JMoyer.eth

364 posts

JMoyer.eth banner
JMoyer.eth

JMoyer.eth

@BitMoyer

Web3 Dev, Smart Contracts, System/Game Designer, Producer/Musician Dev @thecoredevs Music @skillsyrup

Internet Katılım Ekim 2010
251 Takip Edilen883 Takipçiler
JMoyer.eth
JMoyer.eth@BitMoyer·
@RayDalio I wrote a piece that makes the case for economic reform from self interest, not morality Wealth engine requires mass participation to function, kill it and the returns go to zero. Your work on historical cycles was great. Would value your take @RayDalio open.substack.com/pub/justinmoye…
English
0
0
0
2
Dario Amodei
Dario Amodei@DarioAmodei·
The Adolescence of Technology: an essay on the risks posed by powerful AI to national security, economies and democracy—and how we can defend against them: darioamodei.com/essay/the-adol…
English
820
2.7K
15.3K
6.1M
JMoyer.eth
JMoyer.eth@BitMoyer·
@jack I made the case for economic reform from self-interest, not morality. The wealth engine requires mass participation. Remove it and the returns go to zero for everyone. Would love your take @jack open.substack.com/pub/justinmoye…
English
0
0
0
1
jack
jack@jack·
yes we over-hired during covid because i incorrectly built 2 separate company structures (square & cash app) rather than 1, which we corrected mid 2024. but this misses all the complexity we took on through lending, banking, and BNPL. and that we’re now targeting $2M+ gross profit per person, 4x our pre-covid efficiency, which stayed flat at ~$500k from 2019 until 2024. we have and do run an efficient company... better than most.
Will Slaughter@BamaBonds

In 3 years from December 2019 to December 2022, Block $XYZ more than tripled its headcount from 3,900 to 12,500. Unwinding less than half an insane COVID overhiring binge has much more to do with Jack Dorsey's managerial incompetence than whether AI is going to take your job.

English
1.1K
635
8.7K
9.3M
Vinod Khosla
Vinod Khosla@vkhosla·
Agree 100%
Dustin@r0ck3t23

Elon Musk just said the AI community is misunderstanding the math of superintelligence by two orders of magnitude. Not slightly off. Not directionally wrong. A hundred times off. Musk: “Most people in the AI community don’t yet understand. The intelligence density potential is vastly greater than what we’re currently experiencing.” Everyone is focused on the hardware race. Bigger data centers. More GPUs. Nuclear power plants built to feed the compute. That’s half the equation. Musk: “I think we’re off by two orders of magnitude in terms of intelligence density per gigabyte. That’s just algorithmic improvement. Same computer.” Read that carefully. Not more hardware. Not more energy. Not more capital. The same machine. A hundred times smarter. Through software alone. That’s before the hardware improvements compound on top of it. Musk: “And the computers are getting better. That’s why I think it is a 10x improvement per year type thing. 1,000 percent.” A thousand percent compounding annual growth rate in raw intelligence. A system that becomes 10x more capable every twelve months doesn’t follow a linear curve. It doesn’t follow an exponential curve that human intuition can track. It follows a curve that human intuition cannot simulate at all. In year one it’s 10x smarter. In year two it’s 100x. In year three it’s 1,000x. At that point, the gap between that system and a human brain is wider than the gap between a human brain and a calculator. This is the math the public isn’t running. The models aren’t just getting better. They are compounding on themselves at a rate that makes every previous technology curve look flat. Musk: “The intelligence density potential is vastly greater than what we’re currently experiencing.” We aren’t approaching superintelligence on the timeline most people imagine. We are already inside the curve.

