@JPainis @darwintojesus To me it seems like the core of your issue with God is how you find it hard to see him as good. I want to tell you that I am not defending the same God you imagine when we talk about God.
English
aggin swaggin
88 posts
@AgginSwaggin @darwintojesus Clearly not. Otherwise why did he write genesis to confuse even his most devoted followers and refuse to stfu about how addicted he was to killing babies?
English
@JPainis @darwintojesus you know what, I feel you man. I do hope you get to experience what I did when I came to Christ. I don't believe God created an intellectual barrier to logically deduce he exists, but rather leaves enough evidence for those that want to believe but not enough to force belief.
English
@AgginSwaggin @darwintojesus Well, you are right and wrong at the same time.
The Bible god is in a quantum super position of being both evil and good at the same time because the Bible contradicted its narrative, hence making the story implode on itself into a black hole, making the story impossible forever.
English
@JPainis @darwintojesus no you misunderstood my point. There are things that are evil and God would simply not do those things, as he is good by definition.
English
@AgginSwaggin @darwintojesus In other words, there is literally nothing god can do that would be immoral by definition. He could rape a baby, but you can’t argue because he must have a reason according to your presupposition.
What’s even the point of calling him good if you can’t even judge him?
English
@JPainis @darwintojesus if God was evil, then that wouldn't be the Christian God. Because he is by definition good. So if the creator of the universe is evil, then I don't believe in him.
English
@AgginSwaggin @darwintojesus Like for all you know he could be pure evil and you’re just here assuming he’s all good just because some book says so.
Do you see why it’s always smarter to prioritize evident reality over a story yet?
English
@AssetInvestorr @NotA_Bull yeah but most of its value is attributed to robotaxi and humanoid robots. which essentially have no income.
English
@AgginSwaggin @NotA_Bull Tesla does have income, shrinking income
English
Sold my $TSLA for a profit …
I get the hype, but a 360 P/E goes against everything I’ve learned about investing.
Are you still holding $TSLA at these levels, or is the math not mathing? lol
English
@Govindtwtt yup, at first I was the only swe banging that drum. Each step of the way, I just saw cope and delusion
English
Software engineers in 2020: We're irreplaceable.
Software engineers in 2023: AI can't handle complex code.
Software engineers in 2025: Okay it's good but needs supervision.
Software engineers in 2026: Claude, fix the bug please.
Software engineers in 2027: ????
English
@JPainis @darwintojesus So if you believe God did something immoral, then either you are wrong about it being immoral, or you are wrong about God doing it.
English
@JPainis @darwintojesus not really, it's more like morality is an integral part of God's character. He is by definition perfectly good and in a way incapable of doing something truly immoral.
English
@NotA_Bull @AssetInvestorr p/e is irrelevant in some contexts. like if a company has no income, then it's p/e is infinite regardless of it's value.
English
@TH3S0V3R31GN @Teslaconomics not sure why nobody else is saying this, it's so obvious
English
Wait… what do you Elon is hinting at here?
1/ CyberSUV
2/ Robovan
3/ Something else
English
@wholemars well, I think I can pretty easily tell if my mom or my dad is texting me despite using the same phone. AIs have personalities, so I don't think the Turing test in that sense has much of a meaning anymore
English
Have there been any serious attempts to conduct a Turing Test with today’s frontier LLMs?
I hear people say today’s LLMs can pass, but i’m not so sure. I feel like I could tell the difference between a human and a machine somewhat reliably today.
English
@TeslaXplored @scienceoverbias I actually think the ratio has increased, look at the robotaxi tracker. It now shows percentage of trips that are unsupervised (which is arguably a better metric as some cars can be used more than others) and that metric has been growing.
English
@scienceoverbias Zero progress in terms of this “the ratio will increase over time.” The ratio has been very small with zero progress. Where’s the lie?
English
Two full months later and ZERO progress. If you’re a $TSLA investor, do you think this is normal and they’re just being cautious or this is worrisome and the software is not ready? Which would mean a delay in CyberCab production!! Not good!
