AllSeeingGuy

Yesterday in Norwich, I joined Governor Lamont for the opening of Connecticut’s second Opportunity Center, a single destination where people can access a full range of services like Medicaid, SNAP, and LIHEAP. The new Norwich center has a special focus on serving families and youth aged 14-26. With a growing job market in the New London County region, having an opportunity center that can give support for basic needs to younger residents, the goal of self sufficiency is within reach. Amid Trump cuts to the WIC program, energy assistance, Medicaid and SNAP, it’s more important than ever support Connecticut residents trying to access basic need services. In Congress, I’m fighting tooth and nail to reverse those cuts to basic services.

I keep telling people that dates and timelines for the coming midterms DON’T MATTER. They WON’T PREVENT Trump from transforming the ENTIRE election system in every state. We now have PROOF that those dates and timeframes DON’T MATTER. Why? The Supreme Court just ruled that Louisiana’s district map is “unconstitutional.” You cannot use “race” as the basis for drawing Congressional maps. Those “race” based maps have ALWAYS been “unconstitutional.” But for the first time, in modern history, we actually have a Supreme Court majority, who are following and “restoring” the Constitution. But here’s what everyone is missing. One justice dissented in this ruling. Justice Jackson, who will be removed when the 2020 election is proven stolen and Biden illegitimate. It was a 6-3 decision but Jackson was the only one who dissented. Don’t miss these important facts. This ruling came just days before the early voting in the Louisiana primary was scheduled to start, but some mail in ballots had already been mailed out and some returned. That DID NOT prevent this SC decision. It wasn’t too late. Why? The map was “unconstitutional.” The Constitution is the law of the land. So guess what happened to the Louisiana primary and those votes? The Congressional primary was SUSPENDED and POSTPONED. There won’t be a Congressional primary in Louisiana until the Congressional map is made to be Constitutional. This ruling immediately sparked a lot of other states to “redraw” their Congressional maps, in order to eliminate the “unconstitutional” districts based on race. But Jackson’s dissent sparked a “beat down” response by Justice Alito. It reveals something BIG. “The dissent in this suit levels charges that cannot go unanswered,” Alito wrote. “The dissent would require that the 2026 congressional elections in Louisiana be held under a map that has been held to be unconstitutional.”  Did you catch that? “The dissent goes on to claim that our decision represents an unprincipled use of power. See post, at 4 (“And just like that, those principles give way to power”). That is a groundless and utterly irresponsible charge. What principle has the Court violated? The principle that Rule 45.3’s 32 day default period should never be shortened even when there is good reason to do so? The principle that we should never take any action that might unjustifiably be criticized as partisan?” There’s a SC “32 day rule” that is supposed to prevent a fast ruling. But look what Alito says. He says the “32 day rule” does not take precedent over the Constitution. Neither does the threat or possibility of criticism for partisanship. Then Alito says this: “The congressional districting map enacted by the legislature has been held to be unconstitutional, and the general election will be held in just six months,” added Alito “The second reason offered by the dissent is that we should allow the 32 day period to run out in order to “avoid the appearance of partiality.” Post, at 3 (opinion of JACKSON, J.). But the dissent does not explain why its insistence on unthinking compliance with Rule 45.3’s default rule does not create the appearance of partiality (by running out the clock) on behalf of those who may find it politically advantageous to have the election occur under the unconstitutional map.” Did you catch that? No “32 day rule” at the Supreme Court or state law that requires an election on a specific day, supersedes the Constitution. If the Congressional maps are “unconstitutional,” then there won’t be an election UNTIL the maps are fixed. Now think about what’s about to happen. Trump said the evidence of the stolen election is coming and now Kash Patel says it’s incoming. If the ENTIRE election system is PROVEN to be “unconstitutional,” then there will be no election UNTIL the ENTIRE system has been fixed and made Constitutional. Period. And the Supreme Court is going to back Trump up on this because it’s ALSO a “national security” issue.

Are you wondering why the entire Left Wing of America is melting down over this Supreme Court decision right now? Constitutional⚖️lawyer here — Allow me.👋🏼 Today, SCOTUS dropped a 6-3 reality check in Louisiana v. Callais that has the usual race-hustler brigade frothing at the mouth. Justice Alito’s majority opinion just ruled that Louisiana’s congressional map — with its extra majority-Black district snaking across the state like Michelle Obama on Cialis — was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. Why? Because Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act didn’t require the state to play racial bean-counter and subordinate every traditional districting principle (compactness, communities of interest, you know, actual geography) to skin color. No compelling interest under strict scrutiny = GAME OVER. Boom. Equal Protection Clause wins again. This isn’t “gutting” the VRA, you professional outrage farmers. It’s interpreting it correctly for the first time in decades. Alito laid it out crystal clear: The VRA is a SHIELD🛡️against actual discrimination, not a sword🗡️for engineering racial spoils systems or proportional representation by melanin quota. You see, Louisiana’s map prioritized race above everything else without the required justification. That’s textbook reverse discrimination — treating non-Black voters as second-class citizens whose votes get diluted so Democrats can lock in “safe seats.” The 14th Amendment doesn’t do “equity” carve-outs; it demands equal protection for everyone. No more “but it’s for the minorities!” loopholes that just flip the racism script. And yet, here come the usual suspects — the Congressional Black Caucus, their media megaphone, and every blue-check race baiter on X — screaming that this “dismantles Black voting power,” “revives Jim Crow,” and “ends democracy.” Spare us the crocodile tears. These are the same folks who cheered on the race-based admissions, hiring quotas, and DEI hiring that screwed over Asians and whites… but suddenly “racism” is back on the menu when the Court says voters aren’t interchangeable racial pawns. Hypocrites. Your entire grift depends on keeping Americans sorted into victim blocs so you can harvest votes and donor cash. NEWSFLASH: Treating people as individuals instead of skin-color commodities isn’t “suppressing” anyone — it’s the literal definition of civil rights. This opinion is chef’s kiss well-reasoned constitutionalism. It flows straight from Shaw v. Reno-era precedents and the Framers’ vision: Race is the most suspect classification, not a magic wand for map-drawers. The VRA was born to crush poll taxes and literacy tests that kept Black Americans from the ballot box. It was never meant to mandate racial gerrymandering as a permanent feature of American elections. SCOTUS just slammed the door on that perversion, forcing states to draw maps based on people, not pigmentation. Result? More competitive districts, less racial polarization, and an actual shot at post-racial politics. The left can’t handle it because their power model collapses without the division. Fun fact for the woke warriors clutching their pearls in the replies: The Constitution is colorblind by design. It doesn’t care about your feelings, your “disparate impact” spreadsheets, or your need for perpetual victim status to stay relevant. Real equality means one set of rules for all — no reverse-racism exceptions, no matter how loudly you cry “systemic!” Cry harder, identity-politics vampires. The adults in the robe just reminded everyone why we have a Constitution: to protect US from YOU.🫵🏼 America moves forward when we judge ballots by content of character, not color of district. Deal with it.🔥🇺🇸

🇬🇧🇺🇸 King Charles III makes a "cheekier than average" joke at the White House dinner: "Of course, my late mother met no fewer than 13 serving presidents..." "...thankfully all of them were fully clothed."