B-Weave

@snorlax_uw So likely new buyer demand was stepping in? Original trader was closing to roll, but since the other side of that trade was buying to open, it doesnt show up on the volume print, and the OI doesnt change?

Those $SWKS 80c August a great example of some contracts being closed but not closed out of the existing open interest. 20,000 contracts opened last week, and 20,000 closed (and rolled) over the previous 2 sessions (10,000 on each day). But note that the open interest does not decrease by nearly 10,000 on either of the following sessions.

$HIMS Big executive insider purchase and it cooks the set up, all good, were just some weekly lottos I was willing to lose. Sometimes thats how the cookie crumbles. I actually like the company long term

$HIMS coming back and simultaneously rejecting two trend channels, with bearish divergences on both, taking a stab at some weekly puts here, 22s for 0.24

$SWKS I like the idea here, just rolled some of my July 80s to 95s, shorter term than these Aug calls but i think we get to 97ish quickly

Brother, all due respect, the fact you literally can only debate one specific minuscule topic, yet run from any debates on other actually important topics or just overall orthodoxy vs Protestantism, this is a clear admission you just aren’t that smart, nor are you fantastic apologist. You sit here and say “I aM oNlY WilLiNg tO dEbAte SaInT iNteRceSsioN, oNlY fRoM pRe niCene cHurcH fAthErs” lol the fact you have set such a strict criteria and run from any other topic is comical. The audacity to then claim you would “cook” someone is laughable. This is clown behavior.

It seems like the debate between @Alex_Ortodoxie and I has been pushed until October I can not wait nearly that long, We can have @C2Antiquity the Zest master himself moderate on his channel and I'll cook Alex live there on the Prompt we agreed. Then do a second debate on MDD

$SWKS Some PnF targets for the smaller structure, and larger structure. Currently in a VPVR volume gap, considering we didnt bounce right off, we likely teleport thru it. POC is 97, contracts are short dated so I will see what they give in that timeframe, then will potentially roll profits into a few longer dated ones if ptice gets to the first structure targets and consolidates a bit in a backing up action. Small structure objectives from 115-135, long term structure targets 486-542

$SWKS took some off here, great trade so far

@bannedpastor lol I love that this guy gets ratioed on every single tweet then manages to tweet something else even dumber. Congrats bud lol

Orthodox are an innovation. Get the Baptist Bias!

How do you read John 1:1-3 and still hold your “Christology”? All due respect, it seems like your beliefs are more rooted in wanting to be contrarian than actually sound doctrine. How do you reconcile that Ignatius (who directly learned from John) specifically calls Jesus “our God” and that he existed with the Father before time? I’m genuinely curious, with what authority do you make these assumptions? It sounds like you don’t even really know what you believe

@_jonbowlin Can you show me where you get your preminence from? I don’t see it. I’d like to read up from your source of info please.

I’m not a trinitarian, can I still enter the Kingdom? Yeshua is Lord

$SWKS seems interesting here, both july and aug opened, chart has some nice structure, looks like a reaccumulation structure with a spring and a test on lower volume, then re-enters the VAL, short term should see the POC around 97, could be a good move beyond if market conditions hold.

$ENPH Original thesis was this was a wave 3 starting to play out, it looks to be correct, this is definitely impulsive. Here is a PnF chart with some price targets for the accumulation structure started back in summer 25'. I have been long, end of year $60 calls currently up 267%. Trimmed a couple to cover my entry cost. Would be surprised to see a bit of a cool off, but I am looking for a bigger move. #PnFcharts

Yikes, you aren’t the sharpest, I see. Intelligent people can put there big boy pants on and seek out the answers to why they might be wrong here with discernment, you lack the ability to look at any belief you have with discernment lol. James 2:10- talks about the impossibility of being justified by perfect law keeping… he’s not arguing “therefor only intellectual belief matters” lol he’s arguing against selective belief and hypocrisy, literally a few verses later he explicitly tells you your justified by works and NOT faith alone. Romans 11:6 -yeah, he’s contrasting grace vs. works of the law. Romans 11:29 - oh my, you are an actual idiot, an idiot with the internet at your fingertips, you could literally just look the meaning of this verse up. This is 100% out of context, Paul is talking about God’s covenantal faithfulness to Israel 😂 Acts 16:30-31- this is your best argument, however it’s still wrong. Your idea of “believe” and scriptures is completely different. πιστεύω (pisteuō) doesn’t simply mean an intellectual thought, it carries the idea of trust, allegiance, fidelity, entrusting oneself. Hence why the jailer immediately goes into active obedience. Ephesians 2:8-9- yeah we agree, salvation is by grace, but read the next verse “For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works…”. Works do not originate salvation, but grace transforms the believer into a life of obedience, what is so difficult to comprehend here? Yes, correct that is “saved” in the present tense. There are verses talking about being saved (past), currently saved (present), and “shall be saved” future, hence why we say we were saved, are saved and hope to be saved. John 10:28- no external force can steal believers from Christ, this isn’t stating someone can’t fall away out of their own free will, hence why there are so many scriptural warnings about it. Apart of a cult and am going to hell huh!? lol the church that’s unchanged from the first century, the one who gave you the cannonized Bible you trust is a cult? Considering you came from and exist as an offshoot of this church, this is the church of Acts that Jesus started, you sure you want to call it a cult!? lol even I wouldnt damn you to hell, not my job. Don’t see what you evangelicals infatuation with doing that is, you guys like to play God? Can you tell me scripturally how I’m going to hell? I believe I’m saved 100% by God’s grace, I also believe that my faith requires to be obedient in all the areas IN SCRIPTURE we are commanded to obedience. You don’t believe all the the commandments to obedience are necessary, so that somehow makes you saved and me not?

