Aaron

2.3K posts

Aaron

Aaron

@Aaron_1jef

Katılım Ekim 2021
45 Takip Edilen27 Takipçiler
Bullet
Bullet@OMbulletpoint·
@LoganDobson My friend was murdered in his apartment near Logan Circle a little over a month ago.
English
5
0
3
2.6K
Aaron
Aaron@Aaron_1jef·
@Pyth_of_Samos @2024dion I note the “minimum acceptable network” caption he has there: Does he have a map for a maximum feasible network image?
English
0
0
0
6
Jeff Berner
Jeff Berner@Pyth_of_Samos·
@2024dion Ray Delahanty, aka CityNerd, proposes these city pairs as having sufficient populations & the distances close enough to build High Speed Rail in the U. . With freeways & airports at capacity, it just makes sense to use airports for longer flights. Traffic congestion is cost too.
Jeff Berner tweet media
English
1
0
0
56
Val C. Delamere ♦️
Val C. Delamere ♦️@ValDelamere·
does anyone else remember how after jan 6th until biden's inauguration the US was under the effective rule of a military junta led by gen mark milley? just me?
English
36
109
6.1K
283.7K
Alan Fisher
Alan Fisher@alanthefisher·
@conniekettel I have a more nuanced version that I'm releasing soon with a video actually, so I'll have an update
English
3
0
18
1K
Aaron
Aaron@Aaron_1jef·
@ferald_gord Why exactly do you say? Genuinely curious
English
0
0
0
678
Dillion 🇺🇸
Dillion 🇺🇸@bencroyderived·
@Doha1389960 Someone name it the F/A-47 and tell Trump it’s armed with the Discombobulater
English
1
0
52
1.5K
grace spelman
grace spelman@GraceSpelman·
the space program when we’re not recruiting nazis, national parks, jazz….these are the only things that make me feel any sense of patriotism
English
18
99
1.9K
49.6K
RS Archer
RS Archer@archer_rs·
Astonishing statement from General Carsten Breuer, chief of the German defence staff. "Germany no longer regards the USA as a reliable defence partner. We are assuming conflict with Russia in the next few years is inevitable, we are re-arming.
English
631
4.3K
18.9K
781.7K
Aaron
Aaron@Aaron_1jef·
@AirPowerNEW1 Respectfully, and in my lack of knowledge, the best I could find online is that they won’t be available for a least a year, is that true as far as you know and is that an acceptable timeframe? U also think this would encourage the pentagon to start hardening bases?
English
1
0
0
275
Air-Power | MIL-STD
Air-Power | MIL-STD@AirPowerNEW1·
Yes, losing one E-3 is 'bad'. But not losing crew and people at the base is 'good'. Great and remarkable actually. As I've noted, a few E-7's are on order and will be received soon. The USAF also literally sent a dozen E-3's to the boneyard in 2023/24. x.com/hissgoescobra/…
John Jackson@hissgoescobra

The E-3 AWACS has no clear replacement and a 40% mission-capable rate, so losing one is bad. The E-7 was cut from the 2026 Pentagon budget, by Hegseth, Congress wants to reinstate, the Air Force is pushing back. The E-3 & E-2 are all we got for now. airandspaceforces.com/air-force-secr…

English
8
20
160
9.1K
Aaron
Aaron@Aaron_1jef·
@DaoOfMorphy @MartinSkold2 China can no longer be described as not being a serious naval force. It is still not the best but it is getting serious.
English
0
0
0
4
Paul Morphy
Paul Morphy@DaoOfMorphy·
@MartinSkold2 Now imagine this position but the US has bases on Japan, Korea, Taiwan, the Philippines, Vietnam, Guam, and Okinawa. And is against a country with no serious naval forces.
English
1
0
1
227
Martin Skold
Martin Skold@MartinSkold2·
Think of the US naval position in the Pacific between Pearl Harbor and (give or take) the Coral Sea, where carriers were too precious to lose (and the Doolittle Raid had to be launched at dangerously long distance for this reason). Now imagine this position -without- the prospect of rapid reinforcement via superior US shipbuilding and industry.
mattparlmer 🪐 🌷@mattparlmer

Confirmation of what many of us suspected, they did indeed drive the Lincoln out of untanked strike range with ballistic missiles Also sounds like we burnt nearly a whole complement of interceptors in while getting away from the way he’s talking about it

