Basically Wade

@Salutarix @MyLordBebo The deadliest terrorist attack in Canadian history was the 1985 Air India bombing, carried out by the British Columbia-based group Babbar Khalsa in response to the 1984 Indian military operation at the Golden Temple. The perpetrators were Sikh extremists.

@AnimeDisplayPic @MyLordBebo Nope. By Muslims. And you lie to hide this

🇬🇧 Sikhs are allowed to bring their knives into football stadiums. Weapons are forbidden for everyone at sports gatherings … except for Sikhs. This is pretty insane. How about no knives for everyone, and if you can’t deal with it, you don’t go to the stadium? Why is Britain bending over to such bad ideas?

@Salutarix @MyLordBebo Nearly all acts of terrorism in Canada have been done by Sikhs.

@MyLordBebo When did you hear of a Sikh attacking anyone??? Covering much for your Islamic masters????

You have every right to know what your government is doing, and they have no right to know what you are doing. That is why they are called public servants and we are called private citizens. Instead, the relationship has been inverted. The state hides behind secrecy, classified files, and redactions while demanding total visibility into your finances, communications, movement, and behavior. A society where the rulers live in privacy while the population lives under surveillance is the very definition of tyranny.

C-22 is looking like a huge mistake. It worries me a great deal. There is so much nonsense in there that It may well end up dealing a death blow to Canadian tech viability.

The government promised Bill C-11 would "protect Canadian culture." Instead, it’s killing independent Canadian creators and local outlets. Here is the brutal truth of what "CanCon" mandates actually did: The Lie: "We won't regulate user-generated content." The Reality: A loophole lets the CRTC micromanage social media algorithms. The Lie: "It will help Canadians discover your content." The Reality: Forcing videos onto uninterested feeds kills viewer retention. The Penalty: The global algorithm flags the video as "bad" and suppresses it worldwide. Since Independent creators rely on global audiences for 80%+ of their income. By "protecting" us domestically, this bill cut us off from the world. All because of a policy designed by legacy TV executives and bureaucrats who don't understand how the internet works. Don’t let them lie to you. They aren't protecting Canadian content. They are protecting billionaire media conglomerates while crushing the digital entrepreneurs actually building the future. This has been reiterated time and time again in committees but nobody ever hears of it, because the people trusted with carrying the narrative benefit from these authoritarian measures. And don’t even get me started on C-18… a “saviour” for Canadian journalism that needed no saving at all in a competitive and merit based market… in reality, it triggered an absolute catastrophe for local news distribution and grass roots digital publishers… with Google search results being manipulated and news being out right blocked. We are being silenced by the very laws promised to give us a voice. Let’s be very clear: They didn't save Canadian culture—they just made it a crime to compete globally, all the while isolating Canadians from the real news, and from using their voice in the way that every other country in the world, outside of North Korea is able to freely do. Spare me with the saviour superiority complex. The only thing we need saving from is this technocratic, totalitarian leaning government overreach.

Someone needs to trick all the top people pushing the racial grievance complex and show them the flaws in their reasoning. Then this type of media will be banned. Rules for thee, not for me.

@AndyjackV Looked worse than it was, but not good. I hope she gets help. And isnt dead.

in other news, blacked Betty died

"i wish fishtank discourse was more about the people from the show and less about community glup shittos!"

For any interested in the old #fishtanklive game

that CBC-funded “prank” didn’t just target pundits. In @Quillette, I report on their efforts to mock a humble 82-yr-old Brockville granddad who enjoys 19th-c historical re-enanctments. Producers repeatedly lied to him for months, then exploited his trust quillette.com/2026/05/15/a-d…

When did the term "revolver" get replaced with "wheel gun"?

@mints_____ #Fishtanklive

Asian prof: "He torpedoed my career by treating me as white!" White people: ...wait.

@DeplorableNeet ding ding ding ding

Jet and Ben both stated multiple times throughout s5 and the Miami stream that they are tired of #fishtanklive They are purposely pissing FTL fans off so they will leave and new fans will take their place who don't care about FTL.

@sullivan_mma Saw her live, she was great

Who is this? Why do people think this song is good?

@its_anewworld The spell has been broken. The prophecy failed

I'm beginning to doubt Jet's commitment to #fishtanklive And the loyal S1 fans he loves so much!

