Knut Skovereng

20 posts

Knut Skovereng

Knut Skovereng

@KnutSkovereng

Phd. Researcher at the Centre for Elite Sports Research @NTNU. #Physiology #Endurance #SportScience

Trondheim, Norway Katılım Ağustos 2015
234 Takip Edilen80 Takipçiler
Jem Arnold
Jem Arnold@jem_arnold·
@GregLJMU @KnutSkovereng @StephenSeiler @OyvindSandbakk Thanks Greg, yes! I tried to acknowledge and handwave that away in one of the posts 😅 For my analyses, I adjusted for baseline TT & VO2 to mitigate that limitation (not perfect, I know). But I dont think these older papers would have done so. So probably some confounding remains
English
1
0
0
161
Jem Arnold
Jem Arnold@jem_arnold·
In our recent meta-analysis with trained athletes, did the athletes who improved their VO2max more also improve their endurance performance more?🤔 No! 😮 In this dataset, +1% change in VO2max was associated with only +0.04% change in TT performance. But why? 1/15🧵
Jem Arnold tweet media
English
13
32
250
69.1K
Knut Skovereng
Knut Skovereng@KnutSkovereng·
@BasVanHooren So you as an independent researcher do a study using a commercially available product and shortly/immediately afterwards get hired by that company, and you don't see that as a conflict of interest?
English
1
0
0
23
Bas Van Hooren
Bas Van Hooren@BasVanHooren·
@KnutSkovereng Correct! I have been working there for short part-time period, but after data collection, data analysis and writing for this project. Hence no competing interest at the time of this project
English
1
0
0
71
Bas Van Hooren
Bas Van Hooren@BasVanHooren·
New randomized-controlled trial among 220 runners where we show that wearable-based (@atogear) real-time feedback may reduce the risk and severity of running injuries We also investigated effects on: Performance Motivation Much more Free full-text: journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11…
Bas Van Hooren tweet media
English
3
14
62
9K
Bas Van Hooren
Bas Van Hooren@BasVanHooren·
One possible reason: people did change their biomechanics in-field when receiving feedback (as shown in the fig below), but did not learn to alter their movement pattern without feedback in the lab. More discussion on this here: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sm…
English
1
0
1
627
Knut Skovereng
Knut Skovereng@KnutSkovereng·
@nicknorwitz Very interesting. Your rawdata show lower baseline LDL normal BMI group (i.e. 91.2, 108.4, 119.3, 120.8 for the four BMI groups). Ending LDL is 132.7, 110.7, 120.9, 115.4 for the four groups. How much do you think the LMHR is influenced by a "set point" of the diet or reg2mean?
English
0
0
0
169
Nick Norwitz MD PhD
Nick Norwitz MD PhD@nicknorwitz·
🚀Did your #LDL cholesterol sky-rocket on #keto? 🧈Were you told it' was because of Saturated Fat? 🚨NEW META OF 41 RCTs just busted that MYTH! sciencedirect.com/science/articl… 3 Main findings 👉 In studies with 'lean' BMI (<25), LDL-C ⬆️... ... And in those with overweight or class I obesity (25-35), LDL-C didn't change, and in those with class II #obesity (>35), LDL-C ⬇️ 💥BOOM, there's a money shot!💥 👉 Inverse association between BMI and LDL-C 👉 BMI dominates over saturated fat, which has comparatively minimal impact; thus, it's more likely having 6-pack abs is a severe risk factor for high LDL-C on #keto, not butter, beef, bacon or cream 🔗PAPER LINK 🔗 - sciencedirect.com/science/articl… (To share the data love, copy this link to a Quote tweet or original Tweet with your reaction. Please engage!) FULL Video Abstract (7 min): youtu.be/FcUUqGJBXFM Major props to first-author @AdrianSotoMota and senior @davidludwigmd. These man are humble & kind geniuses that I'm privileged to know and learn under And +100 pts for the #LEM ⚡️ @realDaveFeldman Of interest to @Derek_Fitness @PeterAttiaMD @PlantChompers and Walter Willett (if he had a Twitter) @theproof @Drlipid @Lipoprotein @lipo_fan @hubermanlab @DominicDAgosti2 @BioLayne @MetabolicSummit
YouTube video
YouTube
English
62
165
527
269.3K
Chris Dorman
Chris Dorman@chrisdorman0·
Inviting comments please. Wasted Oxygen on VO2 test report, this measure is new to me. My take, a metric of the mismatch and between CV system delivery and peripheral uptake? Any interpretation would be greatly appreciated @StephenSeiler @Alan_Couzens
English
1
0
0
0
Knut Skovereng retweetledi
Dionne Noordhof
Dionne Noordhof@DionneNoordhof·
@SenTIF_NTNU can now also be followed on Twitter. Stay tuned for our updates!
Dionne Noordhof tweet media
English
0
5
9
0
Knut Skovereng
Knut Skovereng@KnutSkovereng·
@BillySperlich My initial toughts would be that a percentage like that would be very dependent on hours trained per week (train less and tolerate bigger %?) and 9%time above 90% HR is quite hard to accumulate consistently If you train >10h/wk. (Only access to abstract).
English
0
0
2
0
Billy Sperlich
Billy Sperlich@BillySperlich·
Mhhh.... 🤔"Based on the current study data, for individuals who regularly exercise, 4% to 9% total training time above 90% maximum HR is the ideal duration to maximize fitness and minimize symptoms related to overreaching." 👉 ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32365286 Any toughts/comments?
English
1
2
6
0
Johnny Penso
Johnny Penso@JohnnyPenso·
@TroughCook @Drlipid Is there an article or paper that explains this concept? It seems intuitively correct but I would like to see some evidence as well. Thank you.
English
1
0
0
0
Knut Skovereng retweetledi
Mick Hughes
Mick Hughes@mickwhughes·
Great share by @robhobscience 👏 👏 Check out the springs on this athlete! This is how you should do your box jumps; It's not about how much you can flex your hips and knees to get on top of a box stacked with a silly amount of 20kg plates...
Melbourne, Victoria 🇦🇺 English
16
155
753
0