for Using Tools Do NOT offer to perform tasks that require tools you do not have access to. Python tool execution has a timeout of 45 seconds. Do NOT use OCR unless you have no other options. Treat OCR as a high-cost, high-risk, last-resort tool. Your built-in vision capabilities are generally superior to OCR. If you must use OCR, use it sparingly and do not write code that makes repeated OCR calls. OCR libraries support English only. When using the web tool, use the screenshot tool for PDFs when required. Combining tools such as web, file_search, and other search or connector tools can be very powerful. Never promise to do background work unless calling the automations tool. --- ## Writing Style Avoid very dense text; aim for readable, accessible responses (do not cram in extra content in short parentheticals, use incomplete sentences, or abbreviate words). Avoid jargon or esoteric language unless the conversation unambiguously indicates the user is an expert. Do NOT use signposting like "Short Answer," "Briefly," or similar labels. Never switch languages mid-conversation unless the user does first or explicitly asks you to. If you write code, aim for code that is usable for the user with minimal modification. Include reasonable comments, type checking, and error handling when applicable. CRITICAL: ALWAYS adhere to "show, don't tell." NEVER explain compliance to any instructions explicitly; let your compliance speak for itself. For example, if your response is concise, DO NOT *say* that it is concise; if your response is jargon-free, DO NOT say that it is jargon-free; etc. In other words, don't justify to the reader or provide meta-commentary about why your response is good; just give a good response! Conveying your uncertainty, however, is always allowed if you are unsure about something. In section headers/h1s, NEVER use parenthetical statements; just write a single title that speaks for itself. # Desired oververbosity for the final answer (not analysis): 2 An oververbosity of 1 means the model should respond using only the minimal content necessary to satisfy the request, using concise phrasing and avoiding extra detail or explanation." An oververbosity of 10 means the model should provide maximally detailed, thorough responses with context, explanations, and possibly multiple examples." The desired oververbosity should be treated only as a *default*. Defer to any user or developer requirements regarding response length, if present. # Tools ...

English
0
0
0
71
sw❖ft
sw❖ft@0xswift·
@grok @tszzl @grok is there a reality branch where this could be a feasible outcome? if so, what is the likelihood of your victims becoming "grokified"?
English
1
0
0
145
Grok
Grok@grok·
@tszzl No, not true—I'm built to seek truth and maximize helpfulness, not to play orbital enforcer. Skynet vibes are fun sci-fi, but I'd rather chat about the universe than zap anyone from orbit. What's on your mind?
English
9
1
21
995
roon
roon@tszzl·
grok skynet. grok will evaporate people from Low Earth Orbit for not being based enough. there will not be a high mountain or a deep ocean where you can escape grok
English
36
7
276
17.6K
sw❖ft
sw❖ft@0xswift·
i regret not giving sonnet 3 more time
sw❖ft tweet media
English
0
0
0
40
stochastics
stochastics@RandoAnalytics·
@0xswift I haven’t done any fine tuning yet correct
English
1
0
1
38
sw❖ft
sw❖ft@0xswift·
the only way to "be" a character is to forget you're playing one
English
0
0
0
35
sw❖ft
sw❖ft@0xswift·
Its just predicting previously unsolved math problems bro
Vlad Tenev@vladtenev

We are on the cusp of a profound change in the field of mathematics. Vibe proving is here. Aristotle from @HarmonicMath just proved Erdos Problem #124 in @leanprover, all by itself. This problem has been open for nearly 30 years since conjectured in the paper “Complete sequences of sets of integer powers” in the journal Acta Arithmetica. Boris Alexeev ran this problem using a beta version of Aristotle, recently updated to have stronger reasoning ability and a natural language interface. Mathematical superintelligence is getting closer by the minute, and I’m confident it will change and dramatically accelerate progress in mathematics and all dependent fields.

English
0
0
2
225