BrettTheTRDR
317 posts

BrettTheTRDR
@BlockhouseBrett
Head of Quant Trading @blockhouse_cap solving frag liq with my friends

CLOBs are not going to take us to the RWA promised land. Today Hyperliquid owns the liquidity for a handful of RWA macro names. But outside the top 10 traded assets (which are ~90% of volume) liquidity falls off a cliff. When there's enough retail demand, order books can work. But "perps on everything" is a different problem, and TradFi solved it decades ago. The answer isn't every venue rebuilding its own order book. That's not what Robinhood does, it's not what Schwab does, and it's not what DeFi should be doing either. Building your own book for every asset means bootstrapping demand ticker by ticker, renting liquidity with subsidies, and ending up with thin markets that blow out 200x the moment news hits. It's like sucking the ocean of TradFi liquidity through a straw. Variational skips all of it via the RFQ model. RFQ is how institutions like Dragonfly actually trade. In RFQ, dealers quote just-in-time and hedge on the primary venue as orders come in. This lets Variational mainline TradFi liquidity directly and mirror it on-chain. Margin in smart contracts, settlement in stablecoins, liquidity aggregated from the people who already trade on the biggest underlying markets, like the CME and NYSE. It makes it permissionless to access the same depth and spreads the big boys get. With the cold start problem gone, new markets can ship at the speed of software. By next year I expect RWA perps to be the biggest contract class on-chain, bigger than BTC and ETH perps combined. That's how crypto truly becomes the market for everything. I believe the platform that wins that won't look like a traditional exchange. Proud to lead Variational's $50M Series A. Watch this space.


Announcing YC Crypto deals We're now providing crypto deals to support fintech builders funded by YC: support on tools like wallets, onramps, audits, blockchains, onchain data.

KIND REMINDER ITS NEVER BEEN ABOUT RFQ VS OB, THATS PROPAGANDA TO MAKE EVERYONE FIGHT. THERE IS ENOUGH RFQ, OTC, INTENTS, OBS WHERE SYNERGY BETWEEN THEM ALL IS WHERE THE SYSTEM FLOURISHES. ITS NOT THIS OR THAT , ONE OR THE OTHER ITS RFQ B4 OB NEVER RFQ VS OB #wearedefi




















The perp DEXs on Solana (including @PhoenixTrade) face a massive uphill battle. Because Solana was built without cancel order prioritization for market makers, they're forced to compete with CEXs/Hyperliquid on latency. And gossip/consensus makes that incredibly difficult. For order priority, makers have to pay a fee, and that gets priced into the spread. Because it's structurally more expensive to be a maker on Solana, the exchanges are forced to lower fees, so the exchange makes less money. Only after future upgrades like JitoBAM and Constelation (MCP) which enable guranteed custom transaction ordering logic (effectively introducing cancel order prio) are the Solana perp DEXs really even competing with Hyperliquid. Post-upgrade, now we're competing on the dimension of product + system architecture, which IMO is significantly harder than sitting back and letting Jito/Anza do your technical work. You're going up against the designer of arguably the most successful DeFi application of all time. The reason for this post is that any other onchain perp DEX stealing significant market share from Hyperliquid should be extremely non-consensus.




Phoenix builder codes are live. Flight Codes let any trading app, terminal, bot, or agent route order flow to Phoenix and collect a fee on every trade.















