Raphael Bendenoun

@RajeezusBackup @lonextrades You could have .. where are the other million quallammagie ?

@lonextrades Qullamaggie is an excellent trader but he was also someone who was at the right place at the right time. I think he made most of his bag in 2020/2021 market pump. You could've longed almost anything for insane ROI. .

Qullamaggie’s Perfect Stock - TASR (2003-2004) “Yeah, I’m going to show you the perfect stock. I’m going to show you a ticker I have in my database - TASR. Went from 35 cents to 30 bucks - almost a 100 bagger in a year. This thing had several high tight flags. Okay, pay attention now whatever you’re doing. Stop it.” Key Takeaways: - Focus on rising 10 and 20-day moving averages for momentum - High tight flag breaks: big moves up, pullback to rising moving averages, series of higher lows, potential undercuts and reclaims, tight ranges, breakout. “I just saved you four bucks and probably hours of time, you don’t need to buy this book. Boom. This is a perfect stock.”

@JustRandomGuy_K @jfsrev @RealSimpleAriel ATR extension from SMA 50 ?

@jfsrev @RealSimpleAriel After reviewing my trades, most finish at 10-15 ATR extensions, however, a small amount keep going and the 21 EMA break is much much higher, so I developed the following selling rules. >25% of initial pos only into 21EMA break >75% saceld out ATR ext

@swing_ka_sultan @jfsrev how do you combine that with max LOD 60% ? After 30min don't you find lost momentum stock are already above it ?

This is indeed very helpful. While 1-minute and 5-minute ORB entries provide the earliest opportunities to enter, the chances of fakeouts are also much higher because the entire retail crowd is concentrated around the same price levels. If you get a fakeout entry and are stopped out, even if your trade idea was correct, it becomes of no use. That is why, at @tradetm_org, we focus on developing multiple entry techniques across different periods of the trading day. The post 30-minute entry technique often proves to be one of the best for avoiding fakeouts.

@jfsrev Do you know that you can inverse any stock using -1 :) , PLTR * -1

$PLTR - Can't Escape 7-Month Downtrend Channel In Market Rally In a euphoric market environment like this, $PLTR displaying this type of trend behavior is a weak sign and could deteriorate further if the broader market begins correcting. Take a look at the inverse $PLTD basing action.

@jfsrev Did you got into oklo yesterday ?

Portoflio Update - Best month of 2026 but this intraday drag is probably what most will experience today. Some ideas have clinched 10 x ATR% from 50-MA to trim and trail. As much as I wish, I don't think it's sustainable for Market to continue a straight up rally without a week or 2 of sideway or pullback action. Outcasted groups need to improve their relative strength and start participating, not continue widening the performance lag — preferably within the value segment. More opportunities to come if it happens.

@FelipeGuirao My question to you is then how you define your stop loss ? If LOD then you can't build a significant position unless you risk more than 2% of equity. What am I missing ?

Most traders blow up their accounts chasing breakouts during the day, but there's a way to avoid the fake-outs and still catch the best moves. The problem with trading breakouts in the morning or midday is simple: most of them reverse and leave you stuck holding a losing position. Price pushes through resistance, you jump in, and then it fades back down as soon as the next hour hits. In choppy or bearish markets, this kills your account slowly with a thousand small losses. I saw this wreck so many traders in 2022, death by fake breakout after fake breakout. But when you wait until the end of the day to enter your breakouts, everything changes because the move is already confirmed on the daily timeframe before you risk a single dollar. No more guessing if the breakout is real or if it's going to reverse in the next 30 minutes. The daily close tells you everything you need to know. Here's what EOD breakout trading gives you: • You filter out 90% of the fake-outs because price already held the breakout all day • You can backtest with clean daily data, no messy intraday noise to deal with • You build systems with hard rules, so there's no stress or discretion involved • You only need 20-30 minutes per day to scan, enter, and manage your trades • Your drawdowns stay controlled because you're not getting chopped up by intraday volatility • You execute without emotion because the system handles all the decisions Sure, you won't get super performance and win championships with this method, but if all you want is to trade with minimal time, get 100%+ returns on good bull years, and do so with a controlled drawdown, and grow your hard-earned money, listen up. I've averaged triple-digit % returns, even made 60% in 2022 shorting breakdowns, all while trading 30-min day with no discretion and no stress. No watching the market all day. No stressing about fake moves. No second-guessing every decision. Just show up before the close, take the signals that meet my criteria, set my stops, and let the market do the rest. If you're tired of getting faked out and want consistency without the all-day grind, EOD breakouts might be exactly what you need 📈

@RealSimpleAriel Could you please add the distinct tickers traded per day ? Thx you

What an absolutely epic month. Didn't start perfect but I just closed out the best single week of my career. $CAR $MU $ARM $IGV $NVDA $AMZN $DELL $RKLB A week to remember!

