Andy Verity
9.2K posts

Andy Verity
@andyverity
‘A man with no eyebrows telling you the emperor has no clothes’. Author of 'Rigged'. BBC economics + investigation. Bust myths. Expose cover-ups. Listen.







#PostOfficeScandal Desperately sad news 😔 Parmod was such a lovely man in every way imaginable - RIP. Yet another SubPostmaster passes away without seeing the full just he fought for for so hard and with such dignity. Condolences to all his family 🙏


“Moments ago, at my direction, the United States Central Command executed one of the most powerful bombing raids in the History of the Middle East, and totally obliterated every MILITARY target in Iran’s crown jewel, Kharg Island... Iran has NO ability to defend anything that we want to attack — There is nothing they can do about it!" - President Donald J. Trump 🇺🇸


Few things have annoyed me more since the start of the war on Iran than to hear some European politicians repeat the narrative that it was "all about China." One surprising (and disappointing) example was France’s Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the leader of La France Insoumise, France's main left-wing opposition party, who claimed that the war's objective was to “limit China's oil supply capabilities” (x.com/JLMelenchon/st…). By saying this he literally parrots - almost word for word - the narrative of Lindsey Graham on Fox News (x.com/OunkaOnX/statu…) or that of the Hudson institute, an American right-wing neoconservative think tank (hudson.org/foreign-policy…). Which, you'll agree, is rather unexpected company for Mélenchon... Why does it annoy me so much? Because it's painfully obvious that the consequences of this war are far, far worse for Europe than they are for China. Heck, if anything, this war may even ironically prove beneficial for China: it is quite literally the best advertisement for green energy the world has ever seen. Every day the Strait of Hormuz remains contested, every oil price spike - all of it is a live demonstration of exactly why fossil fuel dependency is a massive strategic liability. This war is vindicating China's bet in spectacular fashion, and there is little doubt it will further encourage much of the world to buy exactly what China is selling: replacing dependence on whoever controls oil and gas chokepoints with energy from the sun and wind. See, in large part due to its green energy ramp-up China, as of last year, reached an 85% energy self-sufficiency rate (chinadaily.com.cn/a/202602/03/WS…) which is absolutely remarkable for a country that consumes as much energy as the U.S. and the EU... combined. The same, however, very much cannot be said of Europe. Where China is at 85% they're at an appalling 41% (ec.europa.eu/eurostat/stati…), less than half. So already, for this alone, Mélenchon should be worrying about Europe, not China. But that's just the beginning - the full picture is much worse. What is this war, when one strips it to its essence? What is the precedent being set? You have the world’s most powerful country attacking a sovereign nation, assassinating its leader, and attempting regime change - without even bothering to provide a casus belli (insanely the "casus belli" advanced by Rubio was that the victim would defend itself: x.com/RnaudBertrand/…). In other words, the world this precedent establishes is a “might makes right” world on steroids, like we haven’t seen in many generations. And, by definition, in a “might makes right” world what matters is… might. And let's be real: today China has it, and Europe just doesn’t. For instance, what do you think happens to Greenland if Iran goes the way Trump wants and the lesson he gets out of it is that he can simply do anything he wants with impunity if the other party is weak? And when the Europeans who cheered that precedent then turn around and ask the world to respect their sovereignty? Europe is the kind of power that only survives in a world with rules and they’re foolishly cheering their destruction. My latest article makes the full case, with the data to back it up. China will be fine, Europe won't and I feel like I'm taking crazy pills because even the precious few politicians who aren't totally vassalized to the U.S. - the Mélenchons of Europe - are starting to work off the exact same delusional script as U.S. neocons, just reading from the opposite side (replying “they’re encircling China” and objecting to neocons saying “we’re encircling China” and cheering). Which raises the question: who exactly is looking out for Europe? I don't have an answer but my article, I believe, makes a pretty strong case for why this question has never been more urgent. Read it here: open.substack.com/pub/arnaudbert…



#Mandelson #EpsteinFiles #EpsteinBFF #AI #TechSolutions #Palantir #Starmer LORD MANDELSON'S MAGNIFICENT TECHNOLOGY DEAL Or: How To Negotiate A Bilateral Agreement With Big Tech While Your Lobbying Firm Represents… Big Tech Documents released yesterday reveal that Lord Mandelson described the UK-US Technology Partnership as his "personal pride and joy" in a farewell email to Washington Embassy staff on 11 September 2025. One week later, Downing Street published the Memorandum of Understanding for a "Technology Prosperity Deal" committing both nations to "collaborate closely in the build-out of powerful AI infrastructure." How nice for everyone. Especially nice, perhaps, for OpenAI and Palantir — both clients of Global Counsel, the lobbying firm Lord Mandelson founded and in which, according to the FT, he continued to hold a stake as recently as February 2026. But here's the curious part. When Government officials carried out due diligence checks ahead of Mandelson's appointment in December 2024, the resulting checklist named Global Counsel clients including TikTok, Shell, JP Morgan, and Shein. Palantir? Not mentioned. OpenAI? Not mentioned. This despite both appearing on Global Counsel's own lobbying register entry for July–September 2024 — the quarter immediately before the checks were carried out. So to recap: 📌 Ambassador personally negotiates a tech deal with the US 📌 Deal explicitly promotes AI infrastructure and exports 📌 Ambassador's lobbying firm represents AI companies 📌 Ambassador retains a financial stake in said firm 📌 Due diligence somehow fails to mention the AI clients Nothing to see here. Move along....... Except when Mandelson became US Ambassador, Officials told him his stake in Global Counsel "would have to cease." Mandelson failed to comply. On 27 February 2025, Mandelson arranged a secret meeting between PM Keir Starmer and Palantir CEO Alex Karp in Washington DC — while still holding a ~21% stake in the lobbying firm representing Palantir. No minutes. No transcript. No official record. The Government must urgently explain what role Mandelson played in this deal and how these conflicts were managed. Otherwise we're left with the distinct impression that the revolving door between Whitehall and the lobbying industry doesn't so much revolve as stand permanently open — with a welcome mat on both sides. @kevinhollinrake @marksweney @andyverity @DanNeidle @rbrooks45 @PrivateEyeNews @Karlfl @LukePollard @HouseofCommons @UKHouseofLords @premnsikka @TimBushLondon













