GRANTGIBBS

16.2K posts

GRANTGIBBS banner
GRANTGIBBS

GRANTGIBBS

@GIBBSGRANT

Online fitness coach. Click link to work with me 💪🏽 $FAME #APECHAIN $APE

Katılım Ocak 2012
5.1K Takip Edilen4.6K Takipçiler
GRANTGIBBS
GRANTGIBBS@GIBBSGRANT·
@JohnnyFocal business just won’t employ anyone under 21 with no experience. Experience will become one of the biggest factors for work employment with it costing a premium to higher you won’t want to spend time and money training
English
0
0
0
11
Jon Thompson
Jon Thompson@JohnnyFocal·
To be honest, you don't actually have a business. You have a business based on exploitation, which means your business model is neither sound nor ethical.
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪@PeterMcCormack

A minimum wage of £15 would end my coffee shop, it would have to close, as would many other businesses. I’ll explain for the economically illiterate. Staff costs are currently half our costs, a £15 minimum wage is actually more than £15 an hour for the company, because you have to add: - 12.07% holiday - Sick pay - Maternity pay if and when required - National insurance - Pension contributions These costs would mean the shop loses money because remember, energy costs are up, rates are up, regulations are up. Now you can pass these costs onto the consumer - that would mean charging a lot more for coffee, people won’t pay it. The likes of Starbucks and Costa can, because they have economies of scale. The independent doesn’t. Now the little socialist will say well this is your fault, if you can’t run a business that can afford to pay its staff properly, but the little socialist has never run a business and does not understand the dynamics. Now I could pay some staff off and fill those hours myself or reduce us to one staff member during certain periods - but this proves the point that a minimum wage costs jobs. There was a time when these jobs were done by kids, perhaps on the weekend, paid a lower wage, no holiday and no silly employment rights. Perhaps they were even paid cash. The dynamic worked and small businesses like this could operate. It was also a great first job. Sadly now it isn’t worth employing entitlement youngsters at this level of pay. So alas, I don’t need the stress, the business would close, a number of jobs would be lost. Economics is about understanding these dynamics, no vibes. The cost of living is not solved through passing on inflation to the business, it is solved by ending high inflation and creating prosperity. This is what socialists don’t understand, they can’t create prosperity, they can only destroy it.

English
351
40
395
31.6K
GRANTGIBBS
GRANTGIBBS@GIBBSGRANT·
@GeneralFoxxxy @seeitwith He literally justified it. Less experience less pay. You will end up with under 21s with no experience being jobless if business have no insensitive to take them on. You definitely can’t raise taxes in business and min wage at same time like now.
English
0
0
2
39
Faith🐇 🏳️‍🌈 🔞 18+
@seeitwith Still doesn't justify paying them differently as a minimum. You can reward experience without a baseline having to suffer. That's how wages work.
English
10
0
38
1.7K
GRANTGIBBS
GRANTGIBBS@GIBBSGRANT·
@MhairiHunter What’s the incentives for small businesses to pay these higher wages. Maybe government could give tax breaks but no they put wages and taxes up at same time !
English
0
0
0
32
Mhairi Hunter 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 🇺🇦 🇵🇸
Just read that coffee shop owner tweet doing the rounds where he says he can't afford to pay £15 an hour to staff but, also, he's a multi-millionaire. "Why don't people understand economics." They do, mate, that's your problem.
English
325
344
3.2K
62.6K
GRANTGIBBS
GRANTGIBBS@GIBBSGRANT·
@PhilipProudfoot Your government can’t want to solve poverty with higher wages and not drill its biggest resource, It’s oil. Also on top of that spend billions on Green energy when your emissions are only 1% of the worlds. You either want to solve poverty in UK or you don’t.
English
0
0
0
63
Philip Proudfoot
Philip Proudfoot@PhilipProudfoot·
Don’t particularly feel sorry for any business owner whose enterprise is only viable because they pay poverty wages.
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪@PeterMcCormack

