
InTheKnow
9.3K posts

InTheKnow
@Nat_Worst
wont let happy years at Natwest be marred by crooked years with RBS. A voice for the 99.%? of bank staff that are great great people. Campaigner 4 Mental Health



The banks are in trouble because: Unlimited derivatives inflate exposure invisibly • Naked shorting creates future delivery obligations • Settlement events force truth (MMTLP was such an event) • Regulators halted reality instead of enforcing law Banks didn’t collapse, the BS derivatives contracts did and with it went the trust in the system. And that is the real crisis #MMTLP revealed.

I refer you 👇 to Ulster Bank apparently refunding 17 SMEs over “GRG charges” in 2018 rte.ie/news/business/… via @rte - having falsely been cleared of wrongdoing by Mason Hayes & Curran @PSIA1851 in December 2014 - 4 years earlier - as the sham Banking Inquiry kicked off. Certain MHC solicitors were on notice that they were deliberately excluding victims of fraudulently sold swaps from their review - this was achieved by skewing the Terms of Reference, to exclude the period during which the swaps were sold. Today, Ulster Bank continues to mislead the High Court, stating that variable rate loans were “fixed” without any derivative transaction. Not even “a cap”…this is a falsehood. Swaps were sold by deception. Offering a swap where the variable rate customer receives fixed and pays floating does not convert their loan to a fixed rate without consequences. It synthetically achieves fixed net payments by pairing the variable loan with the swap, but introduces derivative risks, early termination costs, and separate contractual obligations. The requirement of customers to “pay floating” or indeed pay any amount at all was completely absent from the documentation. This documentation is an excellent example of predatory lending tactics. It was not executed by any authorised official of Ulster Bank, which is telling. Meanwhile, the documentation presented by Ulster Bank in court is so transparently false that it states, on the one hand, that no derivative was sold to the customers - just that their variable rate was “fixed” & later states that “it is denied that Ulster Bank had a duty to explain the intricacies of derivatives”. Why is the bank denying a duty to explain intricacies of derivatives if they are claiming no derivative was sold? Now reflect upon how many businesses & homes have been lost by a judge turning a blind eye to this or more benignly, simply failing to understand it and being duped by affidavits & pleadings laden with false statements emanating from Ulster Bank (who were found to have been routinely overcharging their mortgage customers for years)?





@JMcGuinnessTD stands up for whistleblower @MLorrM & demands the House hear from her about the whitewash banking Inquiry & @UlsterBankNI fraud, we salute you John @BankConfidenti1 @TransparencyTF @appgonifandffs

Heartfelt congratulations to Quinn Ritchie on well-deserved promotion to Chief of Staff for @MikeKellyPA. Wishing you continued success in steering the office forward. @BankConfidenti1 @stevemiddi1 kelly.house.gov/media/press-re…









![[mine] Art Gallery](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1140042229958041601/sb9QfHv3.jpg)
![[mine] Art Gallery](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1140042229958041601/sb9QfHv3.jpg)
