HarryToe57

9.1K posts

HarryToe57

HarryToe57

@HarryToe57

Katılım Ocak 2024
38 Takip Edilen41 Takipçiler
Clash Report
Clash Report@clashreport·
U.S. Air Force losses in the Iran war (confirmed/claimed): 1× F-35 – damaged by Iranian air defense. 3× F-15E Strike Eagle – shot down by Kuwaiti forces (friendly fire). 1× KC-135 – destroyed in a mid-air collision. 1× KC-135 – damaged in a mid-air collision. 5× KC-135 – damaged in Iranian strikes on an airbase. 12× MQ-9 Reaper drones – shot down by Iranian air defense. 1× UH-60 helicopter – damaged by an FPV drone at an airbase. Source: @EGYOSINT
Clash Report tweet media
English
238
1.3K
6.3K
562.2K
HarryToe57
HarryToe57@HarryToe57·
@NotWoofers Whether its intentional or not, this is pretty smart if you want to further fracture the regime. The most likely (and probably only) road for regime change was through factions breaking off and taking a deal with the US/Israel
English
0
0
1
68
Woofers
Woofers@NotWoofers·
I am confused by reports to the contrary that state the U.S. is indeed in talks with the IRGC. To me, this indicates that there are different factions currently operating in the Iranian government that are willing to talk, while others take a hardline stance.
Woofers@NotWoofers

We are going to be doing this dance for a while. The Iranians likely believe that they can outlast the Trump administration, who are in an extremely unpopular war and, despite what some say, are still beholden to the American voter.

English
11
10
137
7.9K
HarryToe57
HarryToe57@HarryToe57·
@LTGreenwald @StupidMinotaur @ArthurBoreman Yeah its long been a joke (its not really a joke, its the truth) that the officers are the only ones holding the enlisted back. Its something that has always set the US military apart from other countries.
English
1
1
5
145
Geo_Dude
Geo_Dude@GeoPDude·
@HarryToe57 @NotWoofers Patel and his honeypot gf are the insane ones you realize that right? Candace and Tucker are in fact on the right side of things or at least closer to the right side than Patel
English
1
0
0
7
HarryToe57
HarryToe57@HarryToe57·
@GeoPDude @NotWoofers There are definitely bots pushing things on both sides. But strategically it makes more sense for our adversaries to push the objectively insane people and viewpoints
English
1
0
0
16
Geo_Dude
Geo_Dude@GeoPDude·
@HarryToe57 @NotWoofers Id love to see the studies on the bots that back people like Candace and Tucker. Besides let’s not act like there aren’t as many or more bots that back patels side of things.
English
1
0
0
12
HarryToe57
HarryToe57@HarryToe57·
@NotWoofers Surprised it took foreign governments this long to figure out you could pay the schizophrenics to spew their propaganda. Then again you dont even have to pay them half the time, just send them fake stuff and they will do the rest for you
English
1
0
7
272
HarryToe57
HarryToe57@HarryToe57·
@GeoPDude @NotWoofers I mean, the data is right there. This isnt exactly groundbreaking stuff here. People have already analyzed the posts and determined they are being amplified by foreign bots.
English
1
0
0
30
HarryToe57
HarryToe57@HarryToe57·
@johnkonrad Its all about china. Caving now would be a signal to china that we aren't willing to sustain economic hardship to achieve our goals. Which would tell china that we wouldnt do anything if they invade taiwan.
English
0
0
0
35
John Ʌ Konrad V
John Ʌ Konrad V@johnkonrad·
Just got off the phone with a source tied to European intelligence. He laid out a theory on Hormuz that stopped me cold. It’s a continuation of my previous Hormuz Hypothesis. If true, it explains everything. If true, the strait isn’t reopening this year. Talked to @mercaborglanos. He couldn’t punch a hole in it. Working on how to present this. It could panic markets and unleash hell on me from every direction so I should be careful. Plus the TDS afflicted would do everything possible to discredit me and knives would be out from certain groups in my own party. 🤯​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ What I can say is…. what if Trump really is trying to prevent a mega catastrophe? What if everyone’s worst case scenario right now is too conservative? Why has Big Oil and the other Gulf States been relatively silent while the rest of the world screams for US troops to withdraw? Why would Trump want crappy European frigates in Hormuz? Why wouldn’t he send more extremely capable destroyers? Why is he leaving US Merchant Marine ships in the Gulf unprotected? Why is Joe Kent still so supportive of Trump? Why hasn’t Trump gone on a tirade against Joe? Why can’t anyone tell us if there are mines in Hormuz or not? Why aren’t citizens of Iran overthrowing the government? Why aren’t Iran proxies like the Houthis going on the offensive? Why are we unsactioning Iranian oil tankers? Why are refineries blowing up in Russia and Texas? Why has the US asked China to step in and help? Something is seriously wrong and I’ve only heard one explanation that answers every question. What if my Hormuz Hypothesis is correct but the stakes are MUCH higher than anyone thought? 👇
gCaptain@gCaptain

