ꓘodingIsFun

@ZachHumphries @QuaiNetwork Don’t forget it has better scaling than Kaspa.

Thanks to @shubhamm069, I don't have to use my keyboard nearly as much. Their version targets Windows, so I made a Linux version w/ configurable shortcut keys & option to auto paste transcribed text. Was using python & whisper, but this way more efficient github.com/peavey2787/loc…

Thanks to @shubhamm069, I don't have to use my keyboard nearly as much. Their version targets Windows, so I made a Linux version w/ configurable shortcut keys & option to auto paste transcribed text. Was using python & whisper, but this way more efficient github.com/peavey2787/loc…

Hey @KaspaKaha, TL;DR this is wrong info, as I already mentioned in my DM to you several days ago. Results of our research which we'll publish soon: ~6% of frontrunning attempts win the carrier race and land (11 confirmed sandwiches over ~25 days), and 0% of those extract anything from victims. Which is... quite good. For the public, this is my DM message, I copy it here since it contains no private data and important for the context: "We independently confirmed your narrow technical point: our doc conflates probabilistic inclusion with fee-prioritized ordering once transactions are selected. We’ll correct that, thanks for noticing. We also completed a chain-wide measurement covering last months, all 37 ZS pools, 10k swaps joined to their Kaspa carriers, and approximately 14.5 million Kaspa blocks. We found 12 genuine same-Kaspa-block sandwiches across five attackers. All 12 were net-negative for the attacker. Our data confirms that while sandwiching is real and persistently attempted on Igra, and that higher carrier feerate wins the same-block position in the cases we observed, it does not currently support your claim re “live and continuous at scale” as profitable extraction. Over the full measured window, only 12 landed chain-wide, and none was profitable. It also fully supports our previous claim re single-digit per-attempt success rates -- empirical number is ~4.5%. We're going to publish these results next week. Your public app displays 404,362 KAS of extracted MEV without a visible methodology or breakdown. To reconcile the findings, could you share: - how much of the 404,362 KAS is attributed specifically to Igra; - the split between arbitrage, liquidations and sandwiches; - the observation period and covered venues; - your definition of a completed sandwich and extracted value; - one representative Igra example that we can independently reproduce. We’re not asking for your detector or full dataset as we need enough evidence to understand whether your Igra claim measures profitable extraction, attempted execution, or mechanism-level exposure. If your Igra signal reproduces against our chain-wide dataset, a broader engagement makes sense."