Dikardo

🚨 HOLY. SMOKES. A political nuke just went off in the White House briefing room. REPORTER: Are you referring former President Obama to the DOJ for criminal implications? DNI TULSI GABBARD: "Correct." "The evidence we've found and released directly point to President Obama LEADING the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment [of Trump-Russia]."

@DUmeokeke @TatianaSnead All politicians

@TatianaSnead You have not met African politicians.

never saw an abundant person aim to block the abundance of others.

I've been told by a friend from Ohio that one of the reasons the elites are so hysterical about Haitians having to go home, even some Republicans, is apartment owners love renting to them, especially if they are paying government-subsidized rents. Think about the insanity of that. We are subsidizing the rents of foreign nationals, driving up the cost of housing for native Americans by diminishing supply and increasing demand. That is as un-American as anything our government could do to us.

The content I would be focusing on if White people weren't being mass-raped, murdered, and going extinct

The funniest part about watching the fall of Michael Saylor in real-time is how the Bitcoin maxis who once claimed he was “the greatest investor of all time” trying to desperately defend him after he’s down $16 billion and his company plummets towards bankruptcy. When he’s forced to dump all his BTC, locked behind bars, found guilty for all his fraud, they will just say it’s the matrix and the evil centralized bankers trying to stop Bitcoin from succeeding! Maxis can never just admit the truth, that Saylor conned them all, and Bitcoin is a worthless shit coin entirely dependant on speculative gambling and price manipulation.

Women aren’t “producing” more. They are having their entire lives artificially elevated by the state. There shouldn’t be female lawyers or doctors or elected officials or CEOs generally The government is artificially propping them up at the direct expense of men Men are robbed to give women more, the gap ruins things. And no party wants to address this because it hurts women’s feelings

@cryptomanran Ran neuner the p.o.s. scam artist sounds more like unhinged Mark Levin every day. The lies that come out this pos mouth are ridiculous.

If you are bearish MSTR you are bearish Bitcoin - at least for the next few years.

@EntropicWaves @natbrunell 83 cents??? You shouldn't even be on your phone in the trenches on x whining about this then my guy. You should be retired and not giving AF cyber hornet.

@Dikardo3 @natbrunell You’d better believe it. I’ve been in the space since slashdot. I was late at 83 cent Bitcoin.

One thing I don’t understand about Bitcoin X right now is why so many personal attacks are happening between people who actually know each other, sometimes very well. They’ve shared meals, have each other’s phone numbers, and in some cases know each other’s families. Why not pick up the phone? Or sit down over dinner and talk through the disagreement? If both people want the discussion to be public, host an X Space where tone, nuance, and real conversation are possible. Maybe those conversations are happening behind the scenes and we just don’t see them. But from the outside, the endless back-and-forth posts often strip away tone and context, reducing complex disagreements to something much more superficial. More often than not, they seem to create more division than understanding. Maybe I’m alone on this, but if someone has an issue with me, I’d much rather they call me. I’d rather hear their voice, understand where they’re coming from, and let them hear mine.

@BitcoinHopium This is unimportant

#BREAKING 🚨 BOOOOM 💥💥 Billionaire JACK DORSEY has done it again! His app BITCHAT lets users SEND BITCOIN WITHOUT THE INTERNET! This is next-level tech for the crypto world! WHAT A GAME CHANGER! 🎉

@Michaeljdobbin @natbrunell @saylor His intelligence? You people believing the trash that comes out of his mouth shows no intelligence.

@natbrunell Most people won't want to speak to @saylor . His intelligence is too much for most, and he would talk most around. Its easier to Fud on X than in person.

@EntropicWaves @natbrunell Lmao. "Cyber hornets". You people bought the whole psyop hook, line and sinker. Are you a cyber hornet too bud?

It’s funny, I think the title of your book sums it up. Bitcoin is for everyone. That means people can/will/are having ideological disagreements and discussions. Everyone wants the best for Bitcoin within their lane. We’ll have to settle on our own equilibrium. The price going up dampens arguments because people don’t feel as threatened. The cyber hornets need to realize we’re all defending the same nest.