The Hormuz Hypothesis – What If the U.S. Navy Isn’t in a Hurry To Reopen The Strait? gcaptain.com/the-hormuz-hyp…

English
310
344
2.3K
1.1M
Jonah Katz
Jonah Katz@jonahkatz0618·
@Daniering8 @Faytuks Because this is all about calming the markets. We would have heard from foreign media if there were actual talks. There clearly weren’t.
English
2
0
6
507
برژنف
برژنف@p_olitburo·
@sentdefender Vali Nasr is a liar, a paid IRGC mouthpiece. Why are you quoting him?
English
1
0
38
2.4K
OSINTdefender
OSINTdefender@sentdefender·
According to a U.S. intelligence report, assembled prior to the anti-government protests in early January, which was shown to President Donald J. Trump a week before the start of the Iran War, Reza Pahlavi, the Exiled Crown Prince of Iran, they concluded lacked a sufficient network inside the country to lead an effective overthrow of the Islamic Republic. “They never took him that seriously,” Vali Nasr, a Professor at Johns Hopkins, said of the Trump Administration. “There’s a difference between having an organization on the ground versus just having people who like you. If you’re going to help change a regime, you have to have a ground game.” Trump and his aides began referring to Pahlavi as the “loser prince,” according to The New Yorker.
OSINTdefender tweet media
English
634
793
4.9K
960K
HarryToe57
HarryToe57@HarryToe57·
@shorttimelines @sentdefender I think the primary issue here is that the regime has basically become a guerilla terrorist group, so how do you decide proportionality? You can only conduct limited attacks for so long. Its basically the Gaza/hamas problem (obvi will never get that destructive, though)
English
0
0
1
57
xeno
xeno@shorttimelines·
It’s actually more complicated than that. Even if it arguably qualifies as a military objective: - Proportionality: The expected civilian harm (blackouts affecting hospitals, water treatment, etc.) must not be excessive compared to the concrete military advantage. Excessive harm = war crime (Rome Statute Art. 8(2)(b)(iv)) - Precautions: Attackers must take feasible steps to minimize civilian harm (e.g., target only specific transformers, warn civilians, choose less harmful means). Failure here can render the attack unlawful. - Objects indispensable to civilian survival (Article 54 AP I): Starving civilians or denying them essentials by attacking power (which powers water/sewage) is prohibited
English
1
0
1
76
OSINTdefender
OSINTdefender@sentdefender·
For many people asking if such strikes would be considered a war crime, it depends. If strikes were carried out on power plants just because they are power plants and those plants were utilized by civilians, then yes it is a war crime, however, if there is a distinction made and strikes are only carried out on plants supporting military actions, then no it technically is not. Though President Trump does not appear to make a distinction between civilian or military power plants in this post on Truth Social.
OSINTdefender@sentdefender

President Donald J. Trump has posted to his Truth Social platform warning that if Iran fails to reopen the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours, the US will begin targeting Iranian power plants. The message was posted at 7:44pm EST.

