Phoenix Rising ♀️☯️🧙‍♂️🇨🇦🇹🇹🔥💫

15.4K posts

Phoenix Rising ♀️☯️🧙‍♂️🇨🇦🇹🇹🔥💫 banner
Phoenix Rising ♀️☯️🧙‍♂️🇨🇦🇹🇹🔥💫

Phoenix Rising ♀️☯️🧙‍♂️🇨🇦🇹🇹🔥💫

@Phoenix22555220

Survivor. GenX. Women rights activist. RadFem, Humanist. Live, learn, grow. 🌈❤️🌎🌳✊🏾♀️ It's NOT HATE To speak the truth #WomanLifeFreedom

Here-there -everywhere Katılım Eylül 2021
2.3K Takip Edilen821 Takipçiler
Sam Morgan
Sam Morgan@CrunchAlias·
The only reason I have this platform, or even use X, is my support of women who understand the reality of sex. To mark reaching 35k followers, below are 30 women with under 1k followers, who I think should have a louder voice than me. Wide ranging views, one fight in common.
English
111
239
2.1K
34.2K
Phoenix Rising ♀️☯️🧙‍♂️🇨🇦🇹🇹🔥💫 retweetledi
Sex Matters
Sex Matters@SexMattersOrg·
Important new study from Professor Michael Biggs (who is also on Sex Matters board) and Ace North @UniofOxford Qs: 👉 Are transgender people more likely to be victims or perpetrators of homicide? 👉 Does the victim/ perpetrator ratio for natal males resemble the ratio for females or for males? 👉 What does the media report? As: 👉 More transgender perpetrators than victims. 👉 Ratio for natal males is more like male population than female. 👉 But @BBC reported more homicides with trans victims .
English
21
197
595
21.3K
Phoenix Rising ♀️☯️🧙‍♂️🇨🇦🇹🇹🔥💫 retweetledi
ripx4nutmeg
ripx4nutmeg@ripx4nutmeg·
New Oxford University study on BBC reporting of 'transgender' people: Since 2000 in the UK • 11 were murdered (mostly killed by their male partners). This generated 137 news stories • 20 committed murder. This generated just 58 news stories, of which only 23 mentioned trans
ripx4nutmeg tweet media
English
89
2K
7.4K
210.2K
Phoenix Rising ♀️☯️🧙‍♂️🇨🇦🇹🇹🔥💫 retweetledi
Wesley Yang
Wesley Yang@wesyang·
Three of the eleven men who are incarcerated with women in one Massachusetts state penitentiary: -- A man who sexually assaulted and murdered two women, including his own cousin, whom he raped with a broom handle and stabbed more than 40 times. -- A level three sex offender imprisoned for repeatedly kidnapping and sexually a 14-year old at gunpoint -- A "sexually dangerous person" who spent 24 years in a treatment center for sex offenders and was denied parole six times for failing to demonstrate any progress.
Wesley Yang tweet media
English
36
376
974
40K
Phoenix Rising ♀️☯️🧙‍♂️🇨🇦🇹🇹🔥💫 retweetledi
Nicole Lampert
Nicole Lampert@nicolelampert·
Try not to choke on your cornflakes but the Guardian has written a piece acknowledging that sex cannot be changed and explaining why males who went through male puberty have an unfair advantage over women in sport. As Tanya Aldred writes: ‘These physical advantages mean that the fastest 14-year-old boys run the 100m more quickly than the women’s world record; the No 1 women’s tennis player, Aryna Sabalenka, lost last December’s battle of the sexes game to an out-of-shape Nick Kyrgios, then ranked at No 671 in the world; and if there were no category for women at the Olympics, there would be no female medallists – except in equestrian events, and possibly static shooting. This does not mean that women’s sport is lesser, it just means the two sexes are different.’ Please no one tell ‘right side of history’ woke bros Owen Jones, Jonathan Liew, Alistair Campbell etc Link below ⬇️
Nicole Lampert tweet media
English
236
1.4K
6.8K
150K
Phoenix Rising ♀️☯️🧙‍♂️🇨🇦🇹🇹🔥💫
THANK YOU!!! All of this! ⬇️
Annemarie Ward 💜@Annemarieward