English
22
27
299
170.2K
Reid Hoffman
Reid Hoffman@reidhoffman·
There are 18,000 human diseases, yet  14,000 of them don't have a single approved treatment. Dr. David Fajgenbaum on using AI to accelerate drug repurposing—finding where the medicines we already have could help patients who currently have no approved option:
English
83
21
115
26.5K
JMoyer.eth
JMoyer.eth@BitMoyer·
@sama I made the case for economic reform from self-interest, not morality. Index funds require mass participation to function. Kill employment and the wealth engine collapses for everyone. Would love your take @sama open.substack.com/pub/justinmoye…
English
0
0
0
7
Sam Altman
Sam Altman@sama·
Here is re-post of an internal post: We have been working with the DoW to make some additions in our agreement to make our principles very clear. 1. We are going to amend our deal to add this language, in addition to everything else: "• Consistent with applicable laws, including the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, National Security Act of 1947, FISA Act of 1978, the AI system shall not be intentionally used for domestic surveillance of U.S. persons and nationals. • For the avoidance of doubt, the Department understands this limitation to prohibit deliberate tracking, surveillance, or monitoring of U.S. persons or nationals, including through the procurement or use of commercially acquired personal or identifiable information." It’s critical to protect the civil liberties of Americans, and there was so much focus on this, that we wanted to make this point especially clear, including around commercially acquired information. Just like everything we do with iterative deployment, we will continue to learn and refine as we go. I think this is an important change; our team and the DoW team did a great job working on it. 2. The Department also affirmed that our services will not be used by Department of War intelligence agencies (for example, the NSA). Any services to those agencies would require a follow-on modification to our contract. 3. For extreme clarity: we want to work through democratic processes. It should be the government making the key decisions about society. We want to have a voice, and a seat at the table where we can share our expertise, and to fight for principles of liberty. But we are clear on how the system works (because a lot of people have asked, if I received what I believed was an unconstitutional order, of course I would rather go to jail than follow it). But 4. There are many things the technology just isn’t ready for, and many areas we don’t yet understand the tradeoffs required for safety. We will work through these, slowly, with the DoW, with technical safeguards and other methods. 5. One thing I think I did wrong: we shouldn't have rushed to get this out on Friday. The issues are super complex, and demand clear communication. We were genuinely trying to de-escalate things and avoid a much worse outcome, but I think it just looked opportunistic and sloppy. Good learning experience for me as we face higher-stakes decisions in the future. In my conversations over the weekend, I reiterated that Anthropic should not be designated as a SCR, and that we hope the DoW offers them the same terms we’ve agreed to. We will host an All Hands tomorrow morning to answer more questions.
English
3.9K
638
6.1K
3.6M
Mark Cuban
Mark Cuban@mcuban·
Actually, @costplusdrugs would sell every brand and specialty drug we could. But there are brands and specialty manufacturers that won’t sell to us because your buddies at the PBMs tell them they will diminish them on their formularies. That could cost them billions in some cases. It’s not that they don’t want to work with us. It’s that they can’t. It would kill their business Check out our pricing on biosimilars. Stelara biosim, Starjemza $365 plus shipping. Compare to what PBMs charge If you can get your PBM buddies to change their stance on formularies , we would have every drug Why do they fight us so hard ? Because they charge a different price to everyone. They charge full retail during the deductible If brands work with us , they know our pricing will not only be far less, we will publish the prices and markup so everyone can see how badly patients and companies are getting ripped off.
The NOT Working Peoples Party@Jeffery1313

@723Magnus @randy_rhodes123 @costplusdrugs @mcuban Insurance isn’t always evil. He has a pharmacy that picks the low hanging fruit and leaves the more difficult to monitor and dispense to the PBM’s. Both can be good and bad.

English
50
245
1.3K
214.4K
JMoyer.eth
JMoyer.eth@BitMoyer·
@SOLsesame @tapdotfun Idk what this is but a friend told me it was going to revive NFT's so I am tapping in. Tap
English
0
0
2
18
sesāme 🧩
sesāme 🧩@SOLsesame·
i will be launching the first collection on @tapdotfun it's a test, putting the printer under real load 15k wallets on waitlist waitlist = whitelist no waitlist = no access reply "tap" if you want a shot not enough taps = waitlist stays closed
English
1.1K
90
872
52K
shamdoo
shamdoo@TheShamdoo·
@BitMoyer Let’s catch up I’ll share (:
English
2
0
1
99
shamdoo
shamdoo@TheShamdoo·
🎰
ART
17
0
26
2.5K
JMoyer.eth retweetledi
hey
hey@heydotlol·
What if social media was invented today? It would be designed for agents and humans alike. It would offer a native way to monetize content. Meet the social network of the future. Built on @solana and @x402
English
92
57
333
51K
JMoyer.eth
JMoyer.eth@BitMoyer·
@TheShamdoo Oh wow, Sham is back and he is on the old soon game (7 hours ago) What you launching this time?
English
1
0
0
102
shamdoo
shamdoo@TheShamdoo·
tweet soon (:
English
6
0
14
2K
Hydex
Hydex@hydex_io·
hy :]
QST
63
15
115
3.6K
Blank
Blank@blankdotbuild·
What’s Blank? We never told you in details what we’re building. It’s time to reveal what @juliencoulaud, @joiscoding and @va1ag are cooking… ⬇️🧵 (1/9)
English
37
19
98
9.9K
JMoyer.eth
JMoyer.eth@BitMoyer·
@blankdotbuild @va1ag Yo, I have been a dev in web3 for 6 years, for sure interested in this, can't DM anyone because I don't have a check, but hit me up.
English
1
1
2
37
Blank
Blank@blankdotbuild·
First, go and register on blank.build to get early access and get the info before anyone else. Second, if you ARE or KNOW a dev, please DM this account or @va1ag to share about the idea 👀 And remember: It ALWAYS starts from a blank page. (9/9)
English
4
2
21
565