@reactsimply hahahahhahahahahaahhahah too good

I regret betraying you all. Taking a few days to reflect on what i've done and how many of you I've affected. (new vid in desc)

@WDaveDick @KellyLamb86 @Aaronpete_ You realize you're doing the inverse?

@AnimeDisplayPic @KellyLamb86 @Aaronpete_ What is rebellious in parroting talking points from billionaires?

What the hell is going on? I work so hard, every week, to create a show that addresses the hardest issues facing our country. I invite on guests from all backgrounds and political views, and I get insulted from all sides while doing this. And no doubt, I fall short of my own aims at times. Then you have this clown show trying to make light of this and mock Frances? When are left-leaning people going to get it. You’re not morally superior. You’re not more advanced than the rest of us. You’re not more well informed. You’ve just picked the same team as the government of the day. I find this incredibly disrespectful to those of us trying to engage thoughtfully, carefully, and mindfully. No doubt this whole thing cost a lot of taxpayer dollars to play gotcha journalism with Frances Widdowson. You can see in that guys eyes that he underestimated his guest and this all went terribly for him. Good. We need more civil discourse and less nonsense.

@WDaveDick @KellyLamb86 @Aaronpete_ Bro, you get triggered when you read the word 'rebel'.

@KellyLamb86 @Aaronpete_ You started the interaction dummy. You right wingers get so triggered.

“wHy aRe tHerE iNdiaNs In pOrTuGaL?!” Because they are good slaves, you are not. I hate essay-posting but allow me a rare indulgence: To understand what is happening now, you need understand that this isn’t the first time it’s happened. Why are there Indians in Kenya? Suriname? Fiji? Burma? Because Indians have always been the preferred servile class of elites. The evidence for this goes back hundreds of years. I’ve spoken about British colonial Burma before, and it is a great example of what this looks like. Even after extensive efforts to bring them to heel, the majority of the Burmese ethnic groups were far too resistant to submit to the British empire to be reliable labor. They refused to abandon their culture and ways of life to be slave drones for British pocketbooks. So the Brits started importing Indians to be their colonial administrators, preferring them as labor because they were easier to control and satisfy. By the 1940s, Indians made up almost 20% of the population of the entire country. Another great historical example of this is Suriname - a small country in South America that had been under Dutch colonial rule for 300 years. The Dutch abolished slavery in 1863, forcing colonial plantation owners to have to hire labor to do the work they had previously been using slaves for. But… they didn’t want to pay former slaves or Indigenous locals a living wage for the work. So what did the Dutch elites do instead? Import Indians. Today, Indians still make up 27% of the population. 27%. Of a tiny, obscure South American country. We could basically go through the list of every country with a non-negligible Indian population and the theme would be consistent: They were brought there by elites who needed a submissive, easily exploitable labor pool when local labor asked for better living conditions or wages. Why? Because Indians never did. They are a population that seems fully content with subjugation (even Marx noticed this). So it’s easy to see why they were such an ideal population for the intensive global expansion era of colonial empires. And it’s even easier to see why they are perfect subjects for late capitalism now. They are the culturally, psychologically, and physically ideal organism for the dominant system. There’s 1.4 billion of them. They are deeply socially stratified and so expect and even enjoy inequality. Their cuisine is cheap, meat-free slop. They live amongst trash and filth with no qualms. They don’t care about the environment. Their reaction to death and abuse is blank-eyed indifference. They are physically and spiritually malleable. They not only adopt and internalize the demands of the dominant system as personal ambition, they believe this servitude makes them better than everyone else who hasn’t. Absolutely IDEAL subjects. You, on the other hand, are not the ideal subject. You want to live in a high-trust society. You would shed tears if someone tried to cut down the apple tree you climbed as a child to build a data center. You want to see and experience beauty. You want your own space. You have an expectation that your living conditions will improve over time. You would not be content to live in a room with 10 other people, work 16 hours per day for pennies, and eat cheap slop. You are a liability. Just like the Burmese and Surinamese slaves were. And as we continue to crawl deeper into this late capitalist hellscape, you and your silly little needs will come into increasing conflict with those of the system. Thus, you WILL be replaced by people far easier to control and far less concerned about their own welfare or the welfare of everyone and everything around them. … Unless you do something about it. But the system has already locked-in that you won’t, and that you’ll just sort of fade into nothingness, distracted by meaningless comforts and terrified of the uncertainty of change. So “why are Indians in [wherever]?” Because you are about to not be.