English
674
248
3K
856.8K
xeno
xeno@shorttimelines·
@HarryToe57 @sentdefender Pretty sure a power plant that is primarily for civilian use (e.g., supplying homes, hospitals, factories, and the general national grid with no direct or significant military function) is presumed to be a civilian object
English
1
0
4
172
HarryToe57
HarryToe57@HarryToe57·
@shorttimelines @sentdefender He didnt say they had to be strictly for military use. If they are used by the military, its a valid target. The largest plant is in Tehran, so there's a 100% chance it is used by the military.
English
1
0
4
279
xeno
xeno@shorttimelines·
@sentdefender I’d hazard a guess that their largest power plant is not strictly for military use
English
1
0
21
5.5K
HarryToe57
HarryToe57@HarryToe57·
@DerekPederson3 Depends which Iranians are fleeing though. Vast majority aren't muslim and integrate well. They are some of the highest earners in the US. Regime supporting Iranian muslims? Then thats a different story.
English
0
0
0
10
Derek Pederson 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇻🇪
Why I still think we need to try to topple the Islamic Republic before the situation gets out of hand. I don’t want to see a repeat of what happened in Syria:
Ben Fève@BenjaminFeve

According to the latest @Frontex figures, only 30 Syrian nationals were detected crossing into the EU irregularly in January 2026, the lowest monthly figure recorded in nearly 30 years (January 2009). This number may be revised upward as data is refined, but the broader 2025 trend is unambiguous: irregular crossings by Syrians have fallen to their lowest level since 2012 (lower even than during the COVID-19 pandemic). Time and again, the data confirms what researchers have long argued: the primary driver of irregular migration is conflict, not the economy. Syria remains one of the poorest countries in the world, with catastrophic levels of deprivation. Yet poverty alone rarely compels people to risk dangerous, illegal crossings. When the immediate threat of violence and arbitrary detention recedes, so does the impulse to flee. The December 2024 transition has not made Syria prosperous... just yet. But it may have made it survivable, which is, in itself, enough for many to stay.

English
4
1
5
605
HarryToe57
HarryToe57@HarryToe57·
@Guy_Incognito3 @dr_swa6 @Osinttechnical The main issue production was never increased under Biden despite a clear need, and the Biden admin tried to decrease defense spending despite a clear need to increase it.
English
0
0
1
11
Guy Incognito
Guy Incognito@Guy_Incognito3·
@dr_swa6 @Osinttechnical And how is that Ukraine's fault? We've given ZERO Tomahawks to Ukraine. ZERO. We've given ZERO THAAD systems to Ukraine. Best you can argue there is Patriot interceptors.
English
1
0
17
166
OSINTtechnical
OSINTtechnical@Osinttechnical·
Hegseth confirms that the Pentagon is requesting $200 billion from Congress for Iran war. "That number could move... it takes money to kill bad guys."
English
73
113
1.5K
141.4K
HarryToe57
HarryToe57@HarryToe57·
@NotWoofers They watched black mirror and in trying to avoid it becoming reality, they made it reality.
English
0
0
0
123
HarryToe57
HarryToe57@HarryToe57·
@TheIntelFrog @nothanksfrankie Willing to bet things changed significantly when Iran started hitting the gulf nations. Countries that were once averse to dealing with the Iran problem now want it gone no matter the cost. And now they cant/won't back down because none want to miss out on the spoils
English
1
0
1
60
TheIntelFrog
TheIntelFrog@TheIntelFrog·
@nothanksfrankie We could probably walk away now, and it'll be 3-5 years before it comes back to bite us. Or, we put troops in to exert some control for the next 2+ decades. Neither are great options, but yeah, this is already bigger than they envisioned it seems.
English
2
0
1
122
Open Source Intel
Open Source Intel@Osint613·
BREAKING 🔴 Switzerland halts arms exports to the U.S.
Open Source Intel tweet media
English
165
74
653
66.6K
HarryToe57
HarryToe57@HarryToe57·
@Benici0Toro @Faytuks I highly doubt the houthis are beating the Saudis, the US, and Israel at the same time they are facing a ground offensive from Saudi backed groups.
English
1
0
0
85
BenicioTor0
BenicioTor0@Benici0Toro·
@HarryToe57 @Faytuks And the Saudi’s will get whooped again. The Houthis are literally itching for the Saudi’s to get involved.
English
1
0
9
119
Faytuks News
Faytuks News@Faytuks·
"No indications yet" that the Houthis would get involved in the Middle East war, according to a US official - NBC A senior Gulf official says the Houthis are on standby nbcnews.com/world/middle-e…
Faytuks News tweet media
English
17
79
470
44.9K