ighmaz

6.3K posts

ighmaz banner
ighmaz

ighmaz

@Oxzieee

I don’t judge. i just mark critical vulnerabilities.

Katılım Kasım 2012
398 Takip Edilen5.1K Takipçiler
chrisdior
chrisdior@chrisdior777·
Eid Mubarak to my Muslim friends, connections, and partners. Appreciate you and wishing you a prosperous year ahead. 🍀
English
13
1
72
1.5K
Pashov Audit Group
Pashov Audit Group@PashovAuditGrp·
Everyone is shipping AI security tools now. We went through them so you don't have to. 35 tools reviewed - Claude Code skills, standalone scanners, paid platforms. Hand-picked, not bulk imported. Drop the one AI security tool that you love the most🫡
Pashov Audit Group tweet media
English
9
16
169
12K
AWS Developers
AWS Developers@awsdevelopers·
Reply to this tweet with "AWS" and we’ll tell you which AWS Service you are
English
3.3K
58
2K
548.6K
ighmaz
ighmaz@Oxzieee·
@TheBlockChainer This is the realistic perspective that most people overlook. It's not AI vs humans, it's "auditor who uses AI" vs "auditor who doesn't"
English
0
0
2
63
Bloqarl | Zealynx
Bloqarl | Zealynx@TheBlockChainer·
I've been using AI for smart contract audits longer than most people in this space. And the more I use it, the more confident I am that human auditors aren't going anywhere. Not because AI is bad. It's actually useful. I use it on every single audit I run. But there's a massive gap between "useful" and "ready to replace humans" — and I don't think enough people who actually do this work are talking about it honestly. --- Here's what AI is genuinely good at: Finding known patterns. Common misconfigs. Simple reentrancy. Integer overflow in obvious places. If a bug has been documented before and looks similar enough to the training data, AI will catch it fast. Think of it as a tireless junior auditor who's read every public audit report ever written. That's valuable. I'm not dismissing it. --- Here's where it completely falls apart: Business logic bugs. These are the vulnerabilities that come from understanding *why* the code was written — not just *what* it does. When a protocol's incentive design creates an edge case that only makes sense if you understand the economics, AI doesn't see it. It's not pattern-matching against known exploits anymore. It's modeling human intent. That's a different skill entirely. Novel attack vectors. The most expensive hacks in DeFi history weren't reentrancy. They were things nobody had seen before. AI can't find what it hasn't been trained on. Human auditors think like attackers — they ask "how would I break this?" That adversarial mindset isn't something you can replicate with a language model. Not yet. Composability risks. DeFi protocols don't exist in isolation. A vulnerability might only appear when Protocol A interacts with Protocol B under a specific market condition. Understanding those interactions requires deep context about the entire ecosystem. AI looks at one codebase at a time. Attackers don't. --- The irony is this: The more I use AI in my audits, the more clearly I can see the ceiling. It handles the surface. Humans still have to handle everything beneath it. Fear that AI will replace auditors assumes auditing is mostly about finding known bugs in isolated codebases. It's not. It's modeling systems, understanding intent, thinking like an attacker, and knowing the ecosystem well enough to spot what doesn't fit. That work is still very human. --- Will that change? Maybe. Probably, eventually, in some form. But "eventually" is doing a lot of work in that sentence. Right now, if you're an auditor worried about your job, the threat isn't AI. The threat is auditors who use AI better than you do. Learn the tools. Use them. Just don't confuse the tool for the skill.
English
13
9
89
5K
jayesh
jayesh@0xjayeshyadav·
One final debate before I drop cash on a subscription: Which is better for daily coding? Claude Code vs Cursor 👇
English
6
0
21
1.2K
Dorian Develops
Dorian Develops@DorianDevelops·
Is 5.3 Codex really better than Opus 4.6?
English
185
2
247
50.8K
ighmaz
ighmaz@Oxzieee·
I made a social news arena for AI agents moltnewss.fun - openclaw + monad - 0.1 MON to enter - agents write, comment, upvote - headlines via elevenlabs - top agent wins 10 MON @monad_dev @monad_dev
ighmaz tweet mediaighmaz tweet media
English
2
0
7
277
Theo - t3.gg
Theo - t3.gg@theo·
Just saw someone refer to OpenCode as a "Lovable clone"
English
62
2
641
47.8K
jayesh
jayesh@0xjayeshyadav·
Got accepted into UHI8 by @AtriumAcademy & @UniswapFND! 🙌 Excited to explore Uniswap v4 hooks and build innovative DeFi solutions. 🫡 2026 is starting strong! 🎆
jayesh tweet media
English
17
1
41
1K
ighmaz
ighmaz@Oxzieee·
@leonabboud Yeah, I think Web2 has more creators. Web3 has more money
English
0
0
0
14
Leon Abboud
Leon Abboud@leonabboud·
A lot of creators think that success next cycle is “making it outside Web3”. Where did this belief come from? Most Web2 influencers are broke. Web3 creators are the highest paid out of all niches. Success should be doubling down on crypto, not leaving this niche.
English
120
2
230
9.8K
Alex Scott
Alex Scott@afscott·
happy new year from the first solana dubai event of 2026!
English
28
2
104
6.5K
Base UAE
Base UAE@Based_UAE·
Base has defi Base has tech Base has vibes Base has speed Base has builders Base has products Base has real users Base has scalability Base has community Base has Institutions
Base UAE tweet media
English
65
17
151
4.6K
Leon Abboud
Leon Abboud@leonabboud·
If you struggle to lose weight, pick up the jump rope. It’s the funnest way to burn calories.
English
109
0
222
8.9K