Martine Rousset

'Trans' is violence against women. #RoxanneTickleIsAMan #IStandWithSallGrover

@GinaLouXXCrone It cuts through!!

I approve of this message.

And what drives that obedience is cowardice. Anyone who says “she” of this man is paying a contemptible, craven tribute of fear to bullies.

Please @elonmusk invest in Giggle or buy it or whatever billionaires do. The world needs a female-only app and @salltweets is being harassed by the Australian legal system for trying to create one.

@AmandaSamuels4 @TessH_ROGD_Mum 🤮🤮🤮

@MsMartineR @TessH_ROGD_Mum Three out of the group including Tickle, I believe.

Can the handmaidens sink any lower? Helping a man to destroy women’s rights to private spaces?

Why does the ‘lived experience’ of cross dressing men count for so much more than that of women- when virtually every woman has lived experience of being harassed and sleazed on by a man (most of us a lot worse). @AnnaCody04 @gedkearney @johnstonhetty

@angijones I can’t recall who did this cut but Dear X’s… I present Roxy…he really didn’t like the smells and the sounds of men’s changing rooms…

@TessH_ROGD_Mum they're revolting

If you want to do stuff about the outcome yesterday you can join umpteen women's groups who work on these issues all the time. I'll start with the one for which I volunteer: feministlegal.org

@salltweets I feel your pain! As father, this ruling is most distressing! I worry about the future for my daughter in this country!

reading the giggle v tickle (2026) judgement that was published yesterday. some interesting departures from trans activist ideology: 1) the gender identity of a transwoman is "transwoman", _not_ "woman". that means transwomen do not share a gender identity with women. universal gender identity is false. 2) discrimination can be done on the basis of "a characteristic that appertains generally to persons who have the same gender identity as the aggrieved person". this characteristic, according to the judgement, is looking like a man. 3) transwomen, as a distinct protected group (_not_ trans people generally), have in common that they look like men. 4) as usual, no explanation is offered for why a transwoman is a type of woman rather than a type of man. the judgement refers to "gender identity" that is different from "sex assigned at birth" but does not explain what gender identity has to do with sex. e.g. "" transgender" which refers to a person whose gender identity is different from their sex as registered at birth". 5) the federal court decision effectively prevents the exclusion of males from female-only spaces due to the fear that if that male-appearance person turns out to be a transwoman rather than an ordinary man, the exclusion can turn out to have been direct discrimination. you don't need to actually be treating someone worse _because you believe they are trans_. 6) this is so genuinely absurd—that the shared characteristic of transwomen on the basis of which they might be discriminated against is also shared with ALL MEN—that giggle will surely win on appeal to the high court. that's my saturday morning hot take, anyway. ⭐

This is a Koala. If you don't believe me, I will take you to federal court and prove it there.

Ladies from TERF Island, could you please pass on our regards to Julia 😉

There are women still in the clutches of this legal nightmare for recognising men, calling them men, and treating them as men. #IStandWithKirralieSmith #IStandWithJasmineSussex

@SenatorCash @AngusTaylorMP It's a start. 13 years too late. And it must be made retroactive so @sallltweets can discontinue her legal appeal and start up her app for women with no ongoing interference and penalty. She also deserves compensation.

Politicians could fix this issue - for free - in a sitting week. An amendment to the sex discrimination act to reinstate the correct definitions of woman & man, plus clarifying that the ordinary meaning of sex is biological, would fix this issue. The choice is simple: fall behind the rest of the world while becoming an ideological laughing stock, or crossing party lines to fix bad legislation & ensure no more Australian citizens are punished for acknowledging reality. Any politician who says this issue is too difficult to fix is either malicious or incompetent.

With @LiberalAus and @OneNationAus both promising to reinstate sex in the Sex Discrimination Act the issue of women’s sex based rights has (finally) gone mainstream in Australia. The timing of the Liberals announcement is confirmation of the suspicion many of us had that politicians expected @salltweets to carry the burden of challenging the SDA alone as a private citizen, so they didn’t have to get their rainbow donors offside. It’s only now that she failed to overturn this madness that the Libs are realising they have to step in. It was an unfair burden for Sall to carry, yet it’s because of her persistence and tenacity that this issue is now a leading issue heading in to both the Victorian state election and the federal election in 2028. Sall (and all the TERFs who amplified her) should be very proud that persistence against insurmountable odds is finally paying off.

@UNSRVAW @ronalyze #auspol