Juey

53 posts

Juey

Juey

@Jueyegof

Katılım Nisan 2025
13 Takip Edilen11 Takipçiler
Juey
Juey@Jueyegof·
@UtdMano @jun_song You would make more money cause your amount borrowed in JPY would be less on repayment date.
English
0
0
0
39
United Man
United Man@UtdMano·
@jun_song yeah because its not like the dollar lost 25% value in the last 12 months aloneee
English
1
0
0
2.4K
Juey
Juey@Jueyegof·
@J5jayfive It means that customers are getting to the point where they will build their own memory (space x and Tesla) or they’ll find another avenue to get it (Apple). Customers won’t lose margins/business at the expense of making their suppliers rich. No Moat to memory.
English
0
0
1
38
Tech Observer
Tech Observer@J5jayfive·
@Jueyegof I would argue the signal speaks more to the depth of the supply crunch. Maybe it’s not nothing… but if the first alternative is a chinese company literally on a banned list… that’s not an awesome signal for the market and where else it can be bought
English
1
0
1
96
Juey
Juey@Jueyegof·
@wannabfoode @oguzerkan They just sold an additional $80B in backlog 90% prepaid in a 3 month period. Even if OpenAI were to go under bankruptcy. There’s an additional $338B of backlog that needs to be fulfilled.
English
0
0
0
17
bengrama
bengrama@wannabfoode·
@oguzerkan Oracle is toast. OpenAI doesn’t have the money.
English
2
0
3
1.2K
Oguz Erkan
Oguz Erkan@oguzerkan·
Hyperscaler backlog figures tells the $AMZN long thesis. Just look at the frontier lab shares of the backlogs: $MSFT: 44% is OpenAI $ORCL: 54% is OpenAI $GOOG: 42% is Anthropic $AMZN: 29% is OpenAI, 21% is Anthropic AWS has a more balanced risk profile and it’s still projected to grow 30% this year despite already being the largest one.
Oguz Erkan tweet media
English
29
87
588
118.9K
Juey
Juey@Jueyegof·
@casque You’d hope that management thought through this to have it followed by a strong Q2 and guide.
English
1
0
3
114
Mr. Bertrand
Mr. Bertrand@casque·
$FOUR will experience a very relevant forced short covering coming from the 2027 convertible holders ase they have to un hedge because of the prepayment announced 2 days ago. Next to months will be very interesting as I expect the company to repercutida emite shares as soon as early July, making the covering extremely difficult.
English
4
1
15
1.1K
Northwise Project
Northwise Project@InvestNorthwise·
@LukasCycles We certainly could be! We see it as too early to tell where within the range $NBIS will fall. We expect it to be on the low side due to how much vertical integration is at play and the close relationship with $NVDA where most of the cost comes from.
English
1
0
1
2.1K
Northwise Project
Northwise Project@InvestNorthwise·
Our full $NBIS model is officially here! Check out the full report in the first comment. Since our first model Nebius received a significant $NVDA investment, a very underrated $META backstop as a financing lynchpin, and is nearing the 20 site mark globally. We continue to build our Nebius model from the ground up using a site by site energization method that we now have visibility to run out through 2030. Thanks to interviews and events with @daniel_koss @mvcinvesting @romanchernin Tom Blackwell and many other Nebius members and contributors, we gained immense insight into how Nebius continues to execute faster that even our aggressive bull case could image. While we were directionally correct that mix shift would continue to weigh more towards ai cloud contracts with enterprise and ai natives through the end of the decade, we couldn't imagine that it would be near achieved in 2026. Our 2030 Base case below illustrates just how forward our expectations for growth have shifted at this rate of execution. Capacity — Connected MW (base case) 2026: 905 2027: 2,142 2028: 3,964 2029: 4,646 2030: 5,200 Undisclosed data center expansion bucket — Connected MW (base case) 2027: 175 2028: 425 2029: 600 2030: 739 ARR per MW (M, base case) 2026: 9.9 2027: 11.3 2028: 12.8 2029: 13.8 2030: 14.5 Exit ARR (B, base case) 2026: 9.0 2027: 24.2 2028: 50.7 2029: 64.1 2030: 75.4 Recognized revenue (B, base case) 2026: 3.4 2027: 15.8 2028: 36.1 2029: 58.1 2030: 70.3 Gross CapEx (B, base case) 2026: 25.0 2027: 39.4 2028: 59.6 2029: 26.2 2030: 25.2 Cumulative 2026–2030: ~$175B Funding assumptions (base case) 1. Prepayments, % of CapEx: 55% 2. Core OCF, % of EBITDA: 70% 3. External gap, debt/equity: 85/15 4. Blended interest cost: 5.5% Funding outcomes (B, cumulative 2026–2030, base case) 1. Prepayments: ~95 2. Core OCF ex-prepayments: ~49 3. Debt raised: ~34 4. Equity raised: ~6 5. Ending debt: ~43 6. Ending cash: ~20 Adjusted EBITDA margin (base case) 2026: 40% 2027: 42% 2028: 44% 2029: 45% 2030: 45% Implied 2030 adj. EBITDA: ~$32B D&A (B, base case) 2026: 2.9 2027: 8.1 2028: 16.2 2029: 23.1 2030: 27.3 Share count (base case) Ending diluted shares: ~339M Base case scenario probability weight: 55% Thank you to our premium members for your massive support in bringing this refresh so quickly. Price targets, our portfolio allocation, present value calculations, and our buy/hold/trim/sell zones are now live.