@CompoundingPays How would you managed this trade ?

$FCEL updated chart since April 13 Crazy what can happen in one week

$FCEL @FuelCell_Energy Jan 2027 leaps

@jfsrev What about $FCEL ?

50 Strongest Name Trading Over $100M Avg Volume — Mainly Dominated by 5 Industry Groups $CCJ – Uranium $EXPE – Travel Services $ALB – Specialty Chemicals $NXT – Solar $CRWV – Software Infrastructure $NET – Software Infrastructure $CRWD – Software Infrastructure $NBIS – Software Infrastructure $TWLO – Software Infrastructure $MRVL – Semiconductors $ON – Semiconductors $GFS – Semiconductors $ALAB – Semiconductors $ARM – Semiconductors $CRDO – Semiconductors $RMBS – Semiconductors $MU – Semiconductors $AMD – Semiconductors $INTC – Semiconductors $TER – Semiconductor Equipment $LRCX – Semiconductor Equipment $ENTG – Semiconductor Equipment $AMKR – Semiconductor Equipment $COHR – Scientific Instruments $CAVA – Restaurants $MP – Metals & Mining $ROKU – Entertainment $CLS – Electronic Components $TTMI – Electronic Components $GLW – Electronic Components $FLEX – Electronic Components $VRT – Electrical Equipment $BE – Electrical Equipment $STX – Computer Hardware $DELL – Computer Hardware $ANET – Computer Hardware $IONQ – Computer Hardware $SNDK – Computer Hardware $WDC – Computer Hardware $VIAV – Communication Equipment $CIEN – Communication Equipment $HPE – Communication Equipment $LITE – Communication Equipment $IREN – Capital Markets $JHX – Building Materials $RIVN – Auto Manufacturers $CVNA – Auto Dealerships $RKLB – Aerospace & Defense $PL – Aerospace & Defense Hottest Stock Screener Chapter 3.2, jfsrev.substack.com/my-trading-too… P.S. You can now enjoy a free 7-day trial on Finviz Elite with no credit card required via bit.ly/finvizelite

@ohiain When you say Strong group and RS. Is it not too late to get in ? Don't you think that RS is good only in Market down trend to find which trade are surviving even if the market go down ?

Too many traders try to bottom fish garbage: 1. Strong name + Strong group + RS > Market = GET IN. 2. Weak name + Strong group + RS > Market = WATCH IT. 3. Strong name + Weak group = TACTICAL ONLY. 4. Weak name + Weak group + Weaker Than Market = DON'T TOUCH. Keep it simple!

@klazarovbg @jfsrev What type of order do you use ? are those bracket ?