Ashok Elluswamy@aelluswamy
Robotaxi rides without any safety monitors are now publicly available in Austin. Starting with a few unsupervised vehicles mixed in with the broader robotaxi fleet with safety monitors, and the ratio will increase over time.
English
@bsimeone @wholemars delivery. not all driverless miles need to carry humans
English
@wholemars Nah
That’s 125 miles per day per human on earth
not gonna happen
English
Jensen sees autonomous driving getting to 1 trillion miles a day at scale
English
@elonmusk @satyanadella If only they were MacroHard instead.
English
@Tommy2Lightning @RealDanODowd yeah honestly I get you man, no judgement. When I was 16 still living in the states, my dumb ass just drove despite drinking at parties. I don't drink at all nowadays.
English
@AgginSwaggin @RealDanODowd Living in a burb and you want to go to a ball game. That might be a 40 dollar uber there and 40 back. Pray for no surge pricing. Adding an 80 dollar uber bill when I can just fsd doesn't make any sense. Now I don't go and get drunk out anymore, but 3 drinks and fsd.
English
Omar, stop telling people to use FSD when they're drunk. You will get people killed.
You and the other shills will then attack their loved ones when they try to sue Tesla for misrepresenting its defective "Full Self-Driving" software.
If you're drunk get an Uber or a Waymo.
Whole Mars Catalog@wholemars
People love to blame the car when they were just drunk driving the car themselves Next time actually turn self-driving on… you will make it home safe
English
@ChadNotChud You're missing a key point, they are making research far easier and faster to perform.
English
increasingly clear that LLMs are just a Normal Technology
cool and useful, but fantasies that their rate of improvement will continue indefinitely are just that
like everything, we’ll reach a point where further improvement requires a qualitatively different approach
English
@Tommy2Lightning @RealDanODowd I agree with you, but I would say that you probably have the money for an Uber if you have the money for a Tesla + fsd. that being said, driving with fsd is 1000x better than without if you're driving drunk anyways
English
@RealDanODowd Honestly if it's between someone who doesn't have the money for waymo or Uber but they have fsd. Fsd is way way way safer than driving yourself. Zero people killed on fsd hw4 cars. Zero. How many while drinking and driving? Time for Dan to grow up.
English
@jason334990 @JOBhakdi I would say it's because 14.3 hinged on 14.1 and 14.2 to be released first. He said those should all take a couple of weeks. Now that there's nothing in between 14.3 and now, it's likely that his "few weeks" prediction is more accurate
English
I love it when Elon says "a few weeks" a hundred times and it never happens
and I am able to spot the ONE time when it actually WILL happen.
...
Spoiler alert:
It's THIS TIME.
Elon Musk@elonmusk
@DBurkland @pbeisel It’s in testing right now. Wide release in a few weeks.
English
@jeremybp @Codeforged_One @gdb I think people just liked 4o specifically because it was so sycophantic. It's really weird how strongly some people (like this dude) feel about some older model being discontinued.
English
@Codeforged_One @gdb The step improvement from 4o to SOTA thinking models is stark. On simple bench (private bench on common sense reasoning) 4o -> 17.8%. GPT5.4 Pro -> 74.1%. 4o is inferior in coding (33% SWE verif vs 77%), math (13.1% AIME vs 100%)... 4o was not AGI. 4o was sycophantic.
English
we used to have an internal goal, which felt totally impossible, of an AI that could write a coherent 1000-line program. the tech has come a long way!
Greg Brockman@gdb
happy birthday gpt-4
English
@_PradeepGoel @rand_longevity I think there is a massive competitive benefit to keeping agi to yourself for longer. Whoever has the best ai might want to use it for themselves first
English
@rand_longevity If AGI were achieved, its effects would already be visible in the real world.
Extraordinary capability doesn’t stay hidden inside a lab for long
English