Northwise Project tweet media
English
25
41
295
279.9K
Juey
Juey@Jueyegof·
@compound248 @SiliconSalvage Better to characterize as they both trade at the same FCF Yield %. While one company has no growth and a strong balance sheet and the other company has stronger growth rates, competent management team and a very weak balance sheet.
English
1
0
1
104
Compound248 💰
Compound248 💰@compound248·
@SiliconSalvage tbf, Shift4 has a bunch of one-timers associated with its Global Blue M&A and a tax receivables transaction that make 2026 wonky. 2027 projected EPS is $5.60. Almost exactly 7.0x P/E - growing faster and a lower multiple than PayPal.
English
1
0
16
1.5K
Silicon Salvage
Silicon Salvage@SiliconSalvage·
Two payments stocks. Nearly the same share price. Completely opposite bets. $PYPL: $42, 7.9x earnings. $FOUR: $39, 45x earnings. Same sector, same ~$40 sticker price — but the market pays ~6x more per dollar of profit for Shift4 than for PayPal. Both got hit today ($PYPL -3.6%, $FOUR -5.2%), but Shift4’s down 64% from its high vs. 47% for PayPal. So which would you rather own at $40: the slow giant priced for death, or the fast grower still at a premium after a 64% crash?
English
8
0
14
8.5K
Juey
Juey@Jueyegof·
@AlphaWireHQ @IREN_Ltd Why would they put GPUs in there when they can sign more secured power!
English
0
0
0
23
AlphaWire
AlphaWire@AlphaWireHQ·
@IREN_Ltd 490MW of secured power in Spain is a serious foundation. What's the timeline looking like for the first live GPU clusters out of that site?
English
1
0
0
1.4K
IREN
IREN@IREN_Ltd·
Our vertically integrated AI Cloud platform has arrived in Europe. Today, IREN announced it has completed the acquisition of Nostrum Group, adding 490MW of secured power in Spain to serve global demand for AI compute. “Europe is one of the largest and fastest-growing markets for AI infrastructure, and Spain is among its most compelling entry points, with abundant renewables and strong fiber connectivity. Nostrum gives us secured power today along with a development pipeline and a great local team we're excited to work with.” - @danroberts0101 Learn more: iren.gcs-web.com/static-files/9…
IREN tweet media
English
140
253
2.3K
1.1M
Juey
Juey@Jueyegof·
@jonesallen99138 @jimcramer It’s only half the backlog now and they just raised it by $85B. How long until it’s a smaller percent ? OpenAI already raised $80B in its last equity round and is going to have $100B ownership in AMD. While we just saw Anthropic turn a profit and hit $50B annual run rate.
English
0
0
0
65
jonesallen99138
jonesallen99138@jonesallen99138·
@jimcramer Again the devil is in the details. Most of $ORCL RPO is OpenAI. So a bet on Oracle is essentially a bet on OpenAI and betting the farm on OpenAI is something investors have a right to be skeptical about.
English
3
0
1
1.3K
Jim Cramer
Jim Cramer@jimcramer·
Watch Oracle. It was a gigantic number when it came to backlog. Huge. So spending has to go up. (not a traditional levered-so-backlog spend as these are so hard to build.) BUT they can lay off what they need to lay off and the funding needs aren't outrageous. It doesn't have to be down big.
English
76
34
515
130.2K
Juey
Juey@Jueyegof·
@CarioCapital @FindleysFinance I’m actually quite disappointed that neither the CEO or the CFO has bought shares here. Celsius trading at its lowest valuation in 5 years you see 3 people on the C suite team buy the stock. The fact it hasn’t happened here makes me question the thesis.
English
0
0
0
8
cariocapital
cariocapital@CarioCapital·
@FindleysFinance Dirt cheap is an understatement. I honestly get offended every time I see it trading here
English
2
0
2
53
FindleysFinance
FindleysFinance@FindleysFinance·
I want to buy more shares in $FOUR, $ADBE, and $META. I'm out of cash, so the only way I could do it is if I sold some $CROX, or $QLYS... every one of my 6 holdings is selling cheap today with massive return potential. This is hard.
FindleysFinance tweet media
English
6
0
13
1.2K
Juey
Juey@Jueyegof·