English
9
6
125
15.6K
Aaron
Aaron@Aaron_1jef·
@jameslineky @AlDefinitely Thanks for the explanation, do you have any books you might recommend for this topic?
English
1
0
0
267
James Line
James Line@jameslineky·
FDR was a Wilsonian progressive. Northeastern liberalism has always been rooted in Calvinistic morals-based social reform (abolition etc). They didn’t see a contradiction between the GOP as liberal and the GOP as the party of business. Hoover actually identified as liberal (and, years later, bemoaned the way progressives had begun monopolizing the word). Also parties were just very, very big tents back then. So some areas of the country were insanely elastic, with huge swings from one election to the next, while other areas with very strong ideological bases, like New England and the South, found there was enough room in each tent to maintain their partisan loyalties without having to abandon their ideologies.
English
2
4
188
6.8K
Aaron
Aaron@Aaron_1jef·
@einhander14 @0x_Priest You need to be smart enough to understand that it only takes one well-placed bomb to do serious damage to a power plant. I see that you do not allow such conditions.
English
1
0
1
66
Einhander
Einhander@einhander14·
@0x_Priest Their perhaps 10 still functioning launchers that will get blown up the second they actually launch anything?
English
1
0
2
247
planefag
planefag@planefag·
We have specially designed graphite bombs that can disable/disrupt power without doing massive long-term damage to grid infrastructure. We used them in Desert Storm, Allied Force and Enduring Freedom. Damage is minimal; outages last 24 hours or so, but with no air cover to prevent re-attack, Trump can just keep pressing the "off" switch as long as he wants.
Open Source Intel@Osint613

BREAKING BREAKING 🔴🔴🔴 Trump: If Iran doesn’t FULLY OPEN, WITHOUT THREAT, the Strait of Hormuz, within 48 HOURS from this exact point in time, the United States of America will hit and obliterate their various POWER PLANTS, STARTING WITH THE BIGGEST ONE FIRST! Thank you for your attention to this matter. President DONALD J. TRUMP

English
60
203
1.9K
197.4K
Aaron
Aaron@Aaron_1jef·
@ColbyBadhwar Kindly could you explain why we used a 5000lb bomb against the Houthis?
English
0
0
0
55
Colby Badhwar
Colby Badhwar@ColbyBadhwar·
This is the 2nd known combat employment of the 5000lb GBU-72, or A5K Penetrator. The first was against the Houthis 2 years ago. GBU-72 is a BLU-138 penetrating warhead with a KMU-556 JDAM Tail Kit Assembly. It is integrated for use on the F-15E & B-1. 235 have been procured to date, although I can't confirm that McAlester Army Ammunition Plant has completed them all. The Air Force planned to order 175 more this year, and the current acquisition objective is 750.
Colby Badhwar tweet media
U.S. Central Command@CENTCOM

Hours ago, U.S. forces successfully employed multiple 5,000-pound deep penetrator munitions on hardened Iranian missile sites along Iran’s coastline near the Strait of Hormuz. The Iranian anti-ship cruise missiles in these sites posed a risk to international shipping in the strait.

English
11
68
464
49.6K
Aaron
Aaron@Aaron_1jef·
@gambare21 @Parisire @HunterStires There is no way you believe, that for the sake of practicality and also public perception, that achieving this by dropping millions of pounds of bombs was the right way to go and not via diplomacy.
English
0
0
0
24
Gambare
Gambare@gambare21·
@Parisire @HunterStires Enabling comity among Middle Eastern nations that had been adversaries. The Abraham Accords were the first manifestation of this desire/trend but now things can proceed at a better pace. This will result in a regional construct that challenges Europe, China, and globalists.
English
4
0
1
155
Hunter Stires
Hunter Stires@HunterStires·
Two things can be true at once: U.S. forces are performing brilliantly at the operational and tactical levels while U.S. political leaders are demonstrating remarkable incompetence and incoherence at the political and strategic levels. The latter may undo the gains of the former.
English
214
904
4.9K
349.7K
Christian Rutherford
Christian Rutherford@Impitoyable·
@schneider @Anne_Hidalgo She played cynical politics at the expense of doing her job as mayor. She lost any vestige of support I once had for her. Not that it makes any difference now. 2/2
English
1
0
0
48
Michael Schneider
Michael Schneider@schneider·
The mayor of Paris @Anne_Hidalgo is my personal hero. She turned a global city with some of the most chaotic streets filled with cars into a paradise for pedestrians and cyclists. She did it not because it was politically easy (it wasn’t) but because it was the right thing to do.
Financial Times@FT

The city’s transition away from the car, though fantastically chaotic, has become a global role model, says Simon Kuper: ft.trib.al/PENku7n

English
55
337
2.8K
128.9K
Paul Street
Paul Street@pstreetski·
@nickmeals Which underscore the naivety of the 1942 invasion idea by the newcomers to the war.
English
1
0
2
2.8K
0.005 Seconds (3/694)
0.005 Seconds (3/694)@seconds_0·
@MarysRoommate Jones Act Employer Health Insurance Tax Exclusion NEPA NLRA Wagner Act FDA 1962 Kefauver Amendments Davis-Bacon Act CON Laws US Sugar Program Ethanol Mandate Copyright Term Extension Act this is just legislation not court rulings to overturn
English
17
20
377
14.4K
0.005 Seconds (3/694)
0.005 Seconds (3/694)@seconds_0·
Theres like 12 pieces of regulation to remove standing between us and another 200 years of american empire
English
28
140
4.1K
74.5K