MontviewX

62 posts

MontviewX banner
MontviewX

MontviewX

@MontviewX

Katılım Ağustos 2023
152 Takip Edilen199 Takipçiler
MontviewX
MontviewX@MontviewX·
@srg444 Vireo or the artist soon to be known as Medterra
English
0
0
1
39
Scott R. Grossman
New cannabis name entered today in this liquidation. Same themes--this one is a bet on a jockey. Enough to matter, but not enough to get distracted.
English
6
0
10
1.9K
Scott R. Grossman
Time to make $, and a time not to lose $. Know the difference.
English
2
0
10
561
Investor in chaos and shortages
Why does a stock’s valuation over the past 10 years even matter, especially when it’s been overvalued like $CSU.TO? That line of thinking has crushed $CSU.TO longs for the past six months. $CSU.TO and $MELI will keep falling until they’re cheap on a forward basis, not a past.
Deep Sail Capital@DeepSailCapital

What is historically super cheap here (cheaper now than last 10 years)on a NTM basis? $CSU / $TOI $MELI $NVDA What else?

English
1
0
3
1.6K
MontviewX
MontviewX@MontviewX·
@BCobblaw So the ACOs actually pay the $500/patient? And if they save Medicare money (eg on opioids/recurring hospitalizations), they receive some of the savings as a bonus? I’m having trouble making sense of it @V_arrell
English
1
0
0
124
MontviewX
MontviewX@MontviewX·
@evantindell The anti-fashion moat. A “fad” for decades now.
English
0
0
4
427
Evan Tindell
Evan Tindell@evantindell·
The weirdest moat in the world: $CROX product looks so dumb that you would never buy a knockoff. You already look kind of stupid -- you can't also look cheap.
English
15
5
145
14K
MontviewX
MontviewX@MontviewX·
@__OuttaControl_ @srg444 @Walkin_Kiwi @BCobblaw The 2x revenue thing was from me... before the proposed terms came out last week I was assuming SBEV might be paying 1-2x sales. Scott's probably right that 2x was too high at the high end.
English
0
0
2
48
The Antelope
The Antelope@__OuttaControl_·
Scott makes fair points but I'd push back on a few: The 2x revenue framing doesn't fit - Medterra's EV is $37.6M on $52M of *profitable* 2025 revenue. That's 0.72x revenue, not 2x. For a profitable, scaled CBD operator with federally registered products and 2M customers, that's cheap by any comparable standard. On S3 juice -agreed it won't move on that the same way the MSOs will. But the CBD pilot / FDA compliance framework that dropped last Friday is actually *more* directly valuable to Medterra than S3 is. Medterra is already federally compliant. S3 is a cannabis story. The CMS pilot is a CBD story, and Medterra is an NCCC founding member purpose-built for exactly that pathway. On the capital raise risk- completely valid, that's the real bear case. But at $0.37 you're buying below implied deal value ($0.48) *and* below the preferred conversion price ($0.50). The market is pricing in deal-break risk. If the deal closes, the mismatch between the vehicle price and the operating business is significant. Not saying it's a layup. But 37c for $SBEV does seem silly if Medterra's numbers are clean.
English
3
2
3
778
Scott R. Grossman
Scott R. Grossman@srg444·
Anyone do real work on $SBEV? I see it. I haven't gone thru the 8K yet. If anyone has done real work, hit my DM. No pretenders please.
English
3
1
7
1.9K
Brady Cobb
Brady Cobb@BCobblaw·
@MontviewX @srg444 @Walkin_Kiwi @__OuttaControl_ In 2019, Kessler founded the Commonwealth Project…The organization supports a “payer-provider system” for cannabinoid-based therapies through programs like Medicaid Advantage. Kessler believes this model could generate roughly $60 billion in annual savings for the federal govt”
English
1
0
4
59
MontviewX
MontviewX@MontviewX·
@Greenbackd Isn’t the fact that so many have 3-4% mortgages still the main factor in lower turnover? Anyone doing this analysis?
English
1
0
1
99
Scott R. Grossman
Scott R. Grossman@srg444·