Let’s stop pretending this is complicated. It isn’t. A male prisoner, convicted of a brutal murder, is being housed in the women’s estate. An allegation of sexual assault has now been made. And still we are expected to believe this is a “managed risk”. It is not a managed risk. It is a foreseeable outcome. You do not need hindsight to see this. You only need honesty. Women in custody are not a neutral population. They are among the most vulnerable in society. The vast majority have experienced physical or sexual abuse. Many carry long histories of trauma. Addiction is endemic. In Scotland, the majority proportion of women in prison have drug or alcohol problems, and many have co-occurring mental health needs. These are not abstract statistics. They describe women who have already been harmed, often repeatedly, long before they ever entered a cell. And into that environment, the state has chosen to introduce male-bodied prisoners. That is not safeguarding. That is exposure. What we are witnessing is not a failure of risk assessment. It is a failure of principle. For years, the Scottish Prison Service has insisted it can assess individuals and safely place male prisoners in the female estate. That claim was always untenable. You cannot assess away biological reality. You cannot eliminate risk through forms and panels. And you cannot guarantee safety in an environment where the consequences of getting it wrong are this grave. And now, predictably, we are here. The most disturbing aspect is not the allegation itself, serious as it is. It is the inevitability of the response. There will be calls for calm. Assertions that the system works. Claims that this is an isolated incident. It is not isolated. It is structural. When policy elevates ideology above reality, harm stops being a failure and becomes the price paid to sustain the model. We know this only too well in Scotland’s addiction system, where harm reduction has shifted from a tool into an orthodoxy, and the consequences have followed accordingly. And here, that cost is being paid by women who have no say in where they are housed, who they are housed with, or what risks they are expected to tolerate. No civilised system should ask women, many of whom are already survivors of male violence, to accept that risk as the price of someone else’s identity claim. This is not about prejudice. It is about duty of care. It is about safeguarding. It is about the most basic obligation of the state to protect those it holds in custody. Until that principle is restored, cases like this will not be shocking. They will be inevitable.

English
0
2
3
180
Phoenix Rising ♀️☯️🧙‍♂️🇨🇦🇹🇹🔥💫 retweetledi
Mary Harrington
Mary Harrington@moveincircles·
A women's shelter worker in New York says she was fired for "transphobia" after warning about the obviously dangerous nature of a trans-identified man, recently released into the shelter from a prison sentence for murder The man then murdered and dismembered a woman in Brooklyn
Mary Harrington tweet media
English
38
1.4K
4K
124.3K
Phoenix Rising ♀️☯️🧙‍♂️🇨🇦🇹🇹🔥💫 retweetledi
J.K. Rowling
J.K. Rowling@jk_rowling·
Linguistic prescription is authoritarian. It’s one of the things trans activists have used, with enormous success. Seeking to control what people are allowed to say is a hallmark of cults and totalitarian regimes. I do not subscribe to the post modern ideas that changing language changes reality, that redefining something alters its nature, that our conception of a thing is of more importance than observable facts about the thing itself. To me, this kind of thinking is a dead end full of people pontificating and obfuscating, enjoying the sounds of their own voices while the world burns outside. Some gender critical people seem to think that demanding we all use correct sex pronouns will return the world to sanity. This is an attempt to make the tail wag the dog. You cannot fight linguistic prescription with more linguistic prescription, and no rights campaign can succeed if its adherents are more interested in creating a purity spiral than allowing the smallest space for nuance or for the complexities of human nature and feelings.
English
212
572
3.8K
157K
Phoenix Rising ♀️☯️🧙‍♂️🇨🇦🇹🇹🔥💫 retweetledi
Sall Grover
Sall Grover@salltweets·
Women’s rights. She’s talking about women’s rights. If everyone acknowledged that, we wouldn’t be in such a mess. Women’s. Rights.
Sall Grover tweet media
English
230
2.2K
18.3K
178.6K
Phoenix Rising ♀️☯️🧙‍♂️🇨🇦🇹🇹🔥💫 retweetledi
Janet Inglis
Janet Inglis@ThatAussieWoman·
TRANS - the ridiculous idea that people can reject their sex, assume the stereotypes of the opposite sex, call it 'gender', and expect everybody else to go along with it and give them a free pass into every space, service and sport that excludes them on the basis of their sex.
English
121
1.1K
6.1K
175.4K
Phoenix Rising ♀️☯️🧙‍♂️🇨🇦🇹🇹🔥💫 retweetledi
Zoom Afrika
Zoom Afrika@zoomafrika1·
First female Ngoni chief in Malawi ends child marriage. She has broken up 850 child marriages in three years. ✊🏿
Zoom Afrika tweet media
English
584
6.3K
33K
724.4K
Phoenix Rising ♀️☯️🧙‍♂️🇨🇦🇹🇹🔥💫 retweetledi
J.K. Rowling
J.K. Rowling@jk_rowling·
@NotHackingIt Whistleblowers inside the medical profession have been raising the alarm for years now, but there were more social media likes in parroting the nice easy slogans.
English
61
434
5.6K
90K
Phoenix Rising ♀️☯️🧙‍♂️🇨🇦🇹🇹🔥💫 retweetledi
J.K. Rowling
J.K. Rowling@jk_rowling·
And it will forever be appalling to me that a bunch of celebrities with influence over young people used their platforms to amplify unevidenced claims for the benefit of transitioning minors while smearing those urging caution as bigots.
DogsoverCats 🦴@chunderboolt

