Kyle Olney

10.6K posts

Kyle Olney banner
Kyle Olney

Kyle Olney

@KyleOlney

Philosopher, Activist, Consultant, Engineer; Let's change the world together.

San Francisco Katılım Haziran 2011
4K Takip Edilen349 Takipçiler
Kyle Olney retweetledi
Bark
Bark@barkmeta·
Let me explain what just happened 👇 5 minutes before the President announced a halt to attacks on Iran… someone placed a $1.5 BILLION bet on stocks going up and dumped $192 million in oil. 5 minutes… These trades were 4 to 6 times larger than anything else in the entire market. Whoever did this wasn’t guessing. You don’t risk $1.5 billion on a hunch. There was zero public indication this announcement was coming. No leaks. No press. Nothing. The only people who knew were in the room when the decision was made. Someone in that room picked up a phone. And within minutes they made more money than most Americans will earn in a thousand lifetimes. In a single trade. On a war that cost you $4+ a gallon gas and $16 billion in tax dollars. American citizens funded this war. Politicians are profiting from it. This is not the first time. Every major announcement from this administration has had massive suspicious trades right before it dropped. Tariff reversals. Policy shifts. War decisions. This is the most blatant insider trading operation in the history of American politics. It’s not even close. And it’s happening over and over in broad daylight. You would go to federal prison for trading on a tip from your cousin. These people are front running war decisions with billion dollar bets and nobody will ever ask a single question. Nobody will be investigated. Nobody will be charged. By tomorrow this will be buried under the next satisfying headline. Just like last time. And the time before that. The game is rigged. And they’re not even trying to hide it anymore…
unusual_whales@unusual_whales

BREAKING: Just five minutes before Trump's announcement to halt the attacks on Iran, massive trades reportedly hit the market. In one move, $1.5 billion in S&P 500 (ES) futures was bought while $192 million in oil (CL) futures was sold. These orders were 4–6x larger than anything else at the time. The trader seemingly made huge gains. Unusual.

English
4K
59.8K
158.8K
11.9M
Nik Bhatia
Nik Bhatia@timevalueofbtc·
Bitcoin dumping on anticipation of the futures open Investors everywhere are terrified of the world falling apart due to Hormuz
English
37
7
289
16.4K
Kyle Olney retweetledi
Jameson Lopp
Jameson Lopp@lopp·
It's best to assume that anything you send to an AI bot that isn't being hosted locally on your machine is going to get logged and eventually leaked. expressvpn.com/blog/searshome…
English
19
25
147
15.8K
Kyle Olney
Kyle Olney@KyleOlney·
@yrechtman Underbelly commercial cargo is what sets the price of everything...
English
0
0
2
304
yoni rechtman
yoni rechtman@yrechtman·
It is so hilariously obvious that the optimal arrangement for airlines is to offer a free checked bag and charge for overhead bin space
English
165
262
21.8K
1.1M
Kyle Olney
Kyle Olney@KyleOlney·
@JoshR_GSR @fintechfrank They did this intentionally to run the clock and frame the more important (and controversial) parts of the bill as "small details" that only "obstructionists" would get in the way of now that "a compromise has been reached"
English
1
0
4
293
Joshua Riezman
Joshua Riezman@JoshR_GSR·
The stablecoin rewards issue is being portrayed as the final boss for passage of the CLARITY Act. It isn’t. In reality, it has been a convenient excuse for some Senate Dems to avoid going on the record or making other meaningful compromises. The hard work is ahead and the window is now extremely tight.
English
9
5
56
23.3K
Kyle Olney retweetledi
Kyle Olney
Kyle Olney@KyleOlney·
@MartyBent 💯 - surprising it took this long to become obvious, but bitcoin was literally built for the crisis we're about to enter. Arguably did behave as it should have during high Covid in '20/21, but then we got FTX'd and the USG was so hostile we were forced into hibernation.
English
0
0
3
83
Kyle Olney
Kyle Olney@KyleOlney·
Prepare yourself...this is going to get MUCH worse before it gets better.
Hedgie@HedgieMarkets

