Miles Smith IV
111.6K posts

Miles Smith IV
@IVMiles
Historian of the South and the Atlantic World; college prof; lover of sports-ball; North Carolinian always, Michigander by choice; wife-guy; rt≠endorsement.

🚨 BREAKING: Canada’s MAiD euthanasia machine just hit rock bottom. A Quebec physician has formally suggested assisted suicide for infants — babies from birth to one year old with severe deformities and syndromes. Parents “should have the opportunity” to have their newborn killed. Federal committees are now pushing to expand MAiD to “mature minors” (children), where a doctor — not the parents — decides if the kid can “consent” to their own death. Ontario’s Chief Coroner confirms hundreds of MAiD deaths are driven by poverty, loneliness, and lack of housing — not terminal illness. People are being offered lethal injection because they feel like a burden. This isn’t healthcare. This is a moral horror show. Years of Liberal-NDP rule have turned Canada into one of the most dangerous places on Earth for the vulnerable — from newborns to the poor. Danielle Smith is fighting this insanity in Alberta. The rest of the country needs to wake the hell up before it gets even worse. Watch the full press conference 👇 #MAiD #EuthanasiaCanada #cdnpoli #ProtectOurKids #CanadaIsBroken #LiberalFailure





Thank you, Dr. Merkle, for your clarity! So, what should we do? I invite all the Christian colleges and universities of America to reject the secular mission of education and to return to the charge that the apostle Paul gave us. We are here to facilitate the raising of the next generation of Christians in the nurture and admonition of the Lord. And if we are going to reject the secular mission of education, we ought to also reject the secular funding of that education. This is a great moment to walk away from Pell Grants and federally subsidized student loans, which require us to evaluate our performance in purely secular categories. We don’t conduct secular education, and we don’t need secular funding to do it, especially to do it well. wng.org/opinions/their…







Article XVII (“Religious Liberty”) is the least-edited article across all editions of the BF&M over the past 101 years. Why might that be?

Again, this is what I affirm:

The reason Baptist and Presbyterians sometimes sound goofy on religious liberty is because it’s 2026 and a lot of their polemics are still shadow-boxing a 17th century Anglican monarchy.

More and more the strategy of the young ACNA seems to have been "Hey! Let's take this charismatic* guy who has grown a big church and make him a bishop! Surely big church == big diocese someday" *in both senses of the word