A minimum wage of £15 would end my coffee shop, it would have to close, as would many other businesses. I’ll explain for the economically illiterate. Staff costs are currently half our costs, a £15 minimum wage is actually more than £15 an hour for the company, because you have to add: - 12.07% holiday - Sick pay - Maternity pay if and when required - National insurance - Pension contributions These costs would mean the shop loses money because remember, energy costs are up, rates are up, regulations are up. Now you can pass these costs onto the consumer - that would mean charging a lot more for coffee, people won’t pay it. The likes of Starbucks and Costa can, because they have economies of scale. The independent doesn’t. Now the little socialist will say well this is your fault, if you can’t run a business that can afford to pay its staff properly, but the little socialist has never run a business and does not understand the dynamics. Now I could pay some staff off and fill those hours myself or reduce us to one staff member during certain periods - but this proves the point that a minimum wage costs jobs. There was a time when these jobs were done by kids, perhaps on the weekend, paid a lower wage, no holiday and no silly employment rights. Perhaps they were even paid cash. The dynamic worked and small businesses like this could operate. It was also a great first job. Sadly now it isn’t worth employing entitlement youngsters at this level of pay. So alas, I don’t need the stress, the business would close, a number of jobs would be lost. Economics is about understanding these dynamics, no vibes. The cost of living is not solved through passing on inflation to the business, it is solved by ending high inflation and creating prosperity. This is what socialists don’t understand, they can’t create prosperity, they can only destroy it.

English
1.5K
687
6.9K
353.9K
GRANTGIBBS
GRANTGIBBS@GIBBSGRANT·
@implausibleblog How can you say you want to solve child profit in the Uk but not drill oil your richest assent and even more then that spend billions on green energy when your you only have 1% emotions of the world. You can’t do both at the same time.
English
0
0
0
35
Farrukh
Farrukh@implausibleblog·
Rachel Millwall, "What is striking is we are the fifth richest country in the world and yet a third of our children live in poverty" "Children are hungry in schools, so they cannot learn" "Our NHS is crumbling, there's a housing crisis. How can this be?" "We're the fifth richest country in the world" "It doesn't have to be that way" "The reason Keir Starmer needs to go is because he is weak, because he lacks vision and because it's a time when we need bold courage and we need to really transform the systems that we have so that ordinary people's lives are made easier, so that bills come so that we stop kowtowing to profit" "And we have a much fairer, economy"
English
205
863
3.1K
103.1K
GRANTGIBBS
GRANTGIBBS@GIBBSGRANT·
@GoldRobin_11 @PeterMcCormack You say don’t be lazy but why work harder just to pay more wages to staff and see less in profits. What’s the incentives for small businesses to pay these higher wages. Maybe government could give tax breaks but no they put wages and taxes up at same time !
English
0
0
1
113
Callum R
Callum R@GoldRobin_11·
@PeterMcCormack So many people like you want to run a business, but can’t deal with any challenges you face. You own a coffee shop and staff pay has increased? Reward schemes for customer retention Sell your own coffee beans with branding Coffee making classes Don’t be lazy
English
53
2
529
26.9K
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪
A minimum wage of £15 would end my coffee shop, it would have to close, as would many other businesses. I’ll explain for the economically illiterate. Staff costs are currently half our costs, a £15 minimum wage is actually more than £15 an hour for the company, because you have to add: - 12.07% holiday - Sick pay - Maternity pay if and when required - National insurance - Pension contributions These costs would mean the shop loses money because remember, energy costs are up, rates are up, regulations are up. Now you can pass these costs onto the consumer - that would mean charging a lot more for coffee, people won’t pay it. The likes of Starbucks and Costa can, because they have economies of scale. The independent doesn’t. Now the little socialist will say well this is your fault, if you can’t run a business that can afford to pay its staff properly, but the little socialist has never run a business and does not understand the dynamics. Now I could pay some staff off and fill those hours myself or reduce us to one staff member during certain periods - but this proves the point that a minimum wage costs jobs. There was a time when these jobs were done by kids, perhaps on the weekend, paid a lower wage, no holiday and no silly employment rights. Perhaps they were even paid cash. The dynamic worked and small businesses like this could operate. It was also a great first job. Sadly now it isn’t worth employing entitlement youngsters at this level of pay. So alas, I don’t need the stress, the business would close, a number of jobs would be lost. Economics is about understanding these dynamics, no vibes. The cost of living is not solved through passing on inflation to the business, it is solved by ending high inflation and creating prosperity. This is what socialists don’t understand, they can’t create prosperity, they can only destroy it.
Harry Eccles@Heccles94