@BubbyAxelrod @StedfastCam @BaptistBen316 Really so explain James 2:10, Romans 11:6, 11:29, Acts 16:30, and Ephesians 2:8-9, are very clear. "believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved" not being saved but saved meaning now. John 10:28 Never Perish. Youre in a cult dude and yeah youre going to hell

Orthodoxy is not only a cancer, but it's also super cringe and seems to appeal to r/iamverysmart type pseudo-intellectuals. A plain reading of scripture is just too simple for them, so they overcomplicate into damnable heresy. When called on it, their defense is "Muh tradition".

This is disingenuous, notice he’s unwilling to debate the breadth of the two denominations (losing topic). I listened to your convo last night briefly, and both you and your host are disingenuous (not sure if intentional or not), you both made claims that asking intercession of saints is required and a determining factor of salvation. This is not true at all. The truth is you can not debate orthodoxy on its merits and historical accuracy, you can only attempt to point to holes in two topics (intercession/icons because of the minimal amount of early written text surrounding the topic) with an unrealistic level of standard for proof. I can make these same exact claims demanding the same level of proof for many of your doctrines (sola scripura, baptism not regenerative, symbolic Eucharist, PSA, OSAO). You think you are winning by fighting tooth and nail to show that intercession/icons MAY have some theological development, meanwhile your entire theology is man made development. I would love to have this discussion live, respectfully.

I would be interested in the conversation of is intercession of the saints taught by the Apostolic and Ante Nicene church fathers!

Hold on Junior, he’s actually right, admittedly orthobros do have a small negative impact, where Catholic/protestants have nothing but a positive impact, it’s literally them espousing their ahistorical nonsense beliefs that are leading people to orthodoxy. They are our greatest salesmen

@heavenmaxxer @JayDyer @GodLogic_GL No

I don’t care what any evangelicals or otherwise think about me calling out @GodLogic_GL if the channels he runs through proxies are boosting anti-Orthodox attacks and propping up the worst (jp / mauler) - that’s an attack on Orthodoxy and Avery is responsible since it’s his official clips channel. ai don’t care if he’s friends with whoever. Christianity isn’t a cool online club based on who is nice, it’s literally the Orthodox Church. You can’t do Christ without His Church and that goes for anyone in the made up online anti-Islamianity sphere: Ridvan, Wood, Scamoun, Avery, Ruslan, IP. None of these people are Orthodox and to be teachers they need Orthodox doctrine. If Orthodoxy isn’t your standard your assessment is meaningless.

No, you lack the understanding of what a tuquoque fallacy is. This is not fallacious as it’s being used to point out your inconsistent methodology, not as a proof itself, there is a distinction. I’m pointing out that Prots often dismiss early evidence for saintly intercession because it is sparse, debated, or developing, while simultaneously affirming doctrines and practices that have even less ante Nicene evidence. In regards to your actual point, it’s a silly argument, huge amounts of early Christian writings are also unknown author. Early liturgical writings/worship would literally never mention an author. The most ridiculous part of your argument is it “could be” written by some pagan lunatic, the document is clearly Christian prayer material and that’s not debated. Sure could it be written by aliens, could the Didache be written by big foot? Sure I guess, that’s about on par with your argument here

@BubbyAxelrod @JPuncut Is that not true? Unknown author, could be a pagan lunatic, one single papyrus, debated dating, etc? “Uhhhh ummm well what about you???” The perceived inconsistencies of my position have no bearing on whether sub tum presidium is aposotlic. This is why tuquoque is a fallacy.

