Carl Rigson

🚨 WOMAN SAYS REPEATING THIS 5-DIGIT “QUANTUM CODE” SHUTS OFF PHYSICAL PAIN — AND PEOPLE ARE FREAKING OUT AFTER TRYING IT A woman is going viral after claiming physical pain can be reduced without medication… simply by repeating a mysterious number sequence: “55515.” According to her, the sequence acts like a “quantum code” that sends a signal from the brain directly into the area of pain to calm the body naturally. Her instructions: • sit with the pain • focus on where it’s coming from • repeat the code over and over • allow the body to “receive the signal” But the internet immediately took the video down a much deeper rabbit hole. People are now connecting it to the CIA’s declassified Gateway Process documents, the controversial research program that explored consciousness, frequencies, altered states, and the hidden potential of the human mind. Now the comments are completely spiraling: • “Why did this actually calm my migraine??” • “The human brain is way more powerful than we’ve been taught.” • “Why was the CIA researching consciousness in the first place?” • “This sounded insane… until I tried it!” What exactly did the CIA discover about the human mind… and why does it feel like the public still only knows a fraction of it? 📹: TikTok/aviaamber_

Did you know that the church used to charge people for a patriarchal blessing? Maybe it was just me who wasn’t taught this in seminary or in church history lessons.

A French clairvoyant, Stéphane Cardinaux, saw reptilian beings shadow and attach themselves to people's astral bodies. They apparently extend their own lifespan by feeding on negative emotion, which makes them denser. They inspire thoughts and block life force, like heart energy.

PCOS is being renamed to PMOS. (Polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome) The change comes from experts that say the old name was misleading, stating that it inaccurately suggested ovarian cysts as a defining feature.

First Nigerian to play chess at the Louvre 🇫🇷-The world’s most prestigious museum.

When I was young, I romanticized belief: I’d obsessively ruminate on what simple sets of principles could explain the acts of individuals I admired, & how I could coherently pick from them for an instructed life, outsourcing my navigation to something already louder than the mob. When you have nothing but commitments & openness to give, & there’s nothing but honor & coordination that you need, that’s the sensible choice. “If only I could infer the beliefs behind this genius output, I’d have been able to make it as well—unless I discover those beliefs are incoherent, or mistaken, or hazy, or uninteresting, in which case that genius output is actually secretly mediocre!” But eventually “aesthetics” become the principles that matter most: you’re no longer interested in wondering what’s abstractly good or bad, but rather how to do something you care about well, because principles aren’t self-executing, any more than physics formulas are the universe. & then you forget about how much younger people crave legible principles—“is this dogma correct? is this praxis coherent? is this framework my friend?” “what are you talking about, it works in this case & not in that one”—& fumble the opportunity to frame taste & skills as the morals that matter most, & so they stumble into maturity too