Aidan Boustred

909 posts

Aidan Boustred

Aidan Boustred

@AidanBoustred

Trying to understand the world better

Katılım Ocak 2014
760 Takip Edilen41 Takipçiler
Aidan Boustred
Aidan Boustred@AidanBoustred·
@DanNeidle Fascinating stuff. I notice you don't really mention Brexit which kicked in at the same time as Covid. Other than via a modest growth impact, is that relevant in any way?
English
0
0
0
21
Dan Neidle
Dan Neidle@DanNeidle·
If you want to delve further into the data, there's an expanded version of this thread here with pretty interactive charts where you can select different countries and explore the detail. Full methodology and sources. taxpolicy.org.uk/2026/04/29/why… I'd love to be wrong on all this.
English
20
11
153
19.4K
Dan Neidle
Dan Neidle@DanNeidle·
UK tax is going to be the highest since 1945. But public spending won't increase; in fact most of us will experience a decline in public services. Here's why - in a thread that I'd love to be completely wrong.
Dan Neidle tweet media
English
92
399
1.6K
320.8K
Aidan Boustred
Aidan Boustred@AidanBoustred·
@worstall @DanNeidle @danielgoyal In proper MMT (that's 'proper' as in 'proper socialism', but with MMT) the growth from the spending will mean you don't need to raise tax rates. So don't think that the UK's disastrous position in any way discredits MMT, because this wasn't proper MMT.
English
2
0
0
51
Dr Dan Goyal
Dr Dan Goyal@danielgoyal·
So basically, the Tories “spent” so much during the early pandemic that we are now stuck paying off that debt! Taxes up to pay for the Tory pillaging of public money (debt) and Johnson’s spectacular incompetence! Prosecutions and asset recovery now!
Dan Neidle@DanNeidle

UK tax is going to be the highest since 1945. But public spending won't increase; in fact most of us will experience a decline in public services. Here's why - in a thread that I'd love to be completely wrong.

English
45
279
464
14.1K
Aidan Boustred
Aidan Boustred@AidanBoustred·
@JimmySecUK @CraigMurrayOrg I'm not convinced that Craig Murray can distinguish between real and imaginary sufficiently well to be deliberately lying.
English
0
0
15
1.1K
Jimmy Rushton
Jimmy Rushton@JimmySecUK·
@CraigMurrayOrg None of this is true. But did you know Craig Murray is a pathological liar?
English
15
52
1.8K
20.2K
Craig Murray
Craig Murray@CraigMurrayOrg·
Did you know Ukraine was the third largest importer of Bentleys in Europe in 2025? Did you know that Ukraine imported 15 of the new £600,000 Rolls Royce Spectres? Did you know Ukraine imports more supercars than Russia? I wonder where the money comes from and who drives them?
Bloomberg@business

Ukraine will finally start receiving a €90 billion ($106 billion) loan from the European Union after Hungary lifted its veto bloomberg.com/news/articles/…