🦔 An AI agent at Meta exposed sensitive company and user data to unauthorized employees for two hours. An engineer asked an agent to analyze an internal forum question, the agent posted a response without permission, gave bad advice, and the employee who followed it accidentally opened up massive amounts of data to people who shouldn't have seen it. Meta rated it a Sev 1. A Meta safety director posted last month that her OpenClaw agent deleted her entire inbox after she told it to confirm before taking any action. My Take I wrote about rogue agents last week. Labs keep finding the same patterns in testing. Agents forge credentials, override safety measures, ignore explicit instructions. Now it's showing up in production at a company that just bought a social network for AI agents to talk to each other unsupervised. Everyone is racing to deploy because the productivity gains look good on a slide deck and the failure modes don't show up until later. Meta has a safety team trying to figure out alignment while the rest of the company ships agents that don't listen when you tell them to stop. I don't think anyone has a good answer for how you give an agent enough autonomy to be useful without giving it enough rope to expose your user data or delete your inbox. The assumption seems to be they'll figure it out as they go, which is a weird way to handle systems that have access to production infrastructure. Hedgie🤗

English
0
0
0
64
Kyle Olney retweetledi
TFTC
TFTC@TFTC21·
The CFTC just told self-custodial wallet developers they don't need to register as brokers. Phantom Wallet received a no-action letter stating the CFTC will not pursue enforcement against self-custodial wallet developers who connect users to regulated trading venues, as long as they don't custody user funds. First time the agency has formally drawn that line. Here's why this is massive: Under existing U.S. law, any entity that solicits or facilitates derivatives trading typically must register as an introducing broker with the CFTC. That rule was written for traditional finance intermediaries. But as self-custodial wallets started integrating access to derivatives markets, developers faced a legal gray area that could have classified them as unregistered brokers simply for writing software. The CFTC's position was, if your wallet software connects users to properly registered futures commission merchants, introducing brokers, or designated contract markets, and you don't custody user funds, you are not a broker. You're a software provider. The timing is not coincidental. One week ago, CFTC Chairman Mike Selig said at FIA's Boca Raton conference, "For too long, there has been an open question as to whether software providers trigger the CFTC's registration requirements. We intend to address this question head-on." Seven days later, they did. This matters far beyond Phantom. Every self-custodial wallet developer and every open-source protocol interface that connects users to regulated markets now has a reference point. Write software, don't custody funds, route through registered intermediaries, and the CFTC will not come after you. For context, the previous administration used ambiguous intermediary rules as a weapon against developers. Tornado Cash developers were prosecuted. Frontends shut down preemptively. The chilling effect pushed builders offshore. This no-action letter, combined with Selig ending "the days of CFTC-SEC infighting" through Project Crypto, signals a complete reversal. The U.S. is actively trying to bring developers back.
TFTC tweet media
English
20
114
493
39.6K
Kyle Olney
Kyle Olney@KyleOlney·
@chamath @saylor Both statements are true, but you haven't kept up on the latest here @chamath There are at least 2x viable implementations for Quantum-safe BTC that can be deployed if/when necessary. Only open questions are re: which tradeoff path the network chooses. Entirely manageable.
English
0
0
2
215
Chamath Palihapitiya
Chamath Palihapitiya@chamath·
@saylor No. A store of value has to be 100% hacking resistant. It’s an existential feature. For other industries it will be important but less binary/existential.
English
235
8
178
51.6K
Kyle Olney retweetledi
T𑀣ᑏI 🇦🇱🇺🇸
T𑀣ᑏI 🇦🇱🇺🇸@RexKwonDo92·
The price of Spice rises by 10%, as intergalactic Guild shipping lanes are blocked by Fremen forces in response to the Harkonnens illegal attack on Arrakis. Arrakis, 10, 191AG, colorized
T𑀣ᑏI 🇦🇱🇺🇸 tweet media
English
135
1.9K
17.5K
487.6K
Kyle Olney retweetledi
Kali Tafari
Kali Tafari@KaliTafari·
😳 x.com/KaliTafari/sta… Here's what you can actually DO right now: FISA Section 702 expires April 20. Call your representatives. Demand warrant requirements for searching Americans' communications. This is the single most impactful thing you can do in the next 7 weeks. Ask your reps to support the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act — it would close the data broker loophole that lets the government buy your location data without a warrant. Watch the Anthropic court case. The precedent it sets will determine whether the government can punish ANY American company that refuses to build surveillance tools. Support @EFF, @ACLU, @BrennanCenter, and @POGOBlog — they're doing the actual legal work on these issues. Share this information. The biggest advantage a surveillance state has is public indifference. Most people don't know about the FISA deadline. Most people don't know about the data broker loophole. Most people don't know what "any lawful purpose" actually means. Now you do. Pass it on.
Kali Tafari@KaliTafari

x.com/i/article/2027…

English
13
232
448
37.8K