Here is my 3 stop Loss buttons inspired by @jfsrev x.com/jfsrev/status/…

Systemizing profit taking for me, with some nuances highlighted; 1. Entry Day = Day 0, 3 stops at 33% level to final stop (usually LoD). 33% net size at each level. 2. If profit to risk exceeds 2x in day 0-2, i will shave 33% off. all 3 stops level will be maintained, have size adjusted to the net balance qty. I have highlighted several post on managing risk with 3 segregate stops to reduce your 1R loss even 0.6 to 0.8R. 1R loss is not 1R, more often than not it is 1.03 to 1.3R with slippage, spread, borrwing etc depending on liquidity of the securities on average period, and at time of explosive move u saw it is already making. 3. Day 3 = 33% size down (immediate partial profit taking or shaving risk down on trade that did not follow through but still hovering above avg entry as I have tight stops (since I only do execution when price action presents entry to LoD below 60%). All stops are consolidated to breakeven level on 1 full singular size. 4. Day 4 onwards is all mental stop on 10-MA. I do not mess with the trade if it doesn't close below 10-MA. eg. If close below 10-MA on Day 8, stop remains at breakeven level on Day 9 and I will let market trade for a opening range of 5 minutes and adjust my breakeven stop to the low of the opening range (ORL) and let it the market take it out. If stop not taken out by EOD of Day 9, during pre-market routine i will adjust back to breakeven, and reset new ORL for Day 10. I repeat this process until it get taken out. The rationale is to hold onto your winning trade as long as possible with minimal sacrifice or unrealize profit. Study my $XLU entry on 9th July. I'm still holding, and even added along the way up today (86 calendar days and running). 5. Some nuances to consider; i) if I were to take a catalyst gap trade eg. 1/10 (Day 0) $UNFI +100% surprise beat in EPS and intraday hit 10 x ATR% extension to 50-MA. When $UNFI hit 2x profit-risk in full size within 25 mins of the trade, I take 33% size off. It continue to follow through and hit 10 x ATR% extension from 50-MA. It is extremely unlikely for me to even be aware of this because I usually shut off after 3 hours from open and let my stops take care of my open heat risk. I will let Day 1 open and size down further 33% of net size as partial profit taking. When a trade ran up exceeding 4x profit to risk before my Day 4 breakeven, i will definitely consolidate all risk to a singular stop at breakeven. I am taking the risk of losing the remaining unrealized profit but it definitely don't make sense to visit losing range (below entry) by maintaining stop at 33%/66% and LoD stop at this parabolic point. ii) if i were to hold a swing trade beyond day 4 (all stops already consolidated at breakeven with partial profit taking already taken place), and trade continue to trend much faster than 50-MA to give me a 8-10x ATR% extension from 50-MA, this is a partial profit taking alert for me to sell on strength. eg. size down 33% of net size and readjust breakeven stop quantity accordingly. stop is always at breakeven with mental stop at 10-MA. iii) if Day 0 entry executed, and hit my first 33% level stop or even slice through to 66% level stop (2 stops trigger) before Day 4, i will always adjust a horizontal price alert to previous day high (the stop day), and if it trigger, i will add size inverse pyramid method (eg. 10,000 shares in, 6,666 shares stopped out and nett 3,334 shares. I will add 50% of 3,334 size (1,667 size) bringing me back to 50% net size instead of 33% net size). By doing so, if trade turn south to LoD stop on the singular day, u will not be hit risk exceeding 1R even with attempt to re-scale back up. iv) In holding a trade beyond Day 4 (with consolidated stop at breakeven at nett size), if there were to be a sideway price consolidation setup below 4x ATR% from 50-MA, i will inverse pyramid add 50% size of my nett size. @Qullamaggie treat it as a separate new setup but i prefer managing the same ticker as a single trade. By adding smaller size up this way, your avg price to the trade will not be severely disrupted and will bound to be below your 10-MA mental stop. You can continue to trail the trade like it was but with more potential profit trajectory to the trade. v) gap down open occasion below 10-MA, the routine i take is the same as 4. on ORL. The way I manage profit sizing and adjust stops in a sequential manner is aimed at reducing monthly drawdown % and achieving a smoother equity curve on a MoM basis. As your equity grows (especially when it surpasses your absolute dollar risk tolerance relative to your monthly expenses), seeing unrealized profit drop from, say, +$500,000 to +$280,000 in a single session can be hard to handle, even if you're following textbook rules. I believe not many can emotionally withstand holding 8-10 full-sized trades with 80% portfolio utilization, especially when trading with a bankroll that significantly impacts their quality of life and that of their dependents.

@TedHZhang Why do you think this theme attract liquidity ?

The biggest theme I see is semi equipment under the semi layer Younger and lesser market cap names You have $NVDA $AVGO $AMD $INTC $ARM as layer 1 under that, $FORM $ASX $ICHR $MKSI $Q $UCTT $TER You could even put memory as well $SNDK $WDC $STX in this layer.

@DeItaone This is what happen when terrorist do not want to surrender and took by hostage great nation of Iran ..

ISRAELI DEFENCE MINISTER KATZ: ISRAELI MILITARY INSTRUCTED TO CONTINUE STRIKING 'NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE' IN IRAN WITH FULL FORCE

@traderwillhu Data quality is the new gold. UI will become a commodity with very little value.

By connecting the chart made by TV lightweight to the IB API, it transforms into a real-time data chart. I can develop any custom indicators I need, embed my execution tools directly, and seamlessly integrate the chart into my dashboard. As AI capabilities grow and costs drop, we’ll see an explosion of open-source projects on GitHub. In the future, building a trading platform will be like playing with LEGO, just let AI snap together the modules you need. I think traditional trading software companies are facing a real crisis.

@oratnek_ill Light mode by far !

Do you prefer light mode or dark mode? I'm thinking about switching my app to dark mode.

@marketplunger1 @MacroOps Such a bullshit piece of crap. Very easy to hide behind mister X. This has so much misinformation. I would not know where to start.

So much news coming out about ceasefires, talks, negotiations, etc. Make sure you read this @MacroOps interview with a former military intelligence officer. Cuts the noise and gets to the signal.