@jk_rowling It will forever be amazing to me that people with medical degrees got in front of a camera and said that the effects of puberty blockers on children and adolescents are fully reversible. The horror.

English
1.1K
8K
61.8K
2.3M
Phoenix Rising ♀️☯️🧙‍♂️🇨🇦🇹🇹🔥💫 retweetledi
Janet Murray
Janet Murray@jan_murray·
I didn’t really get the problem with gender ideology at first. I’m liberal-minded about most things. 'Live and let' live has generally been my motto. I believed inclusion mattered. I believed in being kind. In not using language that might upset people unnecessarily. I knew people who identified as transgender. I knew some adults chose medical treatments or surgery to resemble the opposite sex. That seemed to me a matter of personal autonomy. Adults can do what they wish with their own bodies. What I hadn’t realised - and I feel slightly embarrassed admitting this - was that I’d misunderstood what was being claimed. I thought “transgender” meant a form of self-expression. A man who liked wearing women’s clothes. Someone changing their name. Gender non-conformity. What I hadn’t grasped was that some activists weren’t just asking for tolerance. They were asserting that declaring yourself the opposite sex made you the opposite sex. Not metaphorically. Literally. And that this wasn’t just cultural. It had legal consequences. - It meant men who said they were women were demanding access to women’s sports, prisons, domestic violence shelters and hospital wards - It meant the rewriting of healthcare language - “pregnant people”, “bodies with cervixes” - to avoid saying “women” - It meant children struggling with identity being affirmed onto medical pathways with lifelong implications And also redefining same-sex attraction. Lesbians called 'bigoted' for not wanting relationships with men who identify as women. Gay men accused of prejudice for saying they're not attracted to female bodies. None of which made any sense. But I'd also overlooked how far this had travelled - into HR policies, professional bodies, schools, political parties and public institutions. And how easily disagreement was framed as cruelty. Speaking up felt risky - because others were being publicly humiliated for doing so. None of this is abstract. Because sex is the basis on which safeguarding works. On which data is collected. On which cancer screening programmes run. On which fair sport and single-sex spaces depend. It’s written into law - including the Equality Act - because material differences matter. If sex becomes a 'feeling' rather than a biological category, those protections become unstable. And once reality becomes negotiable, everything does. Once I saw it, I couldn’t unsee it. But I needed to be sure. So I read. Books, research papers, policy documents. When I finally spoke publicly, there was backlash from all directions. Many women thanked me - both quietly and publicly. But some feminists criticised me for speaking too late. Others were angry about a past interview I’d done with the parent of a transgender person, accusing me of promoting harm. It takes courage to change your mind publicly. It takes courage to speak when you know your reputation, friendships or livelihood may be on the line - when you know raising your voice could strain, or even end, relationships you value. Once I understood what was at stake, staying silent was no longer an option. I lost my livelihood simply for saying I didn’t like the phrase “pregnant people”. That alone tells you something is deeply wrong. It shouldn’t be this way. I will never judge any woman for when she finds her voice. Because every voice adds value - whenever it is raised. And I know how persuasive this ideology can be. I know how easily it bypassed me. And I know how much courage it takes to admit, publicly, that you got something wrong.
English
457
1.8K
8.1K
269.5K
Phoenix Rising ♀️☯️🧙‍♂️🇨🇦🇹🇹🔥💫 retweetledi