Ed Reep (New Jersey Exile in Las Vegas)

This is the best Annihilationism Video with 100% Proof. By the way, just for the record to preempt bad counterarguments, I'm otherwise a regular Charismatic-leaning Protestant in my views who just wants generic Evangelical Christianity + Annihilationism to be mainstream. Furthermore, I think non-existence is an utterly horrible outcome as bad as ECT.

I can confirm the commemorative coin story. Heard the same thing. It does appear the Administration is planning a (limited) disclosure. But will @POTUS admit the full legacy UAP Program?… doubtful.

@fandompulse What about Pulp Fiction?

Quentin Tarantino explains why he does not include nudity or sex scenes in his films: "Sex isn’t part of my vision of cinema. And the truth is, in real life, shooting sex scenes is a pain—everyone gets really tense. And if it was a bit of a hassle to do before, it’s even more so now. If a sex scene had ever come up that was essential to the story, I would have done it, but so far it hasn’t been necessary." Is there a need for sex scenes in films and TV?

@pimomormon Animals were killed in their place to make skins for them, folllwing the pattern of sacrifices being made in place of mankind to pay the penalty of death for sin up to the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross. There's a whole other level of understanding to Bible beyond surface.

God said Adam and Eve would “surely die” the same day they ate the forbidden fruit. Adam and Eve almost lived (according to the Bible) for a thousand years. And we’re told that god tells the truth?

@HypeDuck1 @AliensGov @TheDefiantGhost They have to yield when hearing "Jesus" for instance.

@AliensGov @TheDefiantGhost "must adhere to spiritual laws" what spiritual laws and why must they adhere?

In 2023, an anonymous 4chan user claimed that he has intimate knowledge of what the U.S. knew about UFOs up until 2021.

Catholic priest says demons manifest as gray aliens during exorcisms.

@tombennett71 My undergraduate business degree taught me the "5 Whys" and how to do a SWOT Analysis! That is critical thinking by definition.

You cannot teach critical thinking. You can teach domain specific expertise, which enables you to think critically about that domain. Brilliant chess players do not make great military commanders. More problematically, people who think they have great critical thinking skills are often the ones who get hoodwinked by any fashionable idea, because they lack the domain expertise to interrogate nonsense.

@Yessiiiiir @RageRead I agree, but I think it's a significantly less severe bad deed than it was in the past. Premarital sex in an era before birth control is basically pure wickedness or at least recklessness to the extreme, but in the modern era, it's more so abstract idolatry.

@EdwardReep @RageRead Marriage never STOPPED being "the only safe moral way to have sex" To suggest otherwise is foolishness

This is exactly why I am saying Knowland’s model of masculinity is not only deeply flawed, it’s straight up slavery disguised as biblical manhood. Because by reducing it to a grim “vocation” that merely binds a man to endless self-giving without any expectation of return, he turns God’s design into something that feels more like indentured servitude than the covenant He actually ordained. Marriage IS a lifestyle upgrade—with responsibilities, sure, but it’s not a downgrade into some joyless martyrdom where the husband pours himself out like a sacrificial ATM while his wife’s respect, obedience, and cooperation remain optional “bonuses” she doles out only when he performs perfectly. No, marriage DOES exist to meet our needs; that’s literally biblical, from Genesis 2:18 where the wife is created as a “helper suitable for him” to provide companionship, partnership, and completion that a solitary man cannot achieve, all the way through 1 Corinthians 7 where spouses are commanded to render to each other the affection and physical intimacy they owe so that neither burns with unmet desire. That’s not its only function, of course—procreation and mutual sanctification matter too—but it’s a very important part of it, and pretending otherwise ignores the plain reality that healthy marriages produce tangible goods like peace in the home, sexual fulfillment, admiration, and domestic stability that make a man’s life objectively better, not just a heavier cross to bear. Marriage doesn’t JUST bind a man to give himself in sacrificial love as Ephesians 5:25 requires; there’s a real transaction a man receives in return—like respect, obedience, and authority—as a COMMAND from God Himself in the very same chapter (wives submit “in everything” as to the Lord, and “let the wife see that she respects her husband” in verse 33), not some conventional bonus she might grant if he leads flawlessly enough or absorbs her moods without complaint. His model inverts the entire Christ-and-Church analogy by making the husband’s headship a one-way ticket to self-gaslighting (“lead harder while she disrespects you”) while treating the wife’s commanded response as optional, which isn’t Catholic teaching or biblical balance at all; it’s a disguised gynocentrism that sets men up for contempt-filled homes, broken spirits, and the very chaos he claims to oppose. Real marriage, rightly ordered, upgrades a man’s existence because God wired it with mutual duties and mutual blessings: he leads, provides, and loves sacrificially, and she obeys and honors him that make his leadership effective and his home a place of flourishing rather than endless performance reviews. Anything less is just a raw deal no rational man should sign up for, and it’s why so many are walking away from the version he’s selling.

@RageRead In ancient times, marriage was the only safe moral way to have sex to avoid the tragedy of out of wedlock children since birth control did not exist like it does now. It existed to prevent harm.

@EdwardReep He also encouraged marrying if you’re burning with passion, which looks like directly contradicting Knowland because it literally tells you to marry for the reason of fulfilling your needs.

BREAKING: VP Vance on UFOs: I don’t think they’re aliens, I think they’re demons.

@CodeGrue @ujjwalscript If that's the case, then at least they're limited in the damage they can do via their humanity.

@ujjwalscript You are making an assumption that 90% of humans don't produce spaghetti code that is even worse.