1. Do saints intercede for us? I have no issue with that 2. Mormons and Jehovah witnesses also have their miracles 3. No ante nicene father or apostolic father believed in praying to saints

lol this conversation is so silly, just completely historically inept. We are done on your terms, I’m going to push back here to show how hypocritical your talking points are. If you’re an evangelical/protestant, youre entire theology has zero apostolicity. So much of it is developed and man made. Show me ante-nicene examples of sola scriputra, the “sinners prayer” or alter calls, any 200AD examples of OSAS, literally anyone teaching PSA, a symbolic only Eucharist, modern dispensationalism and pre-trib rapture? Let’s see it

@BubbyAxelrod @JPuncut Isn’t that like one single papyrus fragment? Could have been written by anyone. Does 0 to establish apostolicity or orthodoxy

These aren’t the angels prayers, these are the saints prayers. I think the standard of proof you guys demand here is remarkably high. We have plenty of 4th century fathers detailing it explicitly (that’s not good enough), we have inscriptions on catacombs showing the early church was doing it, and we have an actual ancient written prayer from the mid 200s (you gloss over us having this as insignificant which is crazy tbh, primarily because you lack the historical understanding on what would or should have survived from this timr frame.) This clearly shows the early church was doing this. Again I can easily show how your belief is hypocritical, as you rely on the same 4th century fathers to be righteous/Sprit filled as they cannonized the scripture you trust, but you would then simultaneously claim they were also doing something completely heretical? Thats beside the point, I want to go back to this point you ignored earlier. “This still begs the question, if your argument is that asking intercession from saints is wrong? Why? Considering everything stated (saints are alive -> they can hear us and can intercede -> we are told to ask the righteous to pray for us). Rather than make me pinpoint explicit pre nicene examples instructing us, can you explain why asking for saint intercession is wrong?” I think as with most Protestants, you have a misconception on what “praying” to the saints is, the term itself is misleading, we don’t ask anything other than for that saint to pray for us and intercede on our behalf. It’s also not something you have to do, nor is it somehow tied to salvation as this guy JP and his cohort tried to wrongfully imply. You guys think this is some dogma that you have caught us in a “gotcha” with but it’s literally not. It’s telling because you guys ignore all of the actual reasons Protestants/evangelicals like myself are converting, and you try and poke holes at really the only two areas you can, which is intercession/icon veneration as they are the hardest to show the earliest adoption.

@BubbyAxelrod @JPuncut Angels offering prayers to God is not people praying to angels. Yes saints may have certain awarenesses, still does no work to justify addressing them directly with your noetic faculties. There is no prayer to creatures in the Bible I can’t respond to 5 points in 40 characters

My debate offer "Intercession of the saints is false therefore Orthodoxy is false" We can use 1. The cannon of your choice 2. The NT apostles 3. Antene Nicene and Apostolic Church fathers. Title: Did the Apostilic Fathers and Antne Nicene fathers/ NT & OT TEACH intercession of saints

I mean there’s a biblical case for it, Revelation angels offering prayers before God, showing heaven is aware of earthly prayer. Bowls of incense holding the prayers of the saints etc. This is also where Origen is explicit, that the saints have awareness of earthly believers. Listen brother, if you’re going to ignoring 90% of what I just wrote and asked, and reply to one point, we can go ahead and end this convo right now

@BubbyAxelrod @JPuncut You are assuming dead people have access to or posses divine qualities and powers with no biblical or apostolic warrant Surely you don’t accept as practice everything every saint wrote about. We are rational about the context and development of church praxis in Roman society.

@JPuncut @ScubaDocJMP Kinda hard to with a wife and kids yah know? I also don’t claim to be an expert either, but I could try to for a few minutes, you live now?

@ScubaDocJMP @BubbyAxelrod Would you fellas like to join me live and go over these prayers that include the fathers praying to saints in the apostolic and ante nicene era?

Yeah I guess it’s tough right, you want explicit documentation, yet considering the historical landscape that’s pretty tough. A majority of early Christian writings were apologetics, anti heresy, dealing with crisis, not necessarily devotional manuals on prayer or intercessions…. And that of what we actually have left. The church at that time was persecuted, texts destroyed, churches destroyed, records lost. Even with all this, we do have evidence IE catacomb inscriptions, martyr veneration, Sub Tuum Praesidium. This still begs the question, if your argument is that asking intercession from saints is wrong? Why? Considering everything stated (saints are alive -> they can hear us and can intercede -> we are told to ask the righteous to pray for us). Rather than make me pinpoint explicit pre nicene examples instructing us, can you explain why asking for saint intercession is wrong? Also this also brings up an issue, you have many 4th century fathers who canonized the scriptures (Gregory of Nazianzus, Cyprian of Carthage, Ephrem the Syrian, Basil the Great, John Chrysostom, Augustine of Hippo) and this puts you in a conundrum. You must concede these men were led by the Holy Spirit as they are the reason you have a canonized scripture, yet you simultaneously claim they were all leading the church into heresy by making up saint intercession?

@BubbyAxelrod @JPuncut None of this is a problem for Protestants or Origen. Also, none of which includes prayers addressed TO saints besides sub tuum, which timeframe is debated, even if 3rdC , a single example with an unknown source does not establish doctrine, catholicity, or apostolicity