El_Macho
2.1K posts
@El_galente
🇨🇵 Je pense ne pas être un robot. A vous de voir.
The Count of Monte Cristo has been voted the most American hero in French literature. (In a poll I conducted:) 1. Edmond Dantès is destroyed by the establishment not because he did anything wrong – but because he was about to succeed. Three mediocre men find it convenient that he disappears. This is not villainy. It is the European system operating as designed. 2. He does not petition for justice. He does not appeal to institutions. He builds himself — from nothing, in a prison cell — into something the system has no category for. The Château d’If is his Stanford, his Wall Street, and his boot camp, all at once. 3. The fortune is not inherited. It is found, claimed, and deployed. He has no bloodline the establishment must respect. So he buys his way in, masters their codes faster than they learned them, and uses their own rules as weapons. This is the American founding myth in a French waistcoat. 4. The revenge is not hot. It is architectural. Years of patience, precision, and methodical excellence – each enemy given exactly enough rope. He does not rage against the system. He becomes the consequence. 5. Every other hero of French literature is tragic, compromised, or absorbed. Dantès alone wins completely, on his own terms, without surrendering who he is. The European novel teaches you why the system always wins. Monte Cristo is the exception – which is why it feels American. 6. “Wait and hope” — his closing words — are not passive. They are the most aggressive possible stance: the decision to outlast, outthink, and outlive the corrupt establishment that thought it had finished you. 7. America was built by people who had been finished by someone else’s establishment and who decided to build anew from scratch. They recognized the Count immediately. The French invented him. The Americans understood him.
"Je ne suis ni de droite ni de gauche" Marine le Pen, 2026 "Je ne suis ni de droite ni de gauche" Emmanuel Macron, 2017 Vous voulez vraiment reprendre pour 5 ans de "en même temps"?
Jean-Jacques Rousseau – the original Woke He invented it. Every premise of contemporary progressive ideology traces directly back to one man who had never met a "noble savage", never raised a child, and never lived according to a single principle he preached. 1. His foundational claim: man is naturally good and civilization corrupts. This sounds compassionate. It is the most dangerous idea in Western political thought. Because if man is naturally good, then every failure, every crime, every inequality is caused by the system – never by the individual. Responsibility evaporates. The oppressor is always external. The victim is always pure. This is the complete architecture of Woke in one sentence, written in 1755. 2. The "Noble Savage" is Rousseau’s Form – his version of Plato’s ideal. The uncorrupted man, untouched by property, competition, and civilization, living in natural harmony. Rousseau had never met one. He invented him from an armchair in Paris, extrapolating from travel accounts of peoples he had never visited. The Noble Savage is not an anthropological observation. He is a political weapon – a club to beat civilization with, wielded by someone living comfortably inside it. 3. The "General Will" is the most dangerous concept in modern political philosophy. Not the actual expressed will of actual people – but the deeper will, the will people would have if they were "properly enlightened". Whoever claims to know it can do anything in its name. Robespierre knew it. Every revolutionary vanguard since has known it. Today’s progressive institutions know it – which is why they can override democratic majorities, suppress dissent, and compel speech, all while insisting they represent the people’s true interests. The General Will is the intellectual license for every tyranny that calls itself a liberation. 4. The chain from Rousseau to today is unbroken. Rousseau to Robespierre and the Terror. Robespierre to Marx, who secularized the General Will into historical necessity. Marx to every "liberation" movement that ended in a gulag. And today: replace civilization with white supremacy, replace the Noble Savage with the marginalized community, replace the General Will with lived experience – and you have the complete operating system of contemporary progressivism. The software is the same. 5. Voltaire, his contemporary and rival, saw him quite clearly: Rousseau made primitivism intellectually respectable. He gave the comfortable classes of every generation a way to signal virtue by denouncing the civilization that produced them, from inside it, without cost. The French Left Bank intellectual denouncing capitalism from a café. The Harvard professor deconstructing Western civilization from a tenured chair. The hedge fund billionaire funding the abolition of meritocracy. All of them are living in Rousseau’s armchair. 6. He sent all five of his illegitimate children to a Paris orphanage. Then wrote Émile – one of the most influential books on education in Western history, a detailed guide on how to raise a virtuous child in harmony with nature. He did not find this contradictory. This is not hypocrisy in the ordinary sense – this is obłuda (remember the obłuda of communism?👇🏻). The defining structural feature of the ideology he invented: the sermon is inversely proportional to the practice. The performance of virtue replaces the exercise of it. Naming the oppressor substitutes for personal accountability. Rousseau didn’t just invent Woke – he lived it, in every detail, before anyone had the word. 7. The original Woke was woke about a fiction he invented – and spent his life performing outrage about a civilization he depended on and never left. Two and a half centuries later, the performance is the same. The noble savages have been updated. The General Will has new names. The orphanages are metaphorical. But the man who sends his children away and then lectures everyone else on how to raise theirs – that man is everywhere.
@JonathanSturel Sérieusement, on ne peut reprocher à ces candidats leurs faibles scores. Invitez Asselineau dans des émissions politiques médiatiques et je pense que sa cote de popularité remontera rapidement. C'est la raison pour laquelle ils sont ostracisés.
Instagram me censure. 60 000 abonnés partis en fumée, des années de travail réduites à néant, et une partie de mes revenus qui s’envole. Peut-être que c’est la fin pour moi. Je ne sais pas si j’aurai la force de continuer. Merci à l’@ASLA_asso de m’accompagner. ❤️
Il ne s'agit pas "des plus fragiles" il s'agit de malades qui vont mourir, adultes responsables d'eux mêmes et conscients de leur choix. Leur corps et leur fin de vie leur appartient et n'appartiennent ni à une religion ni au corps médical. Cessez d'infantiliser les gens.