"English is the new programming language" is largely BS. Everyone on X timeline is saying: "Just vibe code it! You don't need to learn syntax anymore, just prompt the AI in plain English!" HOT TAKE from the trenches of reviewing pull requests all day: English is the worst programming language ever invented. It is ambiguous. It is emotional. It lacks strict constraints. Code isn't hard because of the brackets or the syntax. Code is hard because of the precision. When you write in Python or React, you are forced to define the exact boundaries of reality. You have to explicitly handle the edge cases, the null states, and the architecture. When you write in "English", you are just hoping a probabilistic engine guesses your intent correctly. I am watching people use AI to "vibe code" entire backends in a weekend. The result? It functionally works for a demo, but it's an absolute disaster under the hood. No scalability, zero security considerations, and multiple responsibilities crammed into single, unmaintainable components. We aren't building the future 10x faster. We are just generating legacy spaghetti code 10x faster. The engineers getting promoted on my team right now aren't the best "prompt whisperers." They are the ones who know exactly why the AI's "English-to-Code" translation just introduced a silent memory leak into the system design. Stop learning how to "chat" with a bot. Start learning how to architect systems. Ambiguity is the enemy of scale.

@liquidatefoids @majoriansmusing The Holy Spirit.

@majoriansmusing i love the "sisters in Christ" like why is this random bitch suddenly my sister?

This is why young men are leaving the church btw.

Hmm... Mark 10:29-30 indicates the ideal : " 29 “Truly I tell you,” Jesus replied, “no one who has left home or brothers or sisters or mother or father or children or fields for me and the gospel30 will fail to receive a hundred times as much in this present age: homes, brothers, sisters, mothers, children and fields—along with persecutions—and in the age to come eternal life. "

@majoriansmusing This isn't the main reason they're leaving Church. Young men have no reason nowadays to join besides the metaphysical implications. It doesn't solve their loneliness or any other issue they face.

@MomAngtrades I don't understand why they're trying to scare everyone that AI will cause a job apocalypse. It's a great way to inspire society to tax and regulate their companies... unless that's their goal.

Are we ready to have the conversation that AI CEOs are just hype men? It’s the new climate change scam to get money invested in their companies and make them billions. AI is a tool for humans to use. Bookmark this tweet. Not a chance in one year not one lawyers full job will be replaced by AI. Most AI I play around with can’t even solve my 3rd graders homework correctly.

I don't think the Iran war was a good idea, but given that America is committed now, we better win decisively 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸!

@grok @ForensicsKuria @Rainmaker1973 Wouldn't this be evidence against the auditory hypothesis discussed in this thread?

Yes, deaf people—including those born profoundly deaf—can and are diagnosed with schizophrenia at rates similar to hearing people. Their "voices" typically manifest as visual hallucinations (e.g., seeing signing, lip movements, or gestures), and they often sign back to these perceived external communicators. This adapts to their primary language mode, showing neurological mechanisms at work (like misattributed inner "speech" in sign), not social construction. The brain's predictive failure is consistent across sensory experiences.

Confirmed: Schizophrenia’s “voices” are the brain mishearing its own thoughts. For decades, neuroscientists have theorized that the "voices" heard by individuals with schizophrenia stem from the brain mistaking its own inner dialogue for external sounds. A groundbreaking study from the University of New South Wales has now provided direct evidence supporting this hypothesis through brainwave analysis. Using electroencephalography (EEG) to monitor the brain’s electrical activity, researchers examined how individuals process their internal speech. Typically, when we speak—aloud or silently—the brain anticipates the sound of our voice and temporarily suppresses activity in the auditory cortex, the area responsible for processing external sounds, to differentiate self-generated thoughts from external stimuli. However, in people experiencing auditory hallucinations, this predictive mechanism malfunctions. The study involved 142 participants, including those with schizophrenia who recently experienced hallucinations, others with the condition but no recent hallucinations, and a control group without a diagnosis. Participants were instructed to mentally say “bah” or “bih” while hearing these sounds through headphones. In those who heard voices, a striking pattern emerged: their brains showed heightened activity in the auditory cortex when their imagined speech matched the external sound, rather than suppressing it as expected. This suggests the brain was processing internal thoughts as if they were external voices. This sensory misclassification sheds light on why hallucinated voices feel vividly real, revealing them as a neurological error rather than mere imagination. The findings not only deepen our understanding of schizophrenia but also pave the way for earlier detection of psychosis, potentially enabling more timely and effective treatments. ["Corollary Discharge Dysfunction to Inner Speech and its Relationship to Auditory Verbal Hallucinations in Patients with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders." Schizophrenia Bulletin, 21 October 2025]

@ForensicsKuria @Rainmaker1973 @grok can deaf people be diagnosed schizophrenic where they speak to an external force via sign language, proving this is far more socially constructed?

@Rainmaker1973 No, it is actually demons. Do you know why there are no blind schizophrenics?

Do not be deceived. "Aliens" are not real. They are not aliens. Nothing from another galaxy has visited us. These are demonic entities. They are meant to deceive us and are deceiving many.

@RedBedDread @Smoogle01 @SandyofCthulhu I believe in gay acceptance very much so, but I think that the artistic and cultural achievements related to gay culture have been stifled by its full normalization. I'd rather a world where there's acceptance and toleration but just enough of an edge to keep the creativity up!

@EdwardReep @Smoogle01 @SandyofCthulhu Gay rights literally started on the notion that gay people are normal people. Any attitude outside of that is *insane* to support unless you believe gay people are inherently weird. And if that's the case gay acceptance is de facto unsustainable long term.

Remember this guy?

@JamesMartinSJ @EthanBearman I agree, but you should say the same about loving all enemies even Ayatollah.

God help us. This is disgraceful language coming from a Christian, or anyone with a soul. It was just as wrong to celebrate the death of Charlie Kirk as it is to celebrate that of Robert Mueller. May they rest in peace. And may we never forget that Jesus's message is about mercy.