@MontviewX @Walkin_Kiwi @__OuttaControl_ @BCobblaw Hard to see this trade at 2x revenue--yes I get Charlotte's Web proxy--but my view is that balance sheet > income statement should apply thruout. Better ways to make $ in cannabis right now. Won't get the S3 juice (as much), nor does it have the downside protection.
English
2
0
3
143
MontviewX
MontviewX@MontviewX·
@srg444 @Walkin_Kiwi @__OuttaControl_ @BCobblaw Mostly depends what rules we end up with IMHO, but I was expecting $50-100mm valuation on Medterra. Take the midpoint and we ended up with half of that. Agree with the sizing point though
English
2
0
1
132
Scott R. Grossman
Scott R. Grossman@srg444·
@MontviewX @Walkin_Kiwi @__OuttaControl_ @BCobblaw I don't think it's that silly tbh. going to need an enormous amount of capital in an industry that doesn't have much. I'd wait to see how it plays out. A chip down is fine, but don't expect this to trade better than the best cannabis companies in the world that trade for dirt
English
2
0
2
162
MontviewX
MontviewX@MontviewX·
@__OuttaControl_ @srg444 I have but I wonder how much of their business are the 5-15mg THC products (and whether those go away)
English
1
0
1
140
The Antelope
The Antelope@__OuttaControl_·
$SBEV — went through the actual 8-K filed March 12. Here's what the terms say and where I landed. Medterra is the real asset. $52M+ revenue in 2025, profitable. Rare at any stage in cannabinoids. SBEV is the public vehicle and Medterra is using it to get liquid without a traditional IPO. Deal math: Medterra EV of $37.6M, structured as ~75.2M new shares at $0.50 conversion. Pro forma ~78M shares outstanding. Implied deal value: ~$0.48/share. Stock touched $0.46 today. The squeeze premium is fully bled out, so you're buying at deal math. Key terms from the filing worth knowing: 1) At close, Medterra investors get common stock equal to up to 19.99% of shares outstanding (NYSE change-of-control threshold), remainder in Series X / X-1 convertible preferred at $0.50 2) Series X has downside protection: if stock is below $0.50 at conversion, the conversion price steps DOWN, meaning more shares get issued to preferred holders. Floor is 20% of NYSE American's Minimum Price. This is real dilution risk for commons if the stock stays depressed 3) Medterra's lender warrant dispute is resolved - lender gets Series X-1 preferred in exchange for canceling warrants. One less deal blocker 4) Medterra must deliver $4M minimum working capital at close 5) SBEV must raise enough to retire ~$10.4M in Medterra debt as a condition to close which is dilutive, but necessary 5) $250K liquidated damages if shareholder approval isn't obtained within 120 days of close. Creates urgency The downside protection clause is the honest bear flag here. Below $0.50, preferred holders are insulated at common's expense. So this isn't a clean floor, rather a floor with a trapdoor if the deal drags and the stock stays sub-$0.50 through conversion. That said, the risk/reward at $0.46-$0.48 looks asymmetric if the deal closes: - Brady Cobb on the board. He knows these capital markets structures and has the regulatory relationships that matter - CMS CBD pilot initiative (Trump EO, December 2025) is a real optionality lever - reimbursement pathway for compliant hemp CBD is a potential sector re-rating event - Float is ~2.78M shares. Feb 26 saw 33M trade in a single session - 10x+ the float. Coiled spring on any catalyst - Deal-break downside is ~$0.30-0.35 (pre-announcement range) I've added shares here. Watching for the definitive agreement and Medterra's audited financials as the next confirmations. NFA. Do your own work. I'm long and biased.
English
4
0
5
313
Alec Euriq
Alec Euriq@RationalOptimi5·
@MontviewX @breadcrumbsre Most PE assets are deeply underwater at those levels. Don’t see it happening any time soon for the higher quality companies, even if this is where they should trade at a fundamental level
English
1
0
2
48