James Majere 🦞🦞

🎯🎯

Reminder that an element of Trump's success was his refusal to behave like this. He always has the same slight NYC accent, same delivery, same style of dress. He's not faking like he's from your town. I actually think AOC would have better appeal if she were just herself.

39 years ago... ROBOCOP

This is one of the smartest things I've read in a while. It is written the opposite of the way that I write. I would say: Most women in law are not able to understand the basics of justice. Women, even women who are lawyers and judges, usually struggle with the difference between justice and nurture. Men in law look at two opposing parties and judge the cases they present according to the rules of procedure. Women in law look at two opposing parties and feel pity for the one they think is at a disadvantage (needs nurture). This makes them feel invested in a good outcome for the weaker party, or the "baby." (DESERVER) Women also usually fail to see justice as a hostile contest between opposing points of view. "We are not two separate parties; we are one big family, and we should all want everyone to be happy and safe! :)" If a woman in law cannot transcend these family instincts, she violates the basic principle of "nemo iudex," meaning that no one should judge a case if they desire a specific outcome in that case. Instead of seeking justice, they will seek personal satisfaction (my baby won!). She also violates "audi altereram partem," meaning that no one should be judged by someone who refuses to listen to their story (we've heard enough from PRIVILEGED WHITE MEN!). You may recognize the absence of these principles in what we have been calling "cancel culture." "Believe all women!" Remember that one? That means "I want the woman to win" (DESERVER) and "don't listen to the man," all packed up into three neat little words! Now, replace "woman" with "the party I feel bad for," and "man" with "the party I don't care about." "I want the [DESERVER] to win! Don't listen to the [PRIVILEGE]!" It should now be much more clear why the law has become increasingly lenient on criminals in recent years. This is what I call "kindergarten mommy" consciousness, and it is severely corrosive to criminal justice. The courtroom is not a kindergarten or a family, it is a substitute for violent conflict between parties that absolutely do not consider each other family. In other words, most women in law end up treating criminal justice proceedings like a fight between their own children.

A majority of judges are women in all EU countries except Ireland

I obviously don’t think it should be banned but it’s never something I’d do for myself or any future kids I have. Learning how to socialize, interact with people, and how to make and keep friends, and function among a community are unironically super important underemphasized skills that have to be learned from an early age.

The Supreme Court has ruled 5-4 that Border Patrol agents *are* allowed to remove razor wire installed by Texas. The invasion goes on. After a desperate request filed by Biden to open the flood gates, the Court decided that the illegal surge should continue by allowing Border Patrol agents to cut and/or remove Texas' razor wire. Here are federal agents raising razor wire with a fork lift to let migrants in last year.

Trump was president when China was able to get their hands on voter data for 220 million Americans. So…the call is coming from inside the house?