English
1.4K
7.9K
21.5K
876.7K
Aidan Boustred
Aidan Boustred@AidanBoustred·
@SRFielding72 @DPJHodges If I was that civil servant, I would have interpreted the timescale pressure as implied pressure to say ‘yes’. Robbins doesn’t want to admit any pressure influenced outcome as that would be admitting he didn’t do his job properly. And he’s not stupid.
English
1
0
1
77
(((Dan Hodges)))
(((Dan Hodges)))@DPJHodges·
One thing people need to understand. No.10 trying to influence DV is not a run of the mill event. It’s a massive breach of a process that is supposed to protect the national security of the United Kingdom.
English
60
492
2.1K
33.9K
Aidan Boustred
Aidan Boustred@AidanBoustred·
@RoverguyB @DanNeidle It's taking the total amount of "useful stuff" the country produces in a year, and working out what that is equivalent to per person. It's not directly comparable to salaries, so it's only of limited value if that's what you wanted to do.
English
0
0
1
14
Roverguy Bm
Roverguy Bm@RoverguyB·
@AidanBoustred @DanNeidle So, no allowances for those who do and don't contribute. No allowances for retirees, children , the sick, those under the radar, independently wealthy and don't need to work. The figures are of limited value.
English
1
0
0
21
Aidan Boustred
Aidan Boustred@AidanBoustred·
@RoverguyB @DanNeidle GDP per capita is total GDP divided by population (including children). A society where a smaller % of population work will have higher average earnings compared to GDP per capita. So they aren't quite the same thing. Also GDP would include company profits etc.
English
1
0
0
14
Aidan Boustred
Aidan Boustred@AidanBoustred·
@RoverguyB @DanNeidle That's what I suspected. The OP is about GDP per capita, not average earnings (related but a separate measure). GDP does include self employed income, although it probably is more difficult to measure accurately than PAYE.
English
1
0
0
17
Aidan Boustred
Aidan Boustred@AidanBoustred·
@RoverguyB @DanNeidle This is a measure of GDP, which is definitely supposed to include the self employed. Where are you getting this info?
English
1
0
0
19
Roverguy Bm
Roverguy Bm@RoverguyB·
@DanNeidle During austerity public services, who are in PAYE, received a low or zero pay award, stunting pay growth. There's your route problem. The private sector self employed generally received better pay but this was and isn't reported.
English
1
0
0
150
Aidan Boustred
Aidan Boustred@AidanBoustred·
@sfrantzman The routs were scripted in that a proportion (a quarter?) of the side chosen to lose had to run away on a given signal. It wasn’t spontaneous.
English
1
0
7
298
Aidan Boustred
Aidan Boustred@AidanBoustred·
@gillysuit21 @cjsnowdon There can be, but the larger the company, and the more complex the outcome, the harder it is to measure and to incentivise. The private US system isn't particularly efficient either, and European ones also have their problems.
English
1
0
0
18
gillysuit2
gillysuit2@gillysuit21·
@AidanBoustred @cjsnowdon There is though because more so in private companies you have accountability for bad outcomes and bad experiences. Not just in court cases but also loss of earnings, bad reviews etc etc. theres just more consequences.
English
1
0
0
29
Christopher Snowdon
Christopher Snowdon@cjsnowdon·
The NHS isn’t underfunded. If anything, it is overfunded. It is rubbish because of incompetence, process, bureaucracy and the complacency that comes with having no competition.
Joe Michalczuk@joemichalczuk

A shower screen shattered all over my wife this week. Over the next 72 hours, the NHS got almost everything wrong. A cautionary tale of a system that is broken (with the usual caveat that everyone working in it is doing their best) 👇 I called an ambulance. All good at first: “It’s on its way.” Ten minutes later: “Actually, there are no ambulances for hours - can you get her to hospital?” So I loaded my bleeding wife into the car, along with the kids and the dog, and drove to A&E. Ten hours later, she came home - having given up after not even being offered a plaster. The next morning, we called our GP: “Any chance she could see a nurse?” “No - as the ambulance referred her to hospital, we can’t see her.” So I went to the pharmacy and bought a first aid kit. Because apparently that’s where we are now - me and a pack of plasters, in one of the richest countries in the world. This morning, still in pain, still untreated, and with a ballooning foot, we went to an urgent treatment centre. At first, smooth. She was seen in under two hours. X-ray done. “Nasty cut, but nothing broken.” Relief. Two hours later, the phone rang. It was the hospital. “Sorry - we got that completely wrong. Your foot is broken and the wound needs antibiotics.” If it wasn’t so serious, it would be laughable. And the truth is - anyone who uses the system has a story like this. We need to stop clinging to an idealised version of the NHS and have a grown-up conversation about how to fix it. Free healthcare for all should remain a principle - but pretending the current model works isn’t helping anyone. Almost every other developed country combines public healthcare with some level of private provision - and all deliver better outcomes as a result. Yet in the UK, even suggesting that tends to get shut down before the conversation starts. That’s not protecting the NHS. It’s protecting a cult. We don’t need ideology. We need honesty about what works. We need a brilliant NHS in practice for all of us - not one we’re told to revere while it quietly crumbles, and where anyone who speaks up is dismissed or discredited. When are we going to get serious about the things that actually matter - and have the difficult national conversations needed to fix them? We don’t need to abandon the NHS. We need to be honest about fixing it. We shouldn’t just shrug our shoulders. We have to be better. We need to vote for real change.