The Greens will raise the minimum wage to £15 for all workers 💪

English
4.1K
3.5K
21.2K
6.5M
GRANTGIBBS
GRANTGIBBS@GIBBSGRANT·
@MarinaPurkiss @JeremyVineOn5 It would not make sense for the wealthy to want people to have less money. Wealthy business rely on people having money to buy products & services. The best thing that happened for the wealthy was Covid, people got payments from the government and then they sent it to Amazon.
English
0
0
0
24
Marina Purkiss
Marina Purkiss@MarinaPurkiss·
I’m so despairing of this country sometimes… Frothing at the mouth for all the wrong reasons Wake up and smell the BS FFS!
English
348
596
3.4K
127.7K
GRANTGIBBS
GRANTGIBBS@GIBBSGRANT·
@McrGreenParty Come on. Min wage rise Labour just did has left thousands of youngest unemployable. Use your common sense.
English
1
0
0
39
Manchester Green Party 🐝
Manchester Green Party 🐝@McrGreenParty·
It's time for workers to get a New Deal: - A £15 minimum wage - Lower wages for the greedy Super Rich - 4 Day Working Week - More democracy in the workplace A 10:1 pay ratio must be implemented ASAP
Curtis Daly@CurtisDaly_

The 10:1 pay ratio I am fine with as a policy, however it couldn't be done over night, i'm sure we'll hear more details about it. But worth noting that in the 60s, the average ratio was 30:1, now it's 124:1. Inequality must be dealt with.