On day before my talk @BTCPrague on the Fabians inside the Gates I was asked by Natalie Brunell to do a podcast with her. At the end of it she asked me what I was going to do and say. I told her to come to the talk and hear it live. During the podcast she asked me was this an existential challenge to Bitcoin. I told her I would answer that in my talk. I was just informed that after my presentation at @BTCPrague Natalie wants to censor my podcast and not release it. I believe all the Plebs should be made aware of this development. Bitcoin media should not be in the business of sheltering their wedding guests from criticisms. Sunshine is the best disinfectant for the the node running Plebs around the globe. So in the first every Bitcoin morbidity & mortality conference in Prague, where I labeled 5 of 6 "Bitcoiners," and I use that term lightly, FRAUDS, Natalie Brunell has decided to censor what I told her 24 hours before that talk. Ironically, her team never reached out to me, she relayed the message to the meeting organizers who contacted me this AM about this. For those of you who did not go to Prague, from the stage Natalie got a big call out on her question from the stage to me about the "existential Bitcoin Landauer attack" brought about by those "6 Bitcoiners". When the talk goes live you'll hear it and she'll have to explain her reasoning to you. For me, she has lost all face validity as Bitcoin media. I have a clean copy of the Prague talk, so if it gets edited I will be releasing it, FYI. I was wearing my own mic. I knew this talk would be censored in some way so I was ready for it. 7 of my slides also never got shown. I have been reasured that this was a technical issue, so I will not say more about it. Plebs should be away that the media heads inside of Bitcoin are also working with Fabians attempting to ossify the base chain of Bitcoin with spam. We all must be aware that we have a Trojan horse loaded with people we should no longer trust at our gates, and I strongly suggest we not open the door before we employ BIP-110 to limit the pathologic cloud surrounding them at the entrance. The primary purpose of Bitcoin media regarding transparency is to hold power to account, foster an informed citizenry, and maintain public trust through clear disclosures and open communication. The media facilitates transparency in two distinct ways: the media’s transparency toward the public and the media acting as an agent of transparency for society. To combat misinformation and build trust, media & their associated organizations apply transparency to their own operations by employing the following: 1. Editorial Clarity: Distinguishing facts from opinions and explaining reporting methods. Funding & Ownership Disclosure: Revealing financial backers, corporate ownership, and potential conflicts of interest so audiences can weigh potential biases. Radical Transparency: Openly revealing how news is gathered to let audiences independently assess the reliability of a story. As far as I am concerned, based on those three characteristics, Brunell is now part of the same problem now because of this censorship. I spread missing information that Plebs who run nodes need. I find it more than ironic her first released podcast was with a past wedding guest. Is the ethos in Bitcoin, "Don't Trust, verify, or do certain Bitcoiner's get a pass now? Apparently Bitcoin is not for everyone as Brunell's twitter page says in the header. It is just for those who she protects. @mattkratter @LukeDashjr @hodlonaut @BitcoinWay

@NWQLD @saylor So sick of saylors whiney phaggoty voice.

It all went downhill for @saylor from here…

@natbrunell @saylor Fake people, fake ads, fake strategy... Be the loudest, shout down any competition, totally ignore anything different. BTC maxis live in their own delusional reality and are a cancer to society.

@saylor ⚡️

You weren’t meant to live an uncomfortable life. $STRC

@ChainLinkGod @saylor This scam ad is just as bad as the Link people crying about XRP. #LinkPhaggots

@saylor Yeah this doesn’t make crypto look like a predatory get-rich-quick scam at all !

Biggest scam ever!

@Dashpay @saylor Lol called it!

@saylor Ok now this is straight up scammy now.

@IIICapital How are they going to raise more dollars? Are you going to give them all your money? Who else is gonna do that?

Even if Bitcoin fell to $25,000 tomorrow, stayed there until 2036, and somehow Strategy never raised another dollar, it would still have enough capital to make all dividend payments. If Bitcoin is $25,000 in 2036, I’d admit my thesis was wrong. Of course I don’t expect this.

Unpopular opinion: If Strategy misses an $STRC dividend payment, Bitcoin likely died.

@InfoseeekerOO7 @BobLoukas Oh yes, nobody ever understands except geniuses like you who are involved and promoting a fuckin ponzi. 🤣🤣

To call STRC a ponzi shows 3 things. 1. You do not understand STRC 2. You have no idea how the STRC instrument works... 3. That you believe BTC is a Ponzi plus that it makes bad collateral. Is a shame you are not talking about how good of a great investment STRC is right now.

$STRC Market demanding a lot more yield to fund this Ponzi.

@freedomlovinway @Fruuho @BobLoukas Lmao.

@Fruuho @BobLoukas I totally agree with this take, there's more to it than "ponzi" even if it does collapse (not what happened today).