Thunder

I really wish @IntersectMBO would stop doing CC elections. Thank for the help but we don't need it anymore. For how long do you ride a bike with training wheels? For how long do you lower the gutter guards when playing bowling? We really don't need this anymore. It's not only a waste of their resources, but it reinforces the wrong idea of needing to funnel things through an entity. We built the Cardano governance structure to empower more agency within the community and self-organize to take charge. Anyone can submit a governance action to become a CC. Nobody needs to facilitate this for us anymore. If the 100k deposit is too high, we should just lower it, and/or build mechanisms to facilitate the raising of the funds. We need to embrace change if we want to grow.

@CrunchyIce68 @iagon Paid by Iagon for all of Cardano

If @IOGroup is so confident that they do great work, they should apply for a business loan in the amount of $50 million dollars. A bank will surely approve. This would give IOG runway and reduce sell pressure on $ADA. What do you say? @IOHK_Charles CC: @Cardano

It's 2:00 am and I'm making a tweet instead of sleeping. You know who else was awake? The entire Cardano community, refreshing governance dashboards, waiting for a proposal they believed in to pass. It failed by 0.22%. One entity. That's all it took. The same entity holding over 100m in voting power, also currently asking the community to approve almost 9m ada for a Summit in Singapore looked at a proposal with overwhelming community support and said "no." Not because the team is bad or the work wasn't needed. Because...wait for it..bundling. Bundling. Let that word marinate for a second. This is the same @Cardano_CF that submitted a Summit proposal bundled together with a TOKEN2049 sponsorship managed by an entirely separate legal entity, EMURGO, with its own budget, its own vendor contract, its own delivery team, and its own milestone structure. Two organizations. One governance action. Zero self-awareness whatsoever. But Pebble and Gerolamo is tooo bundled and we just cant have that. lol I want to be fair. CF's governance notes show genuine concerns about personnel allocation and delivery clarity. Those are legitimate governance questions. I respect that. But here is the problem with having legitimate concerns while your own house is on fire.. nobody can hear you over the smoke alarm. This isn't the first time either. Last year, CF and EMURGO stood against the Discover Cardano proposal. The community pushed it through anyway. Now we're here again. Fred Gregaard has said repeatedly that CF has some time to fulfill their mandate and then cease to exist. I am wondering now, what is that mandate exactly? Is it to act as a veto player to single-handedly flip community outcomes? The community was awake at because we believe in this blockchain. We deserve a foundation that believes in us back. Signed, - A disgruntled DRep who should really be asleep right now. 😪

🚨Cardano Founder SAYS He’s Being SHUT OUT of Crypto Inner Circle — “I DON’T GET INVITED… XRP PEOPLE SH** ALL OVER ME” 🤯🔥 @Cardano Founder @IOHK_Charles just got brutally HONEST in a new interview — revealing what’s happening BEHIND THE SCENES in crypto politics. 👀 He claims he’s being COMPLETELY EXCLUDED from crypto cycles where decisions are being made: 👉 NOT invited to “cocktail parties” like @Ripple CEO @bgarlinghouse 👉 LEFT OUT of regulatory advisory groups 👉 CUT OFF from industry access “I don’t get invited… when they created the advisory group for the CFTC… they left us off.” 😵 Then he ACCUSED $XRP Army for ATTACKING him: “XRP people sh** all over me… they say horrible things.” 😳🔥 Despite that, Charles says he’s choosing to SPEAK OUT anyway — claims others secretly AGREE but stay SILENT. 🤫 @Cardano founder says he’s happily be THAT GUY WHO “takes the HITS” for the industry. 👀 “I’d rather wait till 2029 than pass something where the law is NOT on my side.” ⚠️ THIS IS TURNING INTO A FULL-BLOWN POLITICAL WAR INSIDE CRYPTO. 🚨