English
77
81
398
10K
GRANTGIBBS
GRANTGIBBS@GIBBSGRANT·
@climbtechy @dailybritainonx Exactly. Min wage won’t go up. Your have less competent people in charge giving your poorer quality goods and services. Less high earning tax payers. Middle working class will get targeted as always to pay more tax.
English
0
0
0
165
Tref
Tref@climbtechy·
@dailybritainonx A 10:1 pay cap basically means high earners leaving the country - those who pay the most tax…
English
7
0
20
1.1K
The Daily Britain
The Daily Britain@dailybritainonx·
🚨 NEW: Green Party leader Zack Polanski unveils sweeping plans to tackle Britain’s “affordability crisis” today. His proposals include: - A 10:1 pay cap, limiting how much top earners can make compared to the lowest-paid workers - Free school meals for all pupils - Universal energy bill support - Stronger rent controls - A customs union with the EU to cut business costs Zack Polanski says: “The affordability crisis is something affecting nearly everyone… any change in circumstance can push people over the edge into requiring a foodbank.” “This crisis is totally avoidable and down to choices made by this Labour Government and previous Tory Governments.” “The Greens have a plan… taking on corporate power and vested interests to give ordinary people a way out of this crisis.”
The Daily Britain tweet media
English
691
964
3.9K
233K
GRANTGIBBS
GRANTGIBBS@GIBBSGRANT·
@Evertxn The min wage won’t go up. Managers and ceos would earn less and less taxes will be paid to the government. Business will be managed by less competent people and the quality or product and services will decline. The government then will come after the middle class for more taxes
English
0
0
0
188
GRANTGIBBS
GRANTGIBBS@GIBBSGRANT·
@PolitlcsUK Mass unemployment and robots coming of that x10 rule comes in. Lowest earner in business will be a head of operations on large amount of money then you can 10x up from there.
English
0
0
0
641
Politics UK
Politics UK@PolitlcsUK·
🚨 NEW: Green leader Zack Polanski will call for policies to end the "affordability crisis" tomorrow - The introduction of a 10:1 pay ratio, whereby the highest-paid employee earns no more than ten times the lowest-paid - Free school meals for all primary and secondary pupils - Universal energy bill support for households and stronger rent controls - A customs union with the EU to cut business costs
English
870
1.5K
20.1K
9.4M
GRANTGIBBS
GRANTGIBBS@GIBBSGRANT·
@Heccles94 Who would people who couldn’t afford houses rent from. Do not say government and or banks as you are going to make it impossible for working class to get out of working class if you don’t allow them to own any assets ? You will just end up with rich people and poor people .
English
0
0
1
30
Harry Eccles
Harry Eccles@Heccles94·
“Without Landlords you would have no houses” Nope, you still have houses, just no landlords…
English
746
1.2K
10.5K
152.4K
GRANTGIBBS
GRANTGIBBS@GIBBSGRANT·
@JossSheldon You probably want to look at how much of the British £ is sent abroad every year then question where all the money is.
English
0
0
0
21
Joss Sheldon
Joss Sheldon@JossSheldon·
Interesting stuff... Apparently, the wealthiest 10% of Brits hoard around 41% of the UK's wealth, but they only pay 33% of the country's tax receipts. Leeches.
Joss Sheldon tweet media
English
125
62
158
8.5K
GRANTGIBBS
GRANTGIBBS@GIBBSGRANT·
@Konain10Qurban @Ric_RTP That’s ridiculous. The response should be the same on every AI. It should be based in common sense and not feelings. One AI done correctly is enough. If you want multiple AI that’s because your looking for someone one to agree with your non common sense opinion.
English
0
0
3
81
Konain Qurban
Konain Qurban@Konain10Qurban·
Before I continue receiving any more resentment, I just want to say that my point was never to trigger a debate on “can transgender women compete in women's sports?", my point was that two different AIs will give you 2 completely different responses for the same question. So in order to maintain balance, we need more then 1 AI, for sure.
English
15
0
12
1.7K
Ricardo
Ricardo@Ric_RTP·
In 19 days, a jury in Oakland is going to decide whether the entire legal foundation of the AI industry is built on fraud. Everyone thinks the Musk vs Altman lawsuit is a billionaire grudge match. Two egos, one grudge, a $150 billion damages number designed for headlines. Easy to dismiss. Easy to scroll past. That's exactly what Altman wants you to think. Because what's actually on trial on April 27 is something much BIGGER than Elon's hurt feelings... A jury is going to decide whether you can legally take billions of dollars in nonprofit donations, use them to build the most valuable technology in human history, and then quietly convert that nonprofit into a for-profit company worth $850 billion. If the answer is no, the entire AI industry has a problem. Because OpenAI is not the only company that did this: Anthropic was founded by OpenAI defectors using the same nonprofit-first mission language. xAI pitches itself as building AI "for humanity." Every frontier lab has used the moral cover of "we're doing this for the good of the world" to attract talent, capital, and regulatory goodwill they would have never gotten otherwise. An Elon win doesn't just touch OpenAI. It creates a legal precedent that every AI company built on a nonprofit or public benefit promise becomes vulnerable to shareholder and donor clawback suits. That's why this case matters. And that's