English
46
113
1.2K
33.5K
Aidan Boustred
Aidan Boustred@AidanBoustred·
@gillysuit21 @cjsnowdon I think you have too much faith in private companies, which tend to have similar issues, albeit usually too a lesser extent. There's basically no strong incentive loop that incorporates either good outcomes or patient satisfaction. That could exist within public ownership.
English
1
0
1
35
gillysuit2
gillysuit2@gillysuit21·
@AidanBoustred @cjsnowdon This is called incompetent leadership because this would be glaringly obvious to a private company and they'd fix it instantly.
English
1
0
0
36
Aidan Boustred
Aidan Boustred@AidanBoustred·
@nomad_dissident @andrew_lilico My understanding is that M passed DV because the process merely required that Robbins decide that. SV initially assessed that he should fail but gave Robbins the impression that it could be ok. R misled Stamer about the level of confidence. I
English
0
0
0
34
Kieran
Kieran@nomad_dissident·
@andrew_lilico And he never once asked the question "Has Peter Mandelson passed DV?" at any point in the apparently duly followed process. Is that likely? To me, it does not feel likely, at all.
English
1
1
8
1.1K
Andrew Lilico
Andrew Lilico@andrew_lilico·
Starmer's position is that: a) Due process was followed in the Mandelson appointment b) Robbins ought to have told Starmer the DV recommendation was against passing vetting & if he'd been told he wouldn't have appointed Mandelson, & this process failure meant Robbins was fired
English
8
5
37
8.4K
Aidan Boustred
Aidan Boustred@AidanBoustred·
@OurJeeBee @andrew_lilico I think that’s correctly summarising the Starmer position but it begs the question - why does Robbins get sacked for his error of judgement when Starmer, who appears to have made a larger one, get to just make an apology.
English
1
0
0
30
Jee Bee
Jee Bee@OurJeeBee·
@andrew_lilico The failing was Robbins judgement? The process gave Robbins responsibility to make the decision but does not protect him from making a decision of almost legendary stupidity?
English
1
0
1
690
Aidan Boustred retweetledi
Computer Science
Computer Science@CompSciFact·
'Much of the essence of building a program is in fact the debugging of the specification.' -- Fred Brooks
English
4
50
338
159.3K
Ben Ehrenreich
Ben Ehrenreich@BenEhrenreich·
In retrospect, basing the entire global food system on fossil fuels may have been a poor idea.
English
52
500
3.7K
307.3K
Aidan Boustred
Aidan Boustred@AidanBoustred·
@petrolandeco Those two axes are a chart crime. Put them both on one and let’s see how alarming it looks then.
English
0
0
0
102
Edwin Drake
Edwin Drake@petrolandeco·
ABD'de olan aslında bütün dünyayı da yansıtıyor. Uzun vadede ekonomide emeğin payı azalırken sermayenin payının arttığı çok açık. 1950’lerden 1980’lere kadar kârlar ile emek payı arasında daha dengeli ve dalgalı bir ilişki varken, 1980 sonrası belirgin bir kırılma yaşanıyor. Özellikle 2000’lerden itibaren bu ayrışma hızlanıyor; kârların GSYH içindeki payı yükselirken emek payı sürekli geriliyor. 2020 sonrasında ise fark daha da açılıyor ve kâr payı tarihsel olarak yüksek seviyelere çıkarken emek payı en düşük seviyelere yaklaşıyor. Bu tablo küreselleşme, üretimin düşük maliyetli ülkelere kayması, otomasyon ve teknolojik dönüşüm, finansallaşma ve sendikaların zayıflaması gibi faktörlerle açıklanabilir. Velhasıl ekonomik büyüme sürse de bu büyümeden alınan pay giderek daha fazla sermayeye kayıyor; bu da gelir dağılımının bozulmasına, orta sınıfın zayıflamasına ve ekonomik dengenin uzun vadede kırılgan hale gelmesine yol açıyor.
Edwin Drake tweet media
Türkçe
4
7
58
4.9K
Aidan Boustred
Aidan Boustred@AidanBoustred·
@WalkerMarcus @mr_james_c I don’t think billionaires typically get much of their income from wages, so this wouldn’t really affect them. It’s only going to hit the very top end of managers, and there really aren’t many of them. Also expect plenty of loopholes around perks and share options.
English
0
0
0
39
Aidan Boustred
Aidan Boustred@AidanBoustred·
@worstall How could things be run other than "politics"? The civil service, as an impartial class of experts who do sensible things, doesn't seem to be working out any better than "do populist nonsense".
English
1
0
0
6
Tim Worstall
Tim Worstall@worstall·
@AidanBoustred That it's so politically popular, this bad idea, is a problem with politics as a way of running things, no?
English
1
0
0
28