@nachunja @bobspaysubstack Imagine squares management team saying we’ll invest $100M in going into stadiums (which would be nothing) to capture at max $1B in revenue. While they’re being eaten alive by Apple and Zelle. Shift4 is stealing market share not the other way around.
English
0
0
1
102
Cute Baby
Cute Baby@nachunja·
When I look at $FOUR and see what Square and Toast are doing, it’s really hard to be bullish FOUR. Their hardware and software is all stitched together randomly and it’s going to be really hard to catch up with SQ/Toast with AI features. The feature gap will only grow, then they will slowly lose market share. Their strong grip in hospitality and venues is cool, but how strong is that really? If SQ decides to pour in $100M to go after that segment, how defensible is that? So cheap, so I’m getting interested too, but thinking it through, cant pull the trigger.
English
8
0
9
2.2K
Bob's Payment Stock Substack
Bob's Payment Stock Substack@bobspaysubstack·
$FOUR: Midpoint of 2026 non-GAAP EPS guide is $5.60. SBC and acquisition-related costs have each been running $20M/Q for the last 5 quarters. Burden the $5.60 for these costs (about $1.40/share after tax) and you get a normalized 2026 EPS number of around $4.20, which implies 8.7x. Now, $FISV, $GPN and $PYPL all trade below that, so I guess things can always get worse. Feels like we're in a 'max pain' situation right now. I'm not sure if it's relentless shorting, overall apathy towards payments, or a genuine belief by the market that we're going to see a Fiserv-type reset for $FOUR in the not too distant future (I don't believe so)--or all of the above. We're clearly past the point of bitching about the Global Blue acquisition (will they or will they not achieve the targeted revenue synergies), having moved on to some real existential threats to the business being priced in. At another time, there would've been support under this stock given consolidation potential. But the most likely strategic buyer $GPN is out of the market and $FISV (which is rumored to have made a bid a few years back) also does not appear eager for any large scale M&A given all of its problems. So, here we are. Having acquired the majority of my shares in the 2022/2023 time period, I've more than round-tripped this sucker. No interest in selling at these levels but not looking to run out and buy more given the abundance of higher-quality options in payments right now.
English
10
0
35
6.5K
Juey
Juey@Jueyegof·
@nachunja @bobspaysubstack Didn’t square grow by 0.3% last year? And you think the company is going to expand into new verticals after cutting almost half its employees base to save margins is going to create product expansion ?
English
0
0
2
104
BarStreet
BarStreet@BarStreetMedia·
@Jueyegof @MamaJaco1 @Lazarus_Capital Coreweave has 0 owned capacity right now they lease. That’s the difference they tried to get core scientific to have their own but it didn’t fall through. Margins look very bad and they won’t make very much profit even off that 99b backlog
English
2
0
0
49
Juey
Juey@Jueyegof·
@BarStreetMedia @MamaJaco1 @Lazarus_Capital Coreweave will operate both owned and lease. Coreweave reported 55% EBITDA margins? What was IREN’s EBITDA margin? Maybe as bad as IRENs investor don’t want to admit it the software stack is more meaningful then owning the land and is why IREN can’t sign contracts.
English
0
0
0
14
Juey
Juey@Jueyegof·
@BarStreetMedia @MamaJaco1 @Lazarus_Capital Coreweave has 1GW of active power being used and will have 1.7GW by the end of the year with 3.5GW secured. On a $99B backlog. Iren is half the market cap of Coreweave. “Deals will come” you think Nvda and micron are building chips rn without a massive backlog ?
English
1
0
0
73
BarStreet
BarStreet@BarStreetMedia·
@Jueyegof @MamaJaco1 @Lazarus_Capital You have not done your research no point in arguing especially since you think those data centers don’t have demand when the largest companies in the world are using them
English
1
0
0
33
Juey
Juey@Jueyegof·
@BarStreetMedia @MamaJaco1 @Lazarus_Capital So they have 2GW sitting empty right now and only .4GW in contracts filled out. Idk about you but it seems like no one else has a demand problem other than IREN. NBIS, CRWV, ORCL and now even space X signing contracts every day.
English
1
0
0
45
BarStreet
BarStreet@BarStreetMedia·
@Jueyegof @MamaJaco1 @Lazarus_Capital They don’t have 4gw online please do research they have 5.8 secured with a little over 2gw energized and 1.4 of that is sweetwater 1 that just started being built out which Nvidia will show as their flagship site for dsx it will get a deal
English
1
0
0
33