why Altman is panicking. Just look at what he did this week: Elon filed a motion demanding the court remove Altman and Brockman from their roles and FORCE OpenAI to return to its nonprofit origins. Then he amended the suit to say if he wins the $150 billion, all of it goes to OpenAI's charity arm. Not him. Zero dollars to Elon personally. That amendment was surgical. It stripped Altman of his entire public defense. He can no longer claim this is about Elon's ego or Elon's bank account. Elon is now legally on record saying he just wants the mission back. OpenAI's response was to panic-write a letter to the California and Delaware attorneys general asking them to investigate Elon for "anti-competitive behavior." Their strategy chief publicly accused Elon of coordinating attacks with Mark Zuckerberg. They called the lawsuit "harassment driven by ego and jealousy." That's NOT the response of a company that thinks it's going to win. Real companies with real defenses don't ask the government to silence the person suing them 3 weeks before trial. They let the evidence speak. OpenAI is scrambling because they know what's in discovery. Elon's team has been building this case for two years. Emails, board minutes, internal conversations about the conversion. The kind of paper trail that juries understand and executives can't explain away. And the timing couldn't be worse... OpenAI is trying to IPO at $852 billion. They just raised $122 billion. Microsoft has $135 billion of exposure to them. A jury verdict that even partially sides with Elon in late April or May would crater the entire IPO runway and send shockwaves through every major AI investor on Earth. This is why Altman spent the last 2 weeks doing press tours and policy blueprints and "super intelligence agendas" aimed at Washington. He's trying to REFRAME himself as the responsible statesman of AI right before a jury decides if he's a con artist. Most people will watch this trial start and think it's celebrity drama. The smart money is watching it and realizing that the legal foundation of the AI boom is about to be tested in court for the first time EVER. And if that foundation cracks, everything built on top of it is at risk.
English
1.3K
6.9K
25.5K
27.9M
GRANTGIBBS
GRANTGIBBS@GIBBSGRANT·
@Lea_EFC Nothing he did makes him unlikeable. It’s all great entertainment. If you’re going to turn on someone for this then what are you like around your friends and family.
English
0
0
1
261
Lea
Lea@Lea_EFC·
Luke Littler is becoming increasingly unlikeable. The people around Littler need to pull him to one side and explain a bit about sportsmanship, or the whole world will turn on him very quickly. Gian van Veen handled the situation brilliantly 👏👏👏
English
1.1K
361
12K
2.2M
GRANTGIBBS
GRANTGIBBS@GIBBSGRANT·
@MaxFRobespierre @MrMBrown The only way the working class can make it out of pay cheque to pay cheque living is through investing. This would end any investments for working class. We would have working class dropping towards poor class as more welfare goes to poor Uk would be poor and rich that’s it.
English
0
0
1
168
Michael Brown
Michael Brown@MrMBrown·
Morons. *UK GREENS SAY THEY WOULD EQUALIZE CAPITAL GAINS AND INCOME TAX
English
51
20
383
43.3K
GRANTGIBBS
GRANTGIBBS@GIBBSGRANT·
@UziCryptoo The negative is the poor and middle class now have zero ambition to make investments to become wealthy as won’t be able to afford the 40% of getting out of working live style it’s a massive con to keep people dependent on government hand outs
English
0
0
0
121
Uzi
Uzi@UziCryptoo·
The Benefits of 40% income tax in Netherlands: -get 70% of salary by govt if lost job -get paid sick leave for 2 years -get a 26 week parental leave -get free Education -get $480 quarterly for every child -get Free Hospital care for children -get Safest Highways what are you getting?
English
99
6
320
179K
GRANTGIBBS
GRANTGIBBS@GIBBSGRANT·
@ChrisWillx Imagine being a good looking guy with a bit of money in NY , you would be a king
English
0
0
0
11
Chris Williamson
Chris Williamson@ChrisWillx·
There is a shortage of straight men in New York. Due to a shortage of male attendees, some dating events in NYC charged women $100 and men $0, yet attendance still ran 3:1.
English
1.6K
641
15.6K
2M
GRANTGIBBS
GRANTGIBBS@GIBBSGRANT·
@KuqiCouture @robprogressive In this case the move would be forcing people to get a 9-5 job and staying poor. Just like vaping is bad option this would also be a bad option for those who do have the ability to run there own business but are getting taxed out or forced out out through so much red tape
English
0
0
0
400
Rob Moore
Rob Moore@robprogressive·
Half of U.K. adults smoked in 1990 The government decided to stop it so they hiked taxes on smoking, increased regulation & made it very difficult to smoke It worked. And now only 10.6% of U.K. adults smoke Now the government are hiking taxes, increasing regulations & making it very difficult to run a businesses If they successfully killed off smoking doing this, are they trying to wipe out entrepreneurship & wealth building in the U.K too? They say they ‘support small business, but seems like they hate it as much as smoking to me
English
151
513
4.7K
428.8K
BladeoftheSun
BladeoftheSun@BladeoftheS·
The Green Party have proposed a policy where the highest paid person in a company could only earn 10x as much as the lowest, currently the ratio is over 1000x in some companies. Do you agree?
English
871
1.3K